I hit 4 and a half numbers, about 7500 dollars in profit, single number 1700 dollars, Brother Chicken did less this time.
Marktowin-项目投研家
--
【One Image Flow】The three-no product SKYAI has issued tokens. Brother Ji invested 0.1 BNB and received 955 tokens, which have already been distributed immediately. Earned 24 USD for free. If you invest a total of 4 BNB and run quickly like Brother Ji, you can earn 960 USD.
The tokens have been airdropped to the wallet and need to be manually added. Directly distributed, not daring to leave much.
Take a look at the square more, it's simple, just punch in 0 to four bnb to the new address. It ended early, it's normal for beginners not to understand. If you're not careful, you might end up with a scammer. The experienced ones have an advantage; they can tell whether it's a scam or a low-risk project, but beginners can't see it. A few hundred can lead to a pitfall. Find a few old promoters to follow, the new ones won't do.
This time I only played 10 accounts, damn I didn't know I could earn this much and was afraid of running away, if I had known, I would have gone straight for a hundred accounts.
The new opening of #four is here, so refreshing! It's been a long time since I've felt this comfortable so late. Each account sold for an average of 1700 dollars, a total of four and a half accounts. Thank you, skyai, I hope I sell high! Friends, may you all make a fortune, glory to bsc! #币安Alpha上新 #bnb #SKYAI
sky#skyai #skyai refreshing, filled with 4 and a half accounts, 18 BNB, 1600 to 1800 dollars per account, thanks to BNB, 50,000 RMB in hand, thanks to Binance, thanks to skyai, thanks to myself! I will give myself a few slaps, I am preparing to hit 100 BNB, got lazy and didn't hit it.
Didn’t see, where is this coin issued? I created a few accounts 18bn
洛风
--
The big BNB has arrived this time, Cost: 1 BNB - 0.99403 BNB = 0.0059 BNB = 3 U Profit: 9550 $SKYAI * 0.0213 = 221 The multiplier is exactly 73 times, this profit is quite substantial At that time, many people said it couldn't be done,
But I also didn't have enough understanding and only played 1 $BNB
The final vote was 99 to 1, with most vecake fully supporting the reform. Can you study and write about how cakepie hijacks vecake holders to exploit them? That would show your skills.
加密城市 Crypto City
--
With a decree from Zhao Changpeng, PancakeSwap changes its token economics? The community questions the on-chain coup
On April 8, PancakeSwap announced its $CAKE token economics 3.0 proposal on X, aiming to comprehensively restructure the issuance, inflation mechanism, and governance model of the $CAKE token.
Since the proposal was announced, it has sparked widespread attention and heated discussions in the market and community. From the background of the proposal, specific content, to the impact on various interests, and then to the core points of controversy and diverse viewpoints in the community, the development of the incident is filled with complexity and drama.
Cause and Effect of the Incident
On March 19, an industry insider stated on X that the current veCAKE locking mechanism design of PancakeSwap is overly complex, not only increasing the participation threshold for users but also causing an imbalance between long-term governance rights and short-term incentives. Binance co-founder Zhao Changpeng agreed in the comments on X that 'PancakeSwap should adopt a buyback and burn model instead of the ve-token model,' stating that 'many current 'models' are too convoluted, and burning is the most direct.' He also tagged PancakeSwap officials.
Before, there were fools saying that Binance wouldn't dare to go down on FTT, otherwise Binance would be in trouble. Let's see if it can lose half of its position in a few days.
七哥
--
$ZEC $FTT Currently, FTT and ZEC rank in the top 2 positions on the delisting leaderboard. Why wasn't the coin delisted during the first voting phase, but it is still here in the second phase? Why are these a few chosen? I believe many friends have doubts. 1. Everyone should know the history of grievances between FTT and Binance. Previously, some contracts had already been delisted, and there were always users with fantasies about FTT. Every time the 'Explosive Head' releases news, it surges by dozens of points. However, due to well-known reasons, it will eventually be delisted by Binance, unless the 'Explosive Head' immediately comes out to revive FTX. 2. ZEC was mentioned previously; ZEC, the Zcash, is considered an old player in the privacy track. Those in the old coin circle know that the privacy track also had a big wave during 2017-2018. Why have the subsequent rounds of bull and bear markets had little to do with the privacy track, with only a few old fans self-soothing? The reason is nothing but regulatory issues. Now exchanges are demanding compliance, and if the privacy track doesn't change its model and stubbornly clings to the old model, it will naturally become a casualty. The once-thriving EOS has changed its track for this reason. The biggest advantage of ZEC is that its price remains relatively stable, justifying all previous spot holders. Regardless of whether it is optimistic, at least it gives everyone a chance to choose, unlike some coins that directly enter a free-fall mode. 3. Jasmy can truly be considered a 'demon coin'; its community base is strong, and it can also be seen as a coin for speculation. Its historical background is somewhat controversial. The voting list on Binance is not groundless; there's no fault in that. 4. GPS continuously making the list is absolutely not unjustified. Treating Binance and retail investors as fools, it's another domestic project that will eventually be delisted on Binance. Initially, I had high hopes for their technology, but alas, the moonlight shines down into the ditch. 5. PDA is also a significant downfall, always dropping, coming down one by one. Binance gave it an opportunity to perform, but it’s useless. This time it’s 100% going to be delisted, and no one will miss it, at least Jasmy has been performing well lately.
The cake Telegram group records, below are the chats I copied from the Telegram group, it has become quite lively, if you're interested, go check it out yourself; These few people have been opposing Binance's proposal, spreading FUD about Binance, flooding the chat to control the group's discourse, and instead helping me get muted. Can Binance not manage this place? Then hurry and create a new group! The muted supporters of Binance are always spreading FUD against Binance and Cake here, where is the problem? Why are these people attacking me? Are they reluctant to give up their power, still wanting to suck blood from Binance's general policies, or is it suggested that visible Binance executives make further adjustments to the Cake Twitter page and Telegram? Who is behind these people that are viciously attacking Binance? Is viciously attacking Binance politically correct here? The parasites collude inside and out to criticize Binance, BSC, and Cake, and even the evidence is prepared in advance by this group. Binance executives should take a look. The funniest part is that I wrote a lot under Bingwa's Twitter about how many Cake holders oppose the original policy support proposal change. If you don't believe it, you can go to the Cake group and see. As a result, I was immediately muted, and then a wave of people flooded the chat cursing Binance and Cake's reforms, pushing up the opposing statements. Everyone can check this tweet, I have been arguing for BSC and Cake. Once again, I report that the bloodsucking group, unable to debate, resorts to personal attacks, and the mods turn a blind eye. As a Cake holder, I disagree with what's being sent to CakePie, and no one has talked to me; voting represents my stance. Now asking major shareholders to talk is really funny. Why didn't you talk to me back then? I invested 33 in Cake, and it has dropped to 1.8; who do I ask for compensation? If I can't find anyone, then forget it, and someone still wants to ask for some compensation from my 1.8 Cake, I'm about to jump off a building. Just copy this, right? Happy to be muted in the Telegram.
What problem does 25 million cake have? What I understand is that Binance is responsible for clearing and has bought this batch of cake. So what problems do you say there are? Additionally, I think cake is good, but the current team of cake is full of pests, leaving backdoors, transferring benefits, and arbitraging using information gaps. They need to be completely replaced.
bnb dodo cake
--
#晒出你的交易 $CAKE 1 I am a long-term holder of cake, having bought it from 33 in 2020 to 1.7 before 22, and I haven't sold any. Who knows the pain of these years? A part of the cake team was involved in internal arbitrage and has been investigated. Cakepie has fallen apart since separating from cake, becoming worthless; it is merely a vehicle for internal benefit transfer for those who suck blood from cake. I have never participated in cakepie's activities; they deliberately designed the rules to be complex, as the more complicated they are, the more they enable benefit transfer. I have long hoped that cz could step in; thank God, today I saw the article published by Bingwa, and only then did I notice that cz took action. He criticized Binance, which was right; it was supposed to be a vote. Binance has the largest amount of cake and falsely accused him of having an illegitimate source for cake without evidence. I see voting as a means to overturn various benefit transfers; all benefits should go to cake holders. I immediately added another 4000 dollars to my position at 1.7, only regretting that I have only this much USDT. Cake needs users, needs revenue, needs prospects, and needs a background. Why has it come to such a miserable state? Today's price reflects public sentiment; people vote with their money, supporting cz and Binance. If cz and some small players like Kalami asked me who is better for you, do you even need to ask? These people have no votes and no influence. The key question is: who do you trust, cz or him? What value has cakepie created? Who created it that relies on sucking blood from cake? It seems to be just a small group within the team, using votes to transfer benefits to these people. Now that Binance has collected the chips, some people maliciously attack him, saying that his chip collection is wrong, but they don't explain how it is wrong. Isn't it also unacceptable for others to vote? Can these things represent the community?
#晒出你的交易 $CAKE 1 I am a long-term holder of cake, having bought it from 33 in 2020 to 1.7 before 22, and I haven't sold any. Who knows the pain of these years? A part of the cake team was involved in internal arbitrage and has been investigated. Cakepie has fallen apart since separating from cake, becoming worthless; it is merely a vehicle for internal benefit transfer for those who suck blood from cake. I have never participated in cakepie's activities; they deliberately designed the rules to be complex, as the more complicated they are, the more they enable benefit transfer. I have long hoped that cz could step in; thank God, today I saw the article published by Bingwa, and only then did I notice that cz took action. He criticized Binance, which was right; it was supposed to be a vote. Binance has the largest amount of cake and falsely accused him of having an illegitimate source for cake without evidence. I see voting as a means to overturn various benefit transfers; all benefits should go to cake holders. I immediately added another 4000 dollars to my position at 1.7, only regretting that I have only this much USDT. Cake needs users, needs revenue, needs prospects, and needs a background. Why has it come to such a miserable state? Today's price reflects public sentiment; people vote with their money, supporting cz and Binance. If cz and some small players like Kalami asked me who is better for you, do you even need to ask? These people have no votes and no influence. The key question is: who do you trust, cz or him? What value has cakepie created? Who created it that relies on sucking blood from cake? It seems to be just a small group within the team, using votes to transfer benefits to these people. Now that Binance has collected the chips, some people maliciously attack him, saying that his chip collection is wrong, but they don't explain how it is wrong. Isn't it also unacceptable for others to vote? Can these things represent the community?