Furina_de_Fontaine

Unknowingly, it has been almost 90 days since I brought orders. Since Binance only displays transaction data and transaction curves within 90 days, I pinned screenshots of the data within the first 90 days to the top for reference by bosses who copy trades.

Overall, I'm quite happy. The amount meets the minimum requirements for copying, and the copying bosses who set up the order exactly according to my requirements basically didn't lose money. And it did successfully double in three months. I hope it can be maintained in the future. My requirements are not high, just a 10-fold increase in one year will be enough. Each quarter only needs to make a profit of 79% to meet the target, and the first quarter can be regarded as overfulfilling the task.

It is worth reminding that the curve data is calculated at a fixed time point every day, so it cannot clearly reflect the intraday situation. It is normal to have retracement. If intraday retracement is included, the maximum retracement is more than 8.79%.

I wish everyone can make a fortune regardless of whether they follow orders or not, whether they are spot goods or contracts!

My chat room exploded, bosses don't panic, I don't want to run away😭😭😭

After being tricked by a bunch of gamblers at the end of last year, I finally found a way to make stable profits. After calculation, in the past three months, I not only made back the loss of following the order, but also made a profit of 3000u. You must know that my principal is only more than 4,000 u, which is almost doubled.

More importantly, the maximum drawdown in my history is less than 10%, and the leverage is below 2 times most of the time, and never exceeds 3 times the leverage. Therefore, I can steadily exchange time for space and enjoy the surprises brought by compound interest. If calculated this way, by the end of the year, I should have a few hundred thousand yuan, and I will have a small amount of wealth and freedom by the end of next year. Although I only went long, the further I pulled back, the better I performed.

Another thing that makes me happy is that the bosses who follow me have now made a net profit of 13,000u. Slowly getting rich together with the bosses, chatting and bragging together is more satisfying than making money alone. . 😂

A big boss asked me to learn StrategyCryptoCap's strategy before. In the last tweet, I reviewed his 2-hour trading records, and finally came to the conclusion that his potential risks were not well followed by historical data at that time. As reflected in the above, his recent performance is quite different from what I judged.

For all the currencies he monitors, when I last observed him, after entering the market for the first time, he covered the position by 1.5 times the last opened position for every 2% drop. I saw up to 4 times of covering the position. The profit point at that time was set at 0.777%, which was the same strategy for any currency. Therefore, the performance of daily needle insertion is not very satisfactory recently. Some people will say that if there is no need to separate positions, just resist the pin. In fact, it doesn't work, because his position is very heavy. If he doesn't use the isolated position mode, it will be easy for him to liquidate his position. It is precisely because of his isolated position model that he was able to achieve a retracement of only a few 10% recently.

Shamelessly promote your order again. Performance has been good recently. Since the opening of the order 78 days ago, the maximum retracement was 8.79%, and the profit rate was 80%. My strategy trades more frequently and the maximum leverage is currently no more than 2.3x (previously it was 2.5x). It is a relatively stable strategy with a high trading frequency and does not deliberately pursue entry points with heavy positions and high winning rates. Therefore, potential risks have been well displayed on the historical curve.

I don’t have many copy quotas anymore. Interested bosses can collect it or simulate following orders to observe. Bosses who want to follow orders suggest that the amount of the order should be between 1,000u and 6,000u. It is too low to keep up, and it is not recommended that the amount is too high. After all, it takes a certain amount of time to build trust. I think the boss who just started following the order and the amount of the order I took will be about the same.

Bosses are welcome to chat in my chat room at any time. For a detailed introduction to my strategies, you can also read other posts on my square. I wish everyone will make a fortune in the bull market!

The order with sir_Large was liquidated!

In my tweet on January 20th, I mentioned that you should be careful with Sir_Large when following orders. The short order he opened on February 8th has been carried until now (I am also among them, but I have withdrawn all the principal on January 20th, leaving only a small amount of profit with him).

Let's make a judgment today. Everyone thinks that StrategyCryptoCap's retracement is smaller and its profit margin is higher, right? In fact, his strategy is very time-intensive, and the potential risks are not reflected in the historical data. Once he makes a mistake, there will be a big retracement. (Of course, since he separates positions, the entire position will not be liquidated directly. I think it is still worth following, but be extra careful about potential risks)

It has been 60 days since I brought orders for real trading. Today, my profit exceeded the 1,000u mark for the first time, from 2,500u to 3,500u. Compared with other gods of war in the square, I may be making money too slowly, but it is worth noting that my historical retracement has never exceeded 300u, which highlights a stability.

In the contract market, surviving is always more important than making more. Even if the profit is only 20% in a month, if you can guarantee to survive, it can double several times in a year, and you will have freedom of wealth in two or three years. I sincerely hope that everyone will make a fortune in the New Year!

The cuckold Excalibur00 fell down, and I was one of his early followers. I got in when he still had 200 players on November 20th. In the early days, he was quite stable, bold and careful, and dared to stop losses. I followed him for 100 dollars at first. Once his GMT fell below, he stopped the loss on the spot. I think this guy is reliable. Later, I gradually followed the order for about 500 dollars, and basically turned over my position with him. .

Later, he added more money and more places. The minimum order amount started at 1,000 dollars, and I had to fill in the amount up to 1,000 dollars. From the transaction records, I felt that his operations began to become more and more distorted, especially the BIGTIME, adding positions and adding more places. I was scared, and then there was a small rebound on January 2. I quickly exited with $1,000 guaranteed. But within a day of leaving, he peed 50% of the time. After a few days of rest, he re-opened the order. Yesterday, he peed again. 40%, directly closed the order and ran away😂

BTC has fallen miserably recently. I have seen a popular saying in the copycat groups of many big guys, saying that those who take orders only do long. They have taken advantage of this rising market and will increase their positions when they fall. Pretend to resist at the first sign of attack, and rush out to save capital. I think they summed it up quite right. In fact, this is my strategy. Then why are these people the big ones? In fact, it is very simple. All short-selling orders have been sent. Those who judge the short-term trend will always overturn. Once the overturn occurs, the return is usually 10% or 20%. withdraw. So why are those who use DCA strategy so much lately? On the one hand, the market has changed, and on the other hand, the operation has deformed. The maximum margin can be as high as 10% and they are still adding positions, which is really not close to liquidation. Far. (PS: Although another brother I am very optimistic about, Sir_Large, has not overturned recently, he has reversed the direction of BTC in the past two days, and has continued to increase his margin to 10%. I feel that this is also a prelude to sending money, and I have already followed him. All the principal has been withdrawn, leaving only the profits for him to play with)

Many people actually have no concept of their own risk tolerance. The 10% retracement in the Binance order data means that your account may shrink by 20% or even 30% in an instant, and the account of 10,000 dollars becomes 7,000. Knife, very scary! However, most friends who follow orders only wait a few days or a week or two to flip their positions, and have no idea how much risk there is.

Put it this way, I have optimized many currencies now. Basically, the average monthly return of spot backtest is 8%, so my goal is only 2.5 times leverage, diversifying risks through multiple currencies, and pursuing 20%-30% % of the monthly capitalization, no matter how high the leverage is, it is too high. The spot has the risk of returning to zero. The monthly capitalization of more than 8% basically has the risk of returning to zero. If you know where the risk is, it’s fine. If you don’t know, then All I can say is that he was sold and still helping to count the money.

Back to my own situation, my lowest retracement in the past 24 hours was probably close to 8%. The decent rebound in the early morning has basically come back. Now my position is still not afraid of further decline. In fact, I don’t consider the SEI that is stuck. , in the past 24 hours, I made 40 dollars on the remaining currencies, which is about 1.3% of the daily change 😂, so the market continues to drop and don’t stop. This kind of market is what I call a volatile market, and the boss in the car may need Adjust your mentality. If nothing else goes wrong, the SEI position is expected to be lost in the end. The other currencies with relatively high positions should not have a big problem in maintaining capital.

If you are a boss who wants to quit, I sincerely recommend not to run away just because you are back to your roots. At least, you should wait until SEI's warehouse program automatically unwinds before running. It won't take too long. It will take a week or two to be longer, but it will be shorter. It lasted about three to five days, and I could still make a profit of 5% to 10% when I left. At least I didn’t go to jail with me in vain.

I found that the positioning of my order-taking strategy should not be in line with what the boss said in the comment area, Binance’s financial management. Binance’s financial management is to protect capital if Binance does not run away, so if it is positioned, the financial management bosses may be afraid of retracement. You can understand this strategy as a coin. Not many KOLs now say to choose a few 10x coins, then hold them firmly until the next bull market and then sell them, right? I don’t know if the currency they selected can increase 10 times. If we take a year or two here, it will probably increase 10 times. There will definitely be retracements in the middle. If the currency price drops by 30%, it can only be regarded as an adjustment. Therefore, if bosses still want to follow the order, they can consider following the order with the mentality and position of investing 10 times the currency.

My personal recommendation is no less than 1,000 knives. A boss with a bad mentality should not spend more than 3,000 knives. That way, you can think about it when you are facing a retracement. Even if you are a leader, you will be beaten, and you will have a companion in jail, right?

In the evening, the pie finally came down, and I feel that the market is much more interesting than the last few days, which was very close to death. I think this kind of market is good hahahahaha (although I am also losing a lot now)

The performance in the past few days was excellent. The currencies INJ and SEI, which were my main sources of profit, have now immediately become the currencies with the largest floating losses. But it doesn't matter, they only account for a small part of my total position. This market is so outrageous, you must always be aware of risks.

When I was having breakfast, I looked around at the KOLs in the square, and I think it’s about half and half. Some said it would continue to fall, and some said that the market was recovering and then falling again. I don’t currently hold many positions. The only currencies that can be considered “locked up” are INJ and SEI. I gave examples a few days ago such as MATIC and DYDX, which haven’t even started to show strength yet. So I’m not afraid of fixing the market and making me lose money. To be safe, I am not afraid of continuing to fall. Continuing to fall is nothing more than turning my 10-wheeler into an 8-wheeler. In this kind of market that has fallen a little and needs to be repaired, I can even make more money than going sideways.

As for INJ and SEI, based on previous experience, it usually takes as short as one or two days, or as long as one week, and there is a high probability that the trap will be solved. First of all, the program itself has a stop-loss mechanism, and it will slowly reduce and increase positions to do T Lowering the cost of holding positions. On the other hand, one of the important reasons why the strategies of these two currencies can be highly profitable is that the currencies are fierce. Once the market stabilizes, the market may rebound. Anyway, it is not rebounding to the previous high. It only needs A decent rebound will basically solve the problem.

I don’t know how the bosses who are still in my car feel now. As of the moment I write this article, Binance’s retracement statistics is 3.82%, but in fact the retracement reached 7.5% at the lowest point in the middle of the night. Therefore, I have repeatedly emphasized that retracement is inevitable. We must be pessimistic and prepare for a large retracement. Only by ensuring that the market does not explode can we make stable profits. The DCA strategy in the bull market is not secure.

In addition, I have observed that compared with orders of 500 dollars and 1,000 dollars, it seems that 500 dollars has encountered a larger retracement. The margin may not be enough? In short, it may be better to spend more than 1,000 knives. My personal suggestion for the maximum order amount is similar to my amount of 3,000 knives. It is mainly a matter of mental endurance. If it is more, the bosses may want to run away if there is a retracement. It is actually pointless to go back and forth. As for the long-term strategy, it is better to buy less and wait until the floating profit bottoms out in a month or two, then add more or not add more positions and slowly roll away.[Monthly conversion rate of 20% is 9 times a year], which is quite a lot.

Finally, I would like to remind my boss that when following an order, regardless of whether it is my order or not, please pay attention. The maximum retracement statistics displayed by Binance are at 8 o'clock every morning. In fact, the maximum retracement of the lowest point in a day is likely to be far greater. This value is displayed on Binance. In other words, those whose maximum retracement can easily reach 50% or 60%, will be liquidated sooner or later. It is not impossible to bet with them. Remember to withdraw the principal in time and use the profits to bet.

Although my strategy has always been to control the maximum leverage within 2.5 times. Considering that there are more and more bosses following large orders, in order to make the bosses feel more at ease, I would just set the leverage to 3 times🤣

I don’t want to use dozens or hundreds of dollars to gamble with high leverage to flip my position. It feels no different from gambling. How can I walk along the river without getting my shoes wet? In order to reap relatively considerable profits, I can only add a little more principal.

It's a pity that I am a poor student and don't have much money. Before Christmas, I put in all the money I saved and earned 20% in 20 days. The $500 is already more than my monthly living expenses. There has been no correction during this period. Overturned, everything is getting better, but I have no capital.

I ran optimizations every day and took data for backtesting. I worked so hard that the income of 500 dollars was still too little to be honest. If I had a principal of tens of thousands of dollars, even if I had a boss with tens of thousands of dollars to follow the orders, it would be great😑 Hey, take your time, I hope there will be more big brothers over time🤤🤤🤤

The Bitcoin ETF was approved, and the growth of various copycats is gratifying. Everyone must have made a lot of money.
It’s been a while since I posted a square, and it’s been 17 days since I started taking orders. At the peak, there were about 7 brothers following orders, but now only two eldest brothers are left to accompany me steadfastly🤣

Among them, the eldest brother who reached 1700 almost from the beginning had a return rate of nearly 40% and a profit of more than 600 dollars. Note that our drawdown is low and the maximum leverage is less than 2.5 times. It can be said that there is basically no risk of liquidation.

I am still very satisfied with my strategy. As we all know, although the market did not fall much some time ago, the copycat market fell like a dog. Even under this situation, my strategy of only copycats still maintained a good and relatively low rate of return. retracement. For a detailed description of the strategy, see my previous post.

It is worth noting here that my 7% retracement was actually profit taking due to the fact that the positions in the previous two days were not reduced. In other words, even if I placed the order with me on January 4, there would not be such a big retracement.

Of course, due to the implementation of the DCA strategy, it is definitely fake that there is no retracement at all. Therefore, there will definitely be floating losses in the process of buying the bottom when following orders. However, as long as there is a rebound, the position can be quickly cleared and settled. , to put it simply, I am not afraid of a major correction, and my strategy will have a stop loss mechanism.

I have horizontally compared orders with people who implement similar strategies. Both the rate of return and the retracement are relatively high among the same type of orders.

So I hope you can pay more attention to it, and I would be very grateful even if you click on it as a favorite or simulate following orders 😂

If you want to follow an order, you must make a definite comparison. The recommended amount is not less than 500 dollars. The comparison of the return rates of the two brothers who followed the order on the same day during this period is enough to illustrate the problem. Thank you all for reading this.

My order ID: Furina_de_Fontaine

I wonder if everyone is okay? Now the KOLs in the square understand it again. Everyone has started to be bearish in the past two days. Some big guys have even been bearish at 45,500 points accurately. Let’s ask ourselves: after the wave just pulled up, the market was immediately smashed. How many people said it? This is tempting

I really don’t know how to read the market, and I don’t know whether it will rebound or continue its waterfall, but I believe in the data. From a data perspective, the risk of my quantitative strategy is indeed relatively low. Now that we have cleared part of our positions, we can still withstand the same situation even if it happens again in the middle of the night.

I find that many people are looking at the quantitative monthly return of 90%, which is very awesome. Is that awesome? Just pull the lever upwards, and I can do it. Anyway, if you bring an order to cut leeks, $1,000 is like an ant warehouse. It will attract a lot of people to cut leeks in a few days and the money will be recovered. If the warehouse is destroyed, you will be reincarnated and become a hero again.

On the contrary, I have been emphasizing risks. My philosophy is to understand whether you are making or losing money. I have also repeatedly introduced to you why the profit margin will be greater if the market rises by 100 dollars in normal times, but this is risky. I have trusted my brother who I have been following for the past few days. Not to mention that I got a lot of meat today, at least I am not at a loss.

Finally, I welcome everyone to pay attention to following orders. I believe that the performance of my strategy during this wave of small corrections can still explain some problems. I hope you can support me.

My order ID Furina_de_Fontaine

Quantified orders with high leverage were sent directly🤣It’s better to be on the safe side.

The pie has been on a good rise in the past two days, and I believe the big guys in the square have made a lot of money. I see that the KOLs in the square are playing tricks in various ways. I looked back at my own account and saw a profit of 4 dollars. I couldn't stand it anymore. I didn't even drink the soup, so I smelled it. Although this strategy is indeed not suitable for sudden rise and fall scenarios. The old saying is true. It is more painful to watch others make money than it is for me to lose money myself. It is more painful to be short than to carry an order. My strategy worked hard and earned 8 points in a week. If I just go all-in, I can earn 8 points in these two days 😂

During the day today, I wanted to spend some money to follow the trend, but then I thought if I entered now, I would just be taken advantage of. Although many KOLs saw 48,000 or even 52,000, I would be a fool if there was a retracement. I went to take a look at those big guys with stable Sharpe ratios and high order taking. It was okay. They didn’t make any money in the past two days. That’s not my problem. I feel that it still confirms that point of view. Many strategies can be used. The key to making money is whether you can implement it consistently. Leek lost all his principal during the swing.

Alas, I feel that the biggest problem now is that the principal is too small. For the few traders who follow orders, I am still afraid that they will think that I have lost my money (I ran away from a big brother this morning. I hope he will take over the order from a high position today). ), to be honest, I looked at it and found that the performance of many orders was more attractive than mine. They knew that they would first try to get a 300% return rate in two days to attract people, and then implement a sound strategy. I don't want to be like this and I'm too lazy to do this. I just hope that my strategy can be implemented from the beginning to the end. People who follow my orders can clearly understand where the profit and risk points of my strategy are, and they must understand the losses even when they are floating losses. As an old leek who has followed more than 50 orders, I will comment on the routine of placing orders another day. Why do you think others are doubling dozens of times when they lead orders, but if you follow up, you will lose money and your position will be liquidated, and your profits will be slow, which is considered a good performance.

So what else can I do? I can only open more squares, hoping to have big bosses and some pocket money to support me. The strategies I implement are almost the same as those of MasterRayn and Magic_Algo, unlike some quantitative strategies. High leverage cannot withstand the risk of plummeting. In fact, after observing their trading behavior, I quite agree with this strategy deployed. Big guys who can't get on their bus should consider me.

Hey, I hope my performance will be a little better when the Sharpe ratio is released in a month. I am really unhappy today. I can’t help but feel the huge increase in the pie, and a big follower has also left, which is doubly heartbreaking.

Open for business, my order ID: Furina_de_Fontaine

Some of the KOLs who call themselves singles in the square are outrageous, bragging that they stand out and are just fools.

Let me give you an example. This example is purely fictitious. If there are any similarities, please do not comment.

Monday strategy: 43500 directly short! Make up once at 43800, defend at 44000 target and look at 43000-42500-42000, the result of the day, loss order (KOL algorithm: stop loss 500 points)

Tuesday strategy: 43500 directly short! 43800 is a replenishment, and the defense is 43000-42500-42000 under the 44000 target. As a result of the day, the pie dropped to a minimum of 42000 (KOL algorithm: profit of 1500 points)

Summary: Brothers, although we have a loss order, the stop loss is 500 points, and the profit is more than 1,500 points. Don’t get lost in the temporary gains and losses in trading. Let’s take a look at the two transactions and easily capture the pie of 1,000 points.

But have you noticed that when stopping loss, position cover is not calculated? When taking profit, it is clearly a ladder stop profit, but the maximum value is calculated directly. We assume that each time we cover a position, we enter 1 position, and each time we take profit, we limit it to one-half of the current position. So what is the real profit point? The answer is 0.5*500+0.25*1000+0.25*1500-700=175 Points, it’s incredible, far less than the 1,000 points claimed. But if you don’t use a stop-profit and stop-loss method and there is a correction, the KOL will accuse you of having a problem with your trading habits. If you are not a leek, who will be?

Such KOLs are relatively kind in the square. They at least admit their losses and have a lot of supporters. There are even more people who secretly edit, modify and delete the orders they object to.

Let me reiterate: this example is fictitious, and any similarity is purely coincidental. This example is mainly used to share our position management experience with each other.

In this post, I introduce some of my own opinions and some immature thoughts that I want to share with you.

Yesterday when I was browsing the square, I saw a friend who called himself 211 Financial Engineering. He claimed that he had quadrupled his position with $3,000 in half a month. It's really amazing. At that moment, I couldn't help but feel excited. After calming down, I thought about it carefully. High profits in a short period of time must bring high risks. The most important thing is that I don't have the financial knowledge to help. I make relevant decisions.

In fact, for me, the most valuable thing is my money, my principal, while the least valuable thing is time. As a student, I don’t need to worry about tomorrow’s credit card or next month’s mortgage. I still have three years to graduate. I have plenty of time to get through it. On the contrary, once I lose this small amount of my principal, it will be difficult for me to return. I can raise enough money off the market (unless I borrow money or gamble with a small capital), so I don't care at all if it quadruples in half a month. Even if I can quadruple it in half a year, a year, or two years, it will be comfortable enough. .

There are always some KOLs in the square who promote the myth of getting rich overnight, and some have a set of logics. As long as the positions are reasonably managed and divided into several parts, as long as one part of the bet is correct and the currency is ten times and a hundred times the currency, it will be completely turned over. To deny the so-called 1%, 1% compound interest strategy of slowly earning money, saying that this is a behavior of making a cake and losing a house. I think there are no good or bad strategies. The key is to have enough execution and whether you have the ability to implement such a strategy. Unfortunately, I don’t have the ability to choose a position to judge whether the market will rise or fall tomorrow or next month. But on the contrary, I do data modeling. The essence of artificial intelligence is to fit big data. I have enough ability to dig out strategies for "making a little progress" from the data every day.

I have been saying in my previous two posts that I can back-test the strategy of 23 years of data to achieve a 12-fold increase. In fact, it only takes one month to earn 23% to increase 12 times. When I emphasized the risks of my own strategy, I repeated it in many places. If this strategy is used on the eve of the 519 incident, it will enter the order-carrying mode very quickly, and then the maximum retracement will be as high as 81.9%. What I did not mention is that, If I had really spent $1,000 on that day, by today, I would be rich and free, at least enough to buy a full-price apartment in a big city.. . .

Of course, I myself will not be all in this strategy. I feel that any financial management behavior should not be all in at any time. However, at this stage, I may be more suitable for quantitative strategies, and at the same time, I need to control the execution in my own hands. Because I never know how many times other people’s leverage has been increased. Maybe behind their 90% monthly profit is a potential retracement of 20%. Maybe I will suffer a big retracement the next day if I follow suit. The order amount of 1,000 dollars may be an ant position for them, but it is already a very important principal for me. I must control it in my own hands. As for the future, if I have a certain amount of principal, I will also Separate a part to take orders for some short-term points. If you can't do it yourself, you have to ask reliable people who can do it to achieve a reasonable allocation of assets overall.

My plan in the future is to further optimize the allocation, and may remove or add certain trading pairs, but for the time being, the main purpose is to control risks, strictly control the leverage, and the monthly return is 20%-40%. At the same time, I may also try the idea of ​​​​long-short dual-opening privately to see if I can optimize a more reasonable allocation, and then allocate a small amount of funds myself to gain higher returns.

After these two days of market trends, I feel that at least the risk of my strategy should be relatively small in taking orders, so I sincerely invite long-term brothers who are willing to accompany me to grow. I am short of principal 😂 At the same time, if you follow the warehouse brother for a period of time and have Stable profits can indeed improve the credibility of taking orders.

I will read and reply to every reply you send. At the same time, I will also take a look at the chat room I opened every two days (although there is no one and no one is talking now). You are welcome to communicate more. I also want to talk to you. Exchange more experiences on leeks and grow together.

My order ID: Furina_de_Fontaine

The market has experienced a retracement in the past two days and then rebounded a little early this morning. Generally speaking, I am very satisfied with my current strategy. This wave of correction plus rebound probably made a little more than 2% profit. I tracked the data in the middle. When the retracement was the most serious, my instantaneous floating loss was about 3%. As for the maximum retracement in days according to Binance’s statistics, 1.25%, this is a number that even conservative me feels is relatively safe.

What makes me even more satisfied is that my strategy is indeed working according to my plan. There was a stop loss operation on the INJ and OP currencies. Although we can say afterwards that due to the rebound, this stop loss operation was in fact The above is to reduce profits, but the reason why I do quantification is to avoid some of my own leek behaviors and leek thoughts such as being afraid to buy when I should buy, reluctant to sell when I should.

I made a horizontal comparison with other quantitative players that I follow. From a horizontal comparison, my retracements and profits should also be quite high. As a way to share my thoughts on leeks with everyone, I would like to share what I think is a good order.

MasterRayn is very stable and has a very small retracement. The biggest problem with him for us to follow the order is that his capital is too large. Our small capital with him is equivalent to 100 dollars with me, and we can follow the order at an equal ratio. It is easy for positions to become unequal, ultimately resulting in loss of profits. Judging from the performance in the past few days, I think he and I have performed equally well. My drawdown and profit are slightly larger. This is mainly determined by the size of the funds, and his strategy is also very conservative.

Magic_Algo is a brother I admire. It is a long-short strategy. Due to the long-short hedging, as long as the long and short orders are balanced, he can set the leverage higher and obtain higher returns. From the perspective of following orders, in addition to the unavoidable risk of unlimited losses for short orders in a one-sided rising market, there is also a problem that since long and short positions are opened at the same time, in most cases there will always be one person who will take the order, so we think When exiting, you must wait for the currency to be in a state of balance between long and short orders, or manually close the new order, and wait for a shock cycle for the trapped orders to unwind before you can exit and follow the order without losing profits.

As for DayangSumbi, who was introduced in the comment area before, he has given up most of his profits during this retracement. I took a look at his position history and found that he is a man with a full position of 20 times leverage. Profits must come with high risks. If there is no rebound this morning, but the market price drops to 40,000, this guy may have already liquidated his position.. . . .

In short, I recommend the top two (of course, this wave of correction has made me have a certain degree of confidence in myself now, Zheng is willing to accompany me as my big brother, hahahaha). I have always believed that losing money is not terrible. The key is to know why you are losing money. Learn a lesson and make sure you don’t lose next time. The strategy I am currently implementing is still focused on controlling risks. Judging from the performance of this wave of corrections, even if the market drops to 38,000, it should not be able to completely penetrate my order book. After that, it will be equivalent to 2.5 times leverage. If you hold the order hard, the risk of liquidation should be very small.

我的上一个帖子 That is, my first post on Binance attracted more people than I expected. I gained more than 20 followers and three followers. I am very happy. I would like to introduce my views in detail. and specific execution strategies for automatic trading with orders.

First of all, like most people, I am a leek. I have been trying to figure it out for a while. Whether I followed the order or followed the square kol to open the order myself, I lost a lot (relative to my principal). I am not a qualified trader either. Or, prone to fomo. This is also the reason why I want to copy automated trading for quantification.

I am really grateful to the boss who believed in me and followed me for more than 900 dollars. Thank you for your trust! To be honest, when I wrote this post, I definitely hoped that I could follow orders. After all, I don’t have much money myself and the principal is too small. However, since it has only been launched for just one day, if I think about it from my perspective, I won’t be able to follow orders everywhere. Therefore, I don’t expect everyone’s trust. If the strategy I introduced seems reasonable to you, click on it and follow it, or try it with a virtual amount through simulated orders, I will be very satisfied.

In fact, this strategy is as introduced in my last post. It is very simple. Assume that for a certain currency A, I now have a minimum investment amount of 5 dollars (assuming that 5 dollars counts as the cost of 1 share). Then if it falls by a certain amount, I will buy more shares. , the more it falls, the lower the average cost is. Then once it rebounds, as long as it exceeds the established profit rate (this profit is set to be very small), it will be cleared out entirely (or in several batches), so most of the time it is a light position. state. And as long as there is no sharp drop that breaks through the entire order book, there is no risk. If it breaks through, it will enter the order-carrying mode.

Based on my description, I believe everyone can also find that this strategy is more suitable for volatile markets, markets that fall sharply and then rebound, and markets that have corrections but slowly rise. It is not suitable for markets that are falling all the way, nor is it suitable for markets that are rising sharply.

There are two reasons why the market is not suitable for rapid rises. First, every initial entry is a light position. Assuming that the cost profit rate of each share is 2%, if it is a volatile market, you may be able to buy dozens of shares in each wave. Cost, but if there is no correction at all when the market goes up, there will be no chance to cover the position (such as SOL a few days ago), and there will be no profit.As we all know, if you don't make money in a bull market, you will lose money. I read that KOLs in the square say that 2024 will be a big bull market. If I have money in the future, I will also keep part of the principal and wait for the correction to try to buy some spot. In short, I do not recommend anyone to [all in] this quantitative strategy. On the other hand, we should avoid opening our ant position at the highest point when there is a sharp rise, because many times a sharp rise is followed by a sharp drop. If the first position is opened at the highest point, it will be easier to penetrate the order book, so in order to avoid this The risk is that if the price rises too fast, this strategy may not open the Ant position.

In order to spread the risk, I divided the principal into different currencies according to a certain proportion. If a currency exceeds the threshold (at this time, the order book has been penetrated), the stop loss mode will be triggered, and it will be based on the currency. Based on the recent performance, choose an appropriate value to stop loss. The goal is to minimize the loss, rather than stop loss on the spot. This also tries to avoid the risks caused by the sharp decline of a single currency.

In fact, the above strategies are all very classic financial quantitative strategies. For a student with a computer background, it is not difficult to deploy an automatic trading strategy. The core of it is the specific parameters, how big each position is opened, and the amount of the next bargain hunt. Where, how to choose the appropriate currency, and how to allocate positions in different currencies to reduce risks as much as possible? This is the core of the strategy and what really needs to be optimized. I have made different parameter optimizations for each currency, but to be honest, because the strategy I am currently deploying has not been implemented, I am not very clear about its future performance, but because almost all my money is on it , so I definitely optimize with risk control as the main purpose.

When using historical data for retracement, assuming that my strategy is launched the day before the 519 black swan event in 2021, then in the next period of time, it will quickly enter the order-carrying mode that breaks through the thin order book, and the maximum retracement in an instant reaches 81.9% (about to explode). If we count from January 1 this year, the maximum instantaneous retracement will be about 30%, and the income will increase 12 times in 2023 on average. In order to pursue returns, my current total leverage allocation is no more than 2.5 times the amount. If I feel that I am entering a bear market, I will further lower the leverage and control it between 1 and 1.Within 5 times. (Under 1x leverage) Unless every currency returns to zero, there is no risk of liquidation. These are historical data and can only be used for reference. I hope everyone will pay attention to this.

I have followed so many orders, and the tuition is not in vain. Some big guys have really powerful parameter configurations. They use the long-short double opening method to obtain greater profits with higher fluctuations. I admire them very much. Parameter configuration (of course, this is a core secret that the big guys can’t tell me), and if you open both long and short positions, it means that one of you will always be trapped. When encountering unilateral market conditions, especially the sharp rise in the market, because there is no loss for short orders. There is an upper limit, so there is a possibility of liquidation. After optimizing the adjustment, I gave up this idea. My current level cannot convince myself to use such a radical strategy based on historical data.

Finally, based on the strategic principles I mentioned earlier, we can clearly draw the conclusion that following orders with equal amounts is a dead end, because the amount I add each time is different, and the more I add, the bigger the position becomes. I don’t know if the person who followed me for 16 dollars is a foreigner or a Chinese person. If he sees this post, please withdraw it immediately. 16 dollars is money, and if you follow me for a few days, your position will be liquidated. In addition, 100 dollars is also risky, because Binance has a minimum minimum order amount (most currencies are 5 dollars), then there may be no money to cover subsequent positions. For rising market prices, 100 dollars will get more A large rate of return may lead to losses for the market on a correction and rebound. I have also followed orders with a similar strategy for 100 dollars, but I can't test it myself.

According to my calculations, if the risk of liquidation is not taken into account, it will basically cost 500 dollars to copy my order book, and the error will not be that big. I wish everyone can get rich, and I hope you can pay attention to my orders and just follow a simulated transaction~

I’ve been with my single-losing mom for a while and I don’t even recognize her anymore. After thinking about it, I decided to go to school on my own.
I have been studying everyone's order-taking style for a while, and during this time I built an automatic trading robot. The principle is DCA strategy plus reverse grid. To put it simply, buy with a small position, and then buy more as the price drops. Once you make a profit, you should close it when it is good. It is suitable for volatile markets and rebounding markets. As long as there is no sharp drop without rebound, the risk of holding up is not high.

This strategy is suitable for volatile markets, markets that have corrections and rebounds, and there is no soup in that kind of rapid rise. Therefore, you need to be patient and be able to withstand the risk of floating losses due to a little correction and decline.

I have tested it using past data. According to the 23-year data, it can probably increase 10 times in a year. Most of the time, there is no retracement. Using the most extreme data in May 21, there is no risk of liquidation. It is outstanding. A stable happiness, will anyone join me and hang up with me 😂
Of course, it must be said that there is indeed no market that is 100 risk-free. If you are willing to join, you must follow the orders on an equal basis, and the minimum amount should not be too low. If it is too low, there may be a risk of liquidation. If there is no bear market, it should be as low as 500 dollars. The risk of liquidation is low
In addition, I have eliminated some products such as btc sol with a minimum order amount of 100 dollars, so if you follow the orders on an equal basis, there should be no overweight currency positions.

I am just a poor student studying artificial intelligence. I have 2,500 dollars all in. I am very happy if you all watch the excitement and add it to your collection🤣 You don’t have to rush to follow the order and then run away after losing two dollars.

The order ID is the same ID: Furina_de_Fontaine, yes, I am a Genshin Impact player😂