Binance Square
LIVE
LIVE
ENSIGN TRADING
--1.2k views
查看原文
⭐微軟宣佈將於 7 月推出自己的移動遊戲商店。 通過在網絡上而不是應用程序上推出商店,微軟將提供一種替代方法,以取代蘋果和谷歌,後者收取 30% 的銷售額佣金。 雖然歐盟的數字營銷法案 (DMA) 迫使蘋果和谷歌開放其移動應用商店,但微軟正尋求在美國和歐盟以外爲這兩家公司提供替代方案。

⭐微軟宣佈將於 7 月推出自己的移動遊戲商店。

通過在網絡上而不是應用程序上推出商店,微軟將提供一種替代方法,以取代蘋果和谷歌,後者收取 30% 的銷售額佣金。

雖然歐盟的數字營銷法案 (DMA) 迫使蘋果和谷歌開放其移動應用商店,但微軟正尋求在美國和歐盟以外爲這兩家公司提供替代方案。

免責聲明:包含來自第三方的見解。非財務建議。可能包含贊助內容。 請參閱條款。
0
探索最新的加密貨幣新聞
⚡️ 參與加密貨幣領域的最新討論
💬 與您喜愛的創作者互動
👍 享受您感興趣的內容
電子郵件 / 電話號碼
相關創作者
LIVE
@ENSIGNTRADING

創作者的更多內容

--
What Is the Scaling Problem? The scaling problem refers to the limitations of a blockchain’s transaction throughput, which ultimately affect the speed and costs of transactions. The scaling problem is tied to how a decentralized network handles blocks of transactions, which depend on factors such as its block size and block time, which is the time it takes to create a new block. This problem became evident after users of Bitcoin, the first blockchain network, experienced delays in transaction settlements and increases in fees whenever usage of the network spikes. In 2015, the Bitcoin blockchain limited its block size to one megabyte (MB), which was later increased to 2 MB. While the increase in block size slightly alleviated Bitcoin’s scaling problem, many developers cautioned against the types of changes that could potentially make the protocol centralized. This is because every transaction carries data, which means that more transactions also means more data per block, which would ultimately result in requiring miners to have massive disk spaces in order to store a copy of the full Bitcoin blockchain. The Bitcoin community ended up deciding against greatly increasing block size, as it traded decentralization for scalability, which was considered the wrong approach by many. Therefore, solving the scaling problem has become an uphill task, taking years of time and effort. The scaling problem is exacerbated by the fact that scaling a blockchain network requires proper consensus and coordination between the different parties involved such as the developers, miners and community. However, months of moving back and forth between these groups can still end in disagreements. In such a case, the process may lead to a hard fork where one team activates the upgrade and branches off the main network. While unscaled blockchains can stay as they are, they will face detrimental consequences like a continuous decrease of transaction speed and increase in costs, as well users leaving for a more scalable network.
--

實時新聞

查看更多

熱門文章

查看更多
網站地圖
Cookie Preferences
平台條款