Woke up in the middle of the night to check coin prices, scrolled through Twitter, and had a piece of gossip.
When the coin price is not ideal, it's really not suitable to argue with user representatives, even if users throw mud, you have to endure it and humbly explain the facts to defend your innocence. Once the flames of war are ignited, the anger from the user community will only grow stronger. Because as long as the coin price is bad and users are trapped, the project party is at fault. When encountering users looking for trouble, it's best to keep the peace.
When the coin price is bad, <project party is doing things> is a protective charm. The project party that is working must deliver results, the pressure is immense, and energy cannot be wasted on arguing.
A former colleague of Seraph always advised me not to argue with other players because it’s all about debating expectations, which is meaningless. If you have the ability to produce results and facts, fixing the game economy, bringing in a large number of players, and raising the coin price is much better than anything else, and at that time, there’s no need to argue.
On the contrary, even breathing is wrong, so it’s better to stay silent.