Binance Square
LIVE
LIVE
ENSIGN TRADING
--252 views
查看原文
Btc LTF 图表更新 Btc 触及 72k 并向 69k(2021 年 ATH)进行了健康修正,这为 PA 提供了支持并使其反弹。由于资金已重置,预计明天将继续看涨势头。由于 ETH ETF 的决定,今天的市场将继续波动。 无论 ETF 是否获得批准或延迟,BTC 都不应在每日蜡烛收盘价中损失 69k。如果 btc 设法保持在 69k 以上,我们将在 2024 年 6 月 7 日之前看到 80k。 今天不要使用杠杆,远离灯芯。#DontFade #BTC☀

Btc LTF 图表更新

Btc 触及 72k 并向 69k(2021 年 ATH)进行了健康修正,这为 PA 提供了支持并使其反弹。由于资金已重置,预计明天将继续看涨势头。由于 ETH ETF 的决定,今天的市场将继续波动。

无论 ETF 是否获得批准或延迟,BTC 都不应在每日蜡烛收盘价中损失 69k。如果 btc 设法保持在 69k 以上,我们将在 2024 年 6 月 7 日之前看到 80k。

今天不要使用杠杆,远离灯芯。#DontFade #BTC☀

免责声明:含第三方内容,不构成财务建议,并且可能包含赞助内容。 详见《条款和条件》。
0
浏览最新的加密货币新闻
⚡️ 参与加密货币领域的最新讨论
💬 与喜爱的创作者互动
👍 查看感兴趣的内容
邮箱/手机号码
相关创作者
LIVE
@ENSIGNTRADING

创作者的更多内容

--
What Is the Scaling Problem? The scaling problem refers to the limitations of a blockchain’s transaction throughput, which ultimately affect the speed and costs of transactions. The scaling problem is tied to how a decentralized network handles blocks of transactions, which depend on factors such as its block size and block time, which is the time it takes to create a new block. This problem became evident after users of Bitcoin, the first blockchain network, experienced delays in transaction settlements and increases in fees whenever usage of the network spikes. In 2015, the Bitcoin blockchain limited its block size to one megabyte (MB), which was later increased to 2 MB. While the increase in block size slightly alleviated Bitcoin’s scaling problem, many developers cautioned against the types of changes that could potentially make the protocol centralized. This is because every transaction carries data, which means that more transactions also means more data per block, which would ultimately result in requiring miners to have massive disk spaces in order to store a copy of the full Bitcoin blockchain. The Bitcoin community ended up deciding against greatly increasing block size, as it traded decentralization for scalability, which was considered the wrong approach by many. Therefore, solving the scaling problem has become an uphill task, taking years of time and effort. The scaling problem is exacerbated by the fact that scaling a blockchain network requires proper consensus and coordination between the different parties involved such as the developers, miners and community. However, months of moving back and forth between these groups can still end in disagreements. In such a case, the process may lead to a hard fork where one team activates the upgrade and branches off the main network. While unscaled blockchains can stay as they are, they will face detrimental consequences like a continuous decrease of transaction speed and increase in costs, as well users leaving for a more scalable network.
--

热门文章

查看更多
网站地图
Cookie Preferences
平台条款和条件