Binance Square
LIVE
LIVE
薛定谔的猫叔
--1k views
See original
Macroeconomics and news: Powell's speech last night was not hawkish enough, but it was not optimistic either. According to Powell's speech, we can see that he now wants to send the market an optimistic signal of future interest rate cuts - shrinking the balance sheet, so that the risk market maintains an optimistic expectation of interest rate cuts, and at the same time ensures the stability of the risk financial market, so that the US stock market, driven by technology stocks, continues to maintain a high level. At the same time, Powell continues to delay the pace of interest rate cuts under the pretext of inflationary pressure, maintaining high interest rates, leading to the strength of the US dollar and US bonds. So tomorrow's employment data, according to this idea, should be lower than the previous value and higher than expected, indicating that the employment market is still healthy and strong, but slightly cooled. If the data meets my expectations, then we can basically judge what the United States is doing now. This is also a topic I will expand on later. First of all, it is still the same point of view. Whether the Fed can achieve a soft landing is unknown, but through GDP, inflation, employment, and financial markets, the greatest possibility of a soft landing can be released to the outside world. That is, GDP is growing positively, the economy is not overheated, and the data has declined, which belongs to a healthy growth state. Inflation can be controlled, whether there is pressure or not, as long as it can be controlled, this is the key point. The employment data is healthy and the data can be weakened, but it still needs to be positive, which is also to respond to the stable sentiment that inflation is controllable, the financial market is stable, and there will be no stampede and rapid decline. If these elements are gathered together, it can directly send a signal to the world that the US economy can land softly. Regardless of whether we are new or not, it will land softly, but with this set of data, many narratives and actions can be made. So from this point of view, I am not optimistic about this year's interest rate cut. Comprehensively considering the current situation in the United States, the risk of interest rate cuts is greater than the current state of maintaining high interest rates. It is the same as the risk market. If there is no interest rate cut, I can cover up many things with data, but once the interest rate is cut, the economic risks will be magnified and the data cannot be covered up. At the same time, in order to enhance the economic situation in the United States, it is inevitable for the Federal Reserve to keep the dollar and US bonds strong. As a capital economy country, the United States has basically filled its entire economic lifeline with half of the world's financial derivatives, so there is no doubt that it has a stronger grasp of bubbles. I have said a point before that, in theory, any economy will create bubbles by continuously issuing bonds and currencies, and then using currencies to buy bonds. The resulting inflation will then be directly left to society to digest, and the central bank will conduct certain adjustments. The United States has used this method to create the world's largest bubble, and in the future, the inflationary pressure brought about by this big bubble will be borne by the world together, especially countries with US dollar assets. I am not only not optimistic about the interest rate cut, but also about the economic situation after the interest rate cut. I may be pessimistic and think that in the future we will face a stage of global hyperinflation after the Fed cuts interest rates, and global central banks will work together to fight inflation, suppress it, and regulate it. The theme I will talk about recently is, in the face of future hyperinflation, how can we resist inflation? At present, investment in cryptocurrency is an effective option, but it is not the best option, and it is still unclear. #大盘走势

Macroeconomics and news:

Powell's speech last night was not hawkish enough, but it was not optimistic either. According to Powell's speech, we can see that he now wants to send the market an optimistic signal of future interest rate cuts - shrinking the balance sheet, so that the risk market maintains an optimistic expectation of interest rate cuts, and at the same time ensures the stability of the risk financial market, so that the US stock market, driven by technology stocks, continues to maintain a high level. At the same time, Powell continues to delay the pace of interest rate cuts under the pretext of inflationary pressure, maintaining high interest rates, leading to the strength of the US dollar and US bonds.

So tomorrow's employment data, according to this idea, should be lower than the previous value and higher than expected, indicating that the employment market is still healthy and strong, but slightly cooled.

If the data meets my expectations, then we can basically judge what the United States is doing now. This is also a topic I will expand on later.

First of all, it is still the same point of view. Whether the Fed can achieve a soft landing is unknown, but through GDP, inflation, employment, and financial markets, the greatest possibility of a soft landing can be released to the outside world.

That is, GDP is growing positively, the economy is not overheated, and the data has declined, which belongs to a healthy growth state. Inflation can be controlled, whether there is pressure or not, as long as it can be controlled, this is the key point. The employment data is healthy and the data can be weakened, but it still needs to be positive, which is also to respond to the stable sentiment that inflation is controllable, the financial market is stable, and there will be no stampede and rapid decline. If these elements are gathered together, it can directly send a signal to the world that the US economy can land softly. Regardless of whether we are new or not, it will land softly, but with this set of data, many narratives and actions can be made.

So from this point of view, I am not optimistic about this year's interest rate cut. Comprehensively considering the current situation in the United States, the risk of interest rate cuts is greater than the current state of maintaining high interest rates. It is the same as the risk market. If there is no interest rate cut, I can cover up many things with data, but once the interest rate is cut, the economic risks will be magnified and the data cannot be covered up. At the same time, in order to enhance the economic situation in the United States, it is inevitable for the Federal Reserve to keep the dollar and US bonds strong.

As a capital economy country, the United States has basically filled its entire economic lifeline with half of the world's financial derivatives, so there is no doubt that it has a stronger grasp of bubbles. I have said a point before that, in theory, any economy will create bubbles by continuously issuing bonds and currencies, and then using currencies to buy bonds. The resulting inflation will then be directly left to society to digest, and the central bank will conduct certain adjustments. The United States has used this method to create the world's largest bubble, and in the future, the inflationary pressure brought about by this big bubble will be borne by the world together, especially countries with US dollar assets.

I am not only not optimistic about the interest rate cut, but also about the economic situation after the interest rate cut. I may be pessimistic and think that in the future we will face a stage of global hyperinflation after the Fed cuts interest rates, and global central banks will work together to fight inflation, suppress it, and regulate it. The theme I will talk about recently is, in the face of future hyperinflation, how can we resist inflation?

At present, investment in cryptocurrency is an effective option, but it is not the best option, and it is still unclear.

#大盘走势

LIVE
薛定谔的猫叔
--
Let the data speak: rebound and shrinkage, is it a mood improvement or a technical rebound?

As Bitcoin hit 56,000, it rebounded to 60,000 twice in just one day, and failed to break through and stabilize.

Today, the overall state of the market is shrinking in rebound, and shrinking in short-term rebound in decline, which basically means that the short-term short-term trend is weakening and the market is gradually optimistic. However, if an effective breakthrough cannot be made, it can also be regarded as a technical rebound, that is, an invalid rebound.

With the overall rebound of the market, the power of the altcoin market, which is still intimidated by Bitcoin, has exploded today. The proportion of altcoins increased by 0.68% in a single day, and the proportion of altcoins sucked the blood of Bitcoin, Ethereum and stablecoins. Of course, this is not difficult to understand. Some time ago, Bitcoin fell slightly, and the altcoins fell on a large scale, which led to the oversold rebound of this decline. Basically, the altcoins fell in advance, and they broke out in this rebound with a good rebound effect.

However, judging from the trading volume, the overall trading volume has declined slightly. In the market of falling rebound, once the trading volume is reduced, although it represents the weakening of short-selling power in the short term and the improvement of market sentiment, once there is no substantial breakthrough to stimulate the increase in volume, it is basically an invalid rebound of technical rebound. This needs special attention.

In terms of funds, the on-site fund retention increased by 300 million, and the optimistic mainstream stable currency USDT returned to the net inflow state again, but the US funds were still in the state of net outflow, with a net outflow of 3 million US dollars per day. A small part of the increase in on-site funds belongs to the inflow of other stable currencies, and more of the funds are retained in the market after the settlement of on-site transactions.

After the two-way outflow of funds from Asia and the United States, the Asian market has suspended net outflows, which is a good thing, but the continuous outflow of the United States itself still means that the market sentiment is not optimistic enough.

If the key resistance level cannot be broken, then this rebound is basically still a technical rebound, because the sentiment of funds does not look good.
#大盘走势
Disclaimer: Includes thrid-party opinions. No financial advice. May include sponsored content. See T&Cs.
0
Quote 1
Explore the lastest crypto news
⚡️ Be a part of the latests discussions in crypto
💬 Interact with your favorite creators
👍 Enjoy content that interests you
Email / Phone number
Relevant Creator

Explore More From Creator

--
6月21日,XLK可能将进行240亿美金的持仓交割,涉及 苹果 $AAPL 英伟达 $NVDA 市值之争。 XLK:科技精选板块指数ETF 根据 James与Eric的推文了解到,下周五6月21日,XLK可能将会对 苹果与英伟达股票持仓进行换仓,涉及总金额达240亿美金,这次换仓可能给短期英伟达与苹果的市值之争带来助推效果。 本次换仓平衡,XLK要以当前 $AAPL 价格 出售126亿美元,并且同一时间购买 价值109亿美元的 $NVDA 。 根据系列推文中可以了解到,XLK每隔一段时间将会对排名前三的股票进行权重评估后调增其自身仓位。 在本周五美股收盘阶段,英伟达自由流通市值小胜苹果,获得权重加持,而苹果惨遭第三名待遇,权重被削弱。 在XLK排名前三中,第二名权重可以达20%以上,而第三名只有5%,所以失败的第三,将会被大量减持,而坚持后的资金将会被增持排名第二的股票。 很多人会疑问,明明周五美股收盘,苹果市值大于英伟达,为何排名落后!? 这里涉及到一个自由流通市值的数据, 自由流通:是进行调整后的流通市值,该数据是排除了持有比例较高门槛的长期持有者(例如政府,机构,创始人以及战略投资人)等。自由流通市值是去掉了这些长期的holder之后的数据。 而XLK的排名是根据自由流通数值得来,其中在自由流通上英伟达险胜苹果,所以苹果在下周五将会遭遇XLK减持。 不过该动作后续需要S&P(标普) /SPDR (XLK发行公司)的确认。 #NVDA #AAPL $BTC
--

Latest News

View More

Trending Articles

avatar
Coinpedia
View More
Sitemap
Cookie Preferences
Platform T&Cs