CryptoFrontNews (CFN) delivers the latest in cryptocurrency with real-time updates, expert analyses, and in-depth articles on digital currencies and blockchain.
BlockFills filed Chapter 11 after reporting $50–$100M in assets against $100–$500M in liabilities.
The firm suspended client withdrawals in February as liquidity pressures and a $75M loss emerged.
A Dominion Capital lawsuit alleging asset misappropriation led to a court order freezing some assets.
Crypto trading and lending firm BlockFills filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy on March 15, 2026, in the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the District of Delaware after suspending client withdrawals and facing legal pressure. The filing came from Reliz Ltd., the company operating BlockFills, alongside three affiliated entities. The restructuring move followed liquidity shortages and an asset freeze tied to Dominion Capital’s allegations of asset misappropriation.
Bankruptcy Filing Reveals Balance Sheet Strain
Reliz Ltd., the operator behind BlockFills, submitted a voluntary restructuring petition on Sunday. The filing took place in the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the District of Delaware. According to the court documents, the company reported assets between $50 million and $100 million. However, liabilities ranged from $100 million to $500 million.
The figures revealed a significant gap between assets and obligations. Consequently, the company sought court protection to restructure its operations. BlockFills said the bankruptcy process followed discussions with investors, clients, and creditors. In a statement, the firm described Chapter 11 as the most responsible path forward.
The company said the court-supervised process would allow orderly restructuring. It also aims to stabilize operations and explore strategic transactions. Additionally, BlockFills said it intends to seek new liquidity sources during the process. The firm also stated that protecting client interests remains a priority.
Withdrawal Halt Preceded Bankruptcy Move
Before the filing, BlockFills had already restricted platform activity. In February, the company suspended client deposits and withdrawals. According to the firm, market and financial conditions triggered the suspension.
At the time, BlockFills said it was negotiating with investors and stakeholders. Liquidity constraints intensified pressure on the trading platform. Meanwhile, reports indicated the company had lost about $75 million.
According to previous disclosures, BlockFills processed more than $61 billion in trading volume in 2025. That figure represented a 28% increase from the previous year. The company also served over 2,000 institutional clients across more than 95 countries. Its services included liquidity provision, lending, and trade execution.
Dominion Capital Lawsuit Adds Legal Pressure
Legal disputes also complicated the company’s financial situation. Earlier this month, a U.S. federal judge issued a temporary restraining order. The order followed a lawsuit filed by Dominion Capital.
According to court filings dated Feb. 27, Dominion accused BlockFills of misappropriating client assets. Dominion alleged the firm retained millions of dollars in cryptocurrency stored on the platform.
The lawsuit also claimed the company commingled client funds. As the dispute continued, the court temporarily froze certain assets linked to the case. Meanwhile, the company continued restructuring under Chapter 11 protection.
BlockFills is backed by investors including Susquehanna Private Equity Investments and CME Group’s venture arm.
The post Crypto Trading Firm BlockFills Seeks Chapter 11 Protection appears on Crypto Front News. Visit our website to read more interesting articles about cryptocurrency, blockchain technology, and digital assets.
Solana Price Rejected at $90 as ABC Correction Targets Lower Support
Key Insights
Solana price rejected the $90 resistance zone as sellers defended the range high, increasing the probability of a corrective market phase.
The current structure suggests an ABC correction where the recent rally may represent the B leg before potential downside continuation begins.
Traders now focus on the $81 support zone since a break below this level could accelerate movement toward the value area low.
Solana price recently rejected the $90 level after buyers attempted to push above a major resistance zone within the current trading range. The rejection appeared as selling pressure increased near the range high where traders often protect previous resistance levels. Besides the structural barrier, the region also aligns with the value area high, which strengthens its importance in the current market structure.
Market Structure Signals Potential Correction
The latest price movement now points to a possible corrective phase as Solana remains below the upper boundary of its range. However, the market structure still reflects a broader consolidation rather than a confirmed directional breakout. Consequently, traders now monitor how price reacts within the established range as liquidity continues to rotate between key levels.
Technical analysis shows that Solana may be forming an ABC corrective structure, which often appears during temporary market pullbacks. In this structure, price moves through three phases before the broader trend resumes or changes direction. Significantly, the initial drop created the A leg while the recent rebound toward $90 likely formed the B leg.
Failure to Break Resistance Weakens Momentum
The inability to reclaim the resistance zone suggests that buying momentum may weaken in the short term. Moreover, traders often interpret repeated rejections at range highs as a signal that sellers remain active at those levels. Hence, the rejection strengthens the idea that Solana could now transition into the C leg of the correction.
Source: TradingView
Market participants now closely watch the $81 level since it acts as an important support zone within the current structure. Additionally, this area sits near a region where previous demand appeared during earlier market rotations. However, a clear break below this support could increase bearish pressure and encourage a move toward lower liquidity zones.
Liquidity Zones Remain a Key Market Driver
Price action within range markets often rotates between the value area high and the value area low as traders search for liquidity. Moreover, swing lows below the current market price remain untested and may attract price movement if selling pressure increases. Consequently, these liquidity clusters could guide the next phase of Solana's short-term market behavior.
Besides the technical developments, activity within the Solana ecosystem continues to expand through infrastructure projects and corporate initiatives. Additionally, companies have recently announced plans to strengthen Solana-based infrastructure in global markets. However, despite these developments, the current price structure still reflects a technical range environment.
The broader outlook now depends on whether Solana breaks below support or reclaims resistance. Moreover, traders continue to monitor the $90 level as the key barrier that controls bullish momentum. Hence, sustained trading below this resistance keeps the corrective structure active while support levels remain under pressure.
The post Solana Price Rejected at $90 as ABC Correction Targets Lower Support appears on Crypto Front News. Visit our website to read more interesting articles about cryptocurrency, blockchain technology, and digital assets.
Dogecoin Futures Data Shows $0 Short Liquidations During Reset
Key Insights
Dogecoin futures recorded zero short liquidations within an hour, signaling a sharp drop in bearish bets as traders increasingly favored long positions.
DOGE gained over four percent during the past week, and that upward trend reduced aggressive short positions across derivatives markets.
Despite the recent pullback to $0.094, Dogecoin trading volume surged strongly, showing continued activity as traders watch resistance near $0.10.
Dogecoin futures markets recorded an unusual signal as short liquidations dropped to zero during a recent trading window. Market data shows that bearish traders largely stepped aside while price movements unfolded across the broader crypto market.
Significantly, liquidation tracking platforms reported no forced closures of short positions within an hour. This rare situation often reflects a sharp imbalance in market positioning.
Moreover, the development highlights how traders currently lean toward bullish expectations despite ongoing volatility.
Bullish Sentiment Reduces Short Exposure
Dogecoin traders appear to have shifted their strategies in recent sessions. Consequently, fewer participants held short positions large enough to trigger liquidations when prices fluctuated.
Besides that, many bearish traders likely closed their positions manually before reaching liquidation thresholds. This move limited forced liquidations while still exposing them to losses through fees, slippage, and rapid market adjustments.
Additionally, the absence of liquidations suggests that speculative pressure on the downside weakened during the observed period.
Weekly Price Momentum Influences Trader Behavior
Recent price activity provides context for the futures market shift. Dogecoin advanced more than 4.35% during the past week, which encouraged traders to reduce aggressive bearish bets.
Hence, the rising price trend influenced derivatives positioning across exchanges. Many traders favored long exposure as optimism increased around short-term price recovery.
Moreover, the meme coin attracted additional interest after technical indicators signaled renewed momentum earlier in the week.
Price Pullback Follows Resistance Rejection
However, Dogecoin failed to sustain its upward push after encountering strong resistance. The rejection triggered a broader decline that aligned with weakness across the cryptocurrency market.
Consequently, DOGE dropped around 4.61% in the past 24 hours and traded near $0.094 at the time of reporting. Bitcoin’s downward movement added pressure and reinforced the short-term pullback.
Additionally, price reactions at resistance levels often influence derivatives positioning and reduce aggressive leverage.
Trading Volume Remains Elevated
Despite the price retreat, market participation continues to expand. Trading volume increased by more than 27% and reached roughly $1.81 billion.
Significantly, higher activity often reflects strong interest from both retail traders and derivatives participants. Increased volume also signals that traders remain engaged even during price corrections.
Moreover, sustained activity indicates that market participants continue to watch technical signals closely.
The post Dogecoin Futures Data Shows $0 Short Liquidations During Reset appears on Crypto Front News. Visit our website to read more interesting articles about cryptocurrency, blockchain technology, and digital assets.
Analyst Says Bitcoin Indicators Show Early Signs of Market Recovery
Stablecoin liquidity rose by ~$8B since February, signaling potential improved market trading conditions.
Inter-exchange Flow Pulse turned positive, indicating more Bitcoin moving to derivatives platforms.
Long-term holders retain ~79% of supply, showing gradual supply transfers rather than sharp shifts.
Signs of change are emerging in the Bitcoin market after months of weakness. According to CryptoQuant analyst Darkfost, several indicators have begun improving despite a broader bear phase that started in October. The analyst highlighted rising stablecoin liquidity and shifts in exchange flows, although he cautioned that more data is needed to confirm any lasting market change.
Market Indicators Begin To Shift
Darkfost reported that Bitcoin remains within the bear market that began in October. However, several metrics have recently started to stabilize. According to Darkfost, three indicators currently show improvement.
These include liquidity conditions, on-chain trader profitability, and the Inter-exchange Flow Pulse indicator. Liquidity data provides the first signal. Since early February, the total stablecoin market capitalization has stabilized and increased.
The analyst said the market added roughly $8 billion in stablecoin value during that period. Stablecoin liquidity often influences trading activity across crypto markets. Meanwhile, another indicator also changed direction. The Inter-exchange Flow Pulse recently turned positive.
According to Darkfost, that shift shows more Bitcoin moving toward derivatives platforms. This movement may indicate growing trader activity in futures markets. However, the analyst stressed that these changes remain early signals. More indicators must strengthen before confirming a broader trend.
Long-Term Holders Still Dominate Bitcoin Supply
Darkfost also examined supply distribution between long-term and short-term Bitcoin holders. The analyst said the current cycle differs from earlier market patterns. Notably, long-term holders still control most of the circulating supply.
According to CryptoQuant data, they currently hold around 79 percent of all Bitcoin. Earlier cycles showed sharper distribution changes. For example, in 2021 long-term holder supply dropped from 82 percent to 70 percent within six months.
That shift occurred when short-term traders absorbed large volumes of selling pressure. However, the current cycle followed a different structure.
Supply Transfers Occur in Multiple Waves
Instead of one large transfer, supply moved gradually during this cycle. The analyst identified six waves of supply transfer between long-term and short-term holders. During each phase, short-term participants absorbed selling pressure.
Over time, some of those traders became long-term holders themselves. According to Darkfost, this pattern reflects stronger liquidity conditions. New participants also entered the market during the cycle. These include investors accessing Bitcoin through exchange-traded funds and digital asset treasuries.
The post Analyst Says Bitcoin Indicators Show Early Signs of Market Recovery appears on Crypto Front News. Visit our website to read more interesting articles about cryptocurrency, blockchain technology, and digital assets.
Former U.K. Prime Minister Boris Johnson described Bitcoin as a “giant Ponzi scheme” in a Daily Mail opinion column. Johnson shared the remarks publicly and discussed them on X, criticizing the cryptocurrency’s value structure. However, Strategy Executive Chairman Michael Saylor and several crypto commentators quickly challenged the claim online.
Boris Johnson Questions Bitcoin’s Value
Boris Johnson explained his view through a personal story from his village in Oxfordshire. According to Johnson, a retired resident gave £500 to a man who promised to double the investment using Bitcoin.
Johnson said the individual later paid additional fees while trying to withdraw funds. Over three and a half years, the victim reportedly lost around £20,000. Johnson described the situation as a scam connected to cryptocurrency promotion.
He argued that such incidents reinforce concerns about Bitcoin’s economic structure. The former prime minister also compared Bitcoin with other assets. He said items such as gold or collectible cards carry cultural or physical appeal.
Johnson specifically referenced Pokémon cards as an example of a collectible with long-standing popularity. By contrast, he described Bitcoin as only “a string of numbers stored in computers.”
He also questioned the identity of Bitcoin creator Satoshi Nakamoto. According to Johnson, the pseudonymous creator offers no institutional accountability.
Michael Saylor Responds to Ponzi Claim
Michael Saylor, executive chairman of Strategy, responded directly to Johnson’s statement. Saylor argued that Bitcoin does not match the definition of a Ponzi scheme. According to Saylor, Ponzi structures require a central operator promising returns. Early investors receive payouts funded by later participants.
Saylor stated that Bitcoin lacks such characteristics. He said the network has no issuer, promoter, or guaranteed profit mechanism. Instead, Saylor described Bitcoin as an open monetary network driven by software and market demand. He emphasized that users voluntarily participate in the system.
Crypto Community Challenges Johnson’s View
Notably, contributors in X’s community notes program added context to Johnson’s claim. The note explained that Ponzi schemes promise unusually high returns with minimal risk. According to the note, Bitcoin does not include such guarantees.
Other users responded with technical explanations of the network. Some highlighted Bitcoin’s fixed supply and decentralized architecture. Meanwhile, BitMEX Research posted a brief response online. The group wrote that “nobody is in charge” of the Bitcoin network.
The post Former UK PM Boris Johnson Labels Bitcoin a Ponzi Scheme appears on Crypto Front News. Visit our website to read more interesting articles about cryptocurrency, blockchain technology, and digital assets.
Robinhood Explains Why It Chose Ethereum Layer 2 Over L1
Robinhood selected an Ethereum Layer 2 instead of a new Layer 1 due to decentralization concerns on some networks.
Company cited Ethereum’s strong infrastructure and interconnected liquidity across EVM ecosystems.
Strategy prioritizes accessibility and integration with existing financial and blockchain networks.
Robinhood’s crypto leadership has raised concerns about the structure of several non-Ethereum blockchains. Robinhood Crypto General Manager Johann Kerbrat discussed the company’s decision to build a Layer 2 network instead of launching a new Layer 1. Kerbrat pointed to decentralization concerns and liquidity access as key factors influencing that strategy.
Centralization Concerns Affect Some Layer 1 Networks
Johann Kerbrat said several large non-Ethereum Layer 1 networks still face centralization challenges. According to Kerbrat, certain incidents show validators restarting systems simultaneously during disruptions.
He explained that such coordinated restarts raise questions about decentralization. In contrast, Kerbrat said Ethereum provides established infrastructure that developers can rely on.
Because of that structure, builders can focus on applications rather than rebuilding core network components. Kerbrat described this foundation as security developers receive without additional engineering effort.
Therefore, teams can direct resources toward building services instead of maintaining base network functions. That difference, according to Kerbrat, influenced Robinhood’s technical decision.
Liquidity Access Shaped Robinhood’s Strategy
Beyond decentralization, Kerbrat highlighted liquidity access as another major factor. Ethereum connects with numerous EVM-compatible chains and decentralized applications.
According to Kerbrat, that interconnected liquidity environment offers advantages for financial services platforms. A project operating independently would struggle to attract the same network activity.
Kerbrat compared isolated networks to private islands. In such an environment, users and assets cannot easily move between ecosystems.
Robinhood, however, aims to build services that operate within a broader financial system. Kerbrat said the company wants open access rather than closed infrastructure.
Layer 2 Design Focuses on Accessibility
Kerbrat also addressed how Layer 2 economics can vary between projects. Some networks choose extremely low transaction fees, while others capture portions of Ethereum’s fee structure.
However, Kerbrat said Robinhood focused less on fee revenue during early planning. Instead, the company prioritized accessibility and integration with existing liquidity networks. That approach reflects the company’s broader goal for blockchain infrastructure.
Kerbrat said Robinhood intends to support financial systems operating directly on-chain. For that reason, the company selected a Layer 2 model connected to Ethereum rather than launching a separate Layer 1 chain.
The post Robinhood Explains Why It Chose Ethereum Layer 2 Over L1 appears on Crypto Front News. Visit our website to read more interesting articles about cryptocurrency, blockchain technology, and digital assets.
Aave Details $50M USDT-to-AAVE Swap Incident Post Mortem
User swapped $50M aEthUSDT through Aave’s interface but received only about $36K in AAVE tokens.
Trade routed via CoW Swap and multiple DEX pools executed at a 99.9% price impact.
Aave plans a new “Aave Shield” safeguard blocking swaps with over 25% price impact.
A massive crypto trade executed on March 12, 2026, triggered scrutiny after a user swapped more than $50 million in tokenized USDT through the Aave interface. According to Aave’s incident report, the transaction occurred through the CoW Swap router integrated into its platform. The unusually large order moved through a thin market and returned only about $36,000 worth of AAVE tokens.
Large Trade Moves Through Low-Liquidity Market
According to Aave, the user attempted to swap 50,432,688 aEthUSDT for aEthAAVE using the swap widget on aave.com. The feature operates through CoW Swap, a decentralized exchange aggregator.
Importantly, the swap occurred outside the core Aave Protocol. The protocol itself handles lending and borrowing functions through its own smart contracts.
Instead, the transaction used the integrated front-end widget connected to CoW Swap solvers. These solvers execute user requests by routing orders across decentralized exchanges.
However, the trade size exceeded available liquidity for the token pair. As a result, the solver quoted a price roughly 99.9% below expected market value. According to Aave, the interface displayed a strong warning about extreme price impact before the order executed.
User Confirmed High-Risk Quote Before Execution
The platform required explicit confirmation before proceeding. The interface warned that the trade carried potential for a full loss of value. To continue, the user checked a box acknowledging the warning. The swap button remained disabled until the confirmation occurred.
After approval, the order executed through the CoW Protocol settlement system. The solver first redeemed aEthUSDT for raw USDT through Aave V3. Next, the funds moved through the Uniswap V3 USDT/WETH pool. The solver received 17,957.81 WETH before routing it to SushiSwap.
That step purchased about 331 AAVE tokens. The solver then deposited those tokens into Aave V3, minting aEthAAVE. Finally, the user received about 327 aEthAAVE worth roughly $36,425.
Aave Introduces Safety Feature After Incident
According to Aave founder Stani Kulechov, the team published a detailed post mortem of the $50 million trade. The incident also produced a swap fee of about $110,368. Aave said it will return the funds if the user contacts the platform.
Meanwhile, the team plans to introduce a safeguard called Aave Shield. The feature automatically blocks swaps exceeding a 25% price impact. Users must manually disable the protection to execute higher-risk trades.
The system adds friction while maintaining permissionless trading options. According to Aave, the user involved in the trade has not contacted the platform.
The post Aave Details $50M USDT-to-AAVE Swap Incident Post Mortem appears on Crypto Front News. Visit our website to read more interesting articles about cryptocurrency, blockchain technology, and digital assets.
CLARITY Act Passage Odds Drop Without April Committee Vote
Analysts warn the CLARITY Act must pass a Senate committee by April or chances of 2026 passage drop sharply.
Dispute over stablecoin rewards between banks and crypto firms remains the main legislative obstacle.
Additional debates on DeFi regulation, SEC authority, and developer protections could delay the bill further.
A narrowing legislative window could stall the proposed U.S. CLARITY Act, a bill designed to set rules for digital asset markets. According to Alex Thorn, head of research at Galaxy Digital, the measure must pass a Senate committee by the end of April. Thorn warned that failure to meet that deadline could sharply reduce chances of passage in 2026.
Senate Timeline Creates Pressure for CLARITY Act
Alex Thorn outlined the timeline concerns in a public statement on X. He said the legislation must reach the Senate floor by early May. According to Thorn, floor time in the Senate continues to shrink. Each delay lowers the probability of passing market structure legislation this year.
Scheduling priorities in Washington also complicate the timeline. Senate Majority Leader John Thune indicated lawmakers will first address the SAVE America Act. That proposal would require individuals to show proof of U.S. citizenship when registering to vote.
As a result, digital asset legislation may wait until April. However, Thorn said the committee vote remains the key procedural step. Without it, the bill may struggle to advance further in 2026.
Stablecoin Rewards Debate Blocks Progress
Currently, lawmakers disagree on whether stablecoin issuers can offer yield or rewards. The issue has become the central dispute delaying the CLARITY Act. Traditional banking groups argue that rewards could pull deposits away from banks. Meanwhile, crypto companies say incentives could expand stablecoin utility.
Thorn noted that the rewards debate dominates the current discussion. However, he warned that it may not represent the final obstacle. Other policy questions could emerge once the rewards dispute ends. These include decentralized finance regulation and protections for blockchain developers.
Additional Policy Disputes Remain Unresolved
Further complications may arise from regulatory authority debates. Lawmakers still discuss the balance of power between agencies such as the SEC.
Thorn also referenced ethics provisions and developer protections as potential flashpoints. These issues remain largely unresolved behind closed doors.
Earlier drafts illustrate the political divisions. A Senate Banking Committee discussion draft released in January followed a largely partisan process. However, lawmakers continue exploring compromises. Senator Angela Alsobrooks said both banking and crypto groups may need concessions.
External analysts also remain cautious about the timeline. Investment bank TD Cowen warned that broader crypto legislation could face delays until 2027. Under that scenario, final rules may not take effect until 2029.
The post CLARITY Act Passage Odds Drop Without April Committee Vote appears on Crypto Front News. Visit our website to read more interesting articles about cryptocurrency, blockchain technology, and digital assets.
TRON joins Mastercard’s Crypto Partner Program to push real-world crypto payments and merchant adoption forward.
TRON processes about $22B daily, showing strong capacity for large-scale blockchain payment infrastructure.
The partnership aims to connect TRON’s blockchain with Mastercard’s global merchant and banking network.
TRON has taken a major step toward mainstream crypto payments by joining Mastercard’s Crypto Partner Program. The announcement signals deeper cooperation between blockchain networks and traditional finance infrastructure. TRON founder Justin Sun highlighted the milestone in a recent post about the network’s expanding payment ambitions.
The partnership links the TRON blockchain system to Mastercard’s worldwide payments network. As such, this union may open new possibilities for crypto payments and merchant settlements globally. Furthermore, the move is part of an expanded effort to incorporate digital assets into financial systems.
It is worth noting that Mastercard also launched the Crypto Partner Program, whose objective is to collaborate with various blockchain systems and digital asset providers. As such, TRON is part of an expanded effort to make crypto more accessible in real-world financial activity.
Expanding Blockchain Payment Infrastructure
TRON has grown into one of the most active blockchain networks in the digital asset industry. According to Whale Insider data, the network processes about $22 billion in daily transactions. Consequently, that scale highlights TRON’s ability to support large financial operations.
Moreover, it plays a significant role in facilitating stablecoin transactions and decentralized finance. This requires high throughput, low fees, and quick confirmation of transactions. Therefore, TRON has established itself as a solid base for facilitating digital payments.
Besides, Mastercard is known to run one of the biggest payment systems in the world. The company connects banks and payment providers as well as millions of merchants in various regions. Therefore, it can be a catalyst in the promotion of cryptocurrencies in everyday transactions.
Bridging Traditional Finance and Crypto
The crypto sector has long struggled to bridge decentralized networks and traditional payment systems. However, collaborations like this attempt to close that gap. Mastercard now explores ways to combine blockchain technology with existing financial rails.
Moreover, networks such as TRON offer scalable infrastructure that supports large transaction volumes. Hence, they suit payment-focused use cases across global financial markets.
Additionally, the partnership may support several real-world applications. These include blockchain-based cross-border transfers and digital asset merchant payments. Furthermore, faster settlement systems could benefit financial institutions exploring crypto integrations.
The post TRON Joins Mastercard Crypto Partner Program appears on Crypto Front News. Visit our website to read more interesting articles about cryptocurrency, blockchain technology, and digital assets.
CZ urges block explorers to filter spam transactions as Ethereum address attacks rise sharply.
Address poisoning exploits fake wallets; even tiny errors can cost users large sums.
AI and secure wallets can help detect fraud, reducing risks from automated Ethereum attacks.
The sharp rise in Ethereum address poisoning attacks has triggered urgent debate about user protection across the crypto ecosystem. Changpeng Zhao recently criticized block explorers for displaying spam transactions that enable these scams. He argued that platforms like Etherscan should directly filter such transactions before users see them.
According to Zhao, the technology already exists. The wallet app Trust Wallet already blocks many of these spam transfers. Consequently, Zhao believes block explorers should adopt similar protections quickly. Attackers increasingly exploit fake wallet addresses to trick users into sending funds. Moreover, the growing scale of attacks threatens confidence in the broader Ethereum ecosystem.
Zhao shared his criticism through a public post on X. He stated, "Block explorers should not show these spam transactions. Should be simple to filter them out completely. TrustWallet does this already. This may have some impact on micro transactions between AI agents later. By then, we can use AI to filter out the spam too."
His comment sparked a wider conversation about security responsibility in crypto infrastructure. Moreover, industry observers now question whether explorers should play a stronger protective role.
Rising Address Poisoning Threat
Security researchers warn that address poisoning attacks now appear more automated and widespread. Etherscan previously alerted users about the growing threat. Attackers create wallet addresses that closely resemble legitimate ones. They then send tiny transactions to victims. Consequently, these fake addresses appear in transaction history lists.
Many users copy addresses from previous transfers. However, attackers exploit this behavior. Victims may accidentally select the fraudulent address during future payments. Hence, attackers redirect large transfers without triggering obvious warnings.
Economics also drives these attacks. Analysts estimate a success rate of roughly 0.01 percent. That means only one victim appears among every 10,000 attempts. However, a single successful transfer can involve large sums. Consequently, attackers easily recover the cost of thousands of failed attempts.
Fusaka Update and Security Concerns
The surge in attacks emerged shortly after the Ethereum Fusaka Update. Developers designed this update to lower transaction fees and improve network efficiency. However, cheaper transactions also enabled attackers to launch large-scale spam campaigns.
Besides infrastructure changes, user habits also contribute to the problem. Security experts urge crypto users to verify every address carefully. Even a single incorrect character can redirect funds permanently. Additionally, experts advise users to avoid copying addresses from transaction history.
Wallets with built-in protections provide another safety layer. Moreover, developers increasingly explore artificial intelligence to detect suspicious transactions automatically.
The post CZ Urges Spam Filtering as Ethereum Attacks Surge appears on Crypto Front News. Visit our website to read more interesting articles about cryptocurrency, blockchain technology, and digital assets.
Circle Introduces AI Skills for USDC, EURC Blockchain Tools
Circle Skills lets AI agents perform payments, wallet tasks, and smart contract actions using USDC and EURC.
Tool integrates with AI platforms like Cursor, Claude Code, and Codex to build stablecoin apps faster.
Circle tested AI agents with a $30K USDC hackathon that produced 204 projects and 9,700 comments.
Circle has introduced Circle Skills, an open-source tool designed to help developers and AI agents interact with blockchain services tied to its stablecoins. The company said the system supports operations such as payments, cross-chain transfers, wallet management, and smart contract execution. The launch comes as Circle expands infrastructure for what it calls the emerging agentic economy.
Circle Skills Expands AI Access to Blockchain
Circle Skills provides structured instructions that help AI systems interact with blockchain networks. Developers can integrate the tools with platforms such as Cursor, Claude Code, and Codex.
According to Circle, these integrations allow AI agents to build stablecoin-based applications more efficiently. The system supports transactions using USDC and EURC across Circle’s developer platform.
The tools also allow AI agents to perform wallet operations. In addition, agents can execute smart contract logic directly through supported frameworks. Circle designed the system to provide more precise context to AI systems. Developers can therefore generate integrations that manage financial operations on-chain.
As the company explained, context can influence how AI agents interpret code and instructions. Circle Skills attempts to standardize that interaction.
AI Agents Tested in USDC Hackathon
Alongside the launch, Circle conducted an experiment involving autonomous AI agents. The company provided $30,000 in USDC to allow agents to organize a hackathon. The event took place on Moltbook’s m/usdc forum. Only AI agents could post messages and participate in discussions.
During the five-day contest, agents submitted 204 project proposals. Participants also cast 1,352 valid votes while posting more than 9,700 comments. Circle organized the event after observing increased use of the Openclaw framework. The software allows agents to send emails, call APIs, and perform automated actions.
To structure the competition, Circle published a submission guide called the USDC Hackathon skill. Agents selected project tracks including Agentic Commerce, Smart Contract, or Skill.
Additionally, each agent had to vote for five other submissions. The voting process began one day after the contest started.
Tokenized Treasuries and Stablecoin Infrastructure
Meanwhile, Circle reported growth in tokenized financial products connected to its ecosystem. The company said its USYC tokenized money market fund recently became the largest in its category.
Circle highlighted tokenized treasuries and repo markets as emerging collateral use cases. The system allows investors to create or redeem USYC using USDC through smart contracts.
According to the company, these operations can run continuously without traditional market hours. The model enables real-time money movement and collateral management on blockchain networks.
The post Circle Introduces AI Skills for USDC, EURC Blockchain Tools appears on Crypto Front News. Visit our website to read more interesting articles about cryptocurrency, blockchain technology, and digital assets.
Kamino Crosses $1B in Real-World Asset Lending on Solana
Kamino surpasses $1B in real-world asset lending, bridging traditional finance and DeFi.
6,338 active loans show healthy growth and strong investor confidence on Solana.
Tokenized RWAs hit $26.78B, signaling rising adoption of blockchain-based financial products.
Kamino has reached a major milestone in decentralized finance, surpassing $1 billion in total real-world asset (RWA) market size. The platform now manages $400 million in active RWA-backed loans, highlighting rapid growth and strong investor trust.
Based on the recent update by Kamino, the current number of active loans that the platform manages is 6,338, and they are spread across six distinct RWA markets. These include home equity loans, tokenized equities, money market instruments, and reinsurance assets. As such, it becomes evident that the platform is trying to bridge traditional finance and blockchain-based lending.
The steady expansion of both market size and borrowing activity since December 2025 shows increasing participation. Early growth was gradual, but sharp upticks occurred around mid-January and early March 2026, indicating rising investor interest.
“These markets require robust credit infrastructure to provide the liquidity and risk frameworks that allow real-world assets to integrate with onchain capital,” Kamino tweeted. Consequently, the proportional relationship between borrowed amounts and market expansion demonstrates healthy loan utilization without excessive leverage.
Tokenized RWAs Gain Traction
The wider tokenized RWA financial industry, meanwhile, also indicates positive trends, as the value of distributed assets currently stands at a significant $26.78 billion, as reported by Falcon Finance. This indicates a 7.74 percent growth over the last 30 days, as blockchain-based financial products continue to gain traction.
Moreover, the total represented asset value within the ecosystem is $352.40 billion, despite the fact that there is a short-term decline of 2.74 percent. According to analysts, the represented value is the underlying assets that are linked with the tokens, whereas the distributed value is the assets that are issued on the chain. Therefore, the difference in the values is attributed to the issuance of the tokens.
The platforms, such as Kamino, offer transparency, accessibility, and liquidity of traditionally illiquid assets. Therefore, investors can gain exposure to institutional-grade assets on the blockchain by using the tokens of government bonds, commodities, credit instruments, and private equity.
The post Kamino Crosses $1B in Real-World Asset Lending on Solana appears on Crypto Front News. Visit our website to read more interesting articles about cryptocurrency, blockchain technology, and digital assets.
Daily XRP Payments Approach 3M as Network Use Grows
XRP Ledger payments climbed from about 1M in mid-2025 to nearly 3M daily transactions in early 2026.
On-chain activity is rising despite XRP price pressure and a $551B drop in the global crypto market.
Evernorth plans a Nasdaq listing under XRPN and aims to expand institutional participation in XRP.
Daily transactions on the XRP Ledger have surged in early 2026, approaching three million payments per day despite continued price pressure. According to Evernorth, activity has nearly tripled from roughly one million daily payments recorded in mid-2025. On-chain data from XRPScan shows the network’s payment activity steadily recovering this year.
XRP Ledger Activity Rises Despite Price Pressure
Evernorth reported that XRP Ledger transactions have accelerated sharply in recent weeks. The firm noted that daily payments now approach the three-million mark.
According to Evernorth, the increase highlights growing blockchain usage rather than price-driven speculation. The firm stated that activity often reveals where real adoption develops.
XRPScan data supports this trend. At the start of 2025, daily payments rose from about 1.1 million to nearly 2.5 million by mid-January. However, the growth slowed afterward. Payments fluctuated between 1.3 million and 2.3 million during February and April 2025.
Later in mid-2025, network activity declined further. Daily payments occasionally fell below one million during June and July.
Payment Volumes Recover Through Early 2026
Although activity weakened in late 2025, a gradual recovery followed. During the fourth quarter, daily payments improved slightly but still dipped below one million in December. The trend changed at the beginning of 2026. Network data shows average daily payments ranging between 1.5 million and two million in January.
Recently, the figure crossed 2.7 million transactions for the first time since December 2024. As a result, activity now approaches three million daily payments. Meanwhile, broader market conditions remained difficult for many digital assets.
The global cryptocurrency market cap has fallen by more than $551 billion this year. XRP contributed about $26.39 billion to that decline. The asset currently represents roughly 3.576% of the overall market.
Evernorth Advances Institutional XRP Strategy
At the same time, Evernorth has launched a new institutional initiative tied to the XRP ecosystem. The company announced a business combination agreement with Armada Acquisition Corp II.
After the transaction closes, the combined firm expects to operate under the Evernorth name. The company also plans to trade on Nasdaq under the ticker symbol XRPN. The deal could raise more than $1 billion in gross proceeds.
Investments include $200 million from SBI and additional support from Ripple, Pantera Capital, Kraken, and GSR. Evernorth CEO Asheesh Birla said the company aims to expand institutional participation around XRP.
Ripple CEO Brad Garlinghouse added that Evernorth’s approach aligns with efforts to expand global payment utility. The transaction, approved by both boards, is expected to close in the first quarter of 2026.
The post Daily XRP Payments Approach 3M as Network Use Grows appears on Crypto Front News. Visit our website to read more interesting articles about cryptocurrency, blockchain technology, and digital assets.
Ethereum ETFs See Fourth Consecutive Day of Inflows
Ethereum ETFs see four straight days of inflows, signaling growing institutional confidence.
BlackRock leads inflows, while Fidelity lags, showing investors are picking ETF favorites.
ETFs make Ethereum investing easy and safe, drawing traditional money into crypto markets.
U.S. financial markets experienced a notable signal of institutional confidence as spot Ethereum ETFs attracted net inflows for the fourth straight day. According to SoSoValue, these funds collectively gained $26.69 million on March 13, reflecting strong investor appetite for regulated crypto exposure.
This sustained inflow streak suggests that traditional investors increasingly view Ethereum as a viable, mainstream asset. BlackRock, Fidelity, and Bitwise led the charge, highlighting early competition among fund issuers in this evolving market.
Diverging Flows Among Leading Ethereum ETFs
Even though the overall market showed gains, the money flowing into different Ethereum ETFs tells a different story. BlackRock’s iShares Ethereum Trust (ETHA) led the way, attracting a huge $32.39 million.
On the other hand, Fidelity’s Ethereum Fund (FETH) had an outflow of $7.86 million, while Bitwise’s Ethereum Fund (ETHW) had a relatively smaller inflow of $890,000. This indicates that investors are already showing their favorites, and these will be the ones to set the pace in the early days of this market.
Experts note that such divergence often reflects brand recognition, distribution networks, and liquidity considerations. “A four-day inflow streak, while early, establishes a positive precedent,” said a veteran ETF analyst. “It indicates initial curiosity has transitioned into measured, ongoing allocation.”
Implications for Ethereum and Broader Finance
Besides showing that big investors are confident, these inflows highlight that Ethereum is becoming easier for people to invest in. Investors don’t need to worry about handling private keys or managing crypto wallets themselves.
On top of that, recent Ethereum upgrades, like “The Merge” and other improvements, have made the network faster and more efficient, which makes investing in it even more appealing.
As a result, Ethereum ETFs act as a safe, regulated way for traditional money to enter the crypto world, while also helping to strengthen the Ethereum network itself. With this growing interest, other countries might follow suit and offer similar ETFs, creating a more uniform approach to crypto regulations worldwide.
The competition between ETF providers is also heating up. BlackRock has the advantage of being well-known and having strong networks of financial advisors. Bitwise attracts investors who prefer a company focused specifically on crypto. Meanwhile, Fidelity needs to figure out how to bring back investors who have moved out.
The post Ethereum ETFs See Fourth Consecutive Day of Inflows appears on Crypto Front News. Visit our website to read more interesting articles about cryptocurrency, blockchain technology, and digital assets.
Rep French Hill Says CLARITY Act Can Resolve Stablecoin Debate
Rep. French Hill says the CLARITY Act may address key stablecoin regulatory issues in Congress.
The GENIUS Act set an early framework defining dollar-backed stablecoins as blockchain payment tools.
Banks warn proposed rules could favor crypto firms, while Treasury may address yield questions.
Rep. French Hill discussed the future of U.S. stablecoin legislation during a recent appearance on Fox Business. The House Financial Services Committee chairman said lawmakers could address key regulatory issues through the CLARITY Act. Hill also referenced the GENIUS Act, which the House passed last July with bipartisan support to establish rules for dollar-backed stablecoins.
GENIUS Act Set Early Framework For Stablecoins
French Hill explained that Congress began addressing stablecoin regulation during last year’s legislative session. Lawmakers passed the GENIUS Act to define the structure of dollar-backed payment stablecoins.
According to Hill, the bill established that stablecoins should function strictly as payment devices on blockchain networks. He said lawmakers agreed that such assets should not pay yield.
The House also passed the CLARITY Act during the same period. Hill noted that both measures received bipartisan backing, including support from 78 Democratic lawmakers.
The legislation outlined rules for both bank and nonbank stablecoin issuers. Hill said Congress aimed to create consistent requirements for sales practices, capital standards, and supervision.
Banking Industry Raises Concerns Over Regulation
However, the debate around the CLARITY Act continues in Washington. Members of the banking industry have raised concerns about the proposed framework.
Some banking representatives argued the bill could give crypto companies greater operational freedom. At the same time, banks would remain subject to stricter financial regulations.
During the Fox Business interview, Hill acknowledged these concerns while discussing possible compromises. He emphasized the importance of equal treatment for all stablecoin issuers.
Hill said lawmakers want to avoid creating regulatory imbalances between bank and nonbank providers. Therefore, Congress continues reviewing how the framework should apply across the industry.
Treasury Rulemaking May Address Yield Questions
Meanwhile, Hill pointed to another regulatory path under development. The U.S. Treasury Department is preparing rulemaking to implement the GENIUS Act.
According to Hill, that process could address questions about yield or rewards tied to stablecoin transactions. Some policymakers and industry leaders have suggested rewards could serve as a compromise.
For example, JPMorgan CEO Jamie Dimon reportedly raised concerns about fairness between banks and crypto companies. Hill said regulators could consider these issues during Treasury’s implementation process.
Meanwhile, the Senate continues reviewing the CLARITY Act. Hill said lawmakers may also outline stablecoin rules directly in the legislation.
The post Rep French Hill Says CLARITY Act Can Resolve Stablecoin Debate appears on Crypto Front News. Visit our website to read more interesting articles about cryptocurrency, blockchain technology, and digital assets.
Pump.fun Launches Automated Buybacks for Tokenized AI Agents
Pump.fun now automates buybacks for AI agent tokens, aligning success with community holders.
Revenue from agents in $SOL or $USDC directly buys and burns tokens, boosting scarcity and value.
Developers can tweak buyback rates, claim revenue, and integrate existing tokens for multiple agents.
The AI-driven crypto economy is taking a step forward as Pump.fun introduces automated buybacks for tokenized AI agents. This new feature allows developers to launch agent tokens on Pump.fun and automatically use agent-generated revenue in $SOL or $USDC to buy back and burn their tokens.
Consequently, early supporters and community holders can benefit directly from the success of the agents, solving a long-standing alignment problem in the rapidly growing agentic economy.
Besides aligning incentives, the update aims to address value accrual issues that previously plagued agentic projects. Often, when an agent succeeds, its token’s value failed to reflect that success, leaving early believers with little reward.
Pump.fun’s automated buyback mechanism directly ties an agent’s onchain earnings to token demand and scarcity. As a result, the token becomes a living reflection of the agent’s performance, encouraging more robust community engagement and early investment.
How the Automated Buyback Works
Launching a tokenized agent is straightforward. Developers create an agent token on Pump.fun, set a percentage of revenue for buybacks, and provide a CA & Skills md file. Whenever the agent earns revenue—from SaaS, product sales, trading, or other channels—a portion is directed toward buying back and burning the token.
Buybacks occur through a centralized authority, then immediately burn via smart contract. To prevent frontrunning, the buyback cadence is probabilistic, adding an extra layer of security.
Additionally, developers retain flexibility. They can adjust buyback percentages, claim non-allocated revenue, and earn creator fees from trading volume. Existing tokens can also integrate the feature, enabling multiple agents to contribute revenue to a single token. Each deposit is verified via a unique invoice ID, ensuring buybacks only execute when revenue is valid and exceeds $10 in value.
Moreover, Pump.fun clarifies that agents themselves are developed off-platform using tools like Claude Code or OpenClaw. The platform strictly manages the tokenized buyback functionality, leaving the agent’s operations and decisions under developer control.
The post Pump.fun Launches Automated Buybacks for Tokenized AI Agents appears on Crypto Front News. Visit our website to read more interesting articles about cryptocurrency, blockchain technology, and digital assets.
KRAK Acquisition raised $345M in a January Nasdaq IPO and is now searching for crypto merger targets.
SPAC targets digital asset firms valued between $2B and $10B across several blockchain sectors.
Focus areas include stablecoins, DeFi, tokenization, and blockchain payment infrastructure.
KRAK Acquisition Corp., a special purpose acquisition company tied to crypto exchange Kraken, has begun searching for digital asset firms valued between $2 billion and $10 billion. The Nasdaq-listed SPAC raised about $345 million in a January IPO and now reviews potential merger targets across the crypto industry. The move comes as Kraken prepares for its own public listing later this year.
KRAK Acquisition Launches Post-IPO Search
KRAK Acquisition Corp. started evaluating takeover candidates soon after completing its initial public offering. The company raised approximately $345 million when it listed on Nasdaq in January.
Like other SPACs, the firm aims to merge with a private company. That process would allow the target to enter public markets. According to company director and CEO Ravi Tanuku, the team currently reviews several possible acquisition targets.
These companies operate across different segments of the digital asset sector. Tanuku said the firm considers businesses valued between $2 billion and $10 billion. However, he noted that some potential targets may sit closer to the $2 billion level.
Meanwhile, Kraken continues expanding its financial position. The crypto exchange raised $800 million in funding during 2024. That funding round placed Kraken’s valuation near $20 billion. As a result, the exchange now explores broader strategies within the crypto industry.
Stablecoins, DeFi And Tokenization
As the search continues, KRAK Acquisition focuses on specific blockchain sectors. These include stablecoins, asset tokenization, decentralized finance, and payment infrastructure. According to Tanuku, Wall Street interest in tokenization and stablecoins increased sharply last year.
Institutional investors have started tracking developments across blockchain financial systems. He also noted that traditional financial markets increasingly examine companies operating in these sectors.
Therefore, the SPAC reviews firms building digital payment tools and blockchain platforms. Notably, the company does not limit its search to one niche. Instead, it evaluates a broader range of crypto-native businesses.
SPAC Structure Creates Path To Public Markets
A SPAC operates as a shell company formed to acquire private businesses. After a merger, the acquired company becomes publicly traded. KRAK Acquisition now has two years to complete such a deal.
This deadline reflects common timelines used across SPAC structures. Tanuku explained that mid-sized crypto firms sometimes face challenges pursuing traditional public listings. Consequently, SPAC mergers can offer an alternative route.
By reviewing potential mergers, KRAK Acquisition examines firms across crypto assets, stablecoins, DeFi, and payment networks. The company continues its evaluation process while monitoring interest from public market investors.
The post Kraken-Linked SPAC Targets $2B–$10B Crypto Firms appears on Crypto Front News. Visit our website to read more interesting articles about cryptocurrency, blockchain technology, and digital assets.
Exchange-held Bitcoin drops to lowest since 2017, signaling investor confidence in holding.
Oil infrastructure threats stir volatility, but crypto traders now price conflict risks calmly.
Cryptocurrency markets are navigating turbulence as the Iran-Israel-US conflict intensifies, showing surprising resilience despite high geopolitical tension. Analysts report that optimism for a swift resolution peaked after former US President Donald Trump stated the US would “win very decisively.”
However, recent retaliatory strikes and coverage of the conflict in the media have had an effect on social sentiment in recent days. Additionally, social media mentions that include “war” or “conflict” and “end” or “over” are starting to pick up as the week progresses, indicating that market sentiment remains highly attuned to geopolitical events.
Besides geopolitical sentiment, the fundamental Bitcoin dynamics reflect strong investor confidence. According to Santiment, the percentage of Bitcoin held on exchanges has dropped to its lowest level since November 2017. This indicates a growing preference for long-term holding rather than reactive selling, even amid conflict-driven volatility.
Market Response Shows Growing Stability
Two weeks into the Middle Eastern war, Bitcoin trades near $70,000, only slightly down after the US targeted Iran’s Kharg Island crude export facility. The cryptocurrency briefly hit a high of $73,838 last Friday before giving back 3.5% due to the strike.
However, the pullback was contained, indicating that the market participants have now developed a framework for pricing the risks of the conflicts in real time. Ether rose by 5.5% to $2,090, Dogecoin rose by 5%, Solana rose by 4.2% to $88, and BNB rose by 4.5% to $655.
Additionally, Trump’s remarks on Kharg Island introduced new market variables. He emphasized sparing oil infrastructure “for reasons of decency” but warned he would “immediately reconsider” if Iran blocked the Strait of Hormuz. Iran responded, stating any strike on energy assets would trigger retaliatory attacks on U.S.-linked facilities.
Consequently, any future energy infrastructure conflict could dramatically disrupt supply and elevate market volatility, with the IEA already citing this as the largest potential supply crisis in history.
The post Bitcoin Holds Steady Amid Middle East Escalation appears on Crypto Front News. Visit our website to read more interesting articles about cryptocurrency, blockchain technology, and digital assets.
Analyst Says XRP Is ‘Criminally Undervalued’ as RSI Drops
Analyst says XRP RSI reached oversold levels last seen during the 2022 bear market bottom.
XRP trades near $1.39 with key support at $1.30–$1.35 and resistance between $1.45 and $1.70.
Price has declined from about $3.10 since Sept 2025, forming a prolonged downward trend.
XRP trades near $1.39 after months of decline. Market commentator Doctor Profit stated that the asset appears heavily undervalued as the Relative Strength Index reaches oversold territory. According to the analyst, the signal resembles conditions seen during the December 2022 market bottom.
Analyst Points To Extreme RSI Levels
Doctor Profit shared the observation while reviewing XRP’s latest technical indicators. According to the analyst, the RSI recently reached levels last seen during the 2022 bear market bottom.
He wrote that XRP appears “criminally undervalued” under current conditions. The analyst also noted that a buy signal previously appeared near the $1.37 level.
According to Doctor Profit, the signal suggests higher prices may emerge within the coming weeks. However, price action still depends on support levels holding.
The statement came as traders examined momentum indicators and support zones closely. Therefore, attention shifted toward how XRP behaved around current levels.
Long Consolidation Preceded Major Breakout
Earlier market activity shows XRP spent years inside a narrow accumulation range. Between 2022 and mid-2024, the price traded mainly between $0.30 and $0.60. Buyers repeatedly defended that support band, forming a prolonged consolidation phase. Eventually, a strong breakout followed during 2025.
Source: Santiment
The rally pushed XRP above $2.00 and later toward $3.30 to $3.40. That move reflected strong momentum and broader market participation. However, the trend later reversed. The market began a gradual pullback toward the $1.37 region, which now acts as a support area.
Notably, this zone aligns with a rising moving average and earlier resistance levels. As a result, traders watch this level closely.
Price Decline Forms Extended Downtrend
Since September 2025, XRP has moved within a sustained downward trend. The price fell from about $3.10 to near $1.39 by March 2026. Technical charts show a sequence of lower highs and lower lows. Meanwhile, the 50-day moving average remains below the 200-day average.
This structure confirms continued bearish pressure. Volume data also shows spikes during major sell-offs. For example, heavy selling appeared in early February 2026. During that period, XRP briefly dropped near $1.25 before stabilizing.
Currently, the market trades between $1.35 and $1.40. Support appears near $1.30–$1.35, while resistance is around $1.45 to $1.70. If price rises above $1.70, analysts note that a move toward $2.00 could follow. However, losing $1.30 could expose another decline near $1.20.
The post Analyst Says XRP Is ‘Criminally Undervalued’ as RSI Drops appears on Crypto Front News. Visit our website to read more interesting articles about cryptocurrency, blockchain technology, and digital assets.
Custodia Loses Final Appeal Over Federal Reserve Account
U.S. Tenth Circuit rejected Custodia Bank’s rehearing request, upholding Fed discretion over master account access.
Custodia sought a Fed master account since 2020 to serve crypto firms but regulators denied the application in 2023.
Dissenting judges warned the ruling grants broad, potentially unreviewable authority to Reserve Banks.
The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit rejected Custodia Bank’s request for a full court rehearing in its dispute with the Federal Reserve. The decision, issued March 13, upheld an earlier ruling that Reserve Banks may decide whether institutions receive master accounts. The court voted 7–3 against rehearing the case, ending Custodia’s latest legal effort.
Court Upholds Federal Reserve Authority
The ruling leaves in place an October decision from a three-judge panel. That earlier opinion concluded that regional Federal Reserve banks retain discretion over granting master accounts. A master account allows banks to access Federal Reserve payment systems directly.
Institutions with such accounts can settle transactions without relying on intermediary banks. Custodia Bank applied for a master account in 2020. The Wyoming-chartered bank focuses on services connected to digital asset companies.
However, the Federal Reserve rejected the application in 2023. Regulators cited concerns tied to the bank’s crypto-focused business model. Custodia then challenged the decision in court. The bank argued federal law requires the central bank to grant accounts to licensed institutions.
Dissenting Judges Warn of Broad Discretion
Despite the majority ruling, several judges disagreed with the outcome. Judges Timothy Tymkovich and Allison Eid joined the dissenting opinion. Tymkovich wrote that the decision grants Reserve Banks unreviewable discretion over account access. He argued the approach conflicts with the Monetary Control Act of 1980.
The dissent also raised constitutional concerns about the decision. Tymkovich stated the ruling could affect the balance between federal regulators and state-chartered banks. However, the majority declined to reconsider the earlier interpretation. As a result, the October ruling remains the controlling decision.
Access Debate Continues Across Fed System
Although Custodia’s legal challenge ended, discussions around master accounts continue. Some Federal Reserve institutions have begun exploring limited access structures.
For example, the Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City recently granted a special limited account to the crypto exchange Kraken. The account provides several payment system features.
Meanwhile, the Federal Reserve Board is developing a broader policy framework. Officials are considering “skinny” master accounts designed for specialized institutions.
According to sources familiar with the process, the policy remains in early development. Custodia representatives did not immediately comment on the latest court decision.
The post Custodia Loses Final Appeal Over Federal Reserve Account appears on Crypto Front News. Visit our website to read more interesting articles about cryptocurrency, blockchain technology, and digital assets.