The Bitcoin community is angry with Ripple for endorsing a multi-asset strategic reserve in the United States instead of a Bitcoin-only reserve. Bitcoiners are accusing the San Francisco-based blockchain payments startup of being the “biggest obstacle” to a national U.S. Bitcoin due to it actively pushing for the inclusion of several coins, including XRP.

Is Ripple Lobbying Against Bitcoin?

In a Jan. 23 post on the X platform, Riot Platforms’ research Vice President Pierre Rochard suggested that Ripple was the “biggest obstacle for the strategic Bitcoin reserve.” He cited Ripple’s heavy lobbying and active involvement in establishing central bank digital currencies (CBCDs). Specifically, Rochard claimed that Ripple had given millions to politicians in an attempt to thwart the Bitcoin Reserve agenda.

“They did the same to attack Bitcoin mining under the Biden administration. Obviously, they want to protect their marketing narratives and push for CBDCs built on their platform,” he added.

As ZyCrypto previously reported, the New York Post revealed that Trump was “receptive” to the idea of establishing a strategic reserve prioritizing U.S.-created cryptocurrencies, including USD Coin (USDC), Solana (SOL), and Ripple’s XRP. Sources told the Post that the strategy could sideline BTC.

Talk of a diversified crypto reserve intensified after Garlinghouse and Ripple’s Stuart Alderoty dined with Trump earlier this month. The Ripple chief shared a photo from the grand dinner, describing it as a “strong start to 2025.”

Does XRP Have A Place In US Crypto Reserve?

Responding to Rochard on X, Garlinghouse said the company’s efforts align with the current administration’s focus on supporting American companies and technologies. He argued that this approach would boost the chances of establishing a reserve that includes assets like XRP, along with Bitcoin.

However, like Rochard, other crypto industry pundits are not convinced this is a good idea.

Bitvolt CEO Nico Moran echoed Rochard’s sentiments about Ripple, positing that the company is “deliberately working against the US Bitcoin Strategic Reserve initiative, prioritizing their own interests over the well-being of the American people.”

Bitcoin advocate Wayne Vaughan asserted on X on Thursday that the US needs a “Strategic Bitcoin Reserve, not a Strategic Crypto Reserve,” adding:

“Ripple, Ethereum, and Solana have no place on the US government’s balance sheet. Including them would create a costly political fallout for the Trump Administration.”

Meanwhile, President Trump has signed a new crypto executive order creating a Presidential Working Group on Digital Assets Markets, which will work on creating a federal regulatory framework for digital assets and assess the feasibility of a “strategic national digital assets stockpile.”

The Bitcoin community is angry with Ripple for endorsing a multi-asset strategic reserve in the United States instead of a Bitcoin-only reserve. Bitcoiners are accusing the San Francisco-based blockchain payments startup of being the “biggest obstacle” to a national U.S. Bitcoin due to it actively pushing for the inclusion of several coins, including XRP.

Is Ripple Lobbying Against Bitcoin?

In a Jan. 23 post on the X platform, Riot Platforms’ research Vice President Pierre Rochard suggested that Ripple was the “biggest obstacle for the strategic Bitcoin reserve.” He cited Ripple’s heavy lobbying and active involvement in establishing central bank digital currencies (CBCDs). Specifically, Rochard claimed that Ripple had given millions to politicians in an attempt to thwart the Bitcoin Reserve agenda.

“They did the same to attack Bitcoin mining under the Biden administration. Obviously, they want to protect their marketing narratives and push for CBDCs built on their platform,” he added.

As ZyCrypto previously reported, the New York Post revealed that Trump was “receptive” to the idea of establishing a strategic reserve prioritizing U.S.-created cryptocurrencies, including USD Coin (USDC), Solana (SOL), and Ripple’s XRP. Sources told the Post that the strategy could sideline BTC.

Talk of a diversified crypto reserve intensified after Garlinghouse and Ripple’s Stuart Alderoty dined with Trump earlier this month. The Ripple chief shared a photo from the grand dinner, describing it as a “strong start to 2025.”

Does XRP Have A Place In US Crypto Reserve?

Responding to Rochard on X, Garlinghouse said the company’s efforts align with the current administration’s focus on supporting American companies and technologies. He argued that this approach would boost the chances of establishing a reserve that includes assets like XRP, along with Bitcoin.

However, like Rochard, other crypto industry pundits are not convinced this is a good idea.

Bitvolt CEO Nico Moran echoed Rochard’s sentiments about Ripple, positing that the company is “deliberately working against the US Bitcoin Strategic Reserve initiative, prioritizing their own interests over the well-being of the American people.”

Bitcoin advocate Wayne Vaughan asserted on X on Thursday that the US needs a “Strategic Bitcoin Reserve, not a Strategic Crypto Reserve,” adding:

“Ripple, Ethereum, and Solana have no place on the US government’s balance sheet. Including them would create a costly political fallout for the Trump Administration.”

Meanwhile, President Trump has signed a new crypto executive order creating a Presidential Working Group on Digital Assets Markets, which will work on creating a federal regulatory framework for digital assets and assess the feasibility of a “strategic national digital assets stockpile.”

The Bitcoin community is angry with Ripple for endorsing a multi-asset strategic reserve in the United States instead of a Bitcoin-only reserve. Bitcoiners are accusing the San Francisco-based blockchain payments startup of being the “biggest obstacle” to a national U.S. Bitcoin due to it actively pushing for the inclusion of several coins, including XRP.

Is Ripple Lobbying Against Bitcoin?

In a Jan. 23 post on the X platform, Riot Platforms’ research Vice President Pierre Rochard suggested that Ripple was the “biggest obstacle for the strategic Bitcoin reserve.” He cited Ripple’s heavy lobbying and active involvement in establishing central bank digital currencies (CBCDs). Specifically, Rochard claimed that Ripple had given millions to politicians in an attempt to thwart the Bitcoin Reserve agenda.

“They did the same to attack Bitcoin mining under the Biden administration. Obviously, they want to protect their marketing narratives and push for CBDCs built on their platform,” he added.

As ZyCrypto previously reported, the New York Post revealed that Trump was “receptive” to the idea of establishing a strategic reserve prioritizing U.S.-created cryptocurrencies, including USD Coin (USDC), Solana (SOL), and Ripple’s XRP. Sources told the Post that the strategy could sideline BTC.

Talk of a diversified crypto reserve intensified after Garlinghouse and Ripple’s Stuart Alderoty dined with Trump earlier this month. The Ripple chief shared a photo from the grand dinner, describing it as a “strong start to 2025.”

Does XRP Have A Place In US Crypto Reserve?

Responding to Rochard on X, Garlinghouse said the company’s efforts align with the current administration’s focus on supporting American companies and technologies. He argued that this approach would boost the chances of establishing a reserve that includes assets like XRP, along with Bitcoin.

However, like Rochard, other crypto industry pundits are not convinced this is a good idea.

Bitvolt CEO Nico Moran echoed Rochard’s sentiments about Ripple, positing that the company is “deliberately working against the US Bitcoin Strategic Reserve initiative, prioritizing their own interests over the well-being of the American people.”

Bitcoin advocate Wayne Vaughan asserted on X on Thursday that the US needs a “Strategic Bitcoin Reserve, not a Strategic Crypto Reserve,” adding:

“Ripple, Ethereum, and Solana have no place on the US government’s balance sheet. Including them would create a costly political fallout for the Trump Administration.”

Meanwhile, President Trump has signed a new crypto executive order creating a Presidential Working Group on Digital Assets Markets, which will work on creating a federal regulatory framework for digital assets and assess the feasibility of a “strategic national digital assets stockpile.”

Here’s the trending token list you need to keep an eye on: One click on this token could change your future! 🎁🔥 $SOL 🎁🔥 $NEAR 🎁🔥 $MKR .







Why Solana's Transaction Speed Claims Are Often Considered 'Fake'
Solana has long been touted as one of the fastest blockchain networks, with claims of handling up to 65,000 transactions per second (TPS). While this sounds impressive, there’s been growing skepticism about whether Solana’s transaction speed is truly as fast as advertised or if it’s somewhat of an exaggeration.
📢 What do you think about Solana's transaction speed claims? Drop a comment below with your thoughts and any emojis you feel represent the current situation! 🤔💬 Don't forget to like 👍 and follow 🔔 for more updates and insights on the latest in the crypto world!
Like, follow, and comment! It means the world to me ❤️🙏.
The 'Fake' Transaction Speed Debate
Solana's transaction speed is often cited as one of its biggest advantages over other blockchains, like Ethereum and Bitcoin. However, some critics argue that the network's claims are misleading, and here’s why:
Theoretical vs. Real-World Performance: Solana’s touted speed of 65,000 TPS is based on theoretical maximums in a controlled environment. In practice, the network has faced slowdowns, bottlenecks, and congestion during periods of high traffic. So while the blockchain can handle this level of throughput under optimal conditions, it doesn’t always perform at that level in real-world use.
Network Congestion and Downtime: One of the biggest issues facing Solana is its susceptibility to downtime and network outages. These outages often occur when transaction volumes spike, putting a strain on the network’s capacity. During such times, the touted high transaction speeds become irrelevant, as the network struggles to process even a fraction of the transactions.
Block Propagation and Validator Issues: Solana uses a unique Proof of History (PoH) mechanism, which allows transactions to be ordered and processed at high speed. However, during periods of high network load, the validators (nodes responsible for processing transactions) struggle to keep up. This results in delays, failed transactions, and a significant reduction in throughput. The speed is not always sustained under heavy usage.
Not Truly Decentralized: Solana’s high transaction speed is also often criticized because of its relatively centralized nature. To achieve high throughput, the network relies on fewer validators compared to more decentralized blockchains like Ethereum. This centralization can lead to concerns about censorship resistance and network security.
Is Solana’s Speed Justified?
Despite the criticisms, Solana’s speed is still an impressive technical achievement, especially in the context of decentralized finance (DeFi) and high-frequency trading. But the question remains whether Solana can truly scale to handle millions of transactions per second without running into issues like network downtime or bottlenecks.
Conclusion
Solana’s transaction speed, while a powerful selling point, can be seen as “fake” or misleading when considering the network’s real-world performance and the factors that affect its stability. As Solana continues to grow and develop, it will need to address these concerns if it hopes to maintain its position as one of the fastest blockchains in the market.
What do you think? Is Solana’s speed really as fast as advertised? Share your thoughts below!

Here’s the trending token list you need to keep an eye on: One click on this token could change your future! 🎁🔥 $SOL 🎁🔥 $NEAR 🎁🔥 $MKR .







Why Solana's Transaction Speed Claims Are Often Considered 'Fake'
Solana has long been touted as one of the fastest blockchain networks, with claims of handling up to 65,000 transactions per second (TPS). While this sounds impressive, there’s been growing skepticism about whether Solana’s transaction speed is truly as fast as advertised or if it’s somewhat of an exaggeration.
📢 What do you think about Solana's transaction speed claims? Drop a comment below with your thoughts and any emojis you feel represent the current situation! 🤔💬 Don't forget to like 👍 and follow 🔔 for more updates and insights on the latest in the crypto world!
Like, follow, and comment! It means the world to me ❤️🙏.
The 'Fake' Transaction Speed Debate
Solana's transaction speed is often cited as one of its biggest advantages over other blockchains, like Ethereum and Bitcoin. However, some critics argue that the network's claims are misleading, and here’s why:
Theoretical vs. Real-World Performance: Solana’s touted speed of 65,000 TPS is based on theoretical maximums in a controlled environment. In practice, the network has faced slowdowns, bottlenecks, and congestion during periods of high traffic. So while the blockchain can handle this level of throughput under optimal conditions, it doesn’t always perform at that level in real-world use.
Network Congestion and Downtime: One of the biggest issues facing Solana is its susceptibility to downtime and network outages. These outages often occur when transaction volumes spike, putting a strain on the network’s capacity. During such times, the touted high transaction speeds become irrelevant, as the network struggles to process even a fraction of the transactions.
Block Propagation and Validator Issues: Solana uses a unique Proof of History (PoH) mechanism, which allows transactions to be ordered and processed at high speed. However, during periods of high network load, the validators (nodes responsible for processing transactions) struggle to keep up. This results in delays, failed transactions, and a significant reduction in throughput. The speed is not always sustained under heavy usage.
Not Truly Decentralized: Solana’s high transaction speed is also often criticized because of its relatively centralized nature. To achieve high throughput, the network relies on fewer validators compared to more decentralized blockchains like Ethereum. This centralization can lead to concerns about censorship resistance and network security.
Is Solana’s Speed Justified?
Despite the criticisms, Solana’s speed is still an impressive technical achievement, especially in the context of decentralized finance (DeFi) and high-frequency trading. But the question remains whether Solana can truly scale to handle millions of transactions per second without running into issues like network downtime or bottlenecks.
Conclusion
Solana’s transaction speed, while a powerful selling point, can be seen as “fake” or misleading when considering the network’s real-world performance and the factors that affect its stability. As Solana continues to grow and develop, it will need to address these concerns if it hopes to maintain its position as one of the fastest blockchains in the market.
What do you think? Is Solana’s speed really as fast as advertised? Share your thoughts below!