Someone has burned a lot of ordinarys for mint $cook, and made a mistake while busy. It is recommended that when introducing new things, the tutorial author should add safety tips such as using a new wallet as much as possible. It should be standard like no FA.

Many people in the market can't tell which rune is which, because the huge profit-driven devs want to grab the original runes "fast and well", but at present, whether it is ordinary wallet's or this time's $cook, They all ended up in a hasty start and a mess of feathers. I think it would be nice to wait for the protocol team to develop the runes protocol, and then develop the market or other infrastructure around runes, right?

Generally speaking, I refuse to comment on most projects that are impatient in the community and then fork the code to gain market popularity. The runes launched by OW that night charge high commissions. This time $cook will charge 4999 green onions. They are all suspected of sickening behavior. You are crazy about moneyđŸ€Š

I specifically asked about the development progress of runes last night. Runes from Ordinals will be available on the test network at the end of December. In my opinion, all previous runes are imitations and often have pitfalls. It really depends on the user's mood. Generally speaking, self-defense is enough.