Fragility is being hurt by volatility, resilience is not being hurt by volatility, and antifragility is gaining from volatility.

I recently re-read Taleb's antifragility. If you put "hoarding coins" in what the book says, it is completely consistent. "Contracts" are fragile and cannot withstand volatility, while "hoarding coins" is antifragile, allowing you to pick up lower chips every time during large fluctuations.

Interestingly, KOLs are also antifragile. The more people who criticize him, the more popular he becomes.

The antifragility of the system depends on the fragility of individuals. In this wave of big drops, the most people bet on ETH's rise because of ETFs. At the same time, this wave of people is also the most fragile (double leverage is liquidated), which also led to the most severe drop in ETH in this wave.

The highest level of anti-fragility is to have anti-fragility. You can understand it as spot selection of coins and hoarding, contracts are to control positions, and the difficulty of copycat is hell-level. Most people who enter this circle only see cases of getting rich by playing memes, but not playing memes and inscriptions. The probability of loss is 80%+. The only people who make money are probably the project parties that issue coins, or the group leaders of CX groups. Similarly, the leeks who play memes are also the most vulnerable.

Many people know the legendary trader hedeng in the currency circle. His philosophy is to always stand on the opposite side of fragility, which also means anti-fragility (position management).

There is no theme, just casually share my recent experience.