Binance Square
LIVE
LIVE
薛定谔的猫叔
--1.7k views
See original
Let's interpret the macroeconomic data of the United States tonight. I was still outside when the data was released just now. I just got home. 1. The number of initial unemployment claims in the United States for the week ending May 18 (10,000 people), the previous value was 22.3, the expected value was 22, and the announced value was 21.5. The value shows that the US job market is strong. There are 3 possibilities for the emergence of this data: 1. The economy is strong, the economy is good, companies are willing to expand, and recruit more new employees, resulting in fewer initial unemployment claims 2. The increase in workers' wages leads to satisfaction with the work of existing workers, reducing the desire to leave and re-employ, but the competitiveness of the job is enhanced. At the same time, people who do not meet the job requirements cannot find a job, and would rather receive relief than participate in low-wage work. 3. The labor market is strong, and people's expectations for finding a new job increase, and their confidence increases. There are three possibilities. According to the current layoffs of major companies in the United States, the main factor for the reduction in initial unemployment claims this time is mainly the second possibility. Of course, from the data, it can also be interpreted as a strong economy (I personally think it is unreliable) At the same time, the data is not conducive to inflation control on the surface, reducing the market's optimistic expectations of interest rate cuts. Second, the initial value of the US S&P Global Manufacturing PMI in May, the previous value was 50, the expected value was 50, and the announced value was 50.9. This value is the purchasing managers' view on the manufacturing industry, including new orders, employment, prices and other sub-items. At the same time, with 50 as the base line, 50 or above represents an industry increase, and 50 or below represents an industry contraction. The data is higher than the previous value and expectations, indicating that the US economic activity has grown, corporate confidence has increased, and corporate investment intentions have increased. However, we can still see that the manufacturing PMI index has been hovering around 50. Although the United States has been trying to save and restore its manufacturing industry, it has achieved little success at present. Of course, looking at the data alone, it can still be interpreted as a strong US economy, which is not conducive to inflation control and optimistic expectations of interest rate cuts. In fact, if it is inflation caused by the strong manufacturing industry, it is the easiest data to digest. Unfortunately, the manufacturing PMI data is strong but limited. Third, the initial value of the US S&P Global Services PMI in May, the previous value was 51.3, the expected value was 51.3, and the announced value was 54.8. This index is the purchasing managers' view on the service industry, including new orders, employment, prices and other sub-items. Compared with the manufacturing PMI, the service industry PMI is the highlight. In fact, the core problem of the difficulty in controlling inflation in the United States is that the main source of inflation does not come from the manufacturing industry, because the inflation brought by the manufacturing industry is benign inflation, and the economy will digest part of it by itself. Instead, it is the inflation other than the manufacturing industry that has been putting pressure on the US inflation, such as the current service industry. The inflation brought by the service industry or investment field is the most difficult to control and the most likely to rebound. It is also the cause of the excessive gap between the rich and the poor. At present, the data is not only higher than the expectations and the previous value, but even stronger than expected. The data also strengthens the expectation of a strong US economy. After all, 80% of the US GDP comes from the service industry, but it also means greater inflationary pressure. It is not conducive to inflation control and optimistic expectations of interest rate cuts. Fourth, the total number of new home sales in the United States in April was annualized (10,000 households), the previous value was 66.5, the expected value was 67.9, and the announced value was 63.4. This value refers to the number of houses with signed sales contracts. There are four possibilities for this value: 1. Economic weakness and declining purchasing power. Of course, this data contradicts the above strong US economic data. 2. Rising interest rates have led to rising home purchase rates. Although the current US federal funds rate remains at 5.25%-5.5%, the actual base rate has reached 7.5%, and the interest rate for civilians to borrow from banks is basically around 7%. Higher interest rates lead to increased loan costs and reduced willingness to buy houses with loans. 3. Rising house prices. There is no valid data to support this, but according to my personal understanding, in the United States, especially in major areas, a large number of houses are controlled by people and the prices are raised. I will not mention which group is the main one here. Those who are interested can find out for themselves. 4. Insufficient housing supply. Literally, this does not exist. For the United States, there is a lot of land and a small population, so the housing supply is still sufficient, but the houses in good locations and regions are artificially controlled, and the ability of the lower-class people to buy houses has indeed weakened. Housing data is not very important, but the main factors for the weakening data are 2 and 3. High interest rates and rising housing prices have led to a decline in new housing data. At the same time, housing data involves several other data, such as home buyers purchasing furniture and appliances, financial banks selling mortgage certificates, and intermediary fees. The decline in this data unilaterally indicates that inflationary pressure has decreased, which is helpful for the optimistic expectations of interest rate cuts, but this data cannot be used as the main measurement data, so the influence is relatively small. Of the above four data, three are from the data to show the strength of the US economy, which can also be interpreted according to the strength of the US economy, so it brings pressure on inflation control, and intuitively unfavorable to the PCE index next Friday, especially the core PCE index. The current data has brought certain pressure, and the market's expectations for the Fed's optimistic interest rate cut have been reduced. At the same time, the market heard that the expectation of interest rate cuts in 2024 was postponed from November to December, which once caused the market sentiment to decline in the short term. However, the main short-term sentiment of the crypto market is still based on the Ethereum ETF data released early this morning. If the Ethereum ETF is passed, even if only the single file 19b-4 is passed, the short-term market will rise, and then it may trigger Sell the news, a short-term decline, and digest the expected landing sentiment. If it is not passed, the market sentiment is bearish, and the current macro data is not optimistic about the short-term interest rate cut this year, and the decline may increase. At present, the current macro data can only serve as an inducement to the market trend and cannot be the main reason. #BTC走势分析 #5月市场关键事件 $BTC

Let's interpret the macroeconomic data of the United States tonight. I was still outside when the data was released just now. I just got home.

1. The number of initial unemployment claims in the United States for the week ending May 18 (10,000 people), the previous value was 22.3, the expected value was 22, and the announced value was 21.5.

The value shows that the US job market is strong.

There are 3 possibilities for the emergence of this data:

1. The economy is strong, the economy is good, companies are willing to expand, and recruit more new employees, resulting in fewer initial unemployment claims

2. The increase in workers' wages leads to satisfaction with the work of existing workers, reducing the desire to leave and re-employ, but the competitiveness of the job is enhanced. At the same time, people who do not meet the job requirements cannot find a job, and would rather receive relief than participate in low-wage work.

3. The labor market is strong, and people's expectations for finding a new job increase, and their confidence increases.

There are three possibilities. According to the current layoffs of major companies in the United States, the main factor for the reduction in initial unemployment claims this time is mainly the second possibility. Of course, from the data, it can also be interpreted as a strong economy (I personally think it is unreliable)

At the same time, the data is not conducive to inflation control on the surface, reducing the market's optimistic expectations of interest rate cuts.

Second, the initial value of the US S&P Global Manufacturing PMI in May, the previous value was 50, the expected value was 50, and the announced value was 50.9. This value is the purchasing managers' view on the manufacturing industry, including new orders, employment, prices and other sub-items. At the same time, with 50 as the base line, 50 or above represents an industry increase, and 50 or below represents an industry contraction.

The data is higher than the previous value and expectations, indicating that the US economic activity has grown, corporate confidence has increased, and corporate investment intentions have increased.

However, we can still see that the manufacturing PMI index has been hovering around 50. Although the United States has been trying to save and restore its manufacturing industry, it has achieved little success at present.

Of course, looking at the data alone, it can still be interpreted as a strong US economy, which is not conducive to inflation control and optimistic expectations of interest rate cuts. In fact, if it is inflation caused by the strong manufacturing industry, it is the easiest data to digest. Unfortunately, the manufacturing PMI data is strong but limited.

Third, the initial value of the US S&P Global Services PMI in May, the previous value was 51.3, the expected value was 51.3, and the announced value was 54.8. This index is the purchasing managers' view on the service industry, including new orders, employment, prices and other sub-items.

Compared with the manufacturing PMI, the service industry PMI is the highlight. In fact, the core problem of the difficulty in controlling inflation in the United States is that the main source of inflation does not come from the manufacturing industry, because the inflation brought by the manufacturing industry is benign inflation, and the economy will digest part of it by itself. Instead, it is the inflation other than the manufacturing industry that has been putting pressure on the US inflation, such as the current service industry. The inflation brought by the service industry or investment field is the most difficult to control and the most likely to rebound. It is also the cause of the excessive gap between the rich and the poor.

At present, the data is not only higher than the expectations and the previous value, but even stronger than expected. The data also strengthens the expectation of a strong US economy. After all, 80% of the US GDP comes from the service industry, but it also means greater inflationary pressure. It is not conducive to inflation control and optimistic expectations of interest rate cuts.

Fourth, the total number of new home sales in the United States in April was annualized (10,000 households), the previous value was 66.5, the expected value was 67.9, and the announced value was 63.4. This value refers to the number of houses with signed sales contracts.

There are four possibilities for this value:

1. Economic weakness and declining purchasing power. Of course, this data contradicts the above strong US economic data.

2. Rising interest rates have led to rising home purchase rates. Although the current US federal funds rate remains at 5.25%-5.5%, the actual base rate has reached 7.5%, and the interest rate for civilians to borrow from banks is basically around 7%. Higher interest rates lead to increased loan costs and reduced willingness to buy houses with loans.

3. Rising house prices. There is no valid data to support this, but according to my personal understanding, in the United States, especially in major areas, a large number of houses are controlled by people and the prices are raised. I will not mention which group is the main one here. Those who are interested can find out for themselves.

4. Insufficient housing supply. Literally, this does not exist. For the United States, there is a lot of land and a small population, so the housing supply is still sufficient, but the houses in good locations and regions are artificially controlled, and the ability of the lower-class people to buy houses has indeed weakened.

Housing data is not very important, but the main factors for the weakening data are 2 and 3. High interest rates and rising housing prices have led to a decline in new housing data. At the same time, housing data involves several other data, such as home buyers purchasing furniture and appliances, financial banks selling mortgage certificates, and intermediary fees.

The decline in this data unilaterally indicates that inflationary pressure has decreased, which is helpful for the optimistic expectations of interest rate cuts, but this data cannot be used as the main measurement data, so the influence is relatively small.

Of the above four data, three are from the data to show the strength of the US economy, which can also be interpreted according to the strength of the US economy, so it brings pressure on inflation control, and intuitively unfavorable to the PCE index next Friday, especially the core PCE index. The current data has brought certain pressure, and the market's expectations for the Fed's optimistic interest rate cut have been reduced.

At the same time, the market heard that the expectation of interest rate cuts in 2024 was postponed from November to December, which once caused the market sentiment to decline in the short term.

However, the main short-term sentiment of the crypto market is still based on the Ethereum ETF data released early this morning.

If the Ethereum ETF is passed, even if only the single file 19b-4 is passed, the short-term market will rise, and then it may trigger Sell the news, a short-term decline, and digest the expected landing sentiment.

If it is not passed, the market sentiment is bearish, and the current macro data is not optimistic about the short-term interest rate cut this year, and the decline may increase.

At present, the current macro data can only serve as an inducement to the market trend and cannot be the main reason.

#BTC走势分析 #5月市场关键事件 $BTC

Disclaimer: Includes thrid-party opinions. No financial advice. May include sponsored content. See T&Cs.
0
Explore the lastest crypto news
⚡️ Be a part of the latests discussions in crypto
💬 Interact with your favorite creators
👍 Enjoy content that interests you
Email / Phone number
Relevant Creator

Explore More From Creator

BTC盘面解读: 一个好消息,一个坏消息。关键支撑测试中!   好几天没有解读一下大盘盘面,主要是阶梯型式下跌测试,周末也并未触及支撑,目前经过周末调整,周线发生上移,我们一起来看一下盘面情况。 一个好消息,周线支撑上移,短期会给下跌带来更好的保护性,说白了没有较大利空就别叫抗跌。 一个坏消息,周线支撑上移,目前价格基本属于周线支撑位置,这个位置如果跌破,60,000上方有效支撑不够。 目前周线支撑已经来到64,200附近,而目前比特币价格暂时企稳也是在这个附近,目前该支撑并未得到有效测试。 短期的下跌通道也是以周线为一个低点,如果这个位置破了,技术面来看是会有继续下探的概率。所以短期64,200将会成为一个关键支撑。 如果该位置跌破,下方有效支撑只有一个61,200,这是一个斐波那契黄金支撑位,但是这个位置在上一次跌破60,000的时候并未提供太好的支撑效果,经历了46天的上方盘整,希望这个位置可以给我们带来更多支撑力量。 再往下看就是60,000关键点,这个位置算不上技术支撑,但是整数关往往会激发不少买量。 很多人关心比特币所谓的底在哪,这个除非是预测未来不然谁都无法说准。如果说是我自己,比特币回归60,000下方,未来一个月如果在57,000附近出现,我就会买入,这是日线MA 200的位置,也是我心理的合适位置。 短期如果反弹,可以注意66,000附近的阻力情况,该位置之前作为支撑,现在会变成一个阻力点。 RSI:指数已经来到35点,属于一个正常偏低的数值,一旦数值来到30以下,可以根据支撑注意反弹情况如何。 #BTC走势分析 $BTC
--

Latest News

View More

Trending Articles

avatar
CoinMarketCap
View More
Sitemap
Cookie Preferences
Platform T&Cs