Binance Square
Square-Creator-d5c14ef07
Following
Followers
Liked
Shared
All Content
--
Bullish
#Bome #shitcoin. if Bitcoin reach 73k+ and bome is below 0.018, base on my observation will consider Bome a shit coin. below are my justification . 1, Any coin that has higher dumping percentage compare to the pumping percentage is a shit coin, because the coin is doomed to be valueless. I invite you to take a look at April lowest price of pepe and bome u will get my point . Pepe lowest April's price is 0.00000389 and now it's 0.00001111 while Bome lowest April's price is 0.007100 and now it's 0.012000. you can do the mathematics and tell me what you think . 2, Any coin that cannot move upward after retrace or correction will hardly generate liquidity to the exchange and liquidity is needed for continuous support of individual coins. Bome has very low or no liquidity as we can see in the chart. 3, if #bome does not reach 0.018 when Bitcoin reaches 73k+ , binance might have a rethink of delisting it. we all know what happened to FTX . Bome raise 1 billion dollars as 24 hrs $vol during the month of it's listing. go and check the current 24 hrs volume and tell me what happened. 4, I don't know who is doing the manipulation but I wait as have high expectations on Bome and believe it will deliver
#Bome #shitcoin. if Bitcoin reach 73k+ and bome is below 0.018, base on my observation will consider Bome a shit coin.
below are my justification .

1, Any coin that has higher dumping percentage compare to the pumping percentage is a shit coin, because the coin is doomed to be valueless. I invite you to take a look at April lowest price of pepe and bome u will get my point . Pepe lowest April's price is 0.00000389 and now it's 0.00001111 while Bome lowest April's price is 0.007100 and now it's 0.012000. you can do the mathematics and tell me what you think .

2, Any coin that cannot move upward after retrace or correction will hardly generate liquidity to the exchange and liquidity is needed for continuous support of individual coins. Bome has very low or no liquidity as we can see in the chart.

3, if #bome does not reach 0.018 when Bitcoin reaches 73k+ , binance might have a rethink of delisting it. we all know what happened to FTX . Bome raise 1 billion dollars as 24 hrs $vol during the month of it's listing. go and check the current 24 hrs volume and tell me what happened.

4, I don't know who is doing the manipulation but I wait as have high expectations on Bome and believe it will deliver
reshare , very useful
reshare , very useful
Crypto PM
--
Here're 5 Things That Big Players Hide From You, But You Need To Know To Make Money In Crypto
Only 1% actually makes money in crypto, while the rest lose money to whales and VCs.
Just a few principles distinguish winners from losers.
Here're 5 things that big players hide from u, but u need to know to make money in crypto 🧵👇

Before I begin, I have a favor to ask...
I spent a lot of time writing this thread, trying to make it genuinely useful for you, so if it's not too much trouble, please SAVE it, REPOST, leave a comment, or simply hit like 🤍
➮ Crypto is far from a fair game, and 99% of crypto investors/traders will just become exit liquidity for leading major players/whales
How to avoid it? Study the crypto market principals
Here are 5 principles that whales/insiders don't want you to know:
1/➮ DeFi protocols don't need a token
✧ Most projects have the following token model: facilitates governance division or boosts liquidity and supports the development of a 2ndry market
✧ Ideally, this is the case, but in reality, many projects end up creating a token just so the team can profit from it.
So how to avoid such projects?

➮ Here are a few things you should make sure of before buying a project's token:
1. Price increase corresponds with user growth
2. Addresses a market demand
3. Edge over similar protocols
4. Serves a purpose beyond profits for holders
This is what a good project should have
2/➮ Many projects are nothing
✧ In crypto, there are thousands of projects, and obviously, not all of them are truly useful.
✧ Many have a beautiful cover with incredible plans/roadmaps that will never happen.
So, how do you distinguish a facade from a truly good project?

➮ Here are a few things you should ask urself before buying a project's token:
1. Is the team real and who are these people, what experience do they have?
2. Who backed the project?
3. Is their valuation reasonable and what problems does the project solve?
3/➮ VCs make money by investing in private sale rounds
✧ Always keep in mind that VCs make their money by investing early in token seed and private sale rounds.
✧ You might think u're entering at a low price, but VCs entered at price 20x lower
Let me explain 👇

➮ Private and seed rounds are an integral part of any project that helps it get off the ground and start developing its product
✧ What's bad? This can create large selling zones when investors begin to dump their bags & most will become exit liquidity.
So how to avoid this?
➮ Here are a few things you should check before buying a project's token:
1. Unlocking Events
2. Tokens allocations
3. Vesting Schedule
Always monitor the unlock dates before investing
4/➮ Whales do opposite of the market
✧ Everyone has heard "Buy the fear and sell the greed", but few manage to do so
✧ This is what whales do; they build their positions while everyone is selling in panic and fear, and accordingly, they take profits when greed sets in.

➮ Thanks to such a rule, whales manage to accumulate positions during the dip and sell at the ATH.
✧ They simply understand the basic people psychology that governs the market.
Here's the rough pattern:

5/➮ APR is designed to boost liquidity
✧ Let's take the real world as an example, where companies offer various types of promotions at launch to incentivize people to spend money and get accustomed to their products.
✧ Something like: 40% off for the first 100 users, etc.

➮ In crypto, it works similarly:
✧ But instead of discounts, there is the token emissions to boost liquidity of the token at an early stage.
✧ This model generally shows success initially, but the subsequent path of the token often ends with a significant drop.
➮ A good example might be the case with $LUNA, where unclear tokenomics and emission led to over-dilution
✧ Holders should get profits through fees, not emissions
✧ As it turned out, the start of the project was promising, but it all ended in a collapse
How to avoid this?

➮ Here are a few key points, the presence of which would make such a scenario impossible:
1. High fees through emissions
2. Real users + big volumes
3. Strong token
4. The true usefulness of token
This way, you won't be holding a token that is being printed like a dollars
➮ Liked this ARTICLE? I write educational CONTENT daily, so don't forget to:
✧ Follow me @Crypto PM

#WhaleAlert
#Whale.Alert
#PEPEATH
#BinanceLaunchpool
#Memecoins
Explore the latest crypto news
⚡️ Be a part of the latests discussions in crypto
💬 Interact with your favorite creators
👍 Enjoy content that interests you
Email / Phone number

Latest News

--
View More

Trending Articles

U.today
View More
Sitemap
Cookie Preferences
Platform T&Cs