The last post mentioned 4 coins, #mkr #ondo #roi #polyx , all of which increased very well. I feel like I shouldn’t write that post anymore, I’ll dig up the grave later.

#币安请你去迪拜 The community gentleman is ready to apply to play. Thank you for your support. Post an in-depth rwa-related research.
At present, the number one rwa is definitely #mkr , because dai’s pledge includes U.S. Treasury bonds, amounting to billions of dollars, and it has begun to pay interest to stablecoin holders. In addition, the founder of mkr has been making buybacks, so mkr can be counted as the first rwa currency.
The token #ondo has been listed on futures on Binance but not on spot because of BlackRock’s investment. Assuming that BlackRock was preparing to issue a build on eth two days ago, it directly added fuel to the rwa track. Then BlackRock’s ondo took off immediately
#polyx This token was invested by Binance, and it was specified in the public chain that it was going to be RWA. In the past two days, due to the news from BlackRock and the long-term inhumane market wash, the token has been raised three times.
The tokens on #roi ok have increased 100 times from the low point. As a real estate-related RWA, I am actually not very interested in the scale of RWA in non-digital categories (such as treasury bonds, repurchases, stocks, etc.), but after all, it is digital. Real estate helps solve real estate liquidity problems, so it seems to be very popular in the market.
To be continued, please like more!

You antique coin guys have gone too far. If you can’t make money from meme, you’ll just flip the table.

After Binance listed #bome , the scarcity of #meme in the exchange sol system will be smaller. Okay, now #myro #wif accepts the revaluation.

Why is #FDUSD unhooked and #TUSDT anchored back?
The reason for both currencies is the same, because the funding rate of Bitcoin exploded today. How explosive?
Bitcoin perpetual contract funding rate is 0.08%, annualized: 87%
This year is basically equal to the annualization of u. The specific operations are:
Taking the principal of 70,000u as an example, use 62,000u to buy a big pie spot, and 8,000u to short a big pie permanently.
The result is: you can get a funding rate of $150 per day. Achieved an annualized rate of 70+%.
In this case, those with low u costs in the market will rush into futures arbitrage. Then because tusd can be used as contract margin, the utilization rate is high enough, and Binance supports tusd as contract margin, which means that tusd has no real anchor, it is just short-term supply and demand FUD, so tusd can eat two fish in this strategy. (Eat back riveting + capital fee). So it is pulled up quantitatively. And because fdusd is temporarily useless, if it is replaced by usdt with an annualized rate of 70-80%, there will definitely be a sell-off conversion. After all, the little bit that breaks the anchor can be earned back in a day or two.
So, if Binance gives real money support to a launchpool as big as fdusd, why don’t you let go of contract margin support?
Outside of this article, if you talk about tusd joining the next mining or fdusd having problems, don’t read it, it’s meaningless.

When the pie was 16,000, everyone said they should buy a house.
The pie has now increased to RMB 61,000, but the house has not been sold yet

#uni Regarding the cost issue, there are two opinions on the market, one is the front-end fee and the other is the LP fee. First of all, it is clear that the fee allocated for this proposal is the handling fee charged by LP.
According to defillama data, uniswap received 72.85m in handling fees in the past 30 days.
It is inappropriate to directly use this data to calculate uni's income. The bulk should still be uni's LP, and a small part should be pledged to uni. We set this ratio at 15%. That is: 10.92m.
The current circulating market value of uni is: 753,766,667.00*12=9045m US dollars.
Not all the circulating market value will be pledged. The maximum pledge ratio can refer to these two tokens: crv (vecrv conversion ratio: 57%) gmx (stake ratio: 65%). Because both tokens consider giving certain additional incentives to long-term staking users, this data is relatively high.
Calculated based on the above situation, the annual data of uni is: 2.4%. (10.92*12/(9045*60%)). Let’s just say that at the moment, this performance and this price are quite reasonable.
The future is limitless

I have a lot of free time today. Let me talk about how I managed to eat four fish with one fish on Binance #Launchpool .
1. Venus loan: Throw your idle BTC eth u into Venus and borrow bnb. Mining revenue-cost is about 20% per year.
2. Buy #RONIN and run away online. (Bought twice...)
3. 0.508 buy #PIXEL pixel, 0.53+ sell
Okay, I feel comfortable with this pixel.
4. Actually, it’s okay not to mention this. #BNB🔥 has increased by 15%.
Bits and pieces of screenshots, just for a look.

cz said that from June last year to now, #BNB has not underperformed #ETH

The Binance ieo arkm investment has started. Let’s put it this way, many people will invest tomorrow for the launch pool, and then wait and see. Some people will definitely say they forgot to invest tomorrow. Set the alarm quickly

bitwise: We applied for ETF.
sec: I understand

cz background is very dark, 4
#czbinance

The hacker borrowed a total of 116402225+36280758u, totaling 152682983u. The hacker currently owns 924,830 bnb (several IEO users have borrowed bnb at high interest rates, which has increased the number). The current 1:1 price bnb is 165. Counting 10%, the liquidation line is 181, and if 5%, the liquidation line is 173. Neither of these two prices is comparable to 220. I don’t know how the 220 in the market came about. Anyway, it can’t stand up to scrutiny.

The bulls have lost all dignity after being suppressed in the past two days. It’s time to teach the Air Force a lesson.

An interesting data is that before the merge of #eth, 2 eth were generated in one block every 13 seconds, and 10,000 eth were generated in almost a day. 200,000 eth will be generated in 20 days. Remember this number, the eth output in 20 days is 200,000 eth. I don’t know that everyone is afraid of #FTX hackers. What about 20weth? Isn’t it just the output of 20 days under POW? There is nothing to be afraid of.

The large cake is made into a rock, the ether is made into pampas grass, and the pampas grass is like silk. The rock is not moved.

I declare that all those who pull the market in the bear market are warriors and pioneers in the bull market. They are a ray of light and a move for the people in the currency circle.

The clever group of friends found such a transaction again, and seemed to follow ftx to withdraw coins and recharge the coming ftt. Is this cz’s money?

#ftx#cz

A withdrawal of 50wu from ftx https://etherscan.io/address/0xbe385b59931c7fc144420f6c707027d4c2d37a81#tokentxns… A deposit of 20000ftt from ftx https://etherscan.io/address/0x79a5e003a46665c7c7ea 0c51cd384b6df54b357e#tokentxns

Continuing yesterday’s research. Yesterday, ftx's eth hot wallet was still having a hard time. Send a screenshot: This is the eth outflow volume of ftx hot wallet in the past 30 hours. It can be found that last night, for several hours, the outflow was less than 5,000 coins, indicating that there was an insufficient balance at that time. No relief until morning. Then there was a large outflow in the morning, and the current balance of eth was less than 1,000 pieces. It can be said that the run is still continuing. ftx please continue to be strong

0-16845

1-4219

2-3787

3-8262

4-2947

5-4600

6-11019

7-19624

The big shipment is here. There is an address that charged 1weth 5 minutes ago. I can’t tell where it is now. But it is certain that it is not a personal recharge.

In addition to depositing eth, this address also deposited millions of usdc to ftx. Haha, come on sbf.

Then the current balance is 5000eth, let’s see how long it takes to withdraw it.

Deposit transaction: https://etherscan.io/address/0x277ed959b29ae2cf4f9890693ebe171e31aa4089