Binance Square
LIVE
LIVE
satoshin
--442 views
See original
Ripple Vs. SEC Update: Here's Why Today Is So Important For The Lawsuit SEC Will File Opposition To Ripple Sealing Request Court filings indicate that the Commission must file its brief opposing Ripple's motion to seal by May 20. Ripple had filed a motion on May 13 in line with the scheduling order, which set that date as the deadline for both parties to file a motion to seal any documents related to the recovery phase. Ripple had revealed in their May 13 filing that they had consulted with the SEC before making the sealing request. The crypto firm further claimed that the Commission "indicated that it approves of certain Ripple requests, but intends to oppose others." Therefore, based on the revelation, the Commission will likely approve some of Ripple's searches. One area that the Commission seems to agree with is the redaction of the names of some of the company's business partners, whose partnerships with Ripple have not been officially disclosed. However, Ripple is asking for more than that as the company seeks to seal the identities of third parties whose identities have nothing to do with the outcome of the case. Crypto companies have also requested that the court seal or redact certain documents that reflect or show Ripple's audited financial statements or other financial documents. The company stated that the documents are not public and disclosing them "would cause significant harm to the company's business interests and competitive position." Meanwhile, Ripple is also trying to seal or redact information about its secret business relationships. They argued that the redactions were “narrow” and only related to “specific financial terms and prices” that had been negotiated with its business partners. The crypto company noted that its request is similar to the proposed redactions the court granted during summary judgment.

Ripple Vs. SEC Update: Here's Why Today Is So Important For The Lawsuit

SEC Will File Opposition To Ripple Sealing Request

Court filings indicate that the Commission must file its brief opposing Ripple's motion to seal by May 20. Ripple had filed a motion on May 13 in line with the scheduling order, which set that date as the deadline for both parties to file a motion to seal any documents related to the recovery phase.

Ripple had revealed in their May 13 filing that they had consulted with the SEC before making the sealing request. The crypto firm further claimed that the Commission "indicated that it approves of certain Ripple requests, but intends to oppose others." Therefore, based on the revelation, the Commission will likely approve some of Ripple's searches.

One area that the Commission seems to agree with is the redaction of the names of some of the company's business partners, whose partnerships with Ripple have not been officially disclosed. However, Ripple is asking for more than that as the company seeks to seal the identities of third parties whose identities have nothing to do with the outcome of the case.

Crypto companies have also requested that the court seal or redact certain documents that reflect or show Ripple's audited financial statements or other financial documents. The company stated that the documents are not public and disclosing them "would cause significant harm to the company's business interests and competitive position."

Meanwhile, Ripple is also trying to seal or redact information about its secret business relationships. They argued that the redactions were “narrow” and only related to “specific financial terms and prices” that had been negotiated with its business partners. The crypto company noted that its request is similar to the proposed redactions the court granted during summary judgment.

Disclaimer: Includes thrid-party opinions. No financial advice. May include sponsored content. See T&Cs.
0
Explore the lastest crypto news
⚡️ Be a part of the latests discussions in crypto
💬 Interact with your favorite creators
👍 Enjoy content that interests you
Email / Phone number
Relevant Creator
LIVE
@Satoshin

Explore More From Creator

--
BlackRock, Grayscale, Bitwise File Updated 19B Forms in Rush for Ethereum ETF BlackRock, Grayscale and Bitwise on Wednesday filed amended 9b-4 forms with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) for their proposed spot ether exchange-traded funds (ETFs). “Neither the Trust, nor the Sponsor, nor the Ether Custodian [...] nor any other person associated with the Trust will, directly or indirectly, engage in action where any portion of the Trust’s ETH becomes subject to the Ethereum proof-of-stake validation or is used to earn additional ETH or generate income or other earnings,” the amended BlackRock filing said. Staking is the process of locking specific cryptocurrencies for a set period to help support the operation of a blockchain, in turn, for a reward. These rewards are considered mainly passive income among crypto traders. All ether ETF hopefuls have now filed their amended proposals ahead of an approval or disapproval decision expected on Thursday. Fidelity filed its amended S-1 forms earlier this week, dropping its staking plans. Later, VanEck, Franklin Templeton, Invesco Galaxy and ARK 21Shares filed similar amendments to remove staking. Hashdex is the only issuer yet to file an amendment to its Ethereum ETF. As such, the Depository Trust and Clearing Corporation (DTCC) has started listing VanEck’s Ether ETF under the ticker symbol ETHV on its site, which some take as a positive sign. On Monday, influential Bloomberg analysts Eric Balchunas and James Seyffart updated their odds of approval to 75% from the earlier 25%, causing a market-wide jump. Ether rose over 17%, while bitcoin retook the $71,000 mark for the first time since early April. Market watchers have described the move as a sudden change in tone for the SEC, which was earlier said not to be considering the approval of an ether ETF. In an interview with Unchained, Seyffart said the issue had become “political,” with the decision coming “from above, likely Biden.” #Ethereum #ETF #blakcrock #GRAYSCALE
--
Ethereum ETF Approval Could Spur 60% Rally as ETH Buying Increases Approval of spot ether (ETH) exchange-traded funds (ETF) in the U.S. could drive a rally of as much as 60% in the second-largest cryptocurrency in the coming months, QCP Capital said in a Thursday broadcast on Telegram The forecast echoes the market reaction after spot bitcoin ETFs were approved in January, the Singapore-based firm said. Bitcoin rose to over $73,000 from $42,000 in the two weeks after the ETFs started trading on Jan. 11, CoinGecko data shows. "With Friday implied volatility above 100%, the market is expecting fireworks," QCP said. "VanEck’s ETF has been listed by the DTCC. We think approval is now highly likely with trading expected as early as next week.”Implied volatility measures the market's expectation of future price fluctuations for a financial instrument. Buying activity increased on both centralized and blockchain-based crypto exchanges, on-chain analytics firm CryptoQuant said in a Wednesday report. Holders bought over 100,000 ETH in spot markets on Tuesday, the highest daily level since September 2023, as reports of a favorable decision emerged and some analysts bumped odds to over 75% from the earlier 25%. Open interest on ether-tracked futures spiked in tandem to a record $14 billion. That's 67% of bitcoin open interest as of Wednesday, an unusually high level. Activity also increased at the Chicago Mercantile Exchange, an exchange favored by institutions, with ether futures hitting a record notional $2.85 billion of trading on Tuesday, according to a spokesperson. Ether options traded a record 1,135 contracts ($216 million). “Traders seem to be getting more exposure now to ETH relative to Bitcoin,” CryptoQuant said. "The largest daily spot buying from ETH permanent holders so far in 2024." Ether prices in the coming days could be volatile after investors sent 62,000 ETH to exchanges, the most since early March, it said. "High exchange flows are typically associated with price volatility.”
--

Latest News

View More

Trending Articles

View More
Sitemap
Cookie Preferences
Platform T&Cs