Everyone knows that $BTC has a famous 50% theory, right? If it controls 50% of the nodes in the network, it can issue coins at will, which will cause the network to lose trust, that is, it can tamper with transactions at will, or issue coins to itself.
So, with the difficulty of mining rising steadily and Bitcoin not rising, will more and more mining machines lose money as soon as they are turned on? What if miners don’t have much, throw away all of them and shut down directly? What if all the nodes are institutions that short BTC? The destruction of trust is terrible.
And the reason for all this is that Satoshi Nakamoto is anonymous and he cannot upgrade the network.
If it is really impossible to short the big cake, then when the black swan comes, I will increase my position in the second cake $ETH and support cz$BNB
1. It is extremely unfair to treat miners. KOL propaganda gets more than miners
2. It does not have the first-mover advantage of not. It is just a spare tire
3. It is hard not to doubt whether the "partner" is the same as $ZK 's insider trading In short, ton will develop, but I am bearish on this meme. #AirdropGuide #meme板块关注热点 #币安上线ZK #新币挖矿
New airdrop, new bull market, which one do you pick? 1. #Blum A placement-style harvesting game, the mortal enemy of the little hamster 2. #HamsterKombat Blum’s mortal enemy, diverse gameplay, daily prize draw for upgraded cards, Morse code, click mining, invite friends, no first-mover advantage of $NOT at any time, but diverse gameplay, an upgraded version of $NOT 3. #Yescoin Ton is not in reverse, the antonym of not is yes, they really understand the game! I like their pacman mechanism, which is labor-saving 4. #Tapswap The gameplay is exactly the same as not, and it is somewhat popular in the tg circle, but it seems that there is no attention on Binance 5. #PocketFi A more unpopular existence, their roadmap is said to be in December, so far away...