BN can open the market of any track, such as inscriptions ordi and sats.

But BN cannot violate objective laws: that is, the target must be bought by someone, and it is best to have a steady stream of funds to buy

The reason why BN can be opened is that there are a lot of users on Binance. Where there are people, there is speculation, and where there is speculation, there is buying.

But the characteristics of speculative buying are: it must rise and must be fast

BN launched not, and it quickly rose several times after it was launched. The funds consumed are extremely high. I randomly estimated that a data should be more than 30 million US dollars. I don’t think that TG’s small game project, including the cat-stroking and other games that are likely to be launched next, can have this strength.

After not rose, this wave of small game ecology was opened. For exchanges, pulling the market and listing coins are all for attracting new users. Not’s new user data should be very good, and dogs is uncertain, but it should be worse. After all, there are more and more repeat users later.

Now looking at the trend of not after the rise, it is basically from the high point all the way down, and the dealer slowly ships to recover the cost.

Not started from 500 million and raised to 2.8 billion, 6 times.

Now dogs is about 600 million. The speculative funds mentioned above (basically Binance's new users, mainly stupid money) are closely observing whether to enter the market and when to enter the market.

But can dogs reproduce the grand occasion of dwf's 6-fold increase? I think it's difficult.

In this circle, basically everyone is eagerly looking forward to the increase, which makes it difficult to do - there are always bad things when there are many people. Not actually had very few people who dared to go up at that time. After all, it was just a white paper on a piece of paper. If you had a brain, you would definitely not dare to go up, especially when the distribution of chips was not clear.