$WLD an almost perfect example of the so-called "dead coin", this is like a body having no more blood left but somehow still fresh.
Currently the most important support level has been broken through, many have left this coin without any more hope, they have accepted the loss, run out of patience. The remaining holders may have already prepared to quit. So it's a very hard time for this to survive this global downtrend which is predicted to last through April this year.
Now only new buyers can recover this coin if they really believe in something good in the future (possibly very far future). To help lure more new buyers in, its price should really dip to $0.5 (possibly by the end of April) then together with the whole market's recovery, it will possibly come back stronger.
Many neophytes in crypto, remember we're in a market! Dyor is the watch word not blames other wise you initiated the trade not a whale or a Trump but you. Market is not Emotions.
Al Crypto
--
Bearish
🚨LATEST: 🇺🇸 Peter Schiff says President Trump helped "pull off the biggest crypto rug pull of all time" and calls on Congress to investigate $BTC $ETH $XRP 🩸🩸
We all should stop whining POTUS, means well, just patience by the time he is through the markets will bounce back, remember he supposed to be a lame duck but no, he is active!
Bullut
--
#USTariffs
🗣️ According to social data across X, Reddit, Telegram, 4Chan, BitcoinTalk, and Farcaster, the topics that are currently driving crypto markets most
🇺🇸 Trump: The US President is seeing an uptick in negative sentiment from the crypto community, with some perceiving his actions regarding tariffs and cryptocurrency as tactics to influence market behavior for personal gain. Crypto discussion platforms are linking him to schemes that benefit insiders at the expense of the public. Recent announcements about a U.S. Crypto Strategic Reserve and tariffs have also impacted the crypto market, causing fluctuations and concerns among investors.
💸Tariffs: President Trump's recent decisions to impose tariffs on imports from Canada, Mexico, and China continue to make headlines. These tariffs have led to significant market volatility and concerns about a potential trade war, affecting both cryptocurrency values and stock markets. Investors are anxious about the economic implications of these tariffs, particularly in relation to the cryptocurrency market, where fluctuations in values of assets like Bitcoin and XRP have been observed.
📊 Market: There are increased discussions about the stock market's relationship with cryptocurrency, particularly Bitcoin. Concerns about market manipulation and the influence of political figures like Trump on economic conditions are prevalent. The cryptocurrency market is experiencing volatility, with significant price fluctuations and trading volumes being discussed.
🏦 Reserve: There are high levels of discussions about the establishment of a U.S. cryptocurrency strategic reserve, following President Trump's announcement this past weekend. This has led to debates within the crypto community regarding which cryptocurrencies, such as Bitcoin, Ethereum, XRP, Solana, and Cardano, should be included. Many users express skepticism about the legitimacy and practicality of such reserves, fearing market manipulation and questioning the motives behind creating a reserve that may dilute existing holders.
🇺🇸🏦 Marko Kolanovic, former lead analyst at JPMorgan believes the situation is exactly the same as 2018, Trump's first term
Then Trump imposed tariffs against China and also crashed the markets, then Trump pressured Powell to start the rate cut cycle and launch QE, which later marked the start of the bull market.
New tariffs — new sell off.
Markets don't like that Trump is resetting the global order.
Stop insulting people, remember you are in a market, to remind you investors have moved past that weekend pump!
Man on the AI rocks
--
Trump's manipulation targeted small investors.
It should be noted that Trump, or rather someone designated by him to carry out this manipulation, posted both messages on Sunday. This timing meant that primarily small investors, who trade on exchanges over the weekend, were able to react. This fact suggests that the manipulation, which turned out to be a classic "Rug Pull" scam, was specifically designed to rob ordinary small investors. On Sunday, a suspicious announcement about reserves was released through official media, artificially driving up the price of coins. Then, right after the weekend, news about tariffs sent the market crashing down. And now, we can clearly see the outcome. Why specifically target small investors? It's simple—because they have no way to defend themselves. That’s why Trump and his people can now feel untouchable. I hope that those who attacked me for my last post, in which I warned about a potential market manipulation, have wised up in the face of these facts. I hope they have learned their lesson and, instead of harming our community, will start helping by staying vigilant and warning others when the next troubling signals appear.
Market manipulation can be direct or indirect every one involved in the market is a manipulator depends who has the advantage, so let's make no big deal about it.
Modern Times
--
We're fed up with the manipulative behavior in the crypto market, especially when influential figures like Donald Trump and Elon Musk sway prices with their tweets. This kind of manipulation undermines the integrity of cryptocurrency and erodes investor confidence. We believe in a fair and transparent market, and if this behavior continues, we'll consider boycotting the crypto market altogether.
Market manipulation is a serious issue that can lead to significant financial losses for retail investors and undermine trust in the cryptocurrency ecosystem ¹. It's essential to recognize the signs of manipulation, such as unusual trading volumes, coordinated buying or selling, and abrupt price fluctuations ².
To protect ourselves and others from market manipulation, we must:
- *Educate ourselves*: Learn about trading and investing, stay updated on market news, and understand price-influencing factors ². - *Diversify investments*: Spread investments across various asset classes to reduce the impact of market manipulation ². - *Set realistic expectations*: Avoid schemes promising unusually high returns, and make informed decisions based on reasonable analysis and long-term goals ². - *Conduct due diligence*: Research assets thoroughly, understand market patterns, and evaluate fundamental principles of investment ².
We urge regulators and market participants to take action against market manipulation and promote a fair and transparent crypto market.
come to think of it all trades should be fair, it can only be fair if tariffs are reciprocal!
a27s
--
Trade War and a Show for the Mentally Unstable.
So, Trump is once again imposing tariffs and trade wars everywhere and with everyone.
Who benefits from this? No one, everyone loses. Any war results in colossal losses. Modern wars are always unprofitable in the long run, no matter how they are.
So, with a trade war against the whole world, this is a spectacle. At least that's what I lean towards. Trump is fond of creating problems and unbearable situations. And then heroically solving them. A kind of sleight of hand, so to speak.
Reciprocity of tariffs is a fair deal to be honest!
Binance News
--
Canada Considers Retaliatory Tariffs On U.S. Goods
According to BlockBeats, on March 4, Canadian political figures have advocated for imposing strict retaliatory tariffs on U.S. goods entering the country. The Angus Reid Institute, Canada's most renowned independent polling organization, reported an increase in voters supporting retaliatory measures against U.S. tariffs over the past month.
Two-thirds of Canadians now back a 25% tariff on all U.S. imports, up from 60% in January. Additionally, nearly two-thirds (65%) support banning key Canadian exports to the U.S., such as oil and minerals. The poll indicates that only 24% of Canadians currently hold a favorable view of the United States, a significant drop from 58% approximately two years ago.
U.S. President Donald Trump's aggressive trade policies have altered Canada's political landscape, providing a lifeline to the ruling Liberal Party, which seemed poised for a significant defeat in this year's elections just a few months ago.
Shocking Crypto Banking Blockade: Custodia Bank CEO Exposes US Regulatory Failures
Is the U.S. government deliberately stifling the burgeoning crypto industry? Custodia Bank CEO Caitlin Long has dropped a bombshell, accusing the U.S. of actively preventing crypto firms from accessing essential banking services. This isn’t just about inconvenience; Long warns it’s a strategic blunder that could push innovation overseas and jeopardize America’s standing in the global financial technology race. Let’s dive deep into this critical issue and understand the potential ramifications for the crypto landscape.
The Alarming Reality of Crypto Banking Access Crisis
Imagine trying to run a business without a bank account. For many cryptocurrency firms in the U.S., this is becoming a harsh reality. Caitlin Long, the CEO of Custodia Bank, a digital asset bank, has publicly criticized the U.S. government for what she describes as a deliberate campaign to restrict crypto banking access. According to FinanceFeeds, Long argues this hostile environment is not only hindering the growth of domestic crypto businesses but also pushing innovation to more welcoming shores. This alleged blockade raises serious questions about the future of crypto in the U.S. and its ability to compete on a global stage.
[img src=”image-url-here.jpg” alt=”Custodia Bank CEO Caitlin Long”]
Custodia Bank CEO’s Damning Indictment of US Crypto Regulation
Caitlin Long isn’t just another voice in the crypto sphere; she’s a seasoned Wall Street veteran turned crypto advocate, and her words carry significant weight. Her critique centers on the perceived inaction and, in some cases, active discouragement from U.S. regulators that are making it incredibly difficult for crypto firms banking operations. She points out a worrying trend:
Soaring Banking Difficulties: Over half of U.S. crypto firms reported facing banking difficulties in 2024. This is a dramatic surge from 34% in 2022, indicating a rapidly escalating problem.
Regulatory Pressure on Banks: Despite the growing global crypto market and the potential for innovation, U.S. regulators are reportedly pressuring banks to steer clear of crypto companies. This leaves crypto businesses with dwindling options for essential banking services.
Innovation Exodus: The lack of banking access is forcing innovative crypto companies to consider relocating overseas to jurisdictions with more favorable regulatory environments. This brain drain could severely weaken the U.S.’s position in the burgeoning fintech sector.
Long’s perspective highlights a critical disconnect between the U.S.’s stated ambition to be a leader in technological innovation and its current regulatory approach to crypto. Is the U.S. inadvertently pushing away the very innovation it seeks to champion?
Understanding the Impact of US Crypto Regulation on Banking
The challenges faced by crypto firms in securing banking services are not happening in a vacuum. They are a direct consequence of the current US crypto regulation landscape. Let’s break down some key aspects:
Factor Impact on Crypto Banking Regulatory Uncertainty Banks are hesitant to engage with crypto firms due to the lack of clear and consistent regulations. The patchwork of state and federal rules creates compliance complexities and perceived risks. Risk Aversion Regulators have expressed concerns about the risks associated with crypto, including money laundering, illicit finance, and consumer protection. This has led to a cautious approach, with pressure on banks to avoid or limit crypto-related activities. Lack of Specialized Banking Framework The U.S. lacks a clear framework for banks to serve crypto companies. This regulatory gap leaves banks unsure of how to properly manage risks and comply with regulations when dealing with digital assets.
This combination of factors has created a chilling effect, making traditional banks wary of serving the crypto industry. For crypto firms, this translates to higher operational costs, limited access to capital, and hindered growth potential. It’s a significant hurdle for an industry that is striving for mainstream adoption.
The Threat to Financial Technology Innovation
Caitlin Long’s warning extends beyond the immediate challenges faced by crypto firms. She emphasizes the broader implications for financial technology innovation in the U.S. By creating a hostile environment for crypto, the U.S. risks losing its competitive edge in the global fintech race. Here’s why this is a critical concern:
Hindered Growth of Fintech Ecosystem: Crypto is a significant driver of fintech innovation. Restricting its growth stifles the entire ecosystem, impacting related sectors and technologies.
Brain Drain and Capital Flight: As companies move overseas to find supportive regulatory environments, the U.S. loses talent, investment, and future economic opportunities associated with fintech leadership.
Reduced Global Competitiveness: Other countries are actively embracing and regulating crypto, positioning themselves as hubs for fintech innovation. The U.S. risks falling behind if it continues to maintain a restrictive stance.
The potential consequences are far-reaching. A thriving fintech sector is crucial for economic growth, job creation, and maintaining global competitiveness. By hindering crypto innovation, is the U.S. inadvertently undermining its own future prosperity?
What’s Next for Crypto Banking Access? Actionable Insights
The situation surrounding crypto banking access is undoubtedly challenging, but it’s not insurmountable. Here are some potential pathways forward:
Regulatory Clarity is Key: The U.S. government needs to prioritize providing clear and consistent regulations for the crypto industry. This would give banks the confidence to engage with crypto firms while ensuring appropriate risk management and consumer protection.
Collaboration and Dialogue: Open communication between regulators, banks, and crypto industry stakeholders is crucial. Constructive dialogue can lead to mutually beneficial solutions and a more balanced regulatory approach.
Specialized Banking Frameworks: Developing specialized banking frameworks tailored to the unique characteristics of digital assets could be a viable solution. This could involve creating licenses or charters specifically for crypto banks, like Custodia, allowing them to operate within a clear regulatory perimeter.
Advocacy and Education: The crypto industry needs to continue advocating for sensible regulations and educating policymakers about the potential benefits of crypto innovation. Highlighting success stories and demonstrating responsible practices can help shift perceptions.
The future of crypto in the U.S. hinges on addressing the banking access crisis. Finding a path towards regulatory clarity and fostering a more collaborative environment is essential to unlock the full potential of crypto and maintain the U.S.’s leadership in financial technology.
Conclusion: A Crossroads for US Crypto and Fintech
Caitlin Long’s stark warning serves as a wake-up call. The U.S. is at a critical juncture. The current approach to US crypto regulation and crypto firms banking is not just hindering the crypto industry; it’s potentially jeopardizing the nation’s broader financial technology innovation leadership. By creating barriers to crypto banking access, the U.S. risks stifling innovation, losing talent, and ceding ground to other countries that are more welcoming to the digital asset revolution. The path forward requires a shift towards clarity, collaboration, and a recognition of the transformative potential of crypto. The stakes are high, and the time for decisive action is now.
To learn more about the latest crypto regulation trends, explore our article on key developments shaping crypto policy and institutional adoption.
Trump confirms 25% tariffs on Canada & Mexico, 10% more on China, effective Mar 4, 2025. Markets drop, retaliation looms, raising costs for US consumers—gas up 30-40¢/gal, cars $2K more. Trade war fears grow.
#MarketPullback The current market pullback since the Trump crypto reserves announcement has shocked many crypto traders.Here is why you shouldn't sell off your crypto holdings. Global Economic Concerns – The U.S. imposed new tariffs on major trading partners has sparked fear of economic instability and rattled investor confidence. This caused FUD hence the selloff.Crypto is decentralized hence no single economy can manipulate its value. Institutions are pilling up their crypto reserves so should you. $BTC
Peter Schiff is no friend of crypto! What has he been doing with the Gold market?
Dr HayatKhan
--
The Alleged Crypto Pump-and-Dump Scheme: Investigating the U.S. President’s Market Manipulation
$BTC $XRP
#PresidentialAgenda #USCryptoReserve
In what could be the most high-profile case of financial fraud in modern history, Donald Trump, the first "crypto President," is being accused of orchestrating a massive pump-and-dump scheme using his influence and online platforms. Renowned financial analyst Peter Schiff has called for a Congressional investigation into the alleged market manipulation, which may have benefited insiders—including Trump’s family, staff, business associates, and campaign donors—at the expense of unsuspecting retail investors. This case raises serious questions about securities fraud, insider trading, and market manipulation, potentially implicating multiple sections of U.S. financial laws, including the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Commodity Exchange Act, and the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations (RICO) Act. This article will provide an in-depth legal and financial analysis of how the alleged fraud unfolded, its potential violations of federal law, and what consequences could follow.
What Happened? Understanding the Alleged Pump-and-Dump Scheme Peter Schiff’s statement suggests that a series of social media posts from Trump’s Truth Social account were strategically timed to influence cryptocurrency prices, leading to a pump-and-dump cycle.
Step 1: Market Pumping via Public Influence Trump’s Sunday afternoon posts allegedly contained pro-crypto statements or endorsements of specific cryptocurrencies such as XRP, ADA, SOL, BTC, and ETH. These statements triggered retail investors to buy cryptocurrencies, increasing demand and driving up prices. The posts were timed at a moment when trading volumes were high, ensuring maximum impact.
Step 2: Insider Trading & Market Dumping Certain individuals, including Trump’s close associates, family members, campaign donors, and Truth Social employees, allegedly knew in advance about these social media posts. These insiders purchased large amounts of crypto before the announcement. Once the market pumped due to retail investment, insiders allegedly sold their holdings at a profit, leading to a sudden price drop. Retail investors, who had followed Trump’s statements, suffered massive losses as prices crashed.
Legal Violations and U.S. Law Sections Applicable The alleged scheme, if proven, could violate multiple federal laws. Here are the key legal statutes that could apply: 1. Securities Fraud – Violation of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. § 78j & SEC Rule 10b-5) The Securities Exchange Act of 1934, specifically Rule 10b-5, prohibits any scheme to defraud investors through deceptive practices, including false or misleading statements. If Trump’s social media posts were deliberately misleading or designed to manipulate the market, they could be considered securities fraud. If insiders used non-public information to buy or sell crypto for profit, that would constitute insider trading (a violation of 15 U.S.C. § 78j(b)).
2. Commodity Market Manipulation – Violation of the Commodity Exchange Act (7 U.S.C. § 9) Since cryptocurrencies like Bitcoin (BTC) and Ethereum (ETH) are treated as commodities by the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC), any attempt to manipulate their prices would violate the Commodity Exchange Act. 7 U.S.C. § 9 prohibits any act of "false reporting" or "fraudulent price manipulation." Trump’s alleged pre-arranged plan to increase demand through social media influence, only for insiders to dump their holdings, could violate CFTC regulations.
3. Wire Fraud – Violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1343 Wire fraud statutes prohibit schemes that use interstate communications (social media, emails, or text messages) to commit fraud. If Trump or his associates coordinated the social media campaign knowing it would artificially inflate crypto prices, that could be wire fraud. If emails, text messages, or any other electronic communication were used to organize the scheme, all involved could be criminally liable under 18 U.S.C. § 1343.
4. Racketeering (RICO Act) – Violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1961 If multiple people (Trump’s family, staff, campaign donors, Truth Social executives) worked together to systematically defraud investors, it could be prosecuted under the RICO Act. The RICO Act (18 U.S.C. § 1961-1968) allows prosecutors to target criminal enterprises engaging in ongoing fraud. If Trump’s group profited from repeated manipulative actions, it could be labeled an organized financial crime.
5. Insider Trading – Violation of 15 U.S.C. § 78u-1 The insider trading laws prohibit individuals with non-public material information from trading assets based on that information. If Trump’s inner circle bought cryptocurrencies before his posts went public and sold them at a profit, they could face civil and criminal penalties under SEC regulations.
Who Might Be Implicated? Potential Individuals Involved Investigators would likely look at several key groups who may have had access to advance knowledge of Trump’s posts: 1. Trump’s Family Members: Close relatives may have been informed in advance and bought crypto before the announcement. 2. Trump’s Political Donors: High-profile campaign donors may have been tipped off about the upcoming crypto-related posts. 3. Truth Social Executives and Employees: Since the posts were made through Trump’s social media platform, internal staff may have been involved in coordinating the timing. 4. Business Associates: Anyone who had direct or indirect communication with Trump regarding crypto investments may face scrutiny.
Potential Penalties and Consequences If found guilty, Trump and his associates could face severe legal consequences: Securities Fraud Penalties: Fines up to $5 million per violation and prison sentences of up to 20 years. Insider Trading Penalties: Criminal fines up to $5 million and imprisonment of up to 20 years. Wire Fraud Penalties: Up to 20 years in prison per count. RICO Act Violations: Up to 20 years in prison, asset forfeiture, and additional civil lawsuits from affected investors.
What Happens Next? A Congressional Investigation Peter Schiff has called for a Congressional investigation into the matter. If taken seriously, the SEC (Securities and Exchange Commission), CFTC (Commodity Futures Trading Commission), and DOJ (Department of Justice) could launch: 1. A forensic audit of crypto transactions linked to Trump’s associates. 2. Subpoenas for emails, text messages, and financial records. 3. Testimonies under oath from Trump’s family, campaign donors, and Truth Social executives. 4. A review of cryptocurrency trading activity before and after the Sunday Truth Social posts.
Conclusion: A Defining Moment for Crypto Regulation If proven, this case could go down as one of the most significant financial frauds in modern U.S. history, raising serious concerns about political figures manipulating financial markets. It also highlights the urgent need for tighter crypto regulations to prevent similar pump-and-dump schemes in the future. The coming months could see high-profile legal battles, SEC investigations, and potential criminal charges against those involved. For now, the crypto world—and the global financial community—waits for justice to take its course.
Do You Think This Was a Pump-and-Dump Scheme? Let us know your thoughts in the comments below. Stay tuned for updates on this developing story.
A trillion-dollar scam: how the Kremlin and Trump executed a historic conspiracy, with Ukraine becoming the bargaining chip.
2025. Donald Trump is back in the White House. His victory alarmed the world, but it is now becoming clear that behind it lies a grand financial scam. Russian money encrypted in cryptocurrency, Saudi banks as guarantors, and Elon Musk as the main liaison between the Kremlin and Trump.
Where's China (neo, vet) , where is Nippon (jasmy) the USA is the only super power in all categories: economic, armamentarium, health name it.
Binance News
--
CZ Highlights Dominance of American Crypto Assets, Sees Industry Growth as a Positive Signal
Changpeng Zhao (CZ), the founder and former CEO of Binance, stated that the current cryptocurrency market is largely dominated by American crypto assets. Acknowledging their role in shaping the industry, CZ emphasized that the increasing adoption of any cryptocurrency is a positive indicator for the sector’s overall growth. He reaffirmed his belief that continued innovation and development will drive the industry forward, stating, "The industry as a whole benefits, and we keep building!"
🚨🚨 #CryptoBanking 🚨🚨 🔥 Custodia Bank CEO Slams U.S. Government on Crypto Banking 🔥
🔹 Regulatory Crackdown 🚨 – Caitlin Long criticizes Washington’s "misguided crackdown" on crypto, arguing it pushes risks underground and stifles innovation.
🔹 Government Interference 🏛️ – She claims the Biden administration and Federal Reserve worked together to block Custodia Bank’s master account, showing a broader anti-crypto stance.
🔹 Ignored Warnings ⚠️ – Long says she alerted regulators months before major crypto collapses but was ignored, highlighting systemic regulatory failures.
🔹 Legal Battle ⚖️ – Custodia Bank is suing the Federal Reserve, accusing it of unlawfully delaying its master account application, limiting access to essential banking services.
🔹 "Debanking" Crypto Firms 💸❌ – Long calls out efforts to push crypto firms out of traditional banking, alleging "staggering" corruption among officials.
🔹 Push for Clearer Rules 📜✅ – She urges better regulations to integrate crypto into the financial system, warning that the current hostile stance will drive innovation abroad.
💡 Do you think the U.S. is intentionally suppressing crypto, or is it just poor regulation? 🤔💬
🚨 BREAKING: Eric Trump Drops a CRYPTO BOMB! 🚨 💥 "Traditional Finance Better Catch Up with Crypto – Or It Will Become EXTINCT!" 💥 Eric Trump has just fired a significant warning to the financial world, and here’s why you should pay attention: 💡 Crypto is the FUTURE! 💡 Eric's message is clear: Crypto is revolutionizing finance, and traditional systems need to adapt – or be left behind. 🚀 You're Not Optimistic Enough! 🚀 If you’re still in banking, it’s time to wake up. The crypto train is moving fast, and you don’t want to miss it. 🏦 Traditional Finance is on Notice! 🏦 Old-school banks and financial institutions are at a crossroads. Adapt to crypto, or risk becoming irrelevant. 💎 The Trump Family Supports Crypto! 💎 With Eric Trump’s bold statement, it’s clear that the Trump family is fully in favor of the crypto revolution. 🔥 The Message is Clear: GO BIG or GO HOME!🔥 The future belongs to those who embrace innovation. Are you ready to join the movement? 🇺🇸 Crypto is Making America Great Again! 🇺🇸
Yesterday, Trump made a surprise announcement about the Federal Reserve, mentioning ADA, XRP, and SOL no doubt its great for crypto market rise more than 3 trillion and everything is looking good but this sudden manipulation can't make retailers a winner. The crypto market reacted rapidly, with prices surging. Bitcoin's price also started rising later. But what's interesting is that the announcement was made on a Sunday, when most people had already withdrawn their funds and trading volume was low. It's suspicious that prices rose so suddenly, and it's clear that those who benefited the most were the ones who made the announcement and their team. As I'm writing this, it's obvious that the people who planned and executed the announcement were the ones who benefited the most. They likely had advance knowledge of the announcement and were able to position themselves to profit from it. Eric Trump even made a joke about how genius it was to announce a strategic reserve on a Sunday, saying it was the first time retail investors came out on top. However, it's hard to take that claim seriously. The reality is that those behind the announcement were the ones who reaped the most benefits. It's no surprise that many people are saying they missed out on the opportunity. The way the announcement was made, it's clear that the playing field was not level. Those with advance knowledge and access to the information were the ones who benefited, while everyone else was left behind.