🎯 Real ones know: When you see a red packet on Binance Square... You. Just. Click. 🧧 No grinding. No guessing. Just free crypto vibes. Might be your lucky scroll 🍀 👇 Don’t say nobody told you #BTC再创新高 #币安八周年
#BinanceTurns8 Join us in the celebration of #BinanceTurns8 and win a share of up to 888,888 USD in BNB! https://www.binance.com/activity/binance-turns-8?ref=GRO_19600_5TP9K
The entity company's dividends have come down, Jiuge not only trades cryptocurrencies but also has his own business, just not very involved in the operations. Sending a BNB red envelope. Answer: Jiuge is getting rich.
The multiplicity of pairs is an important secret that plays a significant role in the rise of currencies during the altcoin phase. But how? When you buy a cryptocurrency, you get its liquidity from several other pairs, not just stablecoins like USDT and USDC, because you can also trade it against BITCOIN, ETHEREUM, and BNB.
Example:
Let's assume there is an electric truck that needs energy to operate; the more multiple energy sources it gets, the more efficient and flexible it becomes. Likewise, alternative currencies in the picture are an example of currency S against several pairs BTC, ETH, BNB. So when the whales of these currencies decide to sell them for S, S will obtain multiple liquidity and not just from one pair, which supports its rise and creates speculation opportunities.
Friends, let me see who hasn't joined our Simey Lightning's exclusive KOL chat room yet. Alpha airdrop, TGE events, spot secondary market strategies, Web3 wallet primary market tracking, wallet finance, we research together with our buddies in the chat room. Recently, who hasn't benefited from Binance's Alpha airdrop? Hurry and join 👇 our chat room!! Simey闪电币安王牌KOL聊天室 The crew is very active, everyone is having a great time, looking forward to your joining!
Bitcoin has recently experienced severe fluctuations, resulting in the evaporation of billions of dollars in assets. The market has engaged in discussions surrounding this volatility, with significant divergence in opinions. The specific analysis is as follows:
Supporting the viewpoint of a 'healthy reset' Market clearing and structural optimization A large number of sell orders in the perpetual swap market triggered long liquidations, with open contracts decreasing by over ten billion dollars from a peak of 80 billion dollars. Weak-handed investors have exited the market, completing a 'detox' and laying the foundation for subsequent market movements.
On-chain indicators release positive signals with actual market value reaching a new high: 93.51 billion dollars, indicating that holder confidence remains strong, and there has been no panic selling due to short-term fluctuations.
Market sentiment is warming: the Fear and Greed Index rebounded from the panic zone (46) to 55, approaching the 'Greed' zone; the number of new Bitcoin addresses has turned positive, and new buyers entering the market are driving FOMO sentiment.
Support from off-exchange funds On June 4, 10,000 BTC were traded off-exchange at a price of 104,700 dollars per coin, indicating strong support in the spot market and being regarded as one of the bottom signals.
Although BTC rebounded by 5.2% in the short term, it only recouped half of its losses, and historically, Bitcoin has shown extreme volatility, making it difficult to confirm long-term trends based on a single indicator.
Macroeconomic and regulatory risks remain present, with expectations for Federal Reserve interest rate cuts and U.S. economic data still unclear, which may exacerbate market fluctuations. Uncertainties exist regarding global cryptocurrency regulatory policies (such as the U.S. SEC's stance on ETFs), where tightening regulations could reverse market trends.
Historically, Bitcoin has often continued to decline after similar 'bottom signals,' and the current 'reset' theory still requires more data validation.
Conclusion: Approach with caution and monitor variables Currently, the evidence is insufficient to determine whether this fluctuation is a 'reset.' Continuous tracking of price trends, on-chain data, macroeconomic conditions, and regulatory dynamics is necessary. In the context of Bitcoin's high volatility, investors should be wary of risks and avoid blindly following trends.
Bitcoin has recently experienced severe fluctuations, resulting in the evaporation of billions of dollars in assets. The market has engaged in discussions surrounding this volatility, with significant divergence in opinions. The specific analysis is as follows:
Supporting the viewpoint of a 'healthy reset' Market clearing and structural optimization A large number of sell orders in the perpetual swap market triggered long liquidations, with open contracts decreasing by over ten billion dollars from a peak of 80 billion dollars. Weak-handed investors have exited the market, completing a 'detox' and laying the foundation for subsequent market movements.
On-chain indicators release positive signals with actual market value reaching a new high: 93.51 billion dollars, indicating that holder confidence remains strong, and there has been no panic selling due to short-term fluctuations.
Market sentiment is warming: the Fear and Greed Index rebounded from the panic zone (46) to 55, approaching the 'Greed' zone; the number of new Bitcoin addresses has turned positive, and new buyers entering the market are driving FOMO sentiment.
Support from off-exchange funds On June 4, 10,000 BTC were traded off-exchange at a price of 104,700 dollars per coin, indicating strong support in the spot market and being regarded as one of the bottom signals.
Although BTC rebounded by 5.2% in the short term, it only recouped half of its losses, and historically, Bitcoin has shown extreme volatility, making it difficult to confirm long-term trends based on a single indicator.
Macroeconomic and regulatory risks remain present, with expectations for Federal Reserve interest rate cuts and U.S. economic data still unclear, which may exacerbate market fluctuations. Uncertainties exist regarding global cryptocurrency regulatory policies (such as the U.S. SEC's stance on ETFs), where tightening regulations could reverse market trends.
Historically, Bitcoin has often continued to decline after similar 'bottom signals,' and the current 'reset' theory still requires more data validation.
Conclusion: Approach with caution and monitor variables Currently, the evidence is insufficient to determine whether this fluctuation is a 'reset.' Continuous tracking of price trends, on-chain data, macroeconomic conditions, and regulatory dynamics is necessary. In the context of Bitcoin's high volatility, investors should be wary of risks and avoid blindly following trends.