Do you support decentralized systems that cannot be reversed, or centralized systems that protect users?
余烬Ember
·
--
The Arbitrum chain project team has retrieved 30,766 ETH ($70.97 million) that the KelpDAO hacker had on the Arbitrum chain.
Through technical means, these 30,766 ETH were transferred from the hacker's wallet to the address controlled by the Arbitrum chain: 0x0000000000000000000000000000000000000da0.
After retrieving the 30,766 ETH, the hacker still has 75,700 ETH ($175 million) left on the Ethereum chain. Hacker address: 0x5d3919f12bcc35c26eee5f8226a9bee90c257ccc
🤔🤔You can never make money beyond recognition in this market
Last February, a dead project party contacted me for advertising help. At that time, it was only $0.06 each, and I gave Brother Niu 10,000 tokens. After writing a tweet, the trading volume exploded due to the dead project, and it rose to about $0.1, almost doubling. I took profits, and now looking back, the highest point has yielded 60 times return. Indeed, we cannot underestimate the domestic projects! $SIREN
Next time a domestic project asks me for advertising like this, Brother Niu will hold firmly! #美伊和谈陷僵局 #美国加密法案再次遇阻
Current important events on the global macro level: - Donald Trump will visit China from May 14 to 15 and meet with leaders. - Both sides also plan mutual visits (leaders will visit the U.S. within the year) 👉 This type of "highest-level interaction between China and the U.S." is a primary macro variable that greatly impacts the global financial market. 🧠 1. How does the market interpret this event (core logic) This is not ordinary diplomatic news; in essence: The relationship between the world's two largest economies → Is it easing? It will affect three main lines: 1️⃣ Trade relations (tariffs, technology restrictions) - If easing signals are released → Positive for global trade - If talks collapse → Tariffs and sanctions escalate 2️⃣ Geopolitical risks - Current background: Iran war, China-U.S. game - Meeting = Expectations for cooling 3️⃣ Capital flows & risk preferences - Easing relations → Capital flows back to risk assets (stocks, crypto) - Escalation of tension → Safe-haven (U.S. dollar, gold, U.S. Treasury bonds)
50 million turns into 36,000: Behind the most expensive "slip-up" in the crypto world lies a concept you must know
A lesson worth 50 million dollars In the early hours of March 13, 2026, the crypto world was rocked by a piece of news. A "big player" used 50 million dollars worth of USDT and ultimately received only 36,000 dollars worth of AAVE tokens in return. You read that right, not 3.6 million, not 360,000, but 36,000. This means that this big player incurred a net loss of nearly 50 million dollars in just a few minutes, equivalent to directly "burning" a small target on-chain. After the news broke, onlookers transformed into "Sherlocks", trying to unravel the truth behind this "mystery". Some said this was "washing rice" (money laundering), others claimed it was a "lobster" (leveraged platform) operational error, and some speculated it was a hacker attack. But as the on-chain data was gradually uncovered, a concept well-known in the crypto circle but never truly understood by the general public surfaced—MEV. This concept may be more valuable than the loss of 50 million dollars itself. Because it is quietly changing the way the entire cryptocurrency world operates, and its impact is far more than just causing a few big players to "slip up".
Shanzhai is dead; it is estimated that 2026 will still be the era of gold, silver, US stocks, Hong Kong stocks, and A shares. Money is depreciating, and shanzhai is also depreciating (unlocking, selling off). These shanzhai coin project companies, as long as they contribute a little to this industry, would not lead so many people to look down on $BTC $ETH $SOL
News: The US, France, and other countries have evacuated their citizens from Iran 🇮🇷. Is this a sign of war? I watched a 173-minute interview with Musk the day before yesterday, in which he also mentioned that the world will be in a period of turmoil over the next three to five years. The ongoing rise in gold and silver prices further supports this view. After all, the ancient saying 'gold in times of chaos' has always held true. $COLLECT Keep looking bearish