Why do people insist on chasing technology-led coins and call them value coins? And they also include projects like MERL that are technology-free and are just for profit. I summarize the following points to share with you:

First, technology without ecology and community is worthless. Only coins with community consensus can talk about "value", so high-quality#MEMEis the real value coin.

Second, it is a basic consensus that institutions and project parties conspire to cut retail investors' leeks. Institutional investment does not mean that the project is high-quality.

Third, private equity valuations are inflated. The actual investment costs of many institutions are not as high as claimed. This is an open secret in the industry.

Fourth, the more retail investors and KOLs who don't understand technology, the more they tend to FOMO technology projects, and they will also make up a lot of so-called beautiful prospects in their minds. This is the source of losses.

Fifth, projects led by purely technical personnel need to be cautious. BTC and ETH both have deep humanities foundations in finance, economics, law, etc., and technology is only a means of implementation.

Sixth, there must be a complete and systematic research system for Web3. If not, learn and follow more.#美国6月CPI大幅降温 #美联储何时降息？ #币安7周年 #BTC下跌分析