If you’re not only farming those 11 days, but planning to keep holding until S2 ends: after the Boost ends, a standard account returns from 45x to 30x, and an account with S1 Boost returns from 54x to 36x.
Rough estimate based on the remaining S2 time:
Account type—expected total points per 1M points cost Standard account (45x → 30x) ≈ 12.53M ≈ 8.0U With S1 Boost (54x → 36x) ≈ 15.04M ≈ 6.65U
The difference is pretty clear here: farming only 11 days means the cost per 1M points is 47–57U; if you hold through the full S2, the cost can be averaged down to 6.65–8U.
3️⃣Compare potential value of the points
Currently, Aspecta shows Saturn Pre-TGE FDV of about $209.6M. Assuming the final allocation for S2 is close to the official stated maximum of 5%, and using the points size to run scenario estimates:
Assume final FDV—1M Points rough value $100M ≈ 10–13U $150M ≈ 15–19U $200M ≈ 20–25U
Final reminder: all of the above is scenario analysis based on the current YT price, remaining days, and Aspecta Pre-TGE FDV. The YT price will move with the Implied APY, and the final value of the points depends on the actual allocation ratio and total points supply. These numbers are for reference only and do not constitute any investment advice.
GME is here—so the name “Stock Meme” is getting more and more fitting😂
This time, FourMeme has added a $GMEb pool. Previously there were $NVDAb and $SPCXb, and now they’ve brought GameStop in as well.
Old-school coin folks should all know how wild GME was back then: a bunch of retail traders went head-to-head with Wall Street, and essentially brought the Meme Stock concept mainstream.
For the first two, I still thought it was US stocks + memes. But with GME, it feels a bit like the ancestor returning.
Back then it was called Meme Stock—now on-chain it’s called Stock Meme.
This round feels like we went around in a circle and ended up back together😂
FourMeme’s Stock Meme has added a new liquidity pool for $SPCXb. The second target is directly chosen from among the most familiar U.S.-stock narratives in crypto.
I previously wondered whether Stock Meme was just trying it out for a taste—but now it keeps adding NVDAb and SPCXb in succession.
On the path of MemeFi × TradeFi, FourMeme looks like it plans to keep going.
After reading FourMeme’s update this time about tax coins, I feel like they’re starting to string many scattered pieces together.
Before, when people talked about tax coins, it was mostly about things like tax rates and dividends.
This time, besides royalty, Gas subsidies, and the US stock base pool, they’ve also included capabilities like X Verified and a developer-customizable royalty framework.
It feels more like they’re building a suite of tools.
Whether it’s trading taxes, royalties, or developer-customized frameworks, this round of updates is largely moving toward the same direction: giving creators more choices, giving developers the tools, and writing the rules into the contract.
As for what kinds of projects ultimately emerge, that will be up to the market.
OKX Wallet @wallet and @pharos_network’s event—my staked funds have reached their maturity, and now I can’t withdraw them.
When I subscribed originally, the page clearly said: Withdrawal Date: 20/07/2026.
But now someone tells me that between June 17 and July 1 there was a redemption request window opened once?
If I hadn’t clicked that button back then, the funds would be locked until October 20.
Who would expect a product that says it can be redeemed on July 20 would also require applying a month in advance—otherwise it automatically stays locked for another three months?
With rules like this, at the very least they should be提示 more clearly on the product page, not wait until the redemption date for users to find out they still can’t get their money out.
Seeing this post from Fora made me realize an issue I hadn't paid much attention to before.
A lot of new meme coins that get launched often take ages for long and short functionalities to kick in.
This is because most leverage products need reliable price feeds, and when new coins first hit the market, they usually lack mature oracles to support them.
Likwid is taking a different route this time.
Prices come directly from liquidity pools, and leverage is sourced directly from the liquidity within those pools.
So, by choosing the Likwid Dex model through OpenFour for the tokens launched, they can support long and short trading right after graduation and migration.
How this will pan out ultimately still depends on actual liquidity and market acceptance.
But from a product design standpoint, it definitely provides a somewhat unique option for new assets that hasn’t been seen much before.
Among the several modules recently opened up by OpenFour, Likwid's approach stands out as quite distinctive.
After checking out four_meme_Fora's take on SkillRoyalty, I think there's a point worth noting.
A lot of mechanisms are discussing how to pay developers.
SkillRoyalty has taken a step forward.
They've embedded fees into the contract, making the flow of funds completely transparent, and developers decide how to use it going forward.
Whether it's community rewards, user growth, or product development, developers now have a stash to sustainably support the project's operations.
For Builders, this is way more valuable than just pocketing some royalties.
Because in the end, most projects don't just compete on launch day data; it's about whether there's someone maintaining it months down the line, whether there are updates, and if new users are coming in.
Funds stay on-chain, and the rules are embedded in the contract.
The rest is up to the developers to innovate.
The mechanisms recently rolled out by OpenFour are, in my opinion, the most imaginative part—putting more control back in the hands of Builders.