Binance Square
希曼Heman
@ximan
币圈10年运营,多家交易所运营总监,操盘过多个项目。
Following
Followers
Liked
Shared
All Content
--
See original
$USUAL The biggest difficulty in defeating Tether lies in user awareness, because for the users of USDT, even if USDT is more centralized and the profits are selfish and not shared with users, it does not affect my use of USDT. I can exchange it for 1 US dollar in equal proportion, and the use of USD0 makes no difference to me. Many users are still willing to use the old brand of USDT. If USDT is not adopted much, it will be difficult to truly subvert Tether. Therefore, he can only find another way to cooperate with bank settlements, or even cooperate with national level to improve his brand value of security, so that it is possible to be used by more institutions and individuals. The more people use USD0, for example, if the current scale of USDT is 120 billion, then the circulation market value of UAUSL can exceed 100 billion US dollars (now it is about 600 million US dollars in circulation) The market value may only be within a few billion US dollars, and it cannot reach the scale of more than 100 billion US dollars of Tether.
$USUAL The biggest difficulty in defeating Tether lies in user awareness, because for the users of USDT, even if USDT is more centralized and the profits are selfish and not shared with users, it does not affect my use of USDT. I can exchange it for 1 US dollar in equal proportion, and the use of USD0 makes no difference to me. Many users are still willing to use the old brand of USDT. If USDT is not adopted much, it will be difficult to truly subvert Tether.

Therefore, he can only find another way to cooperate with bank settlements, or even cooperate with national level to improve his brand value of security, so that it is possible to be used by more institutions and individuals. The more people use USD0, for example, if the current scale of USDT is 120 billion, then the circulation market value of UAUSL can exceed 100 billion US dollars (now it is about 600 million US dollars in circulation)

The market value may only be within a few billion US dollars, and it cannot reach the scale of more than 100 billion US dollars of Tether.
See original
Web3 has an excess premium for innovators. For example, BTC is not as energy-efficient and efficient as any meme coin, but it is the god of the industry. For example, ETH is not as low in handling fees and efficient as many L2 public chains, but it is the first to innovate, so the premium is several times higher than other public chains. If Usual overturns the stable currency status of USDT, it will be a $100 billion project.
Web3 has an excess premium for innovators. For example, BTC is not as energy-efficient and efficient as any meme coin, but it is the god of the industry. For example, ETH is not as low in handling fees and efficient as many L2 public chains, but it is the first to innovate, so the premium is several times higher than other public chains. If Usual overturns the stable currency status of USDT, it will be a $100 billion project.
希曼Heman
--
$USUAL The main difference between usd0 and usdt is that the parent company of usdt collects US dollars as reserves to generate usdt for users to use. The parent company uses the interest of US dollar deposits or treasury bonds for its own profits; usd0 uses treasury bonds as collateral. For example, users exchange 10 billion US dollars, and the profit of usdt is kept by themselves. usd0 continues to invest the 11 billion US dollars that arrived in the account after 10 billion US dollars in treasury bonds after one year into buying treasury bonds. All of them are placed in the vault to support the stability of usd0 against 1 US dollar. At the same time, this interest will be used to pay the value of usual, of which 90% belongs to users. The pledge income of usd0 comes from the liquidity of crv, which is the handling fee when users exchange usd0 and usdc, as well as part of the additional issuance income of usual. In essence, usual is a stable currency with collateral rather than an algorithmic stable currency.
See original
$USUAL The main difference between usd0 and usdt is that the parent company of usdt collects US dollars as reserves to generate usdt for users to use. The parent company uses the interest of US dollar deposits or treasury bonds for its own profits; usd0 uses treasury bonds as collateral. For example, users exchange 10 billion US dollars, and the profit of usdt is kept by themselves. usd0 continues to invest the 11 billion US dollars that arrived in the account after 10 billion US dollars in treasury bonds after one year into buying treasury bonds. All of them are placed in the vault to support the stability of usd0 against 1 US dollar. At the same time, this interest will be used to pay the value of usual, of which 90% belongs to users. The pledge income of usd0 comes from the liquidity of crv, which is the handling fee when users exchange usd0 and usdc, as well as part of the additional issuance income of usual. In essence, usual is a stable currency with collateral rather than an algorithmic stable currency.
$USUAL The main difference between usd0 and usdt is that the parent company of usdt collects US dollars as reserves to generate usdt for users to use. The parent company uses the interest of US dollar deposits or treasury bonds for its own profits; usd0 uses treasury bonds as collateral. For example, users exchange 10 billion US dollars, and the profit of usdt is kept by themselves. usd0 continues to invest the 11 billion US dollars that arrived in the account after 10 billion US dollars in treasury bonds after one year into buying treasury bonds. All of them are placed in the vault to support the stability of usd0 against 1 US dollar. At the same time, this interest will be used to pay the value of usual, of which 90% belongs to users. The pledge income of usd0 comes from the liquidity of crv, which is the handling fee when users exchange usd0 and usdc, as well as part of the additional issuance income of usual. In essence, usual is a stable currency with collateral rather than an algorithmic stable currency.
See original
I like you, a newbie who doesn't know but pretends to know and wants to teach everyone. When you buy 100u of USD0, he doesn't give you 1u of interest out of thin air, but this 100u is a physical collateral with US bonds, and he generates 100u for you. The interest of this 1u comes from the expected return of this bond in the next year, so he first gives you a usual, and then the bond is in the vault. If you don't buy treasury bonds to pledge and there is 1USD0, there is a spread when the price is higher than 1 US dollar, and other people can use the treasury bonds in the vault to generate new USD0 for arbitrage
I like you, a newbie who doesn't know but pretends to know and wants to teach everyone. When you buy 100u of USD0, he doesn't give you 1u of interest out of thin air, but this 100u is a physical collateral with US bonds, and he generates 100u for you. The interest of this 1u comes from the expected return of this bond in the next year, so he first gives you a usual, and then the bond is in the vault. If you don't buy treasury bonds to pledge and there is 1USD0, there is a spread when the price is higher than 1 US dollar, and other people can use the treasury bonds in the vault to generate new USD0 for arbitrage
Digipunk
--
$USUAL has said it ten times that USUAL is not a spiral upward model and has been criticized by a lot of people. You can be optimistic about this coin and say it has potential, but you cannot analyze objective facts and study theories without pure faith. LUNA is a spiral upward, because the higher the TVL of UST, the more LUNA will be destroyed. The circulation will be directly destroyed to less than 100 million in the end. This coin will increase until 4 billion is released. The higher the USD0, the more USUAL. Do you understand? This coin is used to pay the interest income of USUAL and USD0 pledge. The so-called "you buy stable" by the project party The fixed currency can get a share of the profits, but in fact it is using air coins to pay for the profits, and the real profits have long been taken away by themselves. If you bought 100 USD0, and there should be 1 USD in profit every day, you should be given a real 1 USD or 1 USD0, but not a USUAL worth 1 USD, because the USUAL worth 1 USD is exchanged for 1 USD in the secondary market to find leeks as an ATM to sell, not the project party paying you interest. The project party took away the investment income of more than one billion USD0 for nothing, and they only give you USUAL to come here to dump the market for money. I say all this to say that the cryptocurrency world is a market for speculation. Even BTC has no practical value for now, but it does not hinder the market value of several trillions. This USUAL may have dozens or even hundreds of U in the future. After all, the market is irrational and speculates on emotions and consensus. The more routines there are, the higher the price may be. That's fine, but at least you should not treat this project party as some kind of stablecoin revolutionaries and then play this coin rationally. Don't worship and believe in this all day long. In essence, they are still just a despicable capital circle money maker.
Explore the latest crypto news
⚡️ Be a part of the latests discussions in crypto
💬 Interact with your favorite creators
👍 Enjoy content that interests you
Email / Phone number

Latest News

--
View More

Trending Articles

Imran Rai
View More
Sitemap
Cookie Preferences
Platform T&Cs