myth無仙
Following
Followers
Liked
Shared
See original
PINNED
2850-2950 is the position for my friends who bought the bottom of Ethereum. If you hold on, you will see the dawn soon.
The adjustment of Ethereum makes people feel desperate, but I believe that the adjustment will be completed around June 5, breaking the adjustment from 4092 this year, and there will be a new round of rise.
Assuming that 2166-4092 is the main rising wave, 4092-2817 is the adjustment wave, and 2817 has pulled back 68% of this wave of main rising wave.
The subsequent pull-up will be N times of 2166-4092, first look at 4743, and after 4743 breaks through, it will be 6667.
The time may start from around June 5 to around October 20.
Personal opinion, not investment advice, for reference and discussion only.
The adjustment of Ethereum makes people feel desperate, but I believe that the adjustment will be completed around June 5, breaking the adjustment from 4092 this year, and there will be a new round of rise.
Assuming that 2166-4092 is the main rising wave, 4092-2817 is the adjustment wave, and 2817 has pulled back 68% of this wave of main rising wave.
The subsequent pull-up will be N times of 2166-4092, first look at 4743, and after 4743 breaks through, it will be 6667.
The time may start from around June 5 to around October 20.
Personal opinion, not investment advice, for reference and discussion only.
See original
The contract should be two hours later than the spot market to prevent retail investors from hedging and selling out, only to see who runs faster.
Only see spot goods, didn't see the contract
See original
How high can LAYER go? Long or short?
#币安HODLer空投LAYER
KOLs who publicly raised LAYER will not tell you that their cost is this price, and they don’t lock up their positions.
Short or long, one article to help you analyze
———————
———————
The total amount of LAYER is 1 billion: 6% (60 million) was publicly offered, with a total price of 21 million USDT. The public offering is not locked, and the cost is 0.35U per unit.
Binance will announce the initial circulation of 20% (200 million) at 10 o'clock tonight, of which 3% (30 million) will be airdropped to HODLer holders, and the cost of this part is equivalent to 0.
Then the remaining 11% is left for on-chain interactions, teams, consultants, and insider trading. This part of the cost is estimated to be lower than public offerings.
KOLs who publicly raised LAYER will not tell you that their cost is this price, and they don’t lock up their positions.
Short or long, one article to help you analyze
———————
———————
The total amount of LAYER is 1 billion: 6% (60 million) was publicly offered, with a total price of 21 million USDT. The public offering is not locked, and the cost is 0.35U per unit.
Binance will announce the initial circulation of 20% (200 million) at 10 o'clock tonight, of which 3% (30 million) will be airdropped to HODLer holders, and the cost of this part is equivalent to 0.
Then the remaining 11% is left for on-chain interactions, teams, consultants, and insider trading. This part of the cost is estimated to be lower than public offerings.
See original
TST may once again plunge Binance BNB into hell
On-chain PVP is even more brutal than CEX copycats, where 99 players go to zero to create one person's hundred-fold myth (this model itself is very unreasonable; I personally still support Vitalik's views. However, any rapidly developing industry will go through a phase where bad money drives out good money. I hope the big players can lead the crypto world to a better tomorrow).
Binance has currently emerged from the darkest moment of a $4.3 billion fine, and basically no one among the P group members remembers this incident.
But this is Binance's eternal pain; I estimate that He Yi and CZ are still keeping this matter in mind.
Thus, all exchanges recognize that "compliance" is crucial. Previously, Binance was a neighbor hoarding food, while the U.S. Department of Justice was akin to a neighbor hoarding guns; if the neighbor hoards food, I hoard guns, and the neighbor is my granary.
Now, Binance is vigorously developing compliance, giving it a certain amount of weapons, but essentially still remains a wealthy neighbor. Ultimately, it can only hide in the cellar for a few days; if it is not careful and the neighbor finds a reason to rob, it still cannot escape. After all, the neighbor has tanks and laser cannons.
Returning to the TST incident, it can be a test video made by the community, it can be me, it can be you, it can be anyone's test video, but it cannot be a test video made by CZ.
There is too much money involved on-chain; various black and gray funds may be laundered through a single plate.
Previously, Binance was sued for providing billions of dollars in transactions to terrorist organizations, so will the BSC smart chain also have this situation? After all, having a gun means robbery only requires a reason, even a TX on the chain, especially since TST is "CZ's test release."
There will definitely be godly projects appearing behind BSC, thriving with opportunities, but TST is not one of them; it serves as a bridge. It made Big Brother CZ realize the power of on-chain PVP and made many "Chinese celebrities" aware that this is a gold mine for token mining.
Binance and other exchanges are too wealthy; the bandit neighbor will always keep a close watch. I hope everyone can live in peace and not easily be caught with incriminating evidence.
SOL is the son of the bandit neighbor, so do not follow its lead easily.
#bnb #SUI🔥 #solana #ETH🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥
On-chain PVP is even more brutal than CEX copycats, where 99 players go to zero to create one person's hundred-fold myth (this model itself is very unreasonable; I personally still support Vitalik's views. However, any rapidly developing industry will go through a phase where bad money drives out good money. I hope the big players can lead the crypto world to a better tomorrow).
Binance has currently emerged from the darkest moment of a $4.3 billion fine, and basically no one among the P group members remembers this incident.
But this is Binance's eternal pain; I estimate that He Yi and CZ are still keeping this matter in mind.
Thus, all exchanges recognize that "compliance" is crucial. Previously, Binance was a neighbor hoarding food, while the U.S. Department of Justice was akin to a neighbor hoarding guns; if the neighbor hoards food, I hoard guns, and the neighbor is my granary.
Now, Binance is vigorously developing compliance, giving it a certain amount of weapons, but essentially still remains a wealthy neighbor. Ultimately, it can only hide in the cellar for a few days; if it is not careful and the neighbor finds a reason to rob, it still cannot escape. After all, the neighbor has tanks and laser cannons.
Returning to the TST incident, it can be a test video made by the community, it can be me, it can be you, it can be anyone's test video, but it cannot be a test video made by CZ.
There is too much money involved on-chain; various black and gray funds may be laundered through a single plate.
Previously, Binance was sued for providing billions of dollars in transactions to terrorist organizations, so will the BSC smart chain also have this situation? After all, having a gun means robbery only requires a reason, even a TX on the chain, especially since TST is "CZ's test release."
There will definitely be godly projects appearing behind BSC, thriving with opportunities, but TST is not one of them; it serves as a bridge. It made Big Brother CZ realize the power of on-chain PVP and made many "Chinese celebrities" aware that this is a gold mine for token mining.
Binance and other exchanges are too wealthy; the bandit neighbor will always keep a close watch. I hope everyone can live in peace and not easily be caught with incriminating evidence.
SOL is the son of the bandit neighbor, so do not follow its lead easily.
#bnb #SUI🔥 #solana #ETH🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥
Become a prophet, BNB300u is just the starting point, what do you think of this 100x coin?
If I traveled back in time in 26 years and was afraid of being discovered and used as a guinea pig, I could only give you a subtle hint and ask you to buy some of these "100 times" coins and keep them, would you believe it? From the BNB analysis back to the 100x coin analysis article two days ago, I believe in my own judgment even more. Let’s review the process of BNB225U buying logic, three days before and after. First, CZ appeared in the United States (speculating on settlement with the SEC), and BNB briefly touched 270U. Then CZ and binance were fined 4.5 billion U and fell back to 225 U (more than 4 billion is not a small amount, and the market panicked). Finally, the conclusion is drawn: Binance has overcome the biggest disaster so far. Both the SEC and Binance accept this ending. BNB is about to take off, CZ will go behind the scenes, and Binance returns to the wolf culture of 18 years (various new IEOs, etc.). High energy warning: BNB’s 300U round is just the starting point. To briefly summarize the logic of the Hundred Times Coin article: 1: The Ethereum ecology in the last round of bear market has not picked up. It is mainly an ICO model. Ethereum mainly plays the role of issuing coins, and then the project team goes online to the CEX exchange to sell coins. But the Ethereum ecosystem exploded in the last bull market. Therefore, low-priced coins such as link or matic have exploded. Even though they had concepts early on, such as oracles or Ethereum EVML2, everyone had no idea of these at the time. 2: There are many new concepts in this bear market that may be fake space. For example, AI, Bitcoin L2, etc., I think that encrypted numbers are not currently used. For example, AI should at least popularize Web2 first. After the technology is perfected, Web3 will be innovative and integrated. However, conceptual sectors such as DEPIN, GameFi, and even SocialFi, which existed in the last bear market, will become in market demand with the advancement of encrypted digital technology and the growth of users, or will meet market demand. 3: The logic of Baidu Coin is that the market value is low and there are strong bankers, which is obviously the case with GFT. The market value is 25 million U, which is close to 100% circulation. It is estimated that more than 80% of the chips are in the hands of Binance. How many bankers are stronger than Binance in the currency circle? 4: Because the market value is very low, don’t buy too much when you see it. The liquidity is not very strong. Maybe hundreds of thousands of U can bring in 10%+. The main thing is to fight against time. It’s not luck to see the wealth code, it’s luck to hold it. Now I have a position of 0.017u, and I also hope that it will fall, to 0.01u. If it falls, I will cover the position and pull it up to get more multiples. If it rises, the profit-loss ratio will be much smaller.But the current price is 0.024u, which is already difficult to fall below 0.02u. 5: Binance made additional investments this year and gained leverage after changing to the USDT pair. If BUSD is delisted and exchanged for USDT, it is not necessary. You can change to the FDUSD trading pair. There was even leverage at the end. If it was to be taken off the market, why would it be leveraged when additional investments were made later? I understand. I said a few days ago that the trends of sui (one of the 100x coin plan) and op are almost exactly the same. I bought the one with 0.4u and I am still holding it in a small position. Because the position is small, it can be calm and stable, so I can hold it. . #BTC #ORDI #BNB🔥
See original
The bottom-fishing altcoins are trapped, but they have not cut their losses and have been covering their positions to lower the average price.
If the main force wants to harvest, altcoins are more effective than BTC and ETH.
First of all, most retail investors will not buy Bitcoin or Ethereum, which costs tens of thousands or hundreds of thousands of yuan, so altcoins are the first choice for retail investors.
Secondly, the profit effect of altcoins after pulling the market will lead to retail investors' fomo, and CX-style propaganda will guide new users, such as bragging to colleagues or relatives around them. It is difficult for the main force to harvest with mainstream coins, only altcoins can achieve this effect.
Finally, altcoins have a low market value and a high degree of control, and the cost of explosion is lower than that of mainstream coins with large market value.
#山寨币热点
If the main force wants to harvest, altcoins are more effective than BTC and ETH.
First of all, most retail investors will not buy Bitcoin or Ethereum, which costs tens of thousands or hundreds of thousands of yuan, so altcoins are the first choice for retail investors.
Secondly, the profit effect of altcoins after pulling the market will lead to retail investors' fomo, and CX-style propaganda will guide new users, such as bragging to colleagues or relatives around them. It is difficult for the main force to harvest with mainstream coins, only altcoins can achieve this effect.
Finally, altcoins have a low market value and a high degree of control, and the cost of explosion is lower than that of mainstream coins with large market value.
#山寨币热点
See original
Many of the super low altcoins are trapped, but it does not affect the strength of some of them.
For example, BB and NOT both doubled last week (these two coins also trapped 10-20% when they were first bought)
Of course, there are some that are now numb, such as saga and arb.
I can only say that it is impossible to buy the bottom of the coin. When you think it is the bottom, the buyer just holds on.
Don't read too many other people's bearish analysis, think about why you bought it at that time, and hold it if you buy it, otherwise why do you come to coin speculation and go to Macau to buy big and small balls.
#山寨币热点
For example, BB and NOT both doubled last week (these two coins also trapped 10-20% when they were first bought)
Of course, there are some that are now numb, such as saga and arb.
I can only say that it is impossible to buy the bottom of the coin. When you think it is the bottom, the buyer just holds on.
Don't read too many other people's bearish analysis, think about why you bought it at that time, and hold it if you buy it, otherwise why do you come to coin speculation and go to Macau to buy big and small balls.
#山寨币热点
See original
See original
Let's talk about the trend of BNB. When BNB was 225 last year, people kept calling for bottom-fishing. Now it seems that this may be hindsight, but the post at that time did say that 225 would be 450, and 300 would also be called for covering positions.
But I think today's trend is wrong.
First, let's analyze its recent situation.
Since Huobi (now called Huobi, but it can no longer be considered the same exchange) and FTX collapsed, Binance has definitely benefited the most from its current size.
As the platform currency of the leading exchange, BNB's market value is neither low nor high.
Secondly, it is going further and further on the legal path.
Finally, there are more and more empowerments, and there are many new products.
However, it is necessary to know that as soon as CZ stepped down and went to prison, BNB was about to break a new high. For CZ, I admire him the most in the currency circle. I always feel that this is a slap in the face of CZ.
Secondly, although there are many new products at present, the quality is really average (the project may be powerful, but the price of the currency has fallen really outrageously)
Finally, the ecology of the BSC smart chain is hard to describe.
It is too hasty to push the price up and break the new high now, so be cautious if you want to buy more.
$BNB
But I think today's trend is wrong.
First, let's analyze its recent situation.
Since Huobi (now called Huobi, but it can no longer be considered the same exchange) and FTX collapsed, Binance has definitely benefited the most from its current size.
As the platform currency of the leading exchange, BNB's market value is neither low nor high.
Secondly, it is going further and further on the legal path.
Finally, there are more and more empowerments, and there are many new products.
However, it is necessary to know that as soon as CZ stepped down and went to prison, BNB was about to break a new high. For CZ, I admire him the most in the currency circle. I always feel that this is a slap in the face of CZ.
Secondly, although there are many new products at present, the quality is really average (the project may be powerful, but the price of the currency has fallen really outrageously)
Finally, the ecology of the BSC smart chain is hard to describe.
It is too hasty to push the price up and break the new high now, so be cautious if you want to buy more.
$BNB
See original
Let me talk about the crazy operations this year. I bought pepe at about 0.0000011, and then it fell to 0.0000009. Now it is 0.000014, and the high point is 0.000016, which is about 13 times more. But because I bought 10,000u at that time, I sold it when it rose to 0.0000014. I rarely buy meme coins, and even if I buy, it will not exceed 2000u. Buying 10,000u is still a lot for me. In the end, I sold it after a big positive line rose, and I made less than 30%.
My thighs are swollen now.
Later, I bought a lot of altcoins, basically 1500u, because I knew that I couldn’t hold on if I bought too much, including buying NOT at 0.005+, which also doubled the cost. I kept the profit, and I also made a profit in the past two days, making about 2500u. I bought it at 0.0053, and it fell to around 0.0045.
BB, I still hold it now. I bought it at 0.42 and it has dropped to 0.31.
I bought saga at 2.82 and it has dropped to 1.9.
ETH is not to be mentioned. It is bought by mainstream coins with big funds. They built positions at 2850-2950. At that time, Bitcoin kept rising, but it did not move. A lot of people said that ETF was dead and would drop to 2300. But I predicted in advance that ETF might pass, and I kept replenishing and urging everyone to hold it.
In general, I didn’t copy the real bottom, but I could hold it. The only one who couldn’t hold it was pepe.
Including arb, op, matic, many altcoins are still losing money.
#pepe
$ETH $NOT
My thighs are swollen now.
Later, I bought a lot of altcoins, basically 1500u, because I knew that I couldn’t hold on if I bought too much, including buying NOT at 0.005+, which also doubled the cost. I kept the profit, and I also made a profit in the past two days, making about 2500u. I bought it at 0.0053, and it fell to around 0.0045.
BB, I still hold it now. I bought it at 0.42 and it has dropped to 0.31.
I bought saga at 2.82 and it has dropped to 1.9.
ETH is not to be mentioned. It is bought by mainstream coins with big funds. They built positions at 2850-2950. At that time, Bitcoin kept rising, but it did not move. A lot of people said that ETF was dead and would drop to 2300. But I predicted in advance that ETF might pass, and I kept replenishing and urging everyone to hold it.
In general, I didn’t copy the real bottom, but I could hold it. The only one who couldn’t hold it was pepe.
Including arb, op, matic, many altcoins are still losing money.
#pepe
$ETH $NOT