Bitcoin: A Peer-to-Peer Electronic Cash System Satoshi Naka

LIVE

TumeloPat_Crypto

--・136 views

Traduire

Bitcoin: A Peer-to-Peer Electronic Cash System Satoshi Nakamoto satoshin@gmx.com bitcoin.org

Bitcoin: A Peer-to-Peer Electronic Cash System
Satoshi Nakamoto
satoshin@gmx.com
bitcoin.org

Avertissement : comprend des opinions de tiers. Il ne s’agit pas d’un conseil financier. Peut inclure du contenu sponsorisé. Consultez les CG.

Découvrez les dernières actus sur les cryptos

⚡️ Prenez part aux dernières discussions sur les cryptos

💬 Interagissez avec vos créateur(trice)s préféré(e)s

👍 Profitez du contenu qui vous intéresse

Adresse e-mail/Numéro de téléphone

Créateur pertinent

LIVE

TumeloPat_Crypto

@TumeloPat

Découvrez-en plus sur le créateur

May the holiday season bring Binance the gift of seamless transactions, the joy of technological advancements, and the warmth of a thriving crypto community. Here's to a Christmas filled with bullish trends and a New Year brimming with blockchain brilliance! #BinanceWish $BNB Hasib_Dadu CryptoTalker

6. Incentive By convention, the first transaction in a block is a special transaction that starts a new coin owned by the creator of the block. This adds an incentive for nodes to support the network, and provides a way to initially distribute coins into circulation, since there is no central authority to issue them. The steady addition of a constant of amount of new coins is analogous to gold miners expending resources to add gold to circulation. In our case, it is CPU time and electricity that is expended. The incentive can also be funded with transaction fees. If the output value of a transaction is less than its input value, the difference is a transaction fee that is added to the incentive value of the block containing the transaction. Once a predetermined number of coins have entered circulation, the incentive can transition entirely to transaction fees and be completely inflation free. The incentive may help encourage nodes to stay honest. If a greedy attacker is able to assemble more CPU power than all the honest nodes, he would have to choose between using it to defraud people by stealing back his payments, or using it to generate new coins. He ought to find it more profitable to play by the rules, such rules that favour him with more new coins than everyone else combined, than to undermine the system and the validity of his own wealth. #BinanceSquare #Binance #bnbburn #BitcoinWorld #bitcoin $BTC

5. Network The steps to run the network are as follows: New transactions are broadcast to all nodes. Each node collects new transactions into a block. Each node works on finding a difficult proof-of-work for its block. When a node finds a proof-of-work, it broadcasts the block to all nodes. Nodes accept the block only if all transactions in it are valid and not already spent. In that case, they work on the first one they received, but save the other branch in case it becomes longer. block as the previous hash. Nodes express their acceptance of the block by working on creating the next block in the chain, using the hash of the accepted block as the previous hash. Nodes always consider the longest chain to be the correct one and will keep working on extending it. If two nodes broadcast different versions of the next block simultaneously, some nodes may receive one or the other first. In that case, they work on the first one they received, but save the other branch in case it becomes longer. New transaction broadcasts do not necessarily need to reach all nodes. As long as they reach many nodes, they will get into a block before long. Block broadcasts are also tolerant of dropped messages. If a node does not receive a block, it will request it when it receives the next block and realizes it missed one. #bnbburn #BitcoinWorld #bitcoin #Binance #BinanceSquare

3. Timestamp Server The solution we propose begins with a timestamp server. A timestamp server works by taking a hash of a block of items to be timestamped and widely publishing the hash, such as in a newspaper or Usenet post [2-5]. The timestamp proves that the data must have existed at the time, obviously, in order to get into the hash. Each timestamp includes the previous timestamp in its hash, forming a chain, with each additional timestamp reinforcing the ones before it. #BinanceSquare #bitcoin #BitcoinWorld #BNB #trading

4. Proof-of-Work To implement a distributed timestamp server on a peer-to-peer basis, we will need to use a proof-of-work system similar to Adam Back’s Hashcash[6], rather than newspaper or Usenet posts. The proof-of-work involves scanning for a value that when hashed, such as with SHA-256, the hash begins with a number of zero bits. The average work required is exponential in the number of zero bits required and can be verified by executing a single hash. For our timestamp network, we implement the proof-of-work by incrementing a nonce in the block until a value is found that gives the block’s hash the required zero bits. Once the CPU effort has been expended to make it satisfy the proof-of-work, the block cannot be changed without redoing the work. As later blocks are chained after it, the work to change the block would include redoing all the blocks after it. The proof-of-work also solves the problem of determining representation in majority decision making. If the majority were based on one-IP-address-one-vote, it could be subverted by anyone able to allocate many IPs. Proof-of-work is essentially one-CPU-one-vote. The majority decision is represented by the longest chain, which has the greatest proof-of-work effort invested in it. If a majority of CPU power is controlled by honest nodes, the honest chain will grow the fastest and outpace any competing chains To modify a past block, an attacker would have to redo the proof-of-work of the block and all blocks after it and then catch up with and surpass the work of the honest nodes. We will show later that the probability of a slower attacker catching up diminishes exponentially as subsequent blocks are added. To compensate for increasing hardware speed and varying interest in running nodes over time, the proof-of-work difficulty is determined by a moving average targeting an average number of blocks per hour. If they’re generated too fast, the difficulty increases. #BinanceSquare #BTC #BitcoinWorld #uniswap #ftx

Dernières actualités

La croissance de la demande d'Ethereum devrait se poursuivre, déclare Tranchess

Le co-fondateur de Jupiter plaide pour la décentralisation du marché financier

La Render Foundation annonce des subventions pour les créateurs de projets 3D de nouvelle génération

La capitalisation boursière du Stablecoin de Polygon augmente, Tether domine

Ethereum Beacon Chain détient environ 32,75 millions d'ETH, avec une part de participation du Lido à 28,96 %

Cookie Preferences

CGU de la plateforme

ba-one-trust-cookie