it is very easy to verify what you say you just need two accounts with the same amount when in one account you buy in the other you sell the same asset both operations...
HANIA—TRADING—NP
·
--
There is something strange in Binance, who notices? For example, if I bought when it was red and sold when it was green and made a profit, it keeps rising more and more. But if the market drops again, and I buy when it’s red but hold on for it to rise again, the market goes down even more and only rises if I decide to sell at a loss. What’s the reason?
the point is that when he returns the 3 BTC it wouldn't be 9 that each one puts in but approximately 9.33 that's why one BTC would be missing since he rounds the operation to 9...
Crypto Olsson
·
--
Three friends walk into a restaurant and split a bill of 30 BTC — simple, right? Each pays 10 BTC. But then the waiter realizes the bill was actually just 25 BTC, not 30!
He brings back 5 BTC in 1-BTC coins. Unable to split it evenly, he gives 1 BTC back to each friend (3 BTC total) and quietly keeps 2 BTC for himself.
Now let’s break it down:
Each person effectively paid 9 BTC (10 paid - 1 returned)
Total paid = 3 × 9 = 27 BTC
The waiter kept 2 BTC
So... 27 + 2 = 29 BTC? But wait... they originally paid 30 BTC 😱 Where’s the missing 1 BTC??
👉 Spoiler: It’s a trick of logic — the 2 BTC kept by the waiter is already part of the 27 BTC, not something to add to it. 25 BTC (actual bill) + 2 BTC (waiter’s tip) = 27 BTC The 3 BTC returned completes the original 30 BTC.
It’s not missing — it’s just hiding in the math 😉 A classic brain teaser with a Bitcoin twist — and a reminder: always check your change, even in crypto! 🧠💰
If you enjoyed the puzzle, drop a comment and share it with your Binance fam! #Write2Earn #CEXvsDEX101 #TradingTypes101 #FTXRefunds #FTXRefunds $BTC
where can I check that it's true and not just that you used AI to create the image or photoshop...
SLEATHER
·
--
SOMEONE JUST OPENED A LONG OF $276 MILLION IN #BITCOIN Leverage of 40x. Entry: $103,129 They are not guessing, they are betting BIG. He knows something... Or maybe he knows everything. Smart money is moving. Are you watching closely?
yes of course go ahead I bought 1000 dollars in shitcoin held until it has 10 dollars left from those 1000 you invested and binance will give you 1 dollar in shitcoin as an airdrop..hahaha stupid
Formanite602
·
--
Just got word — $NXPC HODLer Airdrop is live on Binance.
If you’ve been holding $NXPC, this one’s for you. No forms, no clicking around — just hold in your spot wallet and let Binance do the rest.
Staking $BNB also puts you in line for future airdrops, Megadrops, Launchpool deals — all of it.
I have seen airdrops come and go, but when Binance runs it, the rewards actually show up.
Quick steps:
Hold $NXPC in your Binance spot wallet
Stake BNB (do it once, benefit long-term)
Snapshot timing May 6-9, 2025
It’s a simple setup. Free tokens just for positioning right.
If you’re new and want in, here’s my Binance link: https://t.co/q67xZW4THO
And if you’ve scored from past Launchpools or airdrops, drop your wins below — real stories hit harder than hype.
I insist you publish the name and ID of the supposed thief, if it was in p2p all the specific data appears... but I don't think he will do it because it's a lie, he is the one trying to steal....
Crypto Vuo
·
--
IF you do P2P trading BE CAREFUL WITH SCAMS
NEW METHOD (first time this happened to me)
they bought USDT, said they made the transfer, then they appealed and instantly contacted me via WhatsApp from the "BINANCE team" asking me to scan a Binance QR code to make a video call. Then I asked them to provide more information to verify that they were truly from Binance. When I refused, they canceled the order and I never received the transfer.
the only scammer is professor criptoman who published or publishes the names and the ID of the account that supposedly did this .... if he doesn't publish their names it's because it's a lie
Crypto Vuo
·
--
IF you do P2P trading BE CAREFUL WITH SCAMS
NEW METHOD (first time this happened to me)
they bought USDT, said they made the transfer, then they appealed and instantly contacted me via WhatsApp from the "BINANCE team" asking me to scan a Binance QR code to make a video call. Then I asked them to provide more information to verify that they were truly from Binance. When I refused, they canceled the order and I never received the transfer.
account name ID everything related to that account that everyone knows what account it is and who is in p2p the specific data appears that person name and surname....
Crypto Vuo
·
--
IF you do P2P trading BE CAREFUL WITH SCAMS
NEW METHOD (first time this happened to me)
they bought USDT, said they made the transfer, then they appealed and instantly contacted me via WhatsApp from the "BINANCE team" asking me to scan a Binance QR code to make a video call. Then I asked them to provide more information to verify that they were truly from Binance. When I refused, they canceled the order and I never received the transfer.
there has been and since when they invest money in a project it helps that this project stagnates or loses trust in it a little common sense for God. not nonsense like this
BullishBanter
·
--
😱#PiNetwork Scandal: Have 70 Million Users Been Deceived?
A shocking twist has shaken the Pi Network community. While the project just announced a massive $100 million fund to support DApp development, many of the 70 million global users called "Pioneers" now feel betrayed after years of dedication and waiting.
🔥 What Just Happened?
On May 14, 2025, Pi Network’s Core Team revealed “Pi Network Ventures,” a $100 million investment fund aimed at supporting developers building decentralized applications (DApps) on its platform.
Instead of excitement, this announcement triggered massive backlash. Many long-term Pioneers argue that they haven’t even earned 1,000 Pi due to referral and ambassador rewards being disregarded. And now, they’re being told that the future of Pi depends on a developer ecosystem funded by their own time and trust.
Price Drop Reflects Trust Crisis
The announcement initially caused a small price pump only to be followed by a brutal drop back to $0.80. Many believe this reflects a loss of trust, not just in Pi’s price, but in the project’s credibility overall.
More than 70 million users across 200+ countries helped turn Pi Network into a global phenomenon not through VC funding, but through belief in the vision. And now, they feel abandoned.
🤐 Unkept Promises and Lack of Transparency
Since 2021, the Pi community has faced endless delays: from KYC verification issues to constantly postponed Open Network launches. The Core Team promised 100 active DApps before mainnet launch but most of them still don’t exist.
Why the silence?
A respected crypto analyst, said:
“Pioneers aren't just users they're the reason Pi exists. The Core Team’s silence says more than words ever could.”
Conclusion
The Pi Network scandal highlights one painful truth: without transparency and respect for the community, even the largest user base can't guarantee long-term success. If the Core Team doesn't rebuild trust, Pi’s most valuable asset its people may walk away.
I must enter to see your private keys this time I promise not to take your cryptos hahahaha
emicabrale
·
--
Bearish
Sometimes, the true act of love… is closing the door
One day, a snake slithered into the burrow of some rabbits. They huddled together, tense, never before had they received a visit like this. But the snake spoke in a soft, almost melancholic voice:
— Do not fear me… I am alone. I have no friends. I only seek a little warmth. Within me are centuries of wisdom that I want to share.
The rabbits looked at each other. They hesitated. But they decided to give her a chance.
That night they listened to her tales, her legends, her hypnotic tone. She spoke like a philosopher. Like one of those ancient souls who seem to understand everything.
And suddenly… she bit one. And disappeared.
The next night, she returned.
— Do not cast me out —she pleaded—. You know I am a snake. It’s hard for me not to bite. But I try. Friends accept each other with their flaws, don’t they?
The rabbits, naive and noble, hesitated once more… and trusted again. Conversations, laughter, closeness… and again: she bit.
On the third night, the burrow was closed with a stone. From outside, the snake coiled, hissed, whispered:
— Forgive me! This time I will change. I just need one more chance…
But no one answered.
And then she huffed with bitterness:
— In this world, there is no longer room for those who think deeply!
And she disappeared into the shadows.
Because sometimes, the most venomous creatures do not come with their fangs exposed… They come with wise words. With pretty phrases. With promises of change. And still… they bite. They always bite.
Do not forget: If someone hurts you over and over —even if they seem sincere, even if they speak beautifully, even if they quote Socrates or Buddha— do not let them into your life anymore. Even if you think being good means enduring.
Sometimes, the true act of love… is closing the door.
hey, any kid with a PC and who knows ChatGPT can do that with just a sentence... don't be silly, reality doesn't pay attention to stupid writings no matter how technical they are...
Armando Pantoja
·
--
Send this to your friends who love, hate or don't quite understand $XRP so you don't have to explain it for the 1,000th time.
for tomorrow is too late sell the house a kidney and metals all to LUNC because in prison good talk is needed.... and you with a house and two kidneys.... hahahahaha stupid hands...
BIT_HUSSAIN
·
--
$LUNC at $0.00006381? Some say it’s over… we say it’s just beginning.
If $217 was possible — then $1 is destiny. This isn’t hopium — it’s history repeating.
-6.75%? That’s just a slingshot pullback. The LUNC Army doesn’t panic — we reload. Every dip is fuel. Every holder is a legend.
$LUNC isn’t just a chart — it’s a comeback story. And Binance is where it begins again.
A question: Binance removed the option to exchange cryptocurrency waste for Binance because I can no longer find it. Could someone clarify that point for me?
my prediction for this project ... the developers will do a rug pull and come up with a stupid excuse of hacking to justify the losses...hahaha
Eleanor Sammut ln1d
·
--
$USUAL
I read the project again. It is an interesting project. However, I do not understand why they have not yet implemented inflation control by burning coins or controlling the issuance of more coins.
My second point is that, today, those who have not read the whitepaper or consulted support do not understand how much they would receive from staking (for those who do not have Web3 available on Binance, they only saw other decentralized wallets) of Usual, which would be UsualX. In other words, they only see when simulating early redemption that there would be a cost of 10% of usual and how much they would earn for that operation.
Third, this 10% - related to how much you would redeem in advance - should be burned by the issuer. I have not yet seen this 10% reflected in the overall amount of Usual, since it should reduce according to a real “Burn”.
Fourth point: up until now, those who invest through Binance and do not have access to Web3 (through Binance) cannot stake their Usual. They can just put it in “Earn” and that’s it. In other words, it is terrible to invest through Binance, you are losing money.
Fifth point: the issuer of Usual @Usual Official could insert a form of staking through Binance (for those who do not have access to Web3, which is the majority), otherwise the price will go to zero, given the greater capacity to reach users.
...the major investors who understand web3 audited the contracts and saw what I saw, which is why the TVL reached a peak and since then it started to decrease. Read the Smart contracts.
Eleanor Sammut ln1d
·
--
$USUAL
I read the project again. It is an interesting project. However, I do not understand why they have not yet implemented inflation control by burning coins or controlling the issuance of more coins.
My second point is that, today, those who have not read the whitepaper or consulted support do not understand how much they would receive from staking (for those who do not have Web3 available on Binance, they only saw other decentralized wallets) of Usual, which would be UsualX. In other words, they only see when simulating early redemption that there would be a cost of 10% of usual and how much they would earn for that operation.
Third, this 10% - related to how much you would redeem in advance - should be burned by the issuer. I have not yet seen this 10% reflected in the overall amount of Usual, since it should reduce according to a real “Burn”.
Fourth point: up until now, those who invest through Binance and do not have access to Web3 (through Binance) cannot stake their Usual. They can just put it in “Earn” and that’s it. In other words, it is terrible to invest through Binance, you are losing money.
Fifth point: the issuer of Usual @Usual Official could insert a form of staking through Binance (for those who do not have access to Web3, which is the majority), otherwise the price will go to zero, given the greater capacity to reach users.
I have already told you the white paper does not matter in a DeFi project, only the smart contracts matter, and these contracts of the project are very centralized that's why it is ....
Eleanor Sammut ln1d
·
--
$USUAL
I read the project again. It is an interesting project. However, I do not understand why they have not yet implemented inflation control by burning coins or controlling the issuance of more coins.
My second point is that, today, those who have not read the whitepaper or consulted support do not understand how much they would receive from staking (for those who do not have Web3 available on Binance, they only saw other decentralized wallets) of Usual, which would be UsualX. In other words, they only see when simulating early redemption that there would be a cost of 10% of usual and how much they would earn for that operation.
Third, this 10% - related to how much you would redeem in advance - should be burned by the issuer. I have not yet seen this 10% reflected in the overall amount of Usual, since it should reduce according to a real “Burn”.
Fourth point: up until now, those who invest through Binance and do not have access to Web3 (through Binance) cannot stake their Usual. They can just put it in “Earn” and that’s it. In other words, it is terrible to invest through Binance, you are losing money.
Fifth point: the issuer of Usual @Usual Official could insert a form of staking through Binance (for those who do not have access to Web3, which is the majority), otherwise the price will go to zero, given the greater capacity to reach users.
if you have #usual hoping it will go up ...the best thing you can do right now is to accept losses and sell because in tvl after reaching 1.36B it started to go down then if the coin stayed at 0.5 while its tvl was increasing now that the usual tvl started to go down which indicates loss of confidence by strong investors the #usual coin will lose its value to maintain the stickiness of usd0 to the dollar... in conclusion if things continue as they are going very soon the usual token will touch levels below 10 cents of a dollar where even at that price you have to think about buying it...