If the market wants to rise, it is not by small leeks. Even if small leeks take over, the price cannot be pushed up. If a market environment relies on small leeks to take over, then there is really no difference from local dogs. Only the funds of larger players and institutions entering the market can better promote the rise of prices!
Why can this market achieve continuous rise? Or is it because the market has a constant flow of fresh blood to early players to take over? To borrow a sentence I saw yesterday: the burning U.S. stocks and the secretive Federal Reserve are like boys and girls who are more than friends but less than lovers, shyly testing each other, and no one dares to take that step. It was the U.S. stocks that took the lead and broke the window paper. Once it was broken, the Federal Reserve would not have to hide it. The two young and white bodies rolled together.
Is it possible that the decline of the U.S. stock market is to force the Federal Reserve to cut interest rates quickly, and to consider the release of water to save the market in the future? It's really hard to say. Anyway, there is a saying that the US stock market will definitely collapse if the Fed cuts interest rates. In fact, this is not absolute. There are two types of interest rate cuts: recessionary interest rate cuts and defensive interest rate cuts.
Graham said: The core of value investing is research. The core of research is to obtain maximum returns under the premise of ensuring the safety of the principal. The core of value investing is: good target + good price + good timing!
