Binance Square
LIVE
LIVE
Zaga
--
206 views
$BNB is having hard time to break 620 barrier even though we have launchpools Here's my Analysis : If BNB want to break ATH, Binance need to restructure Launchpool The problem about current format is the % allocation for BNB I did complained about previous 80% allocation for BNB (You can check my very first post) And Binance did listen, they increase it to 85% for BNB holders If we're calculating using USD, you're going to surprised staking FDUSD can be more beneficial in Launchpools. Staking using stable coin is safer because you aren't subject to market fluctuations Staking using BNB gives you slightly more reward, but the fluctuations after Launchpool can be harmful to your portofolio While BNB price keep increasing means barriers to entry for Launchpools also increasing. Launchpools aren't profitable for Retail Investors If somehow BNB went above 620. Staking using FDUSD generally more safer If you don't believe me go try invest 1k in both asset. And see what happen with your portofolio after Launchpool ended Launchpools actually making BNB harder to break ATH Because if BNB price kept increasing, Launchpool will be harder to enter for Retail Investors Solution to this problem : BNB should be the only coin to stake for Launchpools so we're not calculating based on USD Megadrop actually using a better format where BNB is the only coin to hold But if FDUSD is still present the allocation should be : 95% BNB 5% FDUSD Let's hope Binance listen, because they did listen to increase the reward from 80 to 85% #BinanceLaunchpool #altcoins #binance #megadrop #NotcoinLaunchpool

$BNB is having hard time to break 620 barrier even though we have launchpools

Here's my Analysis :

If BNB want to break ATH, Binance need to restructure Launchpool

The problem about current format is the % allocation for BNB

I did complained about previous 80% allocation for BNB (You can check my very first post)

And Binance did listen, they increase it to 85% for BNB holders

If we're calculating using USD, you're going to surprised staking FDUSD can be more beneficial in Launchpools. Staking using stable coin is safer because you aren't subject to market fluctuations

Staking using BNB gives you slightly more reward, but the fluctuations after Launchpool can be harmful to your portofolio

While BNB price keep increasing means barriers to entry for Launchpools also increasing. Launchpools aren't profitable for Retail Investors

If somehow BNB went above 620. Staking using FDUSD generally more safer

If you don't believe me go try invest 1k in both asset. And see what happen with your portofolio after Launchpool ended

Launchpools actually making BNB harder to break ATH

Because if BNB price kept increasing, Launchpool will be harder to enter for Retail Investors

Solution to this problem :

BNB should be the only coin to stake for Launchpools so we're not calculating based on USD

Megadrop actually using a better format where BNB is the only coin to hold

But if FDUSD is still present the allocation should be :

95% BNB

5% FDUSD

Let's hope Binance listen, because they did listen to increase the reward from 80 to 85%

#BinanceLaunchpool #altcoins #binance #megadrop #NotcoinLaunchpool

Disclaimer: Includes thrid-party opinions. No financial advice. May include sponsored content. See T&Cs.
0
Replies 1
Explore the lastest crypto news
⚡️ Be a part of the latests discussions in crypto
💬 Interact with your favorite creators
👍 Enjoy content that interests you
Email / Phone number
Relevant Creator
LIVE
@zaga_bnb

Explore More From Creator

Fundamental Analysis on $SAGA Write in front: 1) $SAGA is a horizontal technology, not a vertical technology. If I want to publish my own game, I don’t need to use SAGA. I can use the SDK to publish my own chain and use my own tokens as gas fees. 2) $DYM TIA COSMOS is a vertical technology. If I publish my own game, I need to use the data layer (DA for TIA), settlement layer (settlement for DYM), SDK (SDK for cosmos), then I use DYM, TIA and Cosmos technology is necessary. My thoughts on SAGA: 1) I think $SAGA is redundant technology. The games that have been announced on SAGA so far don’t have many followers on their official Twitter. Airdrops may not be valuable. 2) SAGA’s current circulation is 200M, with unlimited printing. This is not like a chip game, but more like a one-sided slaughterhouse. VCs stake without a vesting period and are able to sell their rewards. At current prices, VC is still profitable at nearly 18x. It was listed in April. According to calculations, VCs only need to sell rewards for one month in a row to make back their capital. 3) SAGA's current airdrop is itself, which may cause the price to drop, and requires loyalty, encouraging people to stake rather than sell. This is more of a scam, making investors an ATM. 4) There are differences within SAGA’s team. 5) Anyone can say they are an adviser to Biden, but whether to do so publicly is another matter. I don't believe in the identity of the CEO, Rebecca Liao. 6) The team established a rat position and they had no funds to protect the market. SAGA will be in shock for at least 2-3 months. Whether it will rise significantly is another matter and needs to be based on market analysis. And there are no market makers.
--

Latest News

View More

Trending Articles

View More
Sitemap
Cookie Preferences
Platform T&Cs