Part Two: The False Prosperity of Ecological Construction

1. The Predicament of the Developer Ecosystem

The core competitiveness of blockchain projects lies in the support of the developer community. However, the developer ecosystem of the TON chain can be described as “desolate”:

Poor Development Tools: The official development tools of the TON chain lack necessary functional support, and even the most basic debugging tools are missing. This makes developers feel frustrated when building DApps.

Low Quality Documentation: The development documentation of the TON chain is filled with errors and incomplete descriptions, requiring developers to spend a lot of time figuring things out on their own.

2. The Embarrassment of the DApp Ecosystem

There are almost no noteworthy decentralized applications on the TON chain. The current number of DApps is very limited, and most of them are simple transfer tools or boring mini-games. This ecological status raises the question: Who exactly does the technical advantage of the TON chain serve?

3. Low User Activity

Users are the core of blockchain projects. However, the user data of the TON chain has always been bleak:

Few Active Wallet Users: The growth of wallet users on the TON chain is slow, with a significant gap compared to mainstream blockchain projects.

Low Transaction Volume: The transaction volume on the chain is severely insufficient, which not only indicates limited user interest but also reflects the overall lack of attractiveness of the ecosystem.

If you want to learn more about cryptocurrency-related knowledge and firsthand cutting-edge information, click on my avatar to follow my official account. Those who can multiply their investment tenfold in a month are also welcome to follow. Daily market analysis and recommendations for quality potential coins.