Binance Square
LIVE
LIVE
五月Crypto
--257 views
See original
The end of the copycat is zero! For a long-term coin, the holding logic should always be independent of the short-term price. When a coin is at a high point, if you choose to believe in a narrative, you have to think about whether this narrative can still convince yourself if the price drops to 10% of the current price? If not, you may have to re-evaluate the persuasiveness of this narrative. Some narratives are like this. This narrative is only effective in the current price range. If it falls, it means that this narrative is invalid. There is also a part of the real "narrative". Regardless of whether it rises or falls, as long as there is no fundamental change in conditions (such as the project party running away, black swan events), then its narrative can be completely independent of the price. Temporary narratives are mostly used to boost fomo sentiment. Once it falls, people have ten thousand reasons to disprove it (perhaps before that, they can try to disprove every narrative in order to give themselves an objective investment idea); and what we call reliable and sustainable narratives - people use it to fuel the fomo sentiment, and people use it to strengthen their beliefs when it is fud, and even when it is bland, people will fomo as soon as they hear it... However, it should be noted that even if such narratives are really independent of price, they will inevitably be overly beautified when it is fomo, and covered with some fake hats when it is fud. If you are a long-termist, when choosing to hold tokens for a long time, you should try to avoid temporary narratives (even if it is sometimes really difficult to identify), and choose those narratives that seem to be independent of price and naturally produce persuasiveness. Take Bitcoin as an example. If it crashes to 20,000 tomorrow, I can still tell you with confidence that it should be 1 million in a few years - no explanation is needed. Bitcoin is very simple, and everyone understands its "eternity". But nowadays, simple things are becoming less and less, and it is difficult for us to understand how long the narrative of a thing can survive. The cryptocurrency circle is still a huge makeshift team, using seemingly complex things to fool people. Some people say that no matter what the process of Bitcoin is, the end result is to rise, and no matter what the process of altcoins is, the end result is to return to zero. It makes sense, this is what a makeshift team is like. However, there is something different, that is, "Bitcoin ecology". It is complicated, but not that complicated. It is nothing more than using Bitcoin and empowering Bitcoin. Everything is related to Bitcoin, everything is the other side of Bitcoin, and everything is to make Bitcoin better. From Bitcoin to Bitcoin. I firmly believe that the five words "Bitcoin ecology" are a reliable long-term narrative. You can disprove the inscription, you can disprove the second layer, and people have reasons to disprove every trend that becomes popular on Bitcoin. But it is difficult for people to completely disprove the five words "Bitcoin ecology". How to define "Bitcoin ecology"? If someone calls something Bitcoin ecology, but when more people play Bitcoin or Bitcoin rises, it has nothing to do with this thing, or when this thing develops well by itself, it cannot generate any value for Bitcoin itself, or even is harmful to Bitcoin - then Bitcoin does not need it, it is meaningless to Bitcoin, and this cannot be considered a part of Bitcoin ecology, but can only be regarded as a rip-off of Bitcoin. The remaining models that are truly meaningful to the development of Bitcoin will constitute a complete and long-term continuous gameplay that will not be lost from the Bitcoin mainnet. Even if all the projects in the "Bitcoin ecosystem" today are finally going to zero, the charm of these five words will make it a prairie fire in the future of the blockchain. Look, this is a narrative independent of price. Outside of Bitcoin, various public chains want to falsify each other, various memes want to falsify each other, and various projects are also proving to each other why they are necessary and others are not. Only Bitcoin, you can't falsify it. Bitcoin and everything around Bitcoin will get better and better, just need time to prove it. Human technology will definitely progress, medical care will become more and more perfect, the Internet will become more and more prosperous, people's lives will become happier and happier... In addition to these parallel sentences, you can add a sentence, Bitcoin will get better and better. Then what about everything around Bitcoin? It won't be bad. So, if the end point of the copycat is really zero, the end point of the Bitcoin ecosystem is the revival of all things, the prosperity of singing and dancing, the return of rivers to the sea, and the light of the road. For more market analysis, high-quality currencies, bargain hunting, and overnight information, follow the team for free at #meme板块

The end of the copycat is zero!

For a long-term coin, the holding logic should always be independent of the short-term price. When a coin is at a high point, if you choose to believe in a narrative, you have to think about whether this narrative can still convince yourself if the price drops to 10% of the current price? If not, you may have to re-evaluate the persuasiveness of this narrative.

Some narratives are like this. This narrative is only effective in the current price range. If it falls, it means that this narrative is invalid. There is also a part of the real "narrative". Regardless of whether it rises or falls, as long as there is no fundamental change in conditions (such as the project party running away, black swan events), then its narrative can be completely independent of the price.

Temporary narratives are mostly used to boost fomo sentiment. Once it falls, people have ten thousand reasons to disprove it (perhaps before that, they can try to disprove every narrative in order to give themselves an objective investment idea); and what we call reliable and sustainable narratives - people use it to fuel the fomo sentiment, and people use it to strengthen their beliefs when it is fud, and even when it is bland, people will fomo as soon as they hear it... However, it should be noted that even if such narratives are really independent of price, they will inevitably be overly beautified when it is fomo, and covered with some fake hats when it is fud.

If you are a long-termist, when choosing to hold tokens for a long time, you should try to avoid temporary narratives (even if it is sometimes really difficult to identify), and choose those narratives that seem to be independent of price and naturally produce persuasiveness. Take Bitcoin as an example. If it crashes to 20,000 tomorrow, I can still tell you with confidence that it should be 1 million in a few years - no explanation is needed.

Bitcoin is very simple, and everyone understands its "eternity". But nowadays, simple things are becoming less and less, and it is difficult for us to understand how long the narrative of a thing can survive.

The cryptocurrency circle is still a huge makeshift team, using seemingly complex things to fool people. Some people say that no matter what the process of Bitcoin is, the end result is to rise, and no matter what the process of altcoins is, the end result is to return to zero. It makes sense, this is what a makeshift team is like.

However, there is something different, that is, "Bitcoin ecology". It is complicated, but not that complicated. It is nothing more than using Bitcoin and empowering Bitcoin. Everything is related to Bitcoin, everything is the other side of Bitcoin, and everything is to make Bitcoin better. From Bitcoin to Bitcoin.

I firmly believe that the five words "Bitcoin ecology" are a reliable long-term narrative. You can disprove the inscription, you can disprove the second layer, and people have reasons to disprove every trend that becomes popular on Bitcoin. But it is difficult for people to completely disprove the five words "Bitcoin ecology".

How to define "Bitcoin ecology"? If someone calls something Bitcoin ecology, but when more people play Bitcoin or Bitcoin rises, it has nothing to do with this thing, or when this thing develops well by itself, it cannot generate any value for Bitcoin itself, or even is harmful to Bitcoin - then Bitcoin does not need it, it is meaningless to Bitcoin, and this cannot be considered a part of Bitcoin ecology, but can only be regarded as a rip-off of Bitcoin. The remaining models that are truly meaningful to the development of Bitcoin will constitute a complete and long-term continuous gameplay that will not be lost from the Bitcoin mainnet.

Even if all the projects in the "Bitcoin ecosystem" today are finally going to zero, the charm of these five words will make it a prairie fire in the future of the blockchain. Look, this is a narrative independent of price.

Outside of Bitcoin, various public chains want to falsify each other, various memes want to falsify each other, and various projects are also proving to each other why they are necessary and others are not. Only Bitcoin, you can't falsify it. Bitcoin and everything around Bitcoin will get better and better, just need time to prove it.

Human technology will definitely progress, medical care will become more and more perfect, the Internet will become more and more prosperous, people's lives will become happier and happier... In addition to these parallel sentences, you can add a sentence, Bitcoin will get better and better. Then what about everything around Bitcoin? It won't be bad.

So, if the end point of the copycat is really zero, the end point of the Bitcoin ecosystem is the revival of all things, the prosperity of singing and dancing, the return of rivers to the sea, and the light of the road.

For more market analysis, high-quality currencies, bargain hunting, and overnight information, follow the team for free at #meme板块

Disclaimer: Includes thrid-party opinions. No financial advice. May include sponsored content. See T&Cs.
0
Replies 1
Explore the lastest crypto news
⚡️ Be a part of the latests discussions in crypto
💬 Interact with your favorite creators
👍 Enjoy content that interests you
Email / Phone number
Relevant Creator
LIVE
@Square-Creator-ebd24ec748

Explore More From Creator

--
山寨币为什么没有造福效应? 比特币为什么最坚挺,是因为华尔街在买,是因为币安被监管。要不是华尔街,这时候,比特币也能死给你看… 大部分交易所有亏空,就不想涨,想做空平账。 奈何,华尔街太强势,钱也多。这会只好现货卖出,期货做多(对冲是必要的)。 但比特币就是难跌。 “这轮行情山寨之所以这么艰难,本质上除了华尔街(他们只玩比特币),就几乎没新入场资金。 等于散户们和各交易所各做市商在对赌,散户做多。 以前是各交易所和各做市商各镰刀通过让老韭菜账面盈利,一起吸引新韭菜。 本来有新入场散户,新入场资金,可以让对赌旁氏的延续时间长些。 奈何环境不允许啊…韭菜都被权利阶级割秃秃了… 所以加密市场才对放水这么期待,美股在加息环境,那叫一个欢快! 核心原因,是币圈没几个好东西,只能玩旁氏对赌,放水是充分条件,不是必要条件,好东西才是,明显可预见的是ETF标的震荡向上牛。 在美联储还没有公布数据之前,个人认为行情大概率是没有趋势行情的,也就是震荡为主,跌多了买,涨多了卖,不要追涨杀跌! 总体而言,以太的ETF炒作肯定还会再来,当前不少以太系列的品种都处于低位,此时正是埋伏加仓的好机会,买在下跌处,卖在上涨时! 加密市场真正的狂暴牛市第三季度,所以大家要有信心,千万不要放弃,短暂的调整也好,下跌也罢,都是为了大牛市在蓄力,拿好现货,坚定持有,尤其是优质资产。 目前大盘要关注66000附近位置,如果4小时级别收到66000以下,那么短期的调整在所难免,市场还需要持续的洗礼。目前大家能做的就是多研究和学习,同时越跌越要买优质资产。 牛市不知道怎么做,点开我头像,关注,牛市现货策划,合约密码,无偿分享。#美联储利率决议即将公布 $BTC
--
今日,BTC小跌,ETH跟随,山寨币直接瀑布洗脸。以太坊基金会往交易所充币的信息再次进入公众视野。 以太坊大约有10年历史,以太坊基金会这两年开始被称之为“逃顶大师”,它每次都能在大跌前把ETH卖给接盘的有缘人。 很多人揶揄,币圈只有两个逃顶大师,一个是孙宇晨孙哥,另一个就是以太坊基金会。 我们根据一些图标,看看以太坊基金会的炒币骚操作吧,先来看看图,记录的是23年6月之前的卖币操作。 图中,卖币数量都在数万。不难发现,除了2020年10万多枚ETH这单卖在了“上涨途中外”,其它都卖在了阶段性高点。稳得很。 尤其是2021年2万枚ETH这一笔,卖在了上一轮牛市ETH突破4,000美元后的高点,堪称“神来之笔”,在行情微妙,楚楚欲坠的时候,以太坊基金会的大额卖单甚至会很多人选择跟随卖出。这更加为以太坊基金会逃顶大师的故事增加了很多“作料”。 有时,市场大跌之后,链上数据监控者,或者媒体,有时也会回溯以太坊基金会的近期卖点,投资者们又会慨叹:大师果然还是大师。 以太坊基金会为什么这么牛,我们可以如何向他学习? 实际上,方法很简单,答案就是,如果你有海量筹码,然后一直卖卖卖,总能卖到阶段性顶点。 媒体和公众不会记得你在大暴涨时期的卖单,只会记得你在大跌前的买单。 图是以太坊基金会2017年至2023年的大额卖币情况。有大量ETH卖在了ETH加速上涨的过程中。 另外,监控以太坊基金会的地址也能发现,小额的卖单其实很频繁,以200枚ETH为主,5月份就有4笔,还有一笔1000枚,甚至也会在DEX里直接卖掉100枚ETH来“回血”。 关注查看置顶,牛市策略布局,分享各种密码,只为涨粉,不做牛市的陪跑者,只做牛市的胜利者!#ETHUSDT $BTC
--

Trending Articles

avatar
CryptoNews
View More
Sitemap
Cookie Preferences
Platform T&Cs