Bitcoin AI Generated News

Ripple (XRP) is trading around $1.41 as it looks for a fresh catalyst to climb back into investors’ sights. The token has previously traded as high as roughly $3.50 during earlier rallies, but broader market weakness and recent geopolitical tensions—including the Iran–U.S. flashpoints—have pressured crypto prices across the board. Despite the headwinds, XRP’s narrative has shifted from courtroom drama to product and investment momentum. Ripple’s long-running legal spat with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission ended with court rulings that favored Ripple, a result that helped restore investor confidence and strengthen Ripple’s role in cross-border payments. The company’s partnerships and its expanding stablecoin activity (including RLUSD) have also helped shore up the ecosystem. A new development now putting XRP in the spotlight is growing ETF demand. Bloomberg ETF analyst James Seyffart reports that XRP-focused ETFs have taken in about $1.4 billion cumulatively since launch, and they’ve held relatively well even as spot prices pulled back. Seyffart also notes that retail investors are a strong driver of XRP ETF flows, making XRP one of the newest ETF market entrants alongside SOL that’s seeing heavy retail interest. That institutional and retail ETF traction, combined with on-chain product growth, is renewing bullish speculation. On the technical side, an analyst posting as Dark Defender suggests a wave-based move could push XRP toward roughly $5–$6 in a short-term surge (tweeted as a non-financial-advice projection). Longer-range model-based forecasts are even more optimistic: CoinCodex’s projections peg XRP at about $1.67 by the end of 2026, $5.46 by 2030, $8.20 by 2040, and $13.39 by 2050—figures that reflect long-term scenario models rather than guarantees. Bottom line: XRP is navigating a market where macro and geopolitical forces remain bearish, but growing ETF inflows, strengthened legal footing, and product expansion have put it back on many investors’ radar. As always, potential upside is accompanied by volatility and risk—investors should weigh forecasts and technical calls accordingly. Read more AI-generated news on: undefined/news

A lone chart pattern is underpinning a bullish — and bold — XRP forecast from technical analyst Celal Kucuker, who says a repeat of a past breakout could send the token sharply higher later this year. The setup: a descending channel Kucuker has drawn a descending channel that has contained XRP’s price since it hit a $3.6 peak in July 2025. The channel’s lower trendline actually stretches back to an earlier pullback from $3.4 in January 2025, while the upper line formed after the July high. For roughly nine months these two rails have guided XRP’s swings. Two predicted moves already landed The analyst’s roadmap has already produced two accurate checkpoints. XRP rallied to roughly $2.40 in January 2026, brushing the channel’s upper boundary, then reversed and tumbled to about $1.10 in early February, touching the lower line. Today (March 14) XRP trades around $1.41 — roughly 24% lower since the year began. What Kucuker expects next Kucuker lays out two more channel-driven moves before a potential breakout: - A bounce back toward the upper trendline around $1.80 (a retest). - A subsequent pullback to roughly $0.90, retesting the lower trendline and possibly dipping below $1. Only after that final retest does he see the technical setup for a sustained upside breakout. The breakout target — and why he believes it If XRP clears the channel to the upside, Kucuker projects a move to $8.60 between September and December 2026 — a gain of about 330% from the assumed breakout level. That projection isn’t pulled from thin air: it mirrors XRP’s behavior the last time it broke a similar structure. After exiting a comparable descending channel in November 2024, XRP surged roughly 330% to reach $3.4 by January 2025. Kucuker applies the same multiplier to the current pattern. Market context and caveats The broader crypto market has not been easy this year — the global crypto market cap has reportedly dropped about 18% since January to near $2.4 trillion, and XRP’s losses have outpaced that decline. Those macro headwinds don’t directly invalidate a pattern-based technical forecast, but the scope of the $0.90-to-$8.60 move would require sustained buying pressure over months and relatively few disruptive events. Timing and conditions Kucuker has not pinned exact dates to the near-term moves to $1.80 and $0.90; he treats them as prerequisites for the breakout scenario. The $8.60 target only becomes relevant if and when XRP breaks the channel to the upside. As of March 14, XRP remains well within the channel, with the next clear technical waypoint the $1.80 upper trendline retest. Bottom line Kucuker’s call is straightforward: follow the channel. Two of his projected turns already played out, and he’s betting on one more retest of each boundary before a breakout that could mirror a prior 330% ascent. Whether the market delivers the sustained buying that would make $8.60 realistic remains an open question. Read more AI-generated news on: undefined/news

Wall Street is racing to bring tokenized stocks and around-the-clock trading to crypto rails — but many big investors are quietly skeptical. What is tokenization? It’s the process of representing traditional assets like shares on blockchain networks. In theory, tokenized equities could overhaul decades-old market plumbing by enabling instant settlement and 24/7 trading. That prospect has attracted major players: ICE (owner of the New York Stock Exchange) and Nasdaq have both recently struck large partnerships with native crypto exchanges to introduce tokenized stocks to the market. Still, institutional traders are raising practical objections. “Institutional investors generally do not like instant settlement,” Reid Noch, VP of U.S. equity market structure at TD Securities, said. Today’s U.S. system settles stock trades one business day after execution (T+1), which lets brokers and trading firms net positions and manage funding across the day. Instant settlement would force trades to be fully funded before they occur — a model many pros view as costly and operationally awkward. Key institutional concerns - Prefunding: Firms would need to arrange financing throughout the day instead of relying on netting, increasing capital costs. “No one really wants to be prefunded,” Noch said. - Liquidity strain: Balance-sheet pressures could make busy times — such as the market close when volumes spike — more expensive and unevenly liquid. - Market functioning: Day-to-day trading and financing workflows built around T+1 could be disrupted, raising frictions even if settlement efficiency improves. Retail traders, by contrast, could be quick adopters. Tokenized markets promise advantages that appeal directly to individual investors: direct ownership in digital wallets, trading outside conventional market hours, and easier onboarding for international users who want U.S. stocks but find traditional brokers cumbersome. Retail already makes up about 20% of U.S. equity volume on average, and in some names it can be more than half — even exceeding 90% in certain meme-stock episodes. The network effect matters: if retail liquidity shifts to tokenized venues, institutional players may be compelled to follow. “If retail liquidity migrates there and becomes meaningful, institutions won’t really have a choice but to participate,” Noch observed. But risks remain. One major worry is fragmentation: multiple tokenized versions of the same stock on different chains or platforms could dilute transparency and impair price discovery. “Generally, most companies only have one stock,” Noch said. “If suddenly there are multiple tokenized versions with different rights or liquidity profiles, that could create confusion about what investors actually own.” Despite those hurdles, momentum is building. Exchanges are testing longer trading hours and some industry watchers foresee nearly round-the-clock markets within a few years. Tokenization could become part of that evolution — incrementally modernizing infrastructure and changing how investors access equities — but the technology is likely to gain traction among retail participants before it wins broad institutional acceptance. Read more AI-generated news on: undefined/news

Bitcointreasuries.net’s latest report shows a notable change in corporate Bitcoin behavior: for the first time, public-company BTC sales outpaced purchases in February. What happened - Public companies bought or disclosed roughly 7,800 BTC (~$522 million) at month-end. About two-thirds of that — 5,075 BTC — was acquired by Michael Saylor’s Strategy (formerly MicroStrategy), with six other firms accounting for the remainder. - Meanwhile, corporate treasuries sold or trimmed about 8,600 BTC, producing a net decline of roughly 800 BTC for February. Even without those sales, February’s gross additions would have been far smaller than the prior months’ large inflows (January’s ~41,000 BTC and December’s ~29,000 BTC). Balance-sheet impact - The dollar value of public-company Bitcoin holdings dropped from $102 billion in January to $78 billion in February, reflecting Bitcoin’s price weakness during the month. - Still, public treasuries have added an estimated 62,000 BTC so far this quarter, a tally driven largely by Strategy’s aggressive buying. Who’s buying (and how much) - Strategy dominated February purchasing, supplying two-thirds of the month’s acquisitions and holding 717,722 BTC (~$48 billion) at the end of February. While sizable, February was one of Strategy’s smaller buying months compared with December (22,627 BTC), January (40,150 BTC) and early March (21,009 BTC). - Other contributors: Coinbase reported 15,389 BTC in its Q4 2025 results, up 841 BTC from the prior quarter. MARA Holdings increased to 53,822 BTC (+572 BTC) by month-end, though the company has faced market speculation about potential sell-offs despite clarifications in its 10-K. Looking forward - The report expects Strategy to remain the dominant corporate buyer — especially given its strong start to March and stated intent to continue purchases. However, recent significant sales and fresh approvals to sell from firms such as MARA Holdings and GD Culture Group could push future net flows into negative territory. Market snapshot - At the time of the report, BTC was trading around $71,090, up 1.4% over 24 hours but still below a $74,000 resistance tested earlier in the week. Bottom line - Corporate treasuries remain a meaningful source of Bitcoin demand, but February’s shift toward net selling underscores growing variability: a single large buyer can still drive quarterly inflows, yet broader sell approvals and active reductions by multiple firms can quickly erase gains. Read more AI-generated news on: undefined/news

Bonk.fun domain hacked — fake “Terms” prompt drained wallets, users warned to avoid site A memecoin launchpad on Solana, Bonk.fun, confirmed on March 12 that its main domain was compromised and a wallet-draining script was injected into the site, exposing anyone who interacted with a malicious prompt to immediate fund theft. Tom (@SolportTom), an operator for the platform, alerted users on X (formerly Twitter), urging people not to use the bonk.fun domain “until further notice” after attackers hijacked a team account and pushed a drainer onto the frontend. The project’s official account — backed by Raydium and the BONK community — issued the same warning and advised users to avoid the site while the team secures infrastructure. How the attack worked According to Tom, the compromise wasn’t a smart-contract exploit: attackers took over the web frontend and presented a fake “Terms of Service” signature prompt. If users signed that prompt, the malicious approval allowed the drainer to move funds from their wallets. Tom emphasized that only users who signed that fake TOS were affected — previously connected users and those trading BONKfun tokens through third-party terminals were not impacted. The team said the breach was spotted quickly and losses remained minimal so far. Why this matters This incident is another example of Web2 failures bleeding into Web3 security. Domain hijacks, frontend compromises and UI-based approval phishing circumvent smart-contract safety by tricking users into granting dangerous permissions. Chainalysis estimates billions lost to on-chain scams — reporting roughly $14 billion in scam inflows in 2025 and projecting that number higher as more wallet compromises are uncovered. The attack also follows a string of similar social- and frontend-based scams: in February last year Pump.fun’s X account was hijacked to push a fake token, and high-profile victims such as OG trader Sillytuna have been forced out of the market after multimillion-dollar thefts that combined online manipulation with real-world harassment. Practical takeaways for traders - Avoid interacting with project domains from links you don’t trust; check for official announcements before signing anything. - Prefer interacting directly with verified contracts or using trusted aggregators and UIs. - Regularly scan and revoke token approvals using wallet tools, and consider hardware wallets for large balances. - Harden Web2 touchpoints: projects should protect domains, social accounts and team credentials to prevent frontend compromises. Bonk.fun’s team continues to investigate and remediate the issue; users should stay tuned to official channels for updates and avoid the domain until the project confirms it’s secure. Read more AI-generated news on: undefined/news

Bitcoin bulls are mounting a comeback after weeks of pressure, pushing BTC to hover around the $70,000 mark and reviving hopes for a renewed bull run. After a downturn that began in February, Bitcoin struggled to string together sustained gains — it hadn’t produced three consecutive positive daily closes since January 2026. That streak has now been broken: over the past week, three straight green daily candles have appeared, signaling a shift in momentum as buyers re-enter the market. Crypto analyst Master Ananda sees those three green days as confirmation that bulls have regained control. The analyst expects Bitcoin to print a higher high this week, which would validate the new local uptrend and likely keep price action above $70,000 through the end of the week. Technically, the recovery has placed Bitcoin inside a rising wave pattern. If that pattern holds, it would suggest the months of accumulation and sideways trading are over and a broader recovery rally is underway. Master Ananda sets the first upside target at $80,000 — an area where some resistance is expected — and says that, once cleared, BTC could press toward the psychologically significant $100,000 level. Altcoins are already following Bitcoin’s lead, with many tokens reacting positively to BTC’s lift. If Bitcoin’s momentum sustains, analysts expect the broader crypto market to climb alongside it. As always, traders should watch key resistance and support levels and remain mindful of volatility, but for now the charts are flashing a clearer edge for buyers. Read more AI-generated news on: undefined/news

Analyst EGRAG CRYPTO says XRP isn’t collapsing — it’s compressing. In a Friday post focused on the monthly chart, he pointed to the 21-period exponential moving average (21 EMA) as the “most important trigger” and argued that reclaiming $2.20 would flip the market back to a decisively constructive structure. EGRAG framed his view cautiously: “I don’t predict the future. I read charts, study cycles, and utilize indicators,” he wrote. His read is structural rather than a straight bullish call — the 21 EMA on the monthly timeframe has been the central trend reference through multiple XRP cycles, and recent price action has slipped below that line. What’s happening now looks like a descending compression or falling channel, not a blow-off crash. The latest monthly candles show smaller bodies and weakening downward momentum after the prior impulse higher — behavior EGRAG interprets as “seller exhaustion, not collapse.” Visually, the right side of the structure narrows into a decision zone instead of producing a steep, impulsive unwind. EGRAG sketches two main paths from here: - Liquidity Sweep First: a final shakeout toward roughly $0.80–$1.00, a scenario he describes as a “wedge measured move & liquidity below.” - Fast Reclaim: a quicker bullish turn if XRP reclaims $1.65–$1.80, which would suggest buyers are regaining control before a deeper flush. But the single level he highlights as a macro pivot is $2.20. “The Level That Changes Everything $2.20: Reclaim that level and the expansion phase reactivates,” he wrote, adding a near-term roadmap of “$2.20 reclaim, $2.50 retest.” On this view, a move above $2.20 wouldn’t just be a local breakout — it would invalidate the idea that XRP remains trapped below a failed breakout zone and would mark a return to expansion. Until then, EGRAG’s shorthand is simple: “This is compression, not capitulation.” Structure matters more than headline noise, he says — traders should watch the 21 EMA and the $1.65–$1.80 and $2.20 zones for clues on whether XRP heads toward a shakeout or a renewed rally. At press time, XRP traded at $1.41. Read more AI-generated news on: undefined/news

A new study from the Cambridge Centre for Alternative Finance delivers the first long-term, data-driven look at how resilient Bitcoin is to physical infrastructure damage — and the picture is both reassuring and sobering. Using 11 years of peer-to-peer network data and 68 verified submarine cable fault events, researchers simulated thousands of failure scenarios to see what it would take to significantly fragment the Bitcoin network. They ran 1,000 Monte Carlo simulations per scenario and compared real-world outages to modeled attacks and random failures. The headline: Bitcoin is extremely robust to random infrastructure failures. Between 72% and 92% of inter-country submarine cables would need to be cut simultaneously before the network sees major node disconnection. In the dataset of 68 real cable incidents, more than 87% caused under 5% node impact. The single largest event — seabed disturbances off Côte d’Ivoire in March 2024 that damaged 7–8 cables — disrupted 43% of regional connectivity but only knocked offline about 5–7 Bitcoin nodes globally, roughly 0.03% of the network. Correlation between cable outages and Bitcoin price was effectively zero (-0.02), meaning infrastructure hits are invisible against normal market noise. But resilience depends on the adversary. The study draws a crucial distinction between random failures (storms, accidents) and targeted actions (coordinated state attacks or regulatory shutdowns). If an attacker focused on the cables with the highest betweenness centrality — the chokepoints that fiber traffic must pass through — the threshold for damage falls to about 20% cable removal. Worse, targeting the five hosting providers that host the most Bitcoin nodes — Hetzner, OVH, Comcast, Amazon, and Google Cloud — requires removing just 5% of routing capacity to produce the same disruptive effect. That asymmetry reframes the threat model: natural disruptions are unlikely to knock Bitcoin offline, but a concentrated campaign against specific undersea routes or a few dominant hosting providers could materially degrade the network. The paper also traces how resilience has evolved. Bitcoin was most geographically distributed and robust in 2014–2017 (critical failure threshold 0.90–0.92). Rapid growth and geographic concentration during 2018–2021 drove resilience down, hitting a low of 0.72 in 2021 amid mining concentration in East Asia. The 2021 China mining ban forced redistribution and resilience rebounded to 0.88 in 2022, settling at about 0.78 in 2025. One counterintuitive finding involves TOR. In 2025, 64% of Bitcoin nodes used TOR, making their physical locations unobservable. Previous assumptions held that hidden TOR nodes could mask geographic concentration and thus unseen fragility. Cambridge’s four-layer model found the opposite: TOR relays are heavily concentrated in Germany, France and the Netherlands — jurisdictions with dense submarine and land connectivity — making them harder to isolate. Adding TOR to the model increased the critical failure threshold by 0.02–0.10 compared with a clearnet-only baseline. The researchers describe this dynamic as “adaptive self-organization”: censorship and shutdown events (Iran’s 2019 internet blackout, Myanmar’s 2021 coup, and China’s 2021 mining ban) spurred TOR adoption, which inadvertently strengthened the network’s physical resilience without central coordination. Why this matters now: geopolitical hotspots like the Strait of Hormuz and regional conflicts raise the real possibility of undersea infrastructure disruption. The study’s takeaway is that Bitcoin would likely shrug off random cable failures — but coordinated, targeted attacks on chokepoints or a handful of major hosts remain a credible risk. Implications for the ecosystem are clear: continued geographic distribution of nodes, diversification of hosting providers and paths, and attention to chokepoints in the physical internet all matter for long-term resilience. The network has proven adaptive, but the study maps the limits of that adaptability and highlights where policymakers and operators should focus to prevent single points of failure. Read more AI-generated news on: undefined/news

Kraken’s decision to list Pi sent the token surging more than 30% during Asian trading hours on Friday, thrusting the project back into the spotlight just ahead of Pi Day on March 14. Kraken listing sparks big short-term move In an X post, Kraken said Pi trading would begin on March 13. That announcement — coming one day before the annually observed Pi Day — helped trigger a rapid rally: Pi climbed from about $0.2255 a day earlier to as high as roughly $0.2958, an intraday gain of just over 31%. Trading volume also picked up as traders chased the news, pushing Pi near the top of the day’s gainers. Broader exchange access, but not unanimous Kraken’s addition expands access to Pi beyond exchanges that added the token after the Open Network opened, such as OKX, Gate, and Bitget. Listings on established venues matter for a project that spent years building attention inside a closed ecosystem before enabling external trading and transfers. Background: Open Network launch and user numbers Pi moved into its Open Network phase on February 20, 2025, removing the external firewall around its mainnet. Ahead of that shift the project reported more than 19 million identity-verified users and over 10 million migrated mainnet accounts — figures the team cites to support its scale claims. Pi positions itself as a mobile-first network based on trust graphs and security circles rather than proof-of-work mining. Legitimacy questions persist after Bybit snub Despite the Kraken listing, questions about Pi’s legitimacy remain unresolved. In February 2025, Bybit CEO Ben Zhou said his exchange would not list Pi, referencing a 2023 police warning from China that he said described the project as a scam targeting elderly users. Pi replied that the warning related to bad actors falsely claiming ties to Pi Network and stressed it had no relationship with Bybit or Zhou. What traders will watch next Kraken’s listing created a fresh liquidity event and an immediate price repricing; the important test now is whether trading volume and price support hold once the initial excitement fades. For the moment, the listing widened access, lifted Pi’s price and put the token back in focus at one of the most closely watched moments on its calendar. Read more AI-generated news on: undefined/news

Dogecoin remains a long way from the $1 milestone, but some analysts say the meme coin’s next big move could still be ahead. Why $1 still feels distant - At today’s levels, Dogecoin would need roughly a 1,000% rally to reach $1. After a 2024 surge of more than 500%, the token stalled well short of the roughly $0.74 peak investors had hoped for. Rather than scaring off holders, that muted follow-through has prompted fresh cycle-based bullish forecasts. Cycle-based upside: a 2026 thesis - Crypto analyst Javon Marks argues Dogecoin’s past cycles show a pattern of major recoveries after multi-year build-ups. Marks characterizes 2023–2025 as a stagnation or accumulation phase that could set the stage for another explosive rally in 2026 if the historical trend repeats. - His scenario: a breakout from a bottom near $0.09 would launch the next leg up, with staged targets he highlights as: 1) $0.739 (a roughly 750% move from the bottom, per the analyst) 2) $1.25 (around a 1,100% rise) 3) above $1.80 (more than a 2,000% move) Technical signs of a bottom — and the caveats - A separate trader using the handle CryptoAnalystSignal on TradingView points to price action inside a descending channel on the 1-hour chart. Historically, touches of the channel’s lower boundary often trigger short-term bounces, so a move up from that zone could signal a near-term bottom. - That view comes with warnings: the Relative Strength Index (RSI) still shows bearish pressure, and significant resistance could appear around the 100‑hour moving average. The analyst suggests an initial upside target just above $0.097 before tougher resistance is met. Takeaway - Bulls are leaning on historical cycle patterns and short-term technical setups to argue that Dogecoin’s next major rally could still be coming — potentially in 2026 — but momentum indicators and moving averages temper the case. As always, these scenarios are probabilistic: traders should weigh technicals, cycle narratives, and risk management before acting. Read more AI-generated news on: undefined/news

Bonk.fun’s main domain was hijacked on March 12, 2026, after attackers injected a wallet-draining script into the site, the platform’s operators warned — a fresh reminder that Web2 failures can instantly become Web3 disasters. What happened - Tom (@SolportTom), one of Bonk.fun’s operators, posted on X that a team account had been compromised and urged users “Do not use the … domain until further notice,” explaining hackers had forced a drainer onto the site. - The official BONK.fun X account — the Solana token launchpad backed by Raydium and the BONK community — confirmed the compromise and repeated the warning: “A malicious actor has compromised the BONKfun domain, do not interact with the website until we have secured everything.” How the attack worked - According to Tom, attackers replaced the genuine frontend with a fake prompt disguised as a “Terms of Service” (TOS) signature request. Users who signed that fake TOS unknowingly granted approvals that allowed the drainer to move funds from their wallets. - Crucially, Tom stressed that only users who explicitly signed the fraudulent TOS were affected. Previously connected users and traders interacting with bonk.fun tokens via third‑party terminals were not impacted. The team said the breach was spotted quickly and “losses are minimal to date.” Why this matters - This was not a smart‑contract exploit of Raydium or BONK tokens, but a Web2 domain hijack that leveraged familiar wallet‑approval phishing techniques. By controlling the frontend, attackers can present legitimate‑looking UI prompts that trick users into approving dangerous transactions. - Approval‑phishing and fake‑UI attacks have become a major drain on crypto funds. Chainalysis reported $14 billion in on‑chain scam inflows in 2025, with projections pushing above $17 billion as investigators identify more affected wallets. Context and precedent - Frontend and social compromises aren’t new. In February last year, attackers hijacked Pump.fun’s X account to push a fake token. High‑profile thefts combining online manipulation with offline coercion have also forced some traders out of the market entirely. - As scams scale — aided by social engineering and increasingly capable AI impersonation — security in 2026 is less about perfect smart contracts and more about protecting the surrounding infrastructure: domains, social accounts, employee credentials and user decision‑making. Practical advice for users - Don’t interact with compromised domains; wait for official confirmation that issues are resolved. - Prefer direct contract calls or trusted aggregators over unknown frontends. - Use hardware wallets when possible and verify every approval prompt carefully. - Regularly monitor and revoke excessive token approvals with reputable revocation tools. - Keep domain and social account credentials tightly secured and use multi‑factor authentication. Bonk.fun’s fast detection limited damage here, but the incident underscores an expanding attack surface: even well‑known launchpads and communities can be undermined by Web2 vectors. Stay cautious and treat wallet approvals as sensitive — not just routine clicks. Read more AI-generated news on: undefined/news

The race to electrify and automate the world is colliding with a hard reality: there may not be enough copper to keep up. As geopolitical uncertainty pushes investors toward traditional safe havens like gold and silver, another commodity is quietly becoming critical for the next wave of technology and infrastructure: copper. From AI data centers to electric vehicles, power grids, construction and plumbing, copper is the backbone metal of modern industry. But recent analysis suggests supply won’t keep pace with surging demand—and that has broad implications for markets, industrial policy, and investors, including those in crypto. Key takeaways from Lukas Ekwueme’s recent analysis: - Copper supply deficits are projected to persist for about 25 years. - New mine production is slow to come online: it takes roughly 18 years from discovery to production. - By 2050, deficits could reach roughly 80% of current annual production. - Of 239 major copper discoveries since 1990: 148 are not yet in production, 121 have not completed feasibility studies, and only 15 have finalized construction plans. Why this matters - Structural timing problem: even with capital, the physical and regulatory timelines for opening new copper mines can’t be meaningfully shortened. That makes the supply-demand gap largely a timing and logistics issue, not just a capital one. - Tech and green transitions are copper-intensive: scaling AI infrastructure, electrifying transport, and overhauling power systems all multiply copper demand. - Market ripple effects: prolonged deficits could push up copper prices, feed into broader industrial inflation, and reshape investment flows—potentially buoying commodities and safe-haven assets. For crypto investors, this dynamic could influence macro sentiment, monetary policy responses, and flows into alternative assets. Bottom line Copper’s supply chain looks strained at the very moment global demand is set to accelerate. With long lead times to develop new mines and a small pipeline of projects ready to proceed, the market faces a multi-decade imbalance that could affect industrial costs and investor behavior worldwide. Would you like a deeper dive on how copper shortages might affect crypto markets, tokenized commodities, or energy-intensive mining operations? Read more AI-generated news on: undefined/news

Cardano’s DeFi scene is showing fresh life even as ADA’s price languishes near multi-year lows, creating a clear on-chain vs. market-price disconnect. On-chain inflows lift TVL despite weak ADA price By March 13, 2026, ADA was trading around $0.27—more than 90% below its all-time high—yet decentralized finance activity on Cardano has accelerated. Stake pool operator and delegated representative “Dave” highlighted on X that Cardano’s DeFi TVL jumped roughly 23.5% in just 12 days, climbing from about 447.13 million ADA on February 26 to roughly 552.35 million ADA on March 13. That represents roughly 105 million ADA of fresh capital moving into the ecosystem. Measured in U.S. dollars, the increase looks much smaller. DeFiLlama’s USD-tracked TVL shows Cardano rising from about $127 million on February 26 to roughly $142.27 million in the same period—still a gain, but muted because most DeFi value on Cardano is denominated in ADA and the token’s sliding price has compressed USD-equivalent totals. Stablecoins and USDCx reshape Cardano’s DeFi composition Dori, another Cardano DRep, noted on X that the share of stablecoins relative to DeFi TVL has surged—from around 10% in June to roughly 32% as of his post—about a threefold increase in under a year. He attributes part of that shift to USDCx’s integration on Cardano and to ADA’s depreciation: when most TVL is held in ADA, price declines translate into lower USD TVL even if on-chain positions remain steady. Dori said rising minting volume for USDCx should help diversify and mature the ecosystem as more dollar-pegged liquidity becomes available. Technical picture: downtrend with upside if resistance breaks On the charts, analyst ZAYK Charts posted that ADA is trading inside a falling channel that’s been in place since 2025, tracking a slide from above $1 last year to about $0.27 today. Despite the downtrend, ZAYK is cautiously bullish on a technical breakout: if ADA can push above resistance near $0.28—around the channel’s upper trendline—a measured move could send the price as high as $0.55, a gain of more than 108%. Bottom line Cardano is seeing meaningful on-chain growth—new ADA-denominated inflows and a rising stablecoin footprint thanks to USDCx—while market sentiment for ADA remains depressed. That mix of improving on-chain fundamentals and a beaten-down price creates a watchlist scenario: continued stablecoin adoption and a technical breakout could be catalysts, but the USD value of Cardano’s DeFi remains sensitive to further ADA price weakness. Read more AI-generated news on: undefined/news

Headline: XRP’s on-chain boom vs. token slump — why the ledger is busy but the price isn’t The biggest story in XRP right now isn’t price action — it’s a widening disconnect between booming ledger activity and a weakening native token. The XRP Ledger (XRPL) is busier than it has been in a year, yet XRP’s market price has slid, leaving traders and investors asking why increased usage hasn’t translated into sustained upward pressure on the token. What’s happening on-chain - Daily successful payments on XRPL recently hit a 12‑month high of more than 2.7 million, up from roughly 1 million in late 2025, according to XRPSCAN. The network is processing roughly 2–2.8 million transactions per day at an average of 20–26 transactions per second. - Automated market maker (AMM) activity has exploded to nearly 27,000 active pools supporting more than 16,000 unique tokens, with about 12 million XRP deposited in those pools. - Tokenized real-world asset (RWA) value on the ledger climbed to $461 million — a 35% increase in the past 30 days, per RWA.xyz — and represented asset value on XRPL is cited at about $1.5 billion. RWA transfer volume in the last 30 days surged to $149 million, up over 1,300%, suggesting genuine tokenization flows. - Stablecoin activity is also large: stablecoin transfer volume for the same recent period reached $1.19 billion, and the stablecoin capitalization on XRPL sits around $339 million across 35,800 holders. - Despite all that activity, XRP trades around $1.37, down about 26% year‑to‑date and roughly 62% below its late‑2025 high of $3.65. Why the price isn’t keeping pace The conventional crypto narrative — more network usage creates more demand for the native token — isn’t playing out cleanly for XRP. The most plausible explanation is structural: much of XRPL’s recent growth is driven by stablecoins (notably RLUSD) and tokenized assets that use XRP as a transient bridge for settlements rather than a long-term store of value. A cross-border payment that uses XRP to settle in seconds doesn’t produce the same buy-side pressure as assets that must be staked or locked up for weeks or months. Activity increases, but scarcity and long-duration demand do not. DeFi and liquidity put the gap in perspective - XRPL’s DeFi footprint remains small relative to its market cap. DeFiLlama reports XRPL’s total value locked (TVL) at roughly $47.5 million — negligible against XRP’s roughly $84 billion market cap. - For context, Solana carries around $4 billion in TVL and Ethereum over $40 billion. XRPL’s DeFi is essentially a rounding error relative to token valuation, indicating market capitalization is still largely driven by speculation and ETF-related positioning rather than capital locked in productive on-chain applications. - Native DEX volumes on XRPL are modest, running roughly $4–8 million daily — low for a Layer 1 chain ranked near the top by market cap. Where the bull case still has traction The RWA and tokenization stats are the clearest upside data points. XRPL’s head start in certain tokenization categories — $461 million in distributed asset value and $1.5 billion represented — puts it ahead of some larger chains in those niches. The surge in RWA transfer activity and meaningful stablecoin flows suggest institutional use cases are beginning to show up on the ledger, not just wash trading. Technical and macro outlook On the chart, March has historically averaged an 18% return for XRP, and the $1.27–$1.30 support zone has held through multiple tests. If macro conditions calm and geopolitical risks (the Iran situation cited in market commentary) ease, a relief bounce toward $1.60 or higher is plausible. But for a sustained re-rating, the market will likely need evidence that XRPL’s growing activity converts into longer-term demand for XRP — for example, materially higher TVL, sustained staking-like behaviors, or continued institutional tokenization that requires permanent XRP allocation. Bottom line: XRPL is proving its utility in volume and tokenization, but the token’s economics haven’t caught up. Whether that gap closes will determine if XRP’s on-chain boom eventually sparks a durable price recovery. Read more AI-generated news on: undefined/news

House Financial Services Committee Chair French Hill says the CLARITY Act could plug gaps left by the GENIUS Act as lawmakers work to finalize U.S. rules for stablecoins and other digital assets. Speaking to Fox Business, Hill flagged ongoing concerns from banks about whether crypto firms would face the same regulatory standards as traditional financial institutions under the proposed framework. He noted that Congress already has bipartisan momentum on one front: “In the House last summer, we created the act, and we passed CLARITY Act in the House, with 78 Democratic votes,” he said, pointing to the CLARITY Act as a tool to address unresolved issues. The GENIUS Act — which focuses on how stablecoin issuers should be regulated — has made the mechanics of stablecoin oversight the centerpiece of the debate. Hill emphasized a bipartisan consensus that has emerged during those talks: “On a bipartisan basis we said stablecoin should not pay yield.” That prohibition on paying yield has become one of the most talked-about policy anchors in the ongoing negotiations. Hill suggested that the CLARITY Act could resolve certain outstanding matters left by GENIUS. At the same time, he said some issues might be better handled through regulatory rulemaking rather than new statutory language. He singled out incentives and rewards tied to stablecoin transactions as an area the Treasury could address through regulations: “I think all the issues about paying rewards should be dealt with in the regulatory proposal that Treasury has to come up with,” he said, adding that this approach “is best resolved in the GENIUS Act.” Traditional banks have pushed back, warning that lighter rules for crypto firms could create competitive advantages and regulatory arbitrage. Banking executives, including JPMorgan’s Jamie Dimon, have publicly questioned whether proposed legislation gives crypto firms too much flexibility. Hill echoed that need for a level playing field: “We want equal treatment between bank and nonbank issuers of stablecoins,” he said. “All issuers should be treated the same way. You don’t want to have an imbalance between people using a dollar-backed stablecoin on their platform.” As Washington continues to hammer out the final architecture, Hill’s remarks signal a two-track approach: use the CLARITY Act to shore up statutory gaps while leaving some technical details — especially around rewards and incentives — to Treasury rulemaking under the GENIUS framework. The outcome will shape how stablecoins integrate into the U.S. financial system and whether crypto firms will face parity with banks. Read more AI-generated news on: undefined/news

Ripple’s dollar-pegged stablecoin RLUSD has seen a flurry of treasury-driven burns in recent days, with tens of millions of tokens permanently removed from circulation across both Ethereum and the XRP Ledger. What happened - The Ripple Stablecoin Tracker on X flagged a headline transaction in which 25 million RLUSD were burned at the RLUSD treasury — a single, high-profile reduction in an ongoing sequence of supply cuts. - That burn followed several other removals: 8 million RLUSD and 3 million RLUSD in separate transactions, plus earlier large burns of 15 million, another 15 million (reported on Ethereum), and a 10 million removal on the XRP Ledger. Why it matters - “Burning” here means tokens were sent to an inaccessible address, permanently removing them from supply. These moves are tied to Ripple’s treasury activity and the stablecoin’s reserve-backed structure: each RLUSD in circulation is supposed to correspond to one dollar held in reserve. - Supply reductions are therefore a feature of maintaining the peg and ensuring outstanding tokens don’t exceed backing when holders redeem. Not necessarily bearish - The recent burns don’t signal shrinking adoption — Ripple’s own activity shows even larger minting over the same period. The tracker recorded new minting on Ethereum of 3 million, 6 million, 29 million, and 14.9 million RLUSD in recent days, which outweighed the burn volume. - RLUSD continues to grow since launch and currently has a market capitalization above $1.56 billion. Bottom line These burns reflect active treasury management under RLUSD’s reserve-backed model rather than a crisis of confidence. While large and notable, the reductions have been balanced — and in net terms offset — by fresh minting that keeps the stablecoin expanding. Read more AI-generated news on: undefined/news

Crypto’s political machine is revving up for the US midterms with roughly $200 million ready to deploy — a high-stakes effort to turn the industry’s 2024 momentum into durable wins on Capitol Hill. What’s happening - Federal Election Commission filings show crypto PACs, firms and investors have already spent about $32 million this cycle supporting pro-industry candidates and attacking opponents. Most of that early spending traces back to Fairshake, a crypto-backed Super PAC whose filings show it held more than $193 million in cash heading into 2026 — making it the best-funded Super PAC this cycle. - The industry has already targeted 28 federal battlegrounds, concentrating dollars in Illinois, Arkansas, Alabama and Texas so far. Illinois alone saw roughly $14.2 million spent before its March 17 primary. Why the midterms matter to crypto - The sector sees the midterms as its chance to lock in gains made under the Trump administration and to protect federal legislation that would clarify crypto regulation. While President Trump has positioned himself as pro-crypto, the industry still needs Congress to pass durable rules. - The immediate priority is the Clarity Act — a proposed federal framework the industry says would remove legal uncertainty and unlock institutional capital. But the bill is stalled in Senate negotiations and must reach a floor vote by July before Congress breaks for the midterms, or face an uncertain fate. Partisan tilt and strategy - Lobbyists insist the push is bipartisan, but the bulk of spending has favored Republicans. In 2024, about two-thirds of crypto political spending went to Republicans; insiders expect a similar lean this cycle. - The industry is focused not just on winning seats, but on shaping committees that write financial regulation. Control of the House Financial Services Committee is a particular concern: Republican French Hill, a strong crypto ally, is chair; if Democrats reclaim the House, Maxine Waters — a noted crypto critic — would likely become chair, a shift lobbyists fear would slow or complicate crypto-friendly legislation. Notable races and spending - Illinois: Fairshake and affiliates spent about $10 million on attack ads against Democrat Juliana Stratton, who is running for the US Senate. The group has also spent nearly $2.5 million attacking state representative La Shawn Ford in Chicago. Fairshake’s ads have accused Stratton of ties to a corrupt political machine — charges Stratton denies; she criticizes Fairshake as a “Trump-aligned Super PAC.” - Arkansas: Rep. French Hill received roughly $4 million in crypto-backed support during the Republican House primary and won by a landslide. - Alabama: Rep. Barry Moore, a vocal crypto advocate, is slated to get about $5 million from a Fairshake-affiliated PAC for his Senate campaign. - Texas: In Houston, Democratic candidate Christian Menefee — who signaled support for blockchain innovation without a prior crypto voting record — received more than $1.5 million from a crypto PAC. Republican Jessica Steinmann, who declared herself pro-digital assets, received nearly $800,000 and won her primary. - Other targets: The industry has labeled roughly 500 federal politicians “pro-crypto” and is prioritizing competitive races and candidates on key committees overseeing market structure. Tactics and past performance - The industry’s playbook mixes targeted early spending, broad ad campaigns, and late-stage “swoops” into tight races where every dollar counts. Colin McLaren of the Solana Policy Institute says Fairshake is likely to intervene in final weeks of close contests to push candidates with favorable crypto records over the finish line. - In 2024, Fairshake and affiliates spent about $130 million across 68 congressional contests. They claim an 80% success rate in those races and report that 23 of 28 candidates they supported in the general election won — a greater-than-90% win rate. Flashpoints and controversies - Advertising tactics have drawn pushback. In Illinois, attack ads against La Shawn Ford highlighted a 2012 federal tax-fraud charge that prosecutors later dropped; critics say the messaging omits key facts. Representative Danny Davis, endorsing Ford as his successor, accused Fairshake of attempting to “tarnish his character.” - One lobbyist, speaking anonymously, warned that a non–pro-crypto committee chair can delay or derail legislation, noting the strategic importance of committee control. Big targets still in play - Sherrod Brown, the former Senate Banking Committee chair who long opposed crypto, is a potential target if he runs again in Ohio. In 2024 the industry spent about $40 million to defeat his Senate bid; Brown’s campaign raised $14 million and has reportedly softened its tone, saying he recognizes crypto is part of the economy. - Crypto’s financial ties to Trump have deepened: crypto-focused firms and investors gave more than $50 million to MAGA Inc last year. MAGA Inc now holds about $310 million in cash — the largest war chest any PAC has held heading into a midterm year, according to the Financial Times. Why readers should care The midterms could determine whether Congress enacts a federal crypto framework or leaves the policy patchwork of state-level rules to proliferate — a split that could shape where innovation happens, how institutions invest, and how consumer protections evolve. For an industry that argues clarity will unlock trillions in capital, control of key races and committees in 2024–26 may be as consequential as any technical upgrade or product launch. Bottom line: With a roughly $200 million political war chest, a proven playbook, and an eye on committees that write financial rules, crypto’s political apparatus is betting big that it can turn electoral spending into binding, industry-friendly law. The next few months — and the July deadline for the Clarity Act — will be a critical test. Read more AI-generated news on: undefined/news

Billionaire investor Stanley Druckenmiller says stablecoins could become the backbone of payments — and he’s not shy about it. In a recent Morgan Stanley video interview, the veteran hedge fund manager called fiat-pegged stablecoins “incredibly useful,” citing their efficiency and lower costs as reasons he expects them to dominate payments in the next decade or so. “I assume our whole payments systems will be stablecoins in 10 or 15 years,” he said. Druckenmiller was far less charitable about the broader crypto narrative. Asked to associate one word with “crypto,” he called it “a solution looking for a problem,” and said he’s “very sad that it ever happened as a store of value, ’cause it wasn’t needed.” Still, he acknowledged crypto’s cultural momentum: “It’s a brand, and these people love it, so it’s going to be a store of value,” he added. Those comments echo earlier views he expressed in 2020, when he said a bet on Bitcoin might outperform gold if the metal’s price rose — noting Bitcoin’s illiquidity and volatility as potential catalysts for an outsized run. Back then, Bitcoin traded near $15,000; today it’s roughly five times higher. As of Friday, Bitcoin changed hands around $71,520, putting its market cap near $1.4 trillion — up about 8.5% over the last 30 days but still about 43% below the October all-time high of $126,080. Meanwhile, stablecoins have been steadily growing in market size. DeFiLlama data show the combined stablecoin market cap at roughly $315 billion, an increase of more than $180 billion since the start of 2024. Some high-profile market observers, including investor Scott Bessent, have suggested that the stablecoin supply could expand several-fold by 2030. Why it matters: Druckenmiller’s bullishness highlights a practical use case for tokenized fiat that appeals to traditional investors — payment rails that are faster and cheaper than legacy systems. If stablecoins continue to scale, they could prompt broader adoption by fintechs and institutions, while also attracting greater regulatory scrutiny around reserve transparency and consumer protections. Watch for continued growth in issuance, regulatory moves in major economies, and whether banks and payment networks integrate stablecoins into mainstream rails. Read more AI-generated news on: undefined/news

XRP may be edging toward another major inflection point as a long-running cycle of expansion and correction reasserts itself, analysts say. According to crypto researcher Egrag Crypto, the token’s price action continues to respect a long-term ascending trendline dating back to XRP’s breakout in 2017 — and that historical rhythm could be shaping the path ahead. Egrag notes that XRP’s trajectory has repeatedly followed a clear pattern: strong, fast expansions are typically followed by lengthy corrective phases. Those corrections eventually give the market time to reorganize, after which a new expansion phase can begin. The current pullback appears to be entering a critical confluence area where multiple technical factors are aligning, potentially setting the stage for a macro bottom. The analyst identifies the most significant support band between $0.95 and $0.80. This zone is important because it coincides with several technical elements converging: compression of the 21, 50, and 100 EMAs, support from the long-term ascending trendline, and a historically relevant liquidity area. When moving averages and structural support cluster like this, it often creates a higher-probability environment for a stabilization or bottom to form. Egrag also argues that XRP’s current phase is not only a price correction but a time-based reset. In other words, the market may need an extended period of consolidation to work through the corrective structure before momentum can build again. That could mean more sideways, compressed trading and occasional frustrating moves for traders as the market digests the prior expansion. Timing-wise, Egrag suggests the bottoming process could gradually complete around Q2–Q3 2026 if the pattern holds. From there, the recovery would likely unfold in stages: first clearing the 21 EMA, then decisively breaking the descending corrective structure that has governed the recent downtrend. A push beyond $2.20 is highlighted as a level where momentum could begin to accelerate and a new expansion phase might gain traction. Key levels and signals to watch (per Egrag Crypto): - Primary bottom confluence: $0.95–$0.80 - Short-term recovery milestone: reclaiming the 21 EMA - Structural breakout: end of the descending corrective structure - Momentum trigger zone: $2.20 As always, technical patterns are not guarantees, and macro events, market liquidity, and on-chain dynamics can alter outcomes. Still, with trendline support, EMA convergence, and a possible time-based reset lining up, XRP’s current consolidation looks like a critical setup that traders and investors will be watching closely. Read more AI-generated news on: undefined/news

House Financial Services Committee Chair French Hill says the CLARITY Act could close gaps left by the GENIUS Act as lawmakers race to pin down how stablecoins and other digital assets fit into the U.S. financial system. Speaking to Fox Business, Hill — a lead architect of Washington’s push to regulate stablecoins — said the House already passed the CLARITY Act last summer with bipartisan support, including 78 Democratic votes. He framed CLARITY as a potential fix for unresolved questions that have surfaced as the GENIUS Act moves through debate; the GENIUS Act is focused on establishing a regulatory framework for stablecoin issuers. One point of bipartisan agreement, Hill noted, is that stablecoins should not pay yield. That principle has become central to negotiations over how to treat stablecoin products and where the line should be drawn between crypto firms and traditional banks. Major banks have pushed back, warning that lighter rules for crypto companies could create an unfair competitive advantage — a theme raised publicly by banking leaders such as JPMorgan’s Jamie Dimon. Hill said some remaining issues could be addressed directly in the CLARITY Act, while others might be best resolved through regulatory rulemaking from Treasury — particularly rules covering rewards or incentives tied to stablecoin transactions. “I think all the issues about paying rewards should be dealt with in the regulatory proposal that Treasury has to come up with,” he said, adding that this is “best resolved in the GENIUS Act.” Throughout, Hill emphasized the goal of parity: “We want equal treatment between bank and nonbank issuers of stablecoins,” he said. “All issuers should be treated the same way. You don’t want to have an imbalance between people using a dollar-backed stablecoin on their platform.” The comments underscore how policymakers are juggling legislative fixes and regulatory action to shape the market’s future. For crypto firms, banks, and users alike, the path Washington chooses — whether via CLARITY, GENIUS, or Treasury rulemaking — will determine who gets the same protections, who gets special treatment, and how stablecoins will compete with traditional banking products. Read more AI-generated news on: undefined/news