夏新河

Shocking 😲 The U.S. President loses 180 million
Turns out it was done by a Chinese person
But just saying it strongly tells you—that this matter is mostly fictitious
Let’s not exaggerate or criticize, let’s do the math:
If Brother Sun really spent 75 million USD, buying 3 billion WLFI at an average price of 0.025 USD.
Unlocking would mean only 20%, at 0.3 USD for shipment, at most cashing out 180 million.
Does that sound like a lot? To you and me, it’s astronomical,
But considering Brother Sun’s scale, that’s really just a drizzle.
TRON will generate 2.12 billion USD in 2024, just in December alone there is 330 million in revenue.
The earnings from this WLFI, when the market is good, he can earn back in half a month.
So if you really think that Brother Sun would stab Trump in the back for this small amount of money?
That’s treating a businessman like a fool.
Don’t forget, Brother Sun has long been pouring political donations,
Just to stand on the same boat with the power structure.
Who leads this cycle? It’s politics.
Brother Sun knows very well:
Compliance and connections are the biggest pass.
In the end, this wave of “harvest theory” is more like someone intentionally spreading rumors,
Trying to sow discord between Brother Sun and Trump.
True or false, it’s fine to watch the drama,
But if you really believe it,
Then you are just falling into someone else's rhythm $TRX $JST

I originally thought that the Bitcoin ecosystem, #ORDINALS , #BRC20 , and inscriptions had already fallen silent. After nearly a year of decline, the leading players #ORDI , #SATS , and #RATS became the three fools, with most users enduring the long bear market in wait! Until a reply from the Binance Web3 wallet suddenly activated and angered the long-silent community and users! It turned out everyone was there; the community was there! Whether it is @CZ or @Yi He as the helm of Binance, they will always put the community first.
The users feel the same; after calling out for so long, regarding Binance's Web3 wallet, the greater the expectations, the greater the disappointment. The deeper the love, the sharper the hate. Upon self-reflection, is it really that difficult for the king of all chains, Bitcoin, to provide a feature that can inscribe inscriptions and runes?
I believe it’s not that it can't be done, nor is it a matter of differentiation; it’s the arrogance and prejudice of the wallet team.
With the benchmark OKX Web3 wallet, everyone thought, even if you were copying homework, you should be able to replicate it, but the result was a half-finished product on the first launch. After nearly a year of adjustments and relaunching, the community and users' long-anticipated inscription feature was gone again. The Web3 wallet has become distant from the market and users, drifting further away from everyone's needs, like a person living in their own world; the wallet product is detached from real needs.
I served you a feast, but you prefer Qingfeng buns.
Furthermore, regarding the focus on inscriptions, why is there such a large user base for inscriptions, and they are all BTC holders? It is because inscriptions, following Bitcoin, are the second time in crypto history that retail investors have been given a fair chance; retail investors can participate in fair minting. The word “fair” is so precious—previous ICOs, IDOs couldn't do it, VC projects couldn't do it, and even the currently popular memes have enough conspiracy groups that can't do it. Only inscriptions provide that glimmer of hope, allowing retail investors to truly experience fairness in crypto, which is priceless.
For the Web3 wallet, if it’s not done well, we must find reasons internally and cannot be self-righteous. If it really can’t be done well, then don’t do it; save resources and manpower. Focus on doing CEX well, concentrate efforts on big tasks, and build a strong moat. Binance’s CEX is strong enough! Consistently provide excellent user experience and security. Because we are all users!