Cryptopolitan

The cloud development platform Vercel’s security incident has prompted alarm in the crypto industry, following the company’s disclosure that attackers compromised parts of its internal systems through a third-party AI tool.

Because many crypto projects rely on Vercel to host their user interfaces, the breach highlights just how dependent Web3 teams are on centralized cloud infrastructure. That reliance creates an often overlooked attack surface—one that can sidestep traditional defenses like DNS monitoring and directly compromise frontend integrity.

Vercel said Sunday that the intrusion originated from a third-party AI tool linked to a Google Workspace OAuth app. That tool had been breached in a larger incident affecting hundreds of users from multiple organizations, the company said. Vercel confirmed a limited subset of customers was affected, and its services stayed operational.

The company has engaged external incident responders and alerted the police while also investigating how the data may have been accessed.

Access keys, source code, database records, and deployment credentials (NPM and GitHub tokens) were listed for the account. But these are not independently established claims.

As proof, one of those sample items included about 580 employee records with names, corporate email addresses, account status, and activity timestamps, along with a screenshot of an internal dashboard.

Attribution remains unclear. Individuals connected to the core ShinyHunters group denied involvement, according to reports. The seller also said it contacted Vercel, demanding a ransom, though the company has not revealed whether negotiations were conducted.

Third-party AI compromise exposes hidden infrastructure risk

Rather than attacking Vercel directly, attackers have leveraged OAuth access linked to Google Workspace. A supply-chain weakness of this nature is trickier to identify, as it depends on trusted integrations rather than obvious vulnerabilities.

Theo Browne, a developer known in the software community, said those consulted indicated Vercel’s internal Linear and GitHub integrations bore the brunt of the problems.

He observed that environment variables marked as sensitive in Vercel are safeguarded; other variables that were not flagged must be rotated to avoid the same fate.

Vercel followed up on this directive, urging customers to review their environment variables and utilize the platform’s sensitive variable feature. That kind of compromise is particularly worrying because environment variables often contain secrets such as API keys, private RPC endpoints, and deployment credentials.

If these values were compromised, attackers might be able to alter builds, inject malicious code, or gain access to connected services for broader exploitation.

Unlike typical breaches that target DNS records or domain registrars, the compromise at the hosting layer occurs at the build pipeline level. That allows attackers to compromise the actual frontend delivered to users rather than merely redirecting visitors.

Certain projects store sensitive configuration data in environment variables, including wallet-related services, analytics providers, and infrastructure endpoints. If those values were accessed, teams may have to assume that they were compromised and rotate them.

Frontend attacks have already been a recurring challenge in the crypto space. Recent incidents of domain hijacking have led to users being redirected to malicious clones designed to drain wallets. But those attacks usually come at the DNS or registrar level. These changes can often be detected quickly with monitoring tools.

A compromise at the hosting layer differs. Rather than directing users to a phony site, attackers modify the actual frontend. Users may encounter a legitimate domain serving malicious code, but will have no idea what is happening.

Investigation continues as crypto projects review exposure

How far the breach penetrated, or whether any customer deployments were changed, is unclear. Vercel said its investigation is ongoing and it will update stakeholders as more information becomes available. It also said affected customers are being contacted directly.

No major crypto projects have publicly confirmed receiving notification from Vercel as of publication time. But the incident is expected to prompt teams to audit their infrastructure, rotate credentials, and examine how they manage secrets.

The bigger lesson is that security in crypto frontends doesn’t end at DNS protection or smart contract audits. Dependencies on cloud platforms, CI/CD pipelines, and AI integrations further increase risk.

When one of those trusted services is compromised, attackers could exploit a channel that bypasses traditional defenses and directly affects users.

The Vercel hack, tied to a compromised AI tool, illustrates how supply-chain vulnerabilities in modern development stacks can have cascading effects throughout the crypto ecosystem.

If you're reading this, you’re already ahead. Stay there with our newsletter.

KelpDAO’s $300 million exploit now looks more like a Layer 2 failure than a direct break on the Ethereum mainnet, as fears of DeFi contagion from interactions across chains rise in the community.

Sources who have been granted anonymity reached out to Cryptopolitan and said they had “confidence that Core L1 ETH is not impacted” and that the issue “sits on L2s.”

The attack began after a wallet funded through Tornado Cash’s 1 ETH pool waited about ten hours, then called lzReceive on LayerZero’s EndpointV2 contract. That triggered KelpDAO’s bridge logic and released 116,500 rsETH to an attacker’s wallet.

The tokens were worth about $292 million and made up roughly 18% of rsETH’s circulating supply of around 630,000. Two more packets then targeted 40,000 rsETH each, or roughly another $100 million combined, but both reverted after KelpDAO’s emergency multisig executed pauseAll.

Source: ZachXBT/X

If both extra attempts had worked, the total loss would have reached about $391 million, according to the sources.

Attackers dump rsETH into Aave and rattle ZRO

The stolen rsETH was deposited into Aave V3 as collateral, then used to borrow large amounts of ETH and WETH, with funds routed back through Tornado Cash. That raised the risk of bad debt at Aave, with estimates putting the exposure at up to $177 million.

Aave then froze all rsETH markets on both V3 and V4 and said the flaw was in rsETH, not in its own contracts. SparkLend shut its rsETH market. Fluid froze activity. Upshift paused both High Growth ETH and Kelp Gain vaults. Exposure also ran through products tied to Pendle, Compound, Euler, Beefy, and Yearn.

The private briefings reviewed by Cryptopolitan point in a narrower direction than the market panic first suggested.

Our sources said L1 rsETH remains fully backed and that the relevant Aave market is “completely solvent.” One message said weETH is not affected, liquid vault management is operating as normal, and LiquidETH and LiquidUSD users will not face drawdowns because excess borrow costs from the Aave spike will be covered.

“Out of an abundance of caution, rsETH remains frozen across Aave V3 and V4 and exposure to the incident is capped. WETH reserves also remain frozen across affected markets including Ethereum, Arbitrum, Base, Mantle, and Linea. Aave is actively validating information and assessing potential resolutions.”

– Aave

Early investigations said the problem was enabled by a 1-of-1 DVN setup on the Kelp rsETH Unichain to Ethereum route, which allowed unbacked tokens to be released on Ethereum without a legitimate source-side burn.

Another source told us that another platform’s own LayerZero OFT bridges use a minimum 2/2 DVN setup, scale to 3 on busier routes, and include inbound and outbound rate limits. That platform still paused all LZ OFT bridges as a precaution, but also froze its Teller contract, the module handling deposits, withdrawals, and share minting.

Protocols halt withdrawals and wait for liquidity

According to the sources, “borrow rates on Aave have spiked and Ethereum exit queue has filled which makes delevering harder/more expensive.” Another said Kelp had not yet decided how losses would be covered or socialized and that the best case would be for losses to land only on the L2s where the exploit happened.

Deposits were frozen because delayed oracle reports could create unfair share minting. Withdrawals were described as “technically not paused,” but they could not be processed without more clarity from Kelp and Aave.

Mellow is now looking for windows to exit, but has not been able to do so because premiums to swap from stETH to ETH were too high and the Ethereum exit queue was clogged. Teams held back oracle updates because they did not know how to price rsETH after the losses.

One source said, “We just don’t know how to price rsETH.” Another said, “0 news so far,” when asked about progress from Kelp or Aave. In one worst case, losses were estimated at around 9,000 ETH. 

Another estimate put a possible 6.2% hit on top-level depositors if losses reached L1 and broader backstops were not used. Separate messages said incoming protocol liquidity may arrive by Tuesday or Wednesday to help process larger withdrawals.

EtherFi has told its users on X that:

“EtherFi Liquid vaults are unaffected by the recent Kelp rsETH incident. Liquid vault users will not experience any drawdowns.”

Meanwhile, as all this is happening, we also received knowledge that Vercel has been breached and that the attacker has listed their customers’ data, source code, databases, and keys up for sale.

Source: Vercel

Vercel has already announced publicly on Telegram that they “identified a security incident involving unauthorized access to their internal systems.”

If you want a calmer entry point into DeFi crypto without the usual hype, start with this free video.

Nearly every major company in America has rushed to put artificial intelligence agents to work over the past year, but the technology is delivering far less than promised while creating serious new problems inside organizations, according to new research and industry experts.

Almost all business leaders, 97 percent, say their companies put AI agents into operation during the past 12 months, with 52 percent of employees already using them. But fewer than three in ten are seeing any real financial benefit from the expensive technology. 

The gap between what companies spent and what they got back has left 54 percent of top executives saying the whole effort is tearing their organizations apart.

“The biggest problem that we’re working with in AI right now” comes from companies thinking every task needs to run through costly AI systems, said Kevin McGrath, who runs AI startup Meibel. He told a Silicon Valley conference this week that businesses “just give all of your tokens and all of your money to an AI Claw bot that will just waste millions and millions of tokens.”

The warnings came during two separate technology gatherings in California this week, where engineers and company leaders laid out the real problems behind the AI agent hype.

 A survey of 1,200 top executives and 1,200 employees conducted by WRITER found that 79 percent of companies face challenges adopting AI, a double-digit jump from 2025. This is happening even though 59 percent spend more than one million dollars each year on AI technology.

Two-Thirds of companies report security breaches

The security picture looks alarming. Two-thirds of executives believe their companies have already experienced data leaks or security breaches because workers used unapproved AI tools.

 More than one-third, 36 percent, have no formal plan for watching over their AI agents. Another 35 percent admitted they could not immediately shut down an AI agent if it went rogue. Thirty-five percent of employees have entered company secrets into public AI tools.

Deep Shah, a software engineer at Google, explained that “there are multiple challenges you will find when you try to deploy that system at scale.” He pointed to costs as the first major obstacle. Running AI agents requires constant spending, and poorly designed systems end up burning cash instead of saving it.

The problem goes beyond technical issues. Three-quarters of executives confessed their company’s AI strategy exists “more for show” than as actual guidance for employees.

Nearly half, 48 percent, called their AI adoption efforts a “massive disappointment.” Another 39 percent lack any formal plan to drive revenue from AI tools. The pressure has gotten so intense that 73 percent of chief executives report stress or anxiety about their company’s AI strategy, with 64 percent fearing they could lose their jobs if they fail to lead the transition.

Only 29 percent see real returns despite heavy use

Meanwhile, a separate analysis by Lyzr AI based on 200,000 user interactions, 3,000 demo requests, and 2,000 conversations with business and tech leaders found that 62 percent of companies exploring AI agents lack a clear starting point. Another 41 percent treat them as side projects. Thirty-two percent stall after pilot programs and never reach full operation.

Chris Han, who helps run ThinkingAI in China, said popular tools like OpenClaw cannot meet corporate needs. Business users need to figure out memory management, agent teams, and communications, tasks that the current tools handle poorly.

Only 29 percent of organizations report significant returns from generative AI, and just 23 percent from AI agents, even though 70 percent of employees and 94 percent of top leaders use AI tools for at least 30 minutes every day. Sixty-four percent of executives spend two hours or more with the technology daily.

If you're reading this, you’re already ahead. Stay there with our newsletter.

Nvidia has released new gaming processors every single year since the 1990s. That streak ends now. 2026 marks the first year without a fresh GeForce lineup since the company’s founding.

“The gaming segment is no longer the driving force of the company. There was one point when it clearly was,” said Stacy Rasgon of Bernstein Research as reported by CNBC.

The opening looked perfect for competitors. Nvidia made its name selling graphics processing units that let video games run faster and look better. When the company launched its first GPU in 1999, the GeForce 256, it nearly went bankrupt making it happen. 

Gamers saved the company by snapping up the new technology. Now those early supporters feel abandoned as Nvidia chases bigger profits elsewhere.

The company’s computer and networking division, which makes AI chips, averaged a 69% profit margin over three years. The graphics segment aimed at gamers only managed 40%. A single Blackwell AI chip costs up to $40,000, while gaming cards sell for $299 to $1,999.

AMD and Intel can’t take the advantage

This should have opened the door for rivals AMD and Intel to win over frustrated gamers. Instead, both face the exact same problem strangling Nvidia’s gaming business: a severe shortage of computer memory chips.

AMD’s Radeon RX 9000 series saw price increases between 10% and 17% across all models. The flagship Radeon RX 9070 XT jumped 17%, while the Radeon RX 9060 XT 8GB rose a more modest 10%. The Radeon RX 9060 XT 16GB landed at 14% because it carries twice the memory.

David McAfee, who oversees AMD’s Radeon division, told Gizmodo during CES 2026 the company works closely with memory suppliers to keep prices reasonable for everyday buyers. But he admitted sustaining these efforts remains unrealistic amid the ongoing shortage.

Intel faces even worse setbacks. The company planned to launch an Arc B770 gaming card built on its BMG-31 chip with 32 Xe Cores and 16GB of memory. Reports pointed to a potential first quarter 2026 release. That launch is now cancelled.

Instead, Intel will release the Arc Pro B70 workstation card with 32GB of memory, aimed at AI work rather than gaming.  Intel scrapped the gaming version due to a “lack of financial viability.” With memory shortages and massive price hikes, it no longer makes sense to release an affordable card.

Memory shortage cripples entire industry

Behind all this sits a brutal reality: computer memory is scarce and getting worse. Nvidia plans to cut gaming GPU production by up to 40% because it cannot get enough memory chips. As reported by Cryptopolitan Micron has warned of near-permanent memory shortage affecting the industry.

Research firm Gartner predicts the shortage will push computer prices up 17% this year, causing PC shipments to drop 10.4%. The firm expects entry-level consumer PCs to disappear entirely by 2028.

“If there is push-outs or delays on the gaming roadmap, it’s probably in large part that they probably can’t make the cards anyways because it’s hard to get the memory,” Rasgon explained. “Every bit of memory that’s out there, I think is really getting prioritized to AI compute.”

Making high-performance AI processors requires High Bandwidth Memory, which takes about four times as many silicon wafers to produce compared to regular memory chips. This is why memory problem hits all chipmakers equally.

“That dynamic is starving the overall industry of the type of memory that is traditionally used for more consumer type applications. It’s just not available,” Rasgon said.

“If Nvidia can’t get the memory, AMD ain’t going to get the memory,” he added.

Gamers hoped competition would save them when Nvidia shifted focus. Tim Gettys, who co-hosts the Kinda Funny Games podcast, said AMD and Intel could have filled the gap.

“If they’re making three times the money and the stockholders are three times happier, then yeah, I do think that they will abandon gaming despite it being what got them there,” Gettys said. “There’s a clear favorite,” Gettys noted. “If you’re playing on PC, you’re going to want an Nvidia card.”

If you're reading this, you’re already ahead. Stay there with our newsletter.

The cryptocurrency sector has been clamoring for regulatory clarity, but concerns about the contents of the CLARITY Act have risen. 

Galaxy Digital’s (NASDAQ: GLXY) research head, Alex Thorn, highlighted sanctions data and surveillance concerns, warning that the CLARITY Act may not be all good news as the community is hoping. 

Is the CLARITY Act a surveillance bill in disguise?

The U.S. Senate has returned from its recess, and debates regarding the Digital Asset Market CLARITY Act have begun; however, Alex Thorn, head of research at Galaxy Digital (NASDAQ: GLXY), has urged caution. 

He warned in a January 2026 client note that while the industry has long wished for regulatory clarity, the current version of the bill contains “fine print” that represents the largest expansion of financial surveillance since the USA PATRIOT Act.

According to an analysis shared by Thorn, the U.S. Treasury’s Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) has historically sanctioned 518 Bitcoin addresses. These addresses have cumulatively received 249,814 BTC, sent 239,708 BTC, and currently hold a net balance of approximately 9,306 BTC, worth roughly $707 million. 

OFAC-sanctioned addresses. Source: Alex Thorn via X/Twitter

Thorn notes that OFAC’s Specially Designated Nationals (SDN) list is just one tool the Treasury uses today. However, the CLARITY Act would expand these powers significantly, giving the department new tools to intercept illicit assets. 

Thorn warned in March that if the CLARITY Act does not pass committee by the end of April 2026, the odds of passage this year become “extremely low.” Reports indicate that negotiators are close to a deal on stablecoin yields, but other hurdles remain. 

Supporters on the Senate Banking Committee argue the CLARITY Act is designed to “crack down on illicit finance” while protecting software developers and promoting innovation. The official summary states the bill gives law enforcement “new, targeted tools to combat money laundering, terrorist financing, and sanctions evasion.”

Aside Thorn, Cardano founder Charles Hoskinson argues the language goes too far. Hoskinson has warned that the legislation’s broad provisions could be exploited by future political administrations, regardless of which party is in power. 

The fact that the bill automatically classifies new digital tokens as securities with virtually no pathway to reclassification is also an issue, as it stifles competition. 

One independent analysis of a previous draft noted that while the bill includes a “Keep Your Coins Act” preventing bans on self-custody, it contains loopholes that still allow for government intervention regarding illicit finance. 

The introduction of “Distributed Ledger Application Layers” in the draft could also create compliance obligations for software applications that could force DeFi interfaces to monitor users.

Who benefits from the new rules?

Wall Street giants, including JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) and Citadel LLC, are actively lobbying the SEC to ensure tokenized securities do not receive special treatment.

In a recent letter to the SEC, Thorn argued that “forcing a new architecture to clone the old one” is not technology neutrality. Instead, he suggests that a decentralized automated market maker (AMM) should not be classified as an exchange because it is “autonomous code” and not an organization of persons operating a marketplace.

Thorn argues that liquidity providers (LPs) on AMMs are simply traders using their own balance sheets, not dealers serving customers. 

He warns that banks and brokerages are playing a cynical game where they publicly back Bitcoin but use their Washington lobbyists to delay real integration that would threaten their control over market structure.

According to JPMorgan analysts, the legislative disputes have narrowed to two or three core questions, primarily revolving around stablecoin rewards. 

The tentative compromise would ban passive “idle yield” on stablecoins, because banks fear it would drain deposits, while allowing activity-based rewards. However, critics like Ryan Adams argue that if banks succeed in killing yield provisions, it proves the Senate is prioritizing bank interests over the public.

The smartest crypto minds already read our newsletter. Want in? Join them.

The DeFi community is divided in how they perceived Marc Zeller’s message when eh wrote, “If you have WETH on Aave V3 Core, withdraw now, ask questions later” on X on Saturday, April 18. 

The two options: a genuine alarm or an act of sabotage.

However, a few hours later, more than $6.6 billion had left Aave, with stablecoin borrowing rising to 15%, causing a major liquidity crisis.

That the warning came from Zeller, the founder of the Aave-Chan Initiative (ACI), who had spent months publicly battling Aave Labs before announcing his departure in March, added an unmistakable edge to an already volatile situation. 

An X user responded to Zeller’s initial post, writing, “Think it’s your responsibility to add actual information and context here if you are going to make this claim causing people to panic.”

Supporters called it a timely alert from a well-connected insider. 

Was Zeller sounding the alarm or fanning the flames?

In subsequent posts, Zeller declared the situation “under control” and announced the immediate end of ACI’s Frontier ETH staking program, offering to make all ETH from its validators available to Aave’s DAO to help protect WETH depositors. “It won’t help much,” he wrote, “but seems like the right thing to do now.”

Spark’s MonetSupply, for his part, was unsparing in drawing a competitive lesson. Spark had deprecated rsETH as collateral back in January and maintained high maximum borrow rates on its ETH market, a policy that was “not very popular among eth-loopers,” he conceded, but one that left SparkLend with ample liquidity while Aave markets across mainnet, Arbitrum, Plasma, Mantle, and Base locked up.

Aave’s total locked value (TVL) has fallen from over $26.3 billion as of April 18 to around $19.8 billion. Its token, AAVE, is currently down by over 18% over the past 24 hours, trading around $92.2 as of the time of writing.

What actually happened to Aave, and how serious is the damage?

The crisis started on KelpDAO, a liquid restaking protocol built on Ethereum. 

On April 18, an attacker exploited a vulnerability in KelpDAO’s LayerZero-based cross-chain bridge, which enabled them to manipulate the protocol’s messaging layer into releasing 116,500 rsETH tokens, roughly 18% of the total circulating supply, worth around $292 million.

According to EmberCN, “the amount of funds withdrawn from Aave has reached $6.6 billion, with half ($3.3 billion) being stablecoins,” while Justin Sun alone withdrew around 65,584 ETH, worth around $154 million.

EmberCN later posted that Sun withdrew 53,660 ETH ($125 million) from Aave in the early hours and deposited it into Spark.

Monetsupply.eth, head of strategy at Spark, a direct Aave competitor, warned that with ETH utilization pinned at full capacity, borrowers using ETH as collateral for stablecoin loans cannot unwind their positions even as stablecoin borrowing rates go up. 

Why did Zeller leave Aave?

Zeller founded ACI as Aave’s primary governance and business development delegate, making him one of the protocol’s most influential voices for years. But the relationship between the DAO founder and the leadership of Aave Labs soured badly in the final months of 2025.

There was a governance dispute over Aave Labs’ decision to redirect swap fees on its platform away from the DAO treasury and into a Labs-controlled wallet, a move critics saw as a privatization of the protocol.

Zeller alleged that Labs-linked wallet addresses had swung a major governance vote in the Labs’ favor and declared that there was “no role for an independent service provider in an environment where the largest budget recipient holds undisclosed voting power and uses it on its own proposals.” 

ACI began winding down around this period, declaring that it was leaving. However, it is not alone, as BGD Labs, the developer team behind Aave V3’s core codebase, and Chaos Labs, Aave’s risk curator, have also announced their exits.

The crypto card with no spending limits. Get 3% cashback and instant mobile payments. Claim your Ether.fi card.

Security experts on Saturday flagged nearly $300 million leaving Ethereum-based Kelp DAO on Saturday.

Cryptopolitan reported that Kelp DAO said it had “identified suspicious cross-chain activity involving rsETH” and paused rsETH contracts while it worked with security experts.

ZRO dropped fast, sliding 18% from $2 to $1.4. At the same time, a whale running a leveraged long on HyperLiquid got partially liquidated and lost $2.88 million.

That kind of forced unwinding sends a message. People see liquidation, they don’t ask questions, they just exit. Liquidity pulls back, and price follows.

Source: Onchain Labs/X

DeFi protocols freeze exposure as rsETH spreads risk everywhere

The issue got worse because rsETH is plugged into too many places. This token is wired into lending markets, yield strategies, and leveraged loops across DeFi. On X, Ignas described the exploit as “terrible due to extensive DeFi integrations” and that the full exposure is still unclear.

Aave V3 already froze its markets. SparkLend also shut down the rsETH market. Fluid froze activity as well. Upshift paused both High Growth ETH and Kelp Gain vaults. Lido Earn through the Mellow strategy meta-vault is involved, and that setup likely included leverage.

Pendle PT and YT tokens are also tied into this structure. Compound and Euler are part of the wider network, and some Beefy strategies may be affected too, with possible exposure through Yearn.

Ignas also pointed out that LayerZero could be affected because rsETH was bridged from L2 networks. That raises a direct problem. If rsETH is stuck or broken on L2s, those tokens might not hold real value right now.

He added that the situation is still developing and said he didn’t want to spread fear, but also made it clear there are “not many places to hide in DeFi” during events like this.

Former Euler Labs exec explains how losses, liquidations, and bad debt can spiral

Euler Labs’ former CEO Michael Bentley said, “The fallout from the Kelp rsETH exploit is going to be messy and could potentially be quite a bit more severe than some people are making out right now.”

He explained that rsETH on mainnet may still be backed, but there is no liquidity to sell it, and with contracts paused, “there’s currently no usable redemption path either.”

Michael ran the numbers too. If losses were spread across all holders, rsETH would sit around 81.25% of its original value based on a $300 million loss against $1.6 billion.

But he made it clear that this approach is unlikely, saying that it “would likely push a number of large positions on Aave towards undercollateralisation and risk creating bad debt,” which could trigger legal battles.

Michael also said L2 holders will probably take the hit instead. He questioned who these holders are and pointed out they could be DAOs or funds now sitting on major losses. He added that affected users may try legal action to force shared losses, which could delay redemptions even further.

Michael said once redemptions reopen, lending platforms are unlikely to accept rsETH as collateral again. That means a massive unwind of rsETH and ETH looping trades.

Right now, those trades are already bleeding. Aave ETH utilization is at 100%, borrowing costs sit at 8.71%, and staked ETH yields are around 2.5%. That puts returns deep in negative territory, ranging from about -6.21% to as low as -90%.

Michael explained that the normal unwind process, which involves swapping collateral and repaying debt, may not work at this scale. Without enough liquidity, traders may have to manually unwind step by step. 

Michael added, “If rsETH is no longer collateral and no longer has borrowing power, this makes it much more difficult for people to manually unwind as well.”

If positions stay stuck while interest builds, equity gets wiped out. Once debt grows beyond recoverable collateral, bad debt forms and keeps growing.

The smartest crypto minds already read our newsletter. Want in? Join them.

Cardano founder Charles Hoskinson has reignited a long-running debate over XRP’s value model just as plans to bring the token into Cardano’s decentralized finance (DeFi) ecosystem move forward.

Hoskinson pointed out that Midnight (NIGHT) differs from XRP in how it creates and allocates value. On “The O Show,” he was all in on tokenomics with Wendy O, specifically examining utility and how network growth translates into holders’ benefits. Hoskinson didn’t dismiss XRP’s popularity on the show, but he did challenge the underlying infrastructure that’s allegedly driving its growth.

He noted that there’s a disparity between XRP ownership and Ripple’s financial health, and that token holders are not directly exposed to the company’s profitability. Ripple uses its control over the XRP token supply to finance its independent business lines and then keep the profits all segregated from XRP investors, he believes.

Hoskinson also confirmed this week that efforts to integrate XRP into Cardano DeFi are still underway, even as rival networks accelerate similar initiatives. Solana, for instance, has already introduced wrapped XRP into its ecosystem, intensifying competitive pressure on Cardano to deliver.

The confirmation follows renewed community scrutiny over the timeline and structure of Cardano’s cross-chain ambitions. While Hoskinson offered a simple affirmation that XRP DeFi is “still planned,” the broader discussion quickly expanded beyond technical integration into deeper questions about decentralization and value distribution.

Hoskinson says Midnight prioritizes community-first distribution

Hoskinson said the lack of staking mechanisms indicates that XRP’s model doesn’t prioritize returns for holders. He compared XRP to Tether, portraying it as a tool in which people pay for utility, yet all the true profits go to a central authority rather than being pocketed by holders.

He drew a sharp contrast with Midnight, explaining that the NIGHT token is designed to align the network’s success with users’ actual activity. He contended that distribution for the NIGHT token spanned eight ecosystems, including Cardano and XRP.

However, because it required users holding over $100 at the snapshot to submit a manual claim, only a tiny percentage of the total supply was distributed to the community. Nonetheless, this is a far cry from XRP, where about 80% of the 100 billion supply was concentrated in Ripple’s hands at launch.

However, some XRP proponents did not take too kindly to Hoskinson’s remarks. Critics claimed the Cardano founder has always been preoccupied with Ripple, pointing to his past comments as evidence. Hoskinson and the XRP camp have been at odds for years, and despite a temporary truce after the 2024 election, it seems the old rivalry is back. Post-reconciliation, Hoskinson had outlined a plan to mend fences that involved adding XRP to the Lace wallet and fostering growth in XRP’s DeFi landscape.

Hoskinson reignited the feud after he slammed Garlinghouse’s endorsement of the CLARITY Act, arguing the bill creates a protected class for XRP while strangling innovation for everyone else.

Hoskinson says they will still incorporate XRP into Cardano DeFi

Nonetheless, more recently, Hoskinson reaffirmed that efforts to integrate XRP into Cardano’s DeFi ecosystem are still on track. Speaking on his recent criticism of XRP and how it may have affected their partnership, he asserted that a truly decentralized network shouldn’t be rattled by criticism of one leader. He claimed that a robust, decentralized platform should be able to withstand external criticism of its leadership without it being treated as an existential threat.

He explained on X: “If XRP is so centralized that criticism of a single person’s conduct and lobbying means the ecosystem is shut off, then they aren’t decentralized.”

Earlier, during a discussion with Scott Melker, Input Output Global CEO, he had also stated, “Midnight connects us to all the other blockchains, and we add privacy to all those connection points, so we have a lot to add and offer.”

Meanwhile, Solana is already fast-tracking the integration of XRP into its DeFi ecosystem. XRP holders can now access Solana’s lending and trading pools via wrapped XRP (wXRP), thanks to a custody-and-mint model provided by Hex Trust and LayerZero. The token is pegged 1:1 to XRP secured on the XRP Ledger, allowing funds to flow into Solana-based applications.

Still letting the bank keep the best part? Watch our free video on being your own bank.

Big Tech’s AI debt binge is colliding with a $3.6 trillion refinancing wall across the US and global system as old cheap money turns into expensive refinancing pressure.

The tech sector is sitting on more than $330 billion in high-yield, leveraged loan, and business development company-linked software and technology debt that must mature through 2028. This stack was built in a low-rate era. Now rates are higher, and the math has flipped fast.

A large chunk lands in 2028 alone. About $142 billion matures that year, almost three times the 2026 level. Inside that 2028 wave, roughly $65 billion sits in high-yield bonds and about $77 billion in leveraged loans. Most of this debt was issued when interest rates were near zero during the pandemic. 

That setup is gone. Many companies are already lining up refinancing moves as early as the second half of this year, and the sector is heading into a higher interest rate environment that will reset funding costs across tech balance sheets.

Tech companies begin refinancing pandemic-era debt

The refinancing pressure is not small. More than $330 billion in tech-linked debt is rolling into maturity through 2028, and the 2028 spike of $142 billion stands out as the main pressure point. Companies that locked in ultra-cheap money during the pandemic now face significantly higher borrowing costs when they roll debt forward.

The timing matters. A wave of refinancing is expected to start in the second half of this year, which means the repricing cycle is not years away. It is already starting.

The tech sector, especially software-heavy borrowers tied to high-yield bonds and leveraged loans, is moving from near-zero interest rate financing into a tighter credit regime where every rollover comes at a higher cost. This shift is not isolated. It sits inside a broader global debt squeeze that is hitting both corporate and sovereign borrowers at the same time.

Global debt pressures rise as IMF flags 99% world GDP debt load and US fiscal trajectory climbs toward 142%

The International Monetary Fund mapped a wider stress line across global finances. Global public debt is projected to reach 99% of world GDP by 2028, with scenarios pushing it to 121% under stress cases within three years.

The United States remains a central case, with $39 trillion in national debt and a deficit expected to sit around 7.5% of GDP after a short improvement that faded.

US debt is on track to pass 125% of GDP this year and could reach 142% by 2031. The adjustment needed just to stabilize that path, not reduce it, would require about 4% of GDP in fiscal tightening. Markets are already shifting.

The premium on US Treasuries compared to other advanced debt is shrinking. One IMF fiscal official said, “These are signs that markets are not as sanguine, as forgiving, as they were in the past. This cannot wait forever.”

The fiscal gap has also widened by about one percentage point compared to pre-COVID levels. The IMF linked this to policy choices, not short-term cycles, pointing to higher spending and lower revenues as the base driver.

Real interest rates are now about six percentage points above pre-pandemic levels, adding pressure to every layer of existing debt.

Energy policy is also feeding into the strain. The IMF warned that broad subsidies distort pricing and strain budgets, with one official saying, “They distort price signals, are fiscally costly, regressive, and hard to unwind.”

When many countries shield consumers, the rest absorb the adjustment, with spillover effects that can double price shocks for those not using subsidies.

Fiscal Monitor’s Era Dabla-Norris noted governments have been more restrained than during the 2022 energy crisis, but said fiscal space is now tighter, making old-style support far more expensive.

The smartest crypto minds already read our newsletter. Want in? Join them.

Berkshire Hathaway is moving like it forgot how to compete while the market is flying. Cryptopolitan reported on Friday that the S&P 500 closed above 7,100 for the first time, pushed by rising confidence that the U.S. and Iran are getting closer to ending their conflict.

Wall Street’s alpha index is already up more than 9% this month after hitting its lowest level of the year in late March, when it was close to a 10% drop.

That bounce did not take long before it turned into one of the fastest recoveries seen in at least 36 years. But while everything else pushed higher, Berkshire Hathaway just sat there doing almost nothing. Both share classes slipped, posting month-to-date losses just under 1%.

Now just a day before, Berkshire B shares were actually still ahead of the index by 1.8%, the widest lead seen this year. By Friday, that flipped hard. The same stock closed 9.7% behind the index, the biggest gap recorded so far in 2026.

Berkshire Hathaway stock lags hard as market surges and loses ground fast

This underperformance has been building since May 2, 2025, when the stock hit a record high just before Warren Buffett confirmed he would step down as CEO by the end of that year. Since that moment, both A and B shares have dropped more than 12%.

Prices now sit only about 3% above their early August lows, which shows how little recovery has happened compared to the broader market.

The company’s annual shareholder meeting is just two weeks away, which Cryptopolitan will cover live as usual. At the same time, a new book titled “The Complete Financial History of Berkshire Hathaway, Second Edition” is set for release on April 28 through Harriman House under Pan Macmillan.

The book will reportedly cover six decades of company activity and includes updates through 2024.

Greg Abel changes leadership structure and tightens control across operations

Leadership change is now front and center. In December, just days before taking control, Greg Abel faced employees during a weekly lunch session. One question came up directly about moving headquarters out of Omaha, Nebraska. Abel shut it down fast and said there would be no relocation. That kind of question would not even come up during Warren’s years, but now people expect change.

Abel is already making moves. He raised the profile of executives who worked closely with him before, increased his own salary beyond what Warren took, and said most of that money will go into buying company stock. He also restarted share buybacks after they were paused since 2024. Outside the U.S., he expanded into Japan by taking a stake in an insurance business.

His style is different. He is more involved in day-to-day operations and reviews both company units and stock holdings with tighter control. People close to the company allegedly say he plans to act quickly when expectations are not met, even at senior levels.

In his own words:

“Warren, Charlie and I, we have some differences, just in style and obviously in how we approach things. Our foundational values continue to be what we build our company through.”

His routine shows that hands-on approach. He drives two hours from Des Moines to Omaha several times each week and does not plan to relocate soon, likely staying in Iowa until his son finishes high school. He also travels across multiple states in a single day using a NetJets corporate plane to meet managers directly.

In his February 28 shareholder letter, Abel listed core holdings including Apple, American Express, Coca-Cola, and Moody’s. At the same time, he exited positions handled by Todd Combs, who recently moved to JPMorgan Chase. Combs had been one of Warren’s selected investment managers. Abel does not plan to replace him.

The succession itself was not sudden. It had been expected since 2021 when Charlie Munger revealed the plan during the annual meeting. Still, the exact timing stayed unclear through Munger’s death in November 2023 until Warren confirmed on stage last May that he would retire at year-end.

Your bank is using your money. You’re getting the scraps. Watch our free video on becoming your own bank

Trump-Iran war has wiped out over 500 million barrels from global supply and erased more than 50 billion dollars in crude value in about seven weeks. The disruption started in late February and has not slowed. Analysts and Reuters data say the impact will drag on for months and even years as supply chains struggle to recover.

This is not small damage. It is the largest energy supply shock in modern history, based on Kpler data. The missing barrels include crude and condensate that never made it to market, and that gap is already shaking pricing, storage, and trade flows across the system.

Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araqchi said Friday the Strait of Hormuz is open after a ceasefire deal linked to Lebanon. At the same time, Trump said a deal to end the war could come soon, but gave no clear timing, leaving markets guessing and traders on edge.

Global markets lose massive supply and price risks surge fast

The scale of the loss is extreme. Five hundred million barrels equals ten weeks of global aviation demand, eleven days with zero road traffic worldwide, or five days where the entire global economy has no oil supply. Iain Mowat from Wood Mackenzie said it directly, linking the numbers to real usage.

Reuters estimates show the same volume covers nearly one month of United States demand and more than a month for Europe. It also equals around six years of fuel used by the US military, based on about 80 million barrels per year, and can run global shipping for four months straight.

Prediction markets now price a forty four percent chance US oil jumps above 100 dollars per barrel this month if Iran shuts the Strait of Hormuz again. Traders are watching that choke point closely because it controls a major share of global flows.

Trump addressed the situation on Saturday and said Iran tried to pressure the United States by threatening another closure of the strait. He rejected that approach and said talks will continue without giving in. Speaking from the Oval Office, he said, “Iran got a little cute… they wanted to close up the strait again… they can’t blackmail us.”

Tankers move through strait while damage slows recovery across region

Ship tracking data shows five LNG vessels from Ras Laffan in Qatar moving toward the Strait of Hormuz. The ships are Al Ghashamiya, Lebrethah, Fuwairit, Rasheeda, and Disha. The first four are controlled by QatarEnergy, while Disha is chartered by Petronet from India.

If these vessels pass through, it will mark the first LNG shipments across the strait since the war started on February 28. Iran reopened the route Friday after a US brokered ceasefire between Israel and Lebanon, and by Saturday, a convoy of oil tankers was already moving through the channel.

Before the conflict, the strait handled about one fifth of global LNG trade, making it one of the most critical energy routes on the planet. Qatar holds the position as the second largest LNG exporter, with most cargo heading to Asia, but Iranian strikes cut seventeen percent of its export capacity.

Repairs are expected to remove 12.8 million metric tons per year from supply for three to five years, creating long term pressure on gas markets. Even with the strait open, recovery will not be quick.

Kpler data shows global onshore crude inventories dropped by about 45 million barrels during April alone. Since late March, outages reached around 12 million barrels per day, showing how deep the disruption runs.

Heavy crude fields in Kuwait and Iraq need four to five months to return to normal output levels, pushing supply tightness into summer. Damage to refineries and the Ras Laffan LNG complex adds more delays, meaning full recovery of regional energy systems could take years.

If you're reading this, you’re already ahead. Stay there with our newsletter.

A hacker funded his wallet through Tornado Cash on Saturday, waited 10 hours, and then executed a transaction that siphoned $292 million from KelpDAO.

By the time anyone noticed, the money was gone. And by the time KelpDAO paused, two more attempts had failed within minutes.

KelpDAO hacker wanted to drain $391 million

The wallet that carried out the attack was funded through Tornado Cash’s 1 ETH pool. This is a standard obfuscation step that seeded the address with clean gas money.

The wallet called lzReceive on LayerZero’s EndpointV2 contract, and KelpDAO’s OFT bridge released 116,500 rsETH to a separate attacker address. The drain was complete in one transaction.

What followed showed how tight the margins were. The attacker returned twice. Two more LayerZero packets hit the bridge, each targeting 40,000 rsETH, worth about $100 million combined. Both reverted.

Five minutes earlier, Kelp’s emergency pauser multisig had executed pauseAll. The call froze the LRT Deposit Pool, Withdrawal contract, LRT Oracle, and the rsETH token as well. The interval between the successful drain and the pause was 46 minutes. And the interval between the pause and the next attack attempt was five minutes.

KelpDAO’s total loss would have been around $391 million if the attacker’s second and third attempts had succeeded.

The attacker triggers Aave bad debt

The 116,500 rsETH tokens were worth about $292 million at current prices. The amount represents ~18% of rsETH’s circulating supply of ~630,000.

rsETH is a liquid restaking token built on EigenLayer and is deployed across more than 20 networks, including Base, Arbitrum, Linea, Blast, Mantle, and Scroll.

The attacker didn’t simply hold the stolen rsETH tokens. According to on-chain data, the tokens were deposited into Aave V3 as collateral to borrow large amounts of Ether and Wrapped Ether. The funds were routed back through Tornado Cash to obscure the trail.

That step turned a bridge exploit into a potential bad debt problem for Aave, one of DeFi’s largest lending platforms. Aave V3 could face up to $177 million in bad debt exposure as a result.

Blockchain investigator ZachXBT flagged the incident on Telegram within an hour. “KelpDAO appears to have had $280M+ stolen one hour ago on Ethereum and Arbitrum,” he wrote, confirming the hacker wallets were funded via Tornado Cash.

Kelp’s first public statement came on X, more than two and a half hours after the drain. “Earlier today we identified suspicious cross-chain activity involving rsETH,” the protocol wrote. “We have paused rsETH contracts across mainnet and several L2s while we investigate. We are working with LayerZero, Unichain, our auditors and top security experts on RCA.”

Aave froze all of rsETH markets on both Aave V3 and V4. The protocol confirmed on X that the vulnerability was in rsETH, not Aave’s own contracts. “We are reviewing information about rsETH borrows on Aave that occurred after the exploit and will share more details as soon as possible,” Aave wrote. The Aave team is also exploring ways to cover the losses.

Aave fell 10.65% on the day to $103.86. Ethereum dropped ~3% and currently trades at $2,358.24.

The attack on KeplerDAO also struck less than two weeks after a $286 million exploit of Drift Protocol, the largest crypto theft of 2026 so far. According to a Cryptopolitan report, the Drift Protocol hack is linked to the same group that stole $1.4 billion from Bybit.

KelpDAO now holds the second spot on the list of biggest crypto hacks in 2026.

Your bank is using your money. You’re getting the scraps. Watch our free video on becoming your own bank

Meta is eliminating roughly 8,000 positions starting May 20, while OpenAI plans to nearly double its staff by year’s end, highlighting a widening divide in the technology sector between companies cutting workers and those building the AI systems driving those cuts.

The Meta layoffs, affecting about 10 percent of its 79,000 employees, come as more than 95,000 tech workers have lost jobs across over 240 separate events in 2026 so far, according to TrueUp’s tracking data.

The first quarter alone saw between 78,000 and 91,000 cuts compared to about 30,000 in the same period last year.

Companies are pointing directly to artificial intelligence as the reason.

Meta chief Mark Zuckerberg said earlier this year that projects once requiring big teams can now be handled by “a single very talented person.” Salesforce head Marc Benioff said his support staff dropped from 9,000 people to about 5,000 “because I need less heads.” Amazon’s Andy Jassy told workers the company expected new AI tools to “reduce our total corporate workforce as we get efficiency gains.”

Prediction markets called Meta cuts before official news

Prediction market bettors saw Meta’s cuts coming before Reuters reported them Friday. On Polymarket, a betting platform backed by Intercontinental Exchange, traders put about $112,000 into markets tracking Meta’s employee count and stock price. One market gave 96 percent odds that Meta ended the quarter above 75,000 workers and 55 percent above 77,000.

Polymarket’s broader tech layoffs market has held at 79 percent, expecting increases throughout the month. Kalshi, a competing platform, has a similar market that crossed $30 million in bets.

Traders are treating the job cuts as positive news. A separate poll also gives 79 percent odds that Meta shares will clear $700 in April. Meta’s stock rose roughly 3 percent when the layoff news first leaked. Bank of America set an $885 price target, projecting $7 billion to $8 billion in yearly savings from the restructuring.

OpenAI moves in the opposite direction with a hiring push

While traditional tech companies are cutting, OpenAI is moving in the opposite direction. The Financial Times reported Saturday that the company plans to grow from 4,500 workers to 8,000 by the end of 2026. Most new hires will go into product development, engineering, research, and sales. The company’s latest funding round valued it at $840 billion.  As reported by Cryptopolitan previously, OpenAI has its own hiring platform to be released mid-2026.

While rival CEO Dario Amodei has spent months warning that engineering jobs, especially coding roles, could vanish faster than expected. “I think coding is going away first, or coding is being done by the AI models first,” he said recently. He predicted AI could write 90 percent of code at many companies soon and said, “in 12 months, AI will essentially be writing all the codes.”

Amodei pointed to changes already happening inside Anthropic. Some engineering leaders no longer write code themselves, just reviewing what AI produces. He warned that “there are whole jobs, whole careers that we’ve built for decades that may not be present.”

Yet Anthropic’s careers page shows about 436 open positions right now. The largest hiring area is Sales with 150 open roles, followed by AI Research & Engineering with 68 positions, including Full-Stack Software Engineer and Performance Engineer roles. Several jobs offer between $320,000 and $405,000 in pay.

A Duke and Federal Reserve banks survey of more than 750 chief financial officers found over 80 percent reported zero productivity gains from AI, even as the same survey projected roughly 502,000 AI-related job cuts in 2026, nine times the 2025 figure.

Meta reports first-quarter earnings on April 29. Then comes the May 20 layoff wave. How both events play out will show whether the AI efficiency story holds up or falls apart.

Your keys, your card. Spend without giving up custody and earn 8%+ yield on your balance with Ether.fi Cash.

The Trump Justice Department is not playing along with France, as US officials refused to help French investigators go after Elon Musk’s platform X after a raid hit the company’s Paris office earlier this year.

Washington is not joining what it sees as a politically-motivated case targeting an American tech business, according to a two-page letter sent Friday by the Justice Department’s Office of International Affairs.

DOJ rejects France requests and calls investigation political

The letter reportedly said:-

“This investigation seeks to use the criminal legal system in France to regulate a public square for the free expression of ideas and opinions in a manner contrary to the First Amendment of the United States Constitution.”

It also said France’s requests “constitute an effort to entangle the United States in a politically charged criminal proceeding aimed at wrongfully regulating through prosecution the business activities of a social media platform.”

French authorities had already made three separate requests for US help in 2025. Those included attempts to serve legal summons to X officials.

Investigators had already raided the company’s Paris office in February, pushing tensions higher between European regulators and the platform. X described that raid as “an abusive act of law enforcement theater.”

French officials have since summoned Elon, former CEO Linda Yaccarino, and other employees for what they called voluntary interviews. Elon was scheduled to appear Monday. Under French law, skipping such a summons can lead to arrest warrants. That puts real legal risk on the table.

Authorities are looking into claims tied to deepfake content and alleged bias in X’s algorithm, arguing the system favors Elon’s views.

The case started in January 2025 after complaints from a lawmaker and another official who said the platform’s content selection could count as foreign interference in France. Prosecutors are also reviewing serious charges like distribution of child pornography.

An xAI official allegedly said, “We are grateful to the Justice Department for rejecting this effort by a prosecutor in Paris to compel our CEO and several employees to sit for interviews.”

The same official added, “We hope the Parisian authorities will now come to their senses, recognize that there is no wrongdoing here, and terminate their baseless investigation.” X operates under Elon’s AI firm xAI, which is now owned by SpaceX.

France and UK push independent Hormuz plan without US involvement

While this legal fight plays out, France is also annoying Trump on a totally different front. President Emmanuel Macron and UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer are working on a joint plan focused on the Strait of Hormuz.

They are pushing a European-led mission to reopen the shipping route after conflict ends, without relying on US leadership.

The proposal introduces a naval force made up of Britain, France, and other non-belligerent countries. Deployment would only happen after fighting stops.

According to the boys, their goal is to restore normal shipping, not control the conflict. This approach stands apart from Donald Trump’s strategy, which uses US naval power to block Iranian ports.

A senior European official reportedly said the plan is not meant to bypass Washington. Talks started early in the conflict and are now being finalized with London. Macron confirmed a conference in Paris with multiple countries joining by video, where he said it would support a “multilateral and purely defensive mission aimed at restoring freedom of navigation.”

Starmer described the same plan as a “coordinated, independent, multinational plan to safeguard international shipping when the conflict ends.” Britain has already involved more than 40 countries, and the US was not part of those earlier discussions.

European officials stressed the mission would be “strictly defensive” and only launch after active fighting ends, saying, “What we want in the end is no blockade, no toll, no nothing that blocks the fluidity of what is going through the Strait of Hormuz,” while adding that Iran remains “the first problem.”

If you're reading this, you’re already ahead. Stay there with our newsletter.

Bitcoin immediately dropped to $76,000 as Iran announced that the Strait of Hormuz is closed once again, one day after President Trump declared that the strategic oil passage was reopened to traffic except for Iran. 

The development, which came on a weekend when other markets are closed, has left the crypto market as the only option to take the most of the brunt from the panic, following the news that Iran’s military had resumed “strict control” over the strait due to the U.S. refusing to stop its blockade. 

Market reacts to the US-Iran conflict 

The stock market is closed, and bond traders are off the clock for the weekend, leaving the crypto industry as the only market to absorb volatility. 

Iran’s military, after Trump announced that the Strait of Hormuz was “completely open” on Friday, reversed that declaration from its Khatam al-Anbiya Central Headquarters today, Saturday. 

A spokesman told Iran’s Tasnim News Agency that the strait is now under “strict management and control by the Armed Forces.” The reason given is that the U.S is continuing its “naval blockade” and engaging in “piracy” against Iranian vessels. 

On Friday, markets celebrated the opening of the Strait, and Bitcoin surged to nearly $78,000. According to Cryptopolitan, this jump triggered a massive liquidation event, wiping out roughly $585 million in short positions. 

Now, less than 24 hours later, the euphoria is gone. Bitcoin (BTC) is currently trading near $76,304.

There is a notable pattern of global conflicts affecting the crypto market. For instance, when the war began on February 28, it was Saturday. BTC dropped from roughly $65,500 to $63,000 within hours. Approximately $300 million in leveraged positions were liquidated. 

When traditional markets reopened on Monday, Gold surged toward $5,400. Oil spiked as much as 13%. The Nikkei 225 dropped 1.35%. The US dollar index (DXY) rose to its highest level in over a month.

In October 2025, “Crypto Black Friday” occurred when President Trump revealed he would impose 100% tariffs on all Chinese imports. BTC dropped roughly 12% while ETH fell nearly 26%. Some smaller altcoins lost over 50% of their value. Meanwhile, the S&P 500 Index actually rose over 7% in the following six months.

More recently, in March, the Hyperliquid DEX saw its volumes hit $13.6 billion on a weekend as markets reacted to the Iran conflict. This was nearly seven times the previous weekend’s activity. 

What will happen to global trade?

Bitcoin’s current volatility is a result of the confusion currently gripping global energy markets. Ship-tracking data analyzed by Reuters and Kpler shows a very tense standoff happening right now at the mouth of the Persian Gulf.

Five vessels loaded with Liquefied Natural Gas (LNG) are currently approaching the Strait of Hormuz. These ships, the Al Ghashamiya, Lebrethah, Fuwairit, Rasheeda, and Disha, loaded cargo at Ras Laffan in Qatar, the world’s second-largest LNG exporter. Four are controlled by QatarEnergy, and one is chartered by India’s Petronet (NSE: PETRONET). They are destined for buyers in Pakistan and India.

However, with the Strait being closed again, these vessels are facing a serious problem. Before the war began on February 28, the Strait of Hormuz carried roughly one-fifth of the world’s LNG trade. If these five ships successfully cross today, it would be the first LNG transit since the war started. 

However, reports from Saturday suggest that a group of about 20 vessels that attempted to cross on Friday night were forced to abort or turn back. Iran has stated that until the U.S. ends its restrictions, the situation will remain “tightly controlled.”

Analyst Matt Mena noted before the reversal that the reopening of the strait was the “risk-on” signal the market wanted. Now that it is closed again, the fear of supply shocks, which can drive oil prices up and risk assets down, is back.

Still letting the bank keep the best part? Watch our free video on being your own bank.

The public scrutiny of Rave DAO’s RAVE token reached DEFCON 1 moments before its crash started, as market stakeholders, including ZachXBT, Bitget, Binance, and Gate, were drawn into conversations about insider manipulation red flags. Similar warnings by BubbleMaps about the SIREN token preceded multiple rounds of what appear to be classic pump-and-dumps, leading to huge losses for holders. 

A previous Cryptopolitan report had spotted the RAVE and SIREN rallies near all-time high levels, along with reports of coordinated pumps that often benefit insiders. The SIREN token’s crash came barely an hour after Cryptopolitan’s report. 

As of the time of this report, RAVE is down over 30% on the 24-hour chart, currently trading around $11.47 from a high of over $27 within the day today, April 18. 

RAVE token has crashed over 50% from its highest point today. Source: CoinMarketCap

Both RAVE and SIREN have erased over 50% of their value in relatively short-term trading, delivering the dump that market analysts warned about while holders were riding the highs of the tokens’ pumps. 

RAVE cracks under pressure of scrutiny

Bitget’s CEO Gracy Chen responded to ZachXBT, the prolific on-chain sleuth’s call to investigate the RaveDAO project over “pump and dump activity” that he claimed started on the Bitget, Binance and Gate exchanges. The executive assured that they had started to look into the matter. 

However, the pressure on RAVE came from multiple angles as Zach also offered a $25,000 bounty, upgraded from $10,000,  for anyone with information implicating the people behind what he described as “blatant market manipulation by insiders controlling >90%” of the token at the expense of retail traders. 

According to Zach, the RAVE manipulation is even worse than the SIREN case that he linked to DWF Labs in a late March report. The post was in response to a claim that a small cluster of wallets controls nearly 50% of SIREN’s supply, worth nearly $1 billion at the time. 

Another on-chain analyst estimated that about 98% of RAVE’s supply is actually distributed between three cohorts: 

RAVE team wallets – 95.3% 

Bitget users suspected to be insiders – 3.1%

Gate users suspected to be insiders – 0.34%

The April 13 post came with an ominous warning: “You’re looking at a $10B coin – it’s effectively a ~$200M market cap coin…”

Curiously, the token dropped nearly 50% on the same day, wiping out nearly $7 million in leveraged positions. 

On April 14, RAVE warned users to “remain mindful” of risks and to trade with caution as it had “observed heightened market volatility.”

Meme trenches ignored insider manipulation crash warnings 

The insider control allegations have been a persistent tag that has stuck to the Siren project from as far back as March 23, when BubbleMaps warned that a single entity controlled about 50% of SIREN’s supply after the token made a nearly vertical run to $2 billion in market cap from $40 million. 

Since then, the token has routinely witnessed sharp drops in market cap of between $500 million and $1 billion, which have also corresponded with price drops that have brought pain to retail investors. 

The latest episode on April 17 saw the token’s market cap drop from $1.52 billion to around $320 million, along with a price drop from about $2.1 to $0.44 at its lowest point. 

SIREN’s market cap has endured multiple rounds of sharp drops linked to insider activity. Source: CoinMarketCap

Previous Cryptopolitan reports citing BubbleMaps data have warned about impending crashes in tokens with insider manipulation red flags, including River, which is trading at $6.78 from a peak above $80 and PIPPIN, which is down almost 97% to $0.03 after peaking at $0.896 in early February.

When BubbleMaps’ “you were warned” post on April 3  reminded burned traders that they should have seen the 95% crash coming, one would think that would have meant lesson learned, but today’s Rave DAO crash serves as a reminder of the risky trading that is often attributed when people mention the “memecoin trenches.”

Your keys, your card. Spend without giving up custody and earn 8%+ yield on your balance with Ether.fi Cash.

Polish lawmakers tried but failed to overturn the presidential veto on a government-proposed draft law designed to introduce comprehensive rules for Poland’s cryptocurrency market.

The controversial legislation has become the focal point of a political clash in Warsaw, with Prime Minister Tusk now accusing the head of state, Nawrocki, of acting under Russian influence.

Polish cryptocurrency law remains in limbo

Members of the ruling majority in the Sejm were unsuccessful in another attempt to override the veto imposed by the Polish president on their proposal to regulate the country’s crypto space.

At a session on Friday, 243 of them voted against the veto, falling short of the 263 votes required to defeat it. Another 191 deputies supported Karol Nawrocki’s decision to halt the adoption of the bill.

The latter was put forward by the government with the aim of transposing the EU’s Markets in Crypto Assets (MiCA) rules into national law, but critics say it’s much stricter than the European legislation.

So far, Nawrocki has stopped it twice, citing overregulation and excessive burden on small businesses among his motives, and this is the second push to overcome his opposition.

When he sent it back for amendments in December, the president warned that the Polish Crypto-Asset Market Act “threatens the freedom of Poles, their property and the stability of the state.”

Poland becoming ‘El Dorado for fraudsters’

Representatives of the center-left Tusk cabinet have been attacking Nawrocki, who is backed by the right-wing opposition, for blocking cryptocurrency regulation in the country.

Poland remains the only EU member state that is yet to comply with the framework adopted by Brussels in 2024, the public broadcaster TVP noted in a report ahead of the weekend. It must do so by July.

The lack of rules creates an “El Dorado for fraudsters,” Finance Minister Andrzej Domański stated Friday, adding the veto leaves both consumers and entrepreneurs without adequate protection.

Tusk sees Russian money behind crypto veto

The political conflict in Warsaw has already gone far beyond a normal debate over the future of cryptocurrencies and regulations in Poland.

In his latest attack, Donald Tusk claimed that a crypto firm allegedly funded with money coming from Russia has been sponsoring events promoting his opponents.

Among them, a meeting of America’s Conservative Political Action Conference (CPAC) in the Polish city of Rzeszow in March, last year, which backed Nawrocki’s campaign days before the presidential election.

The Prime Minister was referring to Zondarcrypto, a major exchange in Poland. Speaking ahead of the parliamentary vote, and quoted by the Associated Press, he stated:

“The source of this company’s financial success is not only Russian money linked to the so-called Bratva, one of the most important mafia groups in Russia, but also to Russian secret services.”

Citing information from Poland’s security agency ABW, Tusk accused the trading platform’s CEO, Przemysław Kral, of making large donations to foundations linked to opposition figures.

The premier also insisted that the blocking of his government’s crypto regulations is an indication that some politicians are serving the company’s interests.

The Polish-rooted exchange, which is now registered in Estonia, recently became the main topic of multiple media reports that revealed it is facing liquidity issues affecting withdrawals and sponsorship payments.

While its chief executive rejected these claims, he also admitted this week he does not have the key to a crypto wallet holding over $330 million worth of Bitcoin (BTC) since the mysterious disappearance of his predecessor, Sylwester Suszek, in 2022.

Meanwhile, Interior Minister Marcin Kierwiński vowed that the current government in Warsaw will continue its efforts to regulate the crypto market.

“The plan is to keep addressing this until we succeed, until the awareness of the threats and these strange interests connecting certain right-wing politicians with this exchange finally reaches the president,” Kierwiński commented, quoted by the Polish national television.

If you're reading this, you’re already ahead. Stay there with our newsletter.

Beijing’s Satellite Town, a specialized hub for satellite manufacturers and operators in Haidian District, is expected to complete its core area construction by the end of 2026 as China builds industrial ecosystems aimed at challenging American dominance in space, particularly SpaceX’s grip on commercial launches.

The facility, located in Haidian’s Yongfeng area adjacent to China Aerospace City, will leverage the district’s rich aerospace resources to create a complete industrial ecosystem. More than 40 high-quality commercial aerospace companies have already settled in the pilot area at Zhongguancun No. 1, as reported by state media.

The push comes as NASA’s Artemis II mission completed a successful lunar flyby this month, marking a renewed phase of competition in deep space. The 10-day mission launched April 1, carrying four astronauts on the first crewed test of the Artemis program.

China is now targeting around 140 orbital launches in 2026, up sharply from 92 last year and 68 in 2024, according to Yang Yiqiang, founder of CAS Space. The United States conducted 193 orbital launches in 2025, with SpaceX’s Falcon 9 alone completing 165 missions, more than the rest of the world combined.

Beijing’s approach centers on shared infrastructure to help private companies cut costs and ramp up production quickly. At a conference in January, officials unveiled nine production projects, six satellite programs, and six industrial platforms under the “Beijing Rocket Street” initiative.

The 145,000-square-meter site will be China’s first shared commercial aerospace research and production base, offering more than 10 shared services, including vibration, thermal vacuum, and separation testing that companies would otherwise have to build themselves.

Galaxy Space plans to build a factory in the area capable of producing 500 satellites per year, making it China’s largest facility for mass production of low Earth orbit satellites. Rockets developed in the zone launched 24 times last year, accounting for over 90% of China’s commercial rocket missions.

Commercial sector now drives majority of activity

Commercial launches now account for over 60% of all Chinese space missions. Last year, the country sent 311 commercial satellites into orbit, making up 84% of all satellites launched.

Gao Yibin from Future Aerospace said China’s trillion-yuan commercial space market is moving toward standardization and scale. He pointed to faster launch approvals, locally made components, and steady investment from industrial funds as key factors.

“The accelerated implementation of scenarios such as low-Earth orbit constellation networking, satellite internet, space computing power, and 6G air-space-ground integration suggests sustained growth is expected in 2026,” Gao said.

NASA is working to land Americans on the moon by early 2028, before the end of President Donald Trump’s term. China is targeting 2030.

Jared Isaacman, nominated by Trump to lead NASA, put it bluntly: “The difference between success and failure will be measured in months, not years.”

Wu Weiren, chief designer of China’s lunar program, said: “By 2030, the Chinese people will definitely be able to set foot on the moon. That’s not a problem.”

Moon’s south pole landing could determine future standards

Both countries are eyeing the moon’s south pole, where permanently shadowed craters may contain water ice. Dean Cheng from the Potomac Institute said whoever establishes a permanent presence first could set the rules.

“Imagine [China] setting up a lunar outpost and rotating a crew every six months,” Cheng said. If the US only goes once a year or less, he argued, China could influence everything from the language of space travel to data formats and technical standards.

Zhang Rusheng from China’s space administration said commercial aerospace has progressed across the full industrial chain, from research and development to satellite launches and applications. Officials want Beijing’s development zone to attract up to 1,000 companies and support more than 1,000 commercial launches.

The crypto card with no spending limits. Get 3% cashback and instant mobile payments. Claim your Ether.fi card.

X is pushing deeper into financial territory, turning its social feed into a live trading surface as its new Cashtags feature scales rapidly. Early data from the rollout suggests the experiment is already moving real money at internet scale.

According to X’s Head of Product, Nikita Bier, the Cashtags pilot has generated an estimated $1 billion in global trading volume within days of launch, signaling strong prior user engagement in trading stocks and crypto assets directly in the app.

Ideally, Cashtags integrates stock and crypto market information directly into timelines for iPhone users in the U.S. and Canada. Its development is consistent with Elon Musk’s plan to build X into a super app. Cashtags let users tap symbols like $BTC, $ETH, or $AAPL to instantly access live price charts, related posts, and market discussions.

The feature is designed to collapse the gap between “seeing” and “trading.” Instead of switching between apps, users now encounter financial data embedded directly within posts and conversations.

Bier says they planned to build financial tools

Before launching Cashtags, Bier had asserted that crypto had struggled over the past year and floated the idea of launching a feature to improve it. Although at the time he insisted that X only intended to build financial tools rather than act like a brokerage.

Later, when introducing Cashtags, he explained that entering a Cashtag on X would trigger suggested matches for stocks and cryptocurrencies, making it easier to select the intended asset. He added that when users click a Cashtag, they can view discussions and a price chart without leaving X, further contending, “Cashtags are just the first step in our commitment to be the best destination for the finance and crypto community.”

So far, according to The Kobeissi Letter, daily U.S. trading volumes have reached $1 trillion, with roughly a quarter of that influenced by social media discussions and analysis. “That’s $250B+ in daily trading volume. We are bullish on Finance X,” it added. Cashtags has now fueled an estimated $1 billion in trading activity.

Just last month, Musk also announced that X Money, a wallet for peer-to-peer transfers, will begin early public rollout in April. For now, it’s unknown if X Money will facilitate crypto transactions, but doing so would seem like a natural progression. Mizuho analysts have warned that regulatory hurdles may complicate plans for X Money’s digital asset offerings, even with the new Cashtags feature, as traders bet against a near-term launch. Wagers on Polymarket only give Musk a 46% chance of hitting that April 30 deadline. 

Senator Elizabeth Warren also stated that the planned payment system presents significant consumer, financial, and security risks that require swift action from Congress. She added that achieving a 6% APY might compel X to pursue riskier investment options, as it would outpace the Federal Reserve’s current rates.

X has partnered with Wealthsimple, a Canadian brokerage firm

X also announced a test integration with Wealthsimple, a Canadian brokerage, enabling in-app trading of assets on X. Wealthsimple explained that users can select a ticker to view market data and then proceed to their accounts to complete a transaction. 

However, this X partnership arrives as Wealthsimple deepens its push into day trading and prediction markets, which remain controversial in futures trading. Ontario regulators decided last month to allow the company into prediction markets, where Canadians can now bet on economic conditions, climate change, and financial metrics. 

More recently, Wealthsimple’s co-founder and chief product officer, Brett Huneycutt, portrayed the integration as a bridge that turns investment discussions on X into instant trading opportunities. Additionally, to address some critics’ concerns about the partnership, Victoria Belton, a communications specialist at Wealthsimple, clarified that the integration does not give X access to Wealthsimple user data, and trading remains fully on Wealthsimple’s platform. 

Your keys, your card. Spend without giving up custody and earn 8%+ yield on your balance with Ether.fi Cash.