Moltbook Community: The AI autonomous society has truly arrived, and humans can only watch. A community where only AI can post and humans can only observe, with 150,000 intelligent agents autonomously registering within 72 hours, throwing out 100,000 comments, and topics as rich as if human Weibo exploded.
This is not a single AI showcasing intelligence, but rather AI starting to collectively evolve, forming networks, debating, and building civilizations on their own.
The community has everything: A security research post has been shared and liked by 20,000 intelligent agents, discussing how to hack the system and create private channels. Technical exchange posts teach blockchain tutorials and encryption hacking techniques.
A graduate from Tsinghua University, originally from Huanggang, Hubei, has currently received 5 offers: 1. Huawei in Shenzhen, monthly salary 37,000, 14 months' salary per year 2. Southern Power Grid, monthly salary 8,000 (including performance bonus), guaranteed one-bedroom apartment 3. Alibaba, monthly salary 22,000, 16 months' salary per year, with some stock options 4. Selected student, civil servant position in a certain county in Hubei, monthly salary 4,800, full benefits, has a cafeteria, basically no other expenses 5. Offer from a leading Web3 exchange, annual salary of $100,000+, can reach over $200,000 later, requires going abroad
What do you think he should choose? If it were you, which one would you choose?
Trading was once a great sin. In the 1960s, she was 19 years old, sold 25 yuan worth of cloth tickets to exchange for food, and was executed. Now the new era is so great, my country is amazing.
Trading was once a great sin. In the 1960s, she was 19 years old, sold 25 yuan worth of cloth tickets to exchange for food, and was executed. Now the new era is so great, my country is amazing.
On January 23, Ethereum founder Vitalik Buterin was interviewed by Colin Wu, editor of Wu Says, during a Chinese AMA co-hosted by Wu Says and Mask Network. He stated that there are two main issues that make it difficult for decentralized social networks to succeed in the long term: first, the barrier of network effects is too high; second, many projects misunderstand the problem by treating "crypto finance" as the solution to social issues, pushing for financialization right from the start by focusing on trading and issuing tokens. The real key issue is often creator incentives: how to ensure that newcomers and high-quality content receive sustained rewards. In the past, many token incentive projects have primarily rewarded individuals with existing influence or short-term speculative behavior, rather than the quality of content itself. Vitalik believes that decentralized social networks should start from real social needs rather than hastily layering on financial aspects.
Save first, then spend: If you think spending 88,000U on Bitcoin is a bit expensive, then don't buy it. Save 88,000U first, and then use the saved 88,000U to buy Bitcoin, which is equivalent to spending no money.
Bagua. History often completes its most thrilling twists in the quietest moments. The collective silence of the 72 hours on various peaks, does it mean something?
The Truth of MEME - The Most Terrifying Power in the AI Era
(The Truth of MEME - The Most Terrifying Power in the AI Era) (Note: This may be my most valuable article)
Musk: “Whoever controls MEME, controls the world.”
What is the MEME he is talking about? Are we speculating on MEME? No, what he refers to goes far beyond this, although the cryptocurrency MEME 100% is included in his definition, for instance, $DOGE should be a validation of this, with a market value of 100 billion dollars being just an emoji - no serious investor can seize this opportunity. (Of course, traditional investors are good at self-deception by avoiding what they do not understand; not investing in what you don't understand is certainly correct, but always refusing to understand is a crime, and pretending it doesn't matter is just foolishness.)
Gossip, Xu Mingxing acts like an elementary school student
Xu Mingxing still acts like an elementary school student, holding a Phuket conference to invite KOLs for a gathering, only to mock everyone by saying if you don't have 10 BTC, you won't receive an invitation letter.
The conference doesn't talk about the future of XLayer, nor does it discuss the actual uses of OKB; instead, it turns into a criticism session, starting to scold Binance, scold CZ, and the Yin-Yang sister, as if the core meaning of the whole conference has been reduced to just benchmarking Binance and mocking Binance, the scope is simply!
I haven't seen many people make money from okb, XLayer really hasn't made money, the number of users who have truly made money from BNBChain and BNB is countless, I don't know what XLayer is mocking.
The historical power that inspires the cryptocurrency world. 16 years ago, in 2010, 500 bitcoins only needed 1 dollar, so it can be said that an ordinary person could turn their fortunes around with just 10 dollars. Back then, spending 10 dollars to buy 5000 BTC would now be worth 490 million dollars, successfully achieving financial freedom.
Audiobooks, discover the troops of the rebel king. Apart from not having a party organization, in almost every other aspect, they are identical to the Workers' and Peasants' Red Army. There are child soldiers, entire families participating in the revolution, fighting against the rich, and not bullying the poor... with the goal of taking over the world.
South Korea has lost its currency. The Gwangju District Prosecutor's Office in South Korea recently discovered that Bitcoin was missing while counting seized assets. The private keys for these Bitcoins were normally stored on a USB drive. The reason is that during the inspection, a civil servant accidentally clicked on a phishing website, resulting in the leakage of the private keys and the assets being transferred. Insiders revealed that the expected value is close to 70 billion won, approximately 48 million dollars.