What do you think: should info gypsies be held responsible for the fact that you, on their advice, invested in #STRK #CHIA #PEPE #ATOM , etc.?
I often come across hate bloggers in chats - supposedly with their reviews with faith in coins they "plant" their audience or unload.
And what will happen to those who force their meme coins on SunPump, etc.? 🔫
In my logic, you can't blame someone for the fact that you yourself opened someone's blog, saw with your own eyes a cluster of pixels on your phone, took an action based on this, and blamed someone else.
What does a person who is personally unknown to you have to do with it, who also wrote "not financial advice, there are risks here"?
Don't you think that if the people who influence you are held accountable, then you will think even LESS often with your own head and MORE OFTEN rely on the opinion of others?
Don't you think that this is a super sign that as soon as the whining dies down, an alt-season is possible, because the whiners have sold out and left the chats?
