MDark Tanssi Network

𝕃𝕠𝕠𝕜𝕚𝕟𝕘 𝔹𝕒𝕔𝕜 𝕒𝕥 𝕋𝕖𝕤𝕥𝕟𝕖𝕥 𝕊𝟙/𝕊𝟚 𝕧𝕤. 𝕥𝕙𝕖 𝕃𝔽𝔻𝟛 𝕄𝕒𝕚𝕟𝕟𝕖𝕥 𝕃𝕒𝕦𝕟𝕔𝕙 - 𝔸 ℂ𝕠𝕞𝕡𝕝𝕖𝕥𝕖𝕝𝕪 𝔻𝕚𝕗𝕗𝕖𝕣𝕖𝕟𝕥 𝕋𝕒𝕟𝕤𝕤𝕚 𝔼𝕩𝕡𝕖𝕣𝕚𝕖𝕟𝕔𝕖
Having participated from Season 1, Season 2, all the way to the LFD3 mainnet launch on Dec 3(general access opened today), I can genuinely feel how much the entire system has “grown up” not just technically but also in terms of user experience.

1. The biggest shift: From simulated testnet → real mainnet
In S1/S2, most quests were simulated actions: testnet transactions, wallet setups, basic interactions…
But with LFD3, everything finally feels real:
- Completing actual on-chain actions like staking, bridging, opening vaults, claiming…
- No more “testnet farming for fun” now it feels like participating in a real, functioning network.
2. One dashboard → multiple sovereign L1s
What surprised me the most was how smooth the multi-chain experience is.
Testnet S1/S2 only supported a few simulated environments.
But LFD3 gives you:
- The ability to interact with multiple sovereign L1s from a single dashboard.
- Fast switching, fast confirmations, no break in workflow.
It’s honestly the first time I’ve seen sovereign L1 interactions feel this seamless.

3. UI/UX: cleaner, smoother, and more gamified
If you ever complained about the S1/S2 interface (laggy, slow loading…), LFD3 is a massive upgrade:
- A clean, focused layout that makes actions easy.
- Streaks, spins, NFTs, referrals feel more polished and engaging.
- The whole experience feels more like exploring a living “EcoCity” than completing a static quest board.
This game-like vibe makes the whole thing surprisingly addictive.

4. Expectations for EcoCity as more sovereign L1s go live
What excites me the most:
LFD3 is only the beginning.
As more sovereign L1s get deployed on Tanssi:
- EcoCity could evolve into a true cross-L1 interaction hub.
- Users can learn, test, bridge, and earn across multiple chains from one place.
- It may even become a core liquidity and activity center for the entire ecosystem.
If S1/S2 were the playground, LFD3 is the gateway into the real blockchain city.

🎯 In short:
LFD3 mainnet feels like “living inside the Tanssi ecosystem” not a simulation, but something fully operational.
And I’m convinced this is just the first chapter, especially once new sovereign L1s start appearing.
If you joined S1/S2, you’ll definitely feel the leap forward.
If you haven’t, now is probably the best time to step into EcoCity before it becomes a true blockchain metropolis.
@Tanssi $TANSSI

Over the past few years, we’ve seen a major shift in how blockchain infrastructure is being designed. The industry is moving away from the “many apps on one shared chain” model toward sovereign Layer-1s and appchains. Tanssi is one of the clearest examples of this transition and the fact that companies like Wirex, along with broader signals from large tech players such as Google, are exploring sovereign L1 architectures is not hype. It’s a strategic necessity.
Ecosystem growth that reflects real demand
What stands out to me most about Tanssi is that its momentum is backed by real usage, not just promises. During its testnet phase, Tanssi processed over 57 million transactions, with more than 18,000 appchains registered and 3,000+ active appchains going live as mainnet approached.
These numbers clearly show a growing demand from teams that need predictable performance, stable fees, and deep customization. More importantly, it signals that companies no longer want to build mission-critical products on shared blockchains where congestion, fee spikes, and governance decisions are completely out of their control.
Why are companies choosing sovereign L1s?
1. Full control over UX and fees
On public shared chains, user experience is at the mercy of network traffic. Gas fees fluctuate wildly, confirmation times vary, and apps compete for block space. With a sovereign L1 built on Tanssi, teams can design their own fee models, execution environments, and performance guarantees. This results in smoother UX and predictable costs especially critical for payment and financial applications.
2. Governance and compliance by design
For large companies, governance and regulatory compliance are not optional. Sovereign L1s allow teams to embed compliance rules such as KYC, AML, auditability, or permissioned logic directly into the chain itself. Upgrades, parameter changes, and governance decisions are controlled internally or by a defined community, rather than being dependent on the roadmap of a shared Layer-1.
3. Faster deployment and lower operational overhead
Wirex plans to process over $20 billion in transactions annually on its dedicated appchain. Building a chain from scratch would be expensive and slow. Tanssi provides ready-to-deploy infrastructure, validator orchestration, and operational tooling, allowing teams to launch faster while reducing long-term costs and risk.
This trend goes beyond fintech
While fintech companies like Wirex are early adopters, this model is spreading quickly. Gaming platforms, real-world asset tokenization projects, and global payment systems are increasingly choosing sovereign L1s to support hundreds of thousands or millions of users without compromising performance or governance. Tanssi’s growing ecosystem reflects this broader shift toward application-specific blockchains.
My personal takeaway
Sovereign L1s are no longer a future concept they’re happening right now. As Web3 applications mature, control over UX, fees, and governance becomes non-negotiable. Platforms like Tanssi give companies the ability to scale with confidence, adapt quickly, and build products that feel reliable to everyday users.
If you’re building at the edge of Web3, this is the moment to think differently and sovereign L1s may be the foundation that defines the next phase of blockchain adoption 🚀
@Tanssi $TANSSI

The more I work with appchains, the more I realize one thing: the sequencer is the real “power bottleneck” of blockchain infrastructure. Most centralized sequencer models are optimized for speed, but they always come with predictable risks single-point-of-failure, potential censorship, unpredictable fees, and, most importantly, dependency on a single operator.

What caught my attention about Tanssi is that they don’t just “decentralize a sequencer.” They turn sequencing into a competitive, rotating, stake-secured infrastructure service that is automatically provisioned for each sovereign L1. That’s a big shift compared to traditional centralized models.
1. 𝑴𝒚 𝒑𝒆𝒓𝒔𝒐𝒏𝒂𝒍 𝒆𝒙𝒑𝒆𝒓𝒊𝒆𝒏𝒄𝒆 𝒆𝒗𝒂𝒍𝒖𝒂𝒕𝒊𝒏𝒈 𝑻𝒂𝒏𝒔𝒔𝒊’𝒔 𝒂𝒓𝒄𝒉𝒊𝒕𝒆𝒄𝒕𝒖𝒓𝒆.
Digging deeper into the system, three things stood out:

(1) Permissionless sequencer pool with continuous rotation
Any operator that meets requirements can join the pool, and each appchain gets a rotating set of sequencers per epoch. In practice, this significantly reduces the risk of “one node fails → chain halts,” because there’s always redundancy to keep liveness healthy.
(2) Clear deterministic execution
Transaction ordering is signed and committed by a group of sequencers, making execution deterministic. When testing an appchain, the most noticeable impact was the absence of the small, annoying rollbacks that often happen when a centralized sequencer glitches.
(3) Fast and stable finality
Sub-3-second block times and near-instant finality at the appchain layer make a huge difference. This translates directly into smoother UX for payments, trading, onboarding, and especially enterprise use cases that require immediate finality.

2. 𝑭𝒆𝒆 𝒑𝒓𝒆𝒅𝒊𝒄𝒕𝒂𝒃𝒊𝒍𝒊𝒕𝒚 𝒔𝒐𝒎𝒆𝒕𝒉𝒊𝒏𝒈 𝒕𝒆𝒂𝒎𝒔 𝒐𝒇𝒕𝒆𝒏 𝒖𝒏𝒅𝒆𝒓𝒆𝒔𝒕𝒊𝒎𝒂𝒕𝒆.

One thing I appreciate in Tanssi is predictable fees.
Centralized sequencers rarely excel here because maximizing MEV or priority fees aligns with their economic incentives.
In Tanssi’s model, sequencing is competitive and each appchain can define its own fee policy. This gives businesses and dApps much more stable cost expectations.
For real product development, this is a massive advantage.
3. 𝑾𝒉𝒚 𝑰 𝒃𝒆𝒍𝒊𝒆𝒗𝒆 𝑻𝒂𝒏𝒔𝒔𝒊 𝒐𝒖𝒕𝒑𝒆𝒓𝒇𝒐𝒓𝒎𝒔 𝒄𝒆𝒏𝒕𝒓𝒂𝒍𝒊𝒛𝒆𝒅 𝒔𝒆𝒒𝒖𝒆𝒏𝒄𝒆𝒓 𝒎𝒐𝒅𝒆𝒍𝒔.
Centralized sequencers great for MVPs, risky for long-term systems
Pros: low latency, easy setup, simple operations.
Cons (which I’ve faced many times):
- one operator failure → chain outage,
- higher risk of censorship or transaction favoritism,
- unpredictable fee spikes,
- weak economic incentives for good behavior,
- hard to build trust for financial or enterprise ecosystems.

Tanssi’s decentralized sequencer pool ideal for teams needing true sovereignty.
From my perspective, Tanssi provides a balanced blend of sovereignty and performance:
- no single point of failure,
- staking + slashing reduce bad behavior,
- rotation reduces collusion and censorship risk,
- stable sub-3-second block times + fast finality,
- predictable fee structures,
- fully provisioned infra (RPC, indexer, DA, etc.) out of the box.
Yes, coordination among multiple sequencers introduces some complexity. But to me, this is the right trade-off for teams building for durability, not just for a demo.

𝑴𝒚 𝒄𝒐𝒏𝒄𝒍𝒖𝒔𝒊𝒐𝒏
If you’re deciding between:
- using a centralized sequencer to move fast,
- or running your entire stack for sovereignty,
Tanssi feels like a smart middle ground:
- you keep sovereignty,
- you don’t carry all the infrastructure risk,
- and you get true decentralized sequencing something I believe will become an industry standard in the next few years.
If I were a CTO or founder preparing to launch an appchain, I’d start with a small pilot to measure latency, finality, and fee stability. But based on everything I’ve seen so far, Tanssi’s decentralized sequencing model is setting a new benchmark worth watching closely.
@Tanssi $TANSSI

Top 3 Cryptocurrencies Under 1 USD in April 2024
SHIB
Shiba Inu (SHIB) is one of the most popular cryptocurrencies on the market. Furthermore, analysts at CoinCodex predict the dog-themed cryptocurrency will hit a new all-time high in April. According to the platform, SHIB could clear zero and rise to $0.0001 on April 21, 2024. Changelly also paints a bullish picture for SHIB, predicting a price of $0.00009 on the 21st April 2024.