Binance Square
LIVE
LIVE
crчptσ khασs
Boğa
--465 views
Orijinali görüntüle
#BNBToTheMoon! $BNB : $1200 Yükleniyor.. @CZ

#BNBToTheMoon! $BNB : $1200 Yükleniyor.. @CZ

LIVE
crчptσ khασs
--
Boğa
Çılgın Boğa Koşusu Başladığında. ..🚀

Bunu ilk başlatan BNB olacak..

O gün Cz'nin bile Bnb Satın Alma İmkanı Olmayacak..

Çünkü bu kalkan bir tren değil. bir roket olacak.

1BNB = 1200$ ♥️♥️
#BNB #BTC #Binance #dyor #ETH
Sorumluluk Reddi: Üçüncü tarafların görüşlerini/fikirlerini içerir. Yatırım tavsiyesi değildir. Hüküm ve Koşullar'a bakın.
0
Size Özel İçerikleri Keşfedin
100 USDT değerinde ödül kazanma şansını yakalamak için hemen kaydolun!
veya
Kurum olarak kaydolun
veya
Giriş Yap
İlgili İçerik Üretici

İçerik Üreticisinden Daha Fazla İçerik Keşfedin

--
Vitalik Buterin Reveals How to Make Ethereum More Decentralized. Vitalik Buterin, Ethereum's creator, has always looked for ways to make the network more decentralized. A recent study by Toni Wahrstätter expands on Bute rin's ideas about changing how Ethereum rewards its validators to support this goal. The study focuses on what is called "anti- correlation penalties." Right now, large groups that run many Ethereum validators can save on costs, which tends to pull the network toward a few big players. But if many validators controlled by one operator fail at the same time, it can be a risk for the whole network. This is where the new idea comes in: if validators run by the same operator often fail together, they could get a penalty, which would encourage more diverse and independent validators. In a nutshell, if more validators miss their chance to confirm transactions (attestations) than usual, they could get a penalty. This would help keep Ethereum decentralized, making it less likely that one big validator has too much control. Wahrstätter's analysis looks at data from over 40 days, which includes around 9.3 billion validator activities. The research imagines applying Vitalik's proposed formula to this data to see what would change. For staking operators - the entities running the validators - the effects would vary by size. Large operators might face higher penalties under the new system, while smaller operators could benefit. This fits with the idea that the penalties would discourage large-scale centralization. Interestingly, a category with unidentified validators, possibly solo stakers, also showed up, hinting at the diversity of the network. The analysis also considered different software clients used by validators. The idea was that if validators using the same software fail together, they might face higher penalties. The findings were subtle, showing small changes for different clients, suggesting that the software is reliable. #SHIB #CATEX #CATEXListing #sui #FET $USDC $SHIB $SOL
--

Öne Çıkan Makaleler

Daha fazlasını görüntüle
Site haritası
Cookie Preferences
Platform Hüküm ve Koşulları