FOMO and FUD rumors often appear in the coin-mining circle. The L0 coin issuance rumor a few days ago has not yet been implemented, and last night it was reported that ZK will carry out points tasks and even KYC. So what are these two things talking about? How can we do coin-mining without being disturbed? How to avoid being affected by FOMO and FUD rumors on the Internet? I hope this article can help you~
The previous rumors about Layerzero issuing coins made many people fud because they were afraid that it would be too late and they would not be able to become the selected high-quality airdrop users; the later rumors that ZK would carry out points tasks and even KYC were about the rules for checking witches.
Okay, let's talk about these two things: "screening high-quality users" and "checking witches". First of all, we have to understand that screening high-quality users and checking witches are two different things! If you compare LuMao to an exam, screening high-quality users can be understood as selecting the test paper with the highest score, while checking witches is to find cheaters.
Well, that’s easy to understand! So how will the project team select high-quality users? What is the optimal solution for checking witches?
According to ARB’s airdrop rules, we can find clues on how the project will screen high-quality users and check for witches.
First of all, how will the project party screen high-quality users?
Therefore, the rules for the project to screen high-quality users must be based on "interaction frequency", "interaction amount" and "transaction cycle"! In plain words, if you swipe often, swipe more, and swipe longer, you will be selected as a high-quality airdrop user.
Secondly, what is the optimal solution to prevent witches?
Therefore, the best solution to prevent witches is to exclude witches through dimensions such as "first interaction time point", "interaction density", "wallet balance", and "witch blacklist", rather than the KYC that everyone is panicking about. Top-tier project owners will not exclude witches through centralized methods such as KYC identity authentication. Why? Because this will not only damage their own reputation, but also violate the spirit of blockchain decentralization, not to mention the privacy-focused Ethereum second-layer network.
Subsequent projects will definitely refer to ARB's anti-witch rules, such as wallet balances of no less than 0.01 ETH, being disqualified from being on the ARB witch list, etc. They may even add a little more to this, such as wallet addresses with similar interaction records being considered witches.
What are similar interaction records?
This standard is difficult to define, but one thing is certain: interacting with the same contract at the same time with the same amount of money must be similar interaction records. Simply put: Same time, Same money, Same contract is Sybil behavior! For example, "withdrawing 0.1ETH from the exchange to 3 wallet addresses within 3 minutes" is a similar interaction record.
Well, now that you understand how the project team screens high-quality users and detects witches, don’t be swayed by online FUD rumors and FOMO emotions. You must maintain your independent analysis and judgment capabilities so that you can interact and experience Web3 products with your heart and for a long time.
PEACE！YO！
