Luke Dashjr, who is known for his strong opposition to Ordinals, expressed support for colored/colored coins. He emphasized the role of colored coins in the Bitcoin network, pointing out that they actually work within Bitcoin and will not cause irrelevant effects on Bitcoin users. , does not affect the fungibility of Bitcoin, does not generate spam, does not create artificial fee fluctuations, does not accuse irrelevant upgrades of enabling them, is not designed for fraud, does not affect the expansion of Bitcoin, does not Will attempt to take over the Bitcoin consensus, will not present non-problems as "solutions", and will not introduce illegal content into Bitcoin nodes.
Later, he also denied the existence value of ARC20 as a colored currency on @atomicalsxyz for unknown reasons. As we all know, ARC20 is a token protocol that relies on dyeing technology to issue tokens.
According to public information, we can summarize several main views of Luke Dashjr on Bitcoin:
1. Opposing the use of inscriptions: Luke Dashjr strongly opposes the use of inscriptions (Ordinals protocol) on the Bitcoin blockchain, believing that it is a spam attack that exploits Bitcoin Core vulnerabilities. He believes that since 2013, Bitcoin Core has allowed users to set limits on the size of additional data when relaying or mining transactions, and Inscription circumvented this limit by obscuring its data into program code. Dashjr hopes to disable inscriptions by fixing this vulnerability to protect the security and efficiency of the Bitcoin blockchain;
2. Propose to fix the vulnerability: In order to solve the vulnerability exploited by Inscription, Luke Dashjr implemented a fix in Bitcoin Knots v25.1, and hopes to completely solve this problem in future Bitcoin Core versions. He submitted a PR (Pull Request) to the Bitcoin Core Github repository and updated the "datacarriersize" to filter transactions carrying a new type of script data, namely inscriptions. This demonstrates his commitment to solving problems facing the Bitcoin blockchain through technical means;
To sum up, Luke Dashjr’s views on Bitcoin have aroused extensive discussion and attention in the Bitcoin community, but unfortunately, he failed to maintain consistency, and at the same time, he failed to propose effective solutions to reduce the problem. Feasible hypotheses and scenarios for post-semi security budgeting. At the same time, his view that the emergence of inscriptions has caused the price of BTC to fail to rise sharply seems to be just a personal idea without data support.