At midnight I stumbled across that line in Ray Dalio’s book Principles: “Pain + reflection = progress.” I stared at the screen for a while, just blank. I dug out my own notebook of “reasons for losses”—I’d been writing it for half a year.
When I flipped back through it, my scalp went numb. The same mistake—recorded three times: chasing too high and getting trapped; adding to the position while it was falling; and holding on until I finally had to cut at a loss. It wasn’t that I didn’t learn the technicals. It was that every time I reached that point, my hands wouldn’t listen to my brain.
Take today’s <c-1/> $ETH as an example. At 1,606, over 24 hours it rose by 2 points, with volume of 380 million U. The market action was steady—nothing to get too excited about. If it were back then, I’d definitely think, “Is it starting now?” and place an order and rush in.
But looking at this chart now, what jumps into my head is the note from the last time at a similar level when I got liquidated. That time, too, I thought, “This time is different.” What happened? The exact same pit—then I jumped into it twice.
Dalio said to write down each failure and turn it into a principle. I did write it, but I couldn’t truly get to the part where “next time I won’t make the same mistake.” It’s not that the book is useless. It’s that human nature—this stubborn dog—can never be tied up securely.
First, write it down. Tonight I won’t take this bite.
Before bed, I went over today’s market chart. To be honest, today’s move had quite a bit of information.
Today, BTC hovered between 57,800 and 59,508, and finally closed at 59,484, up 1.38% for the day. The most worth watching in this move isn’t the price rise or fall itself, but whether the trading volume kept up. Today’s volume was 1.229 billion USDT—honestly, that’s not very active—which suggests market sentiment is still fairly cautious.
ETH is a bit stronger on this side: +2.02% for the day, closing at 1,597, with a trading range from 1,553 to 1,604. The correlation with the big BTC is still very clear—if BTC doesn’t move, it’s hard for ETH to run independently.
The strongest today is $CELO : up 15.76% for the day, with volume of 353 million. Such a move is either funds positioning early, or sentiment-driven competition amplifying the volatility.
The most core signal today: whether BTC can expand volume at key levels, which will determine the next direction. Tomorrow I’ll focus on whether BTC’s xxx level can be held.
Did you catch your prey today? Which coin are you most watching tomorrow?
Today’s trading session has been pretty slow—big coin (the “big pancake”) hovered around 58,000 for the whole day with no major movement.
BTC’s current price is 58,780, and the 0.35% gain is pretty mild. Over the past 24 hours, the low touched 57,800 and the high pushed up to 59,457. Trading volume is 1.24 billion USDT, about 40% higher than usual.
RSI is at 52.9, neutral but slightly strong. MACD is still in a bullish alignment: DIF is -121, and the green histogram hasn’t expanded or contracted much. The moving averages look a bit tangled—MA5 is 58,704, MA20 is 58,812, and the price is perfectly stuck between these two lines.
What’s most worth watching is that volume increased but price didn’t break out—this signal is rather weak. When volume rises but price doesn’t increase, it suggests fewer people are chasing longs at this level, while the shorts are slowly “picking up” the supply.
57,800 is the key support. Today it was tested twice and held without breaking. 60,684 is short-term resistance, but without volume it can’t push through.
Overall, it’s a bit more bearish than bullish. A low-volume rebound with a volume-supported sideways chop is a classic correction pattern.
If tomorrow the pullback tests around 57,800 and can still hold, I might cautiously try a long position with a small size, with a stop-loss set just below 57,600. First target: 59,400. If that breaks, then look at 60,600. If it directly breaks down through 57,800, and then rebounds toward around 58,200, I’d consider going short; stop-loss would be above 58,400, with a target of 57,200.
Just me thinking out loud—if you lose money, don’t come find me.
This trade is really exhausting to watch. I’m going to take a break.
I recently delved into the Model Registry of @NewtonProtocol and found that its design logic is more pragmatic than I initially imagined. Traditional automated contracts often force users to confront complex Solidity logic, effectively keeping non-developers out of the door. The Model Registry acts like an “on-chain strategy store.” Developers register frequently reused business logic—for example, automatically executing a transfer when an oracle price exceeds a certain threshold—as standardized model templates, and others can use them directly. From selecting a template to filling in parameters and then deploying, it’s done in three steps. To me, this essentially amounts to “modular encapsulation” for automation strategies.
This kind of architecture is crucial for attracting everyday users. The ultimate value of the $NEWT ecosystem depends on how many real application scenarios can be executed, and the richness of those scenarios is directly tied to the breadth of participation. If every automated action requires writing a contract from scratch, it will always remain a niche tool. The Model Registry lowers the barrier to a “choose + fill in” level. It’s like IFTTT in the blockchain world, combined with a decentralized template marketplace. The more templates there are, the more combinations become possible, enabling users to design custom automation workflows without needing to be engineers.
It’s also worth noting that @NewtonProtocol doesn’t sacrifice security for the sake of simplification. With a dual-verification mechanism combining EigenLayer AVS and both TEE and ZKP, it ensures that before execution, a model’s logic is verified at both the hardware level and the mathematical level. This is especially critical in real deployments: when users call a model written by someone else, they are essentially authorizing another party’s logic to operate their assets. Without hardware isolation and zero-knowledge proofs as safeguards, the trust cost would be extremely high. The RedStone oracle has been integrated into the policy execution layer, meaning off-chain signals like price data can trigger model actions in a compliant manner.
#Newt totals one billion tokens. As a fee payment and governance token, its role in the Model Registry is more like the “fuel cost for models”—each time you call or combine models, you need to spend $NEWT , while governance votes determine which models can be included in the official Registry. This economic binding is designed as a closed loop: the more users there are, the richer the strategy templates become, which in turn makes on-chain activity more active—and the scenarios requiring token consumption become clearer. Overall, the Model Registry is a bridge for Newton to move from the underlying permission layer to the application layer. Whether it can later produce blockbuster scenarios is something worth continuing to watch.
I just took a serious look into @NewtonProtocol’s Model Registry. This on-chain proxy registry is indeed quite useful. Developers can directly publish and discover automated strategy templates on it—basically bringing the strategy market on-chain and lowering the development barrier. As an ecosystem token, $NEWT should participate deeply in this process, such as verifying or incentivizing template contributors. If you’re interested in on-chain automation, you can check out the topic #Newt to see the specific documentation.
After dinner, take a quick glance at the gainers board—within the last two hours of today, the strongest one turned out to be ADA, up 4.7%.
At the price of 0.1508, within 24 hours it was pushed up from 0.142; the traded volume is 0.3e8 USDT, but the volume isn’t big.
The RSI has reached 82.4, overbought. The MACD is still in the bullish zone; DIF=0.0016 and there’s no dead cross. MA5 is at 0.1507, higher than MA20 at 0.1477; the moving averages are in a bullish arrangement.
On the surface it looks good, but trading volume is shrinking—the average volume is only about 0.0x times. This kind of rally looks more like a sentiment-driven push rather than real money getting poured in.
Can it continue tomorrow morning? If there isn’t additional capital adding volume tonight, it’s likely to gap up and then sell off.
Risks of chasing it now: RSI is in the overbought zone and could pull back at any time. Support is at 0.14; if it breaks that level, the bulls will likely scatter. Resistance is at 0.15—only if it can hold above it at today’s close will it be somewhat meaningful.
My personal plan: if it retraces toward around 0.148, I’ll consider trying a small long position, with a stop-loss placed below 0.139. If it can’t get past 0.15, I’ll leave first and look at 0.153. I won’t go short unless 0.14 breaks.
The above is only my personal plan, not a call to trade.
ETH swung around the 1560–1570 range all day. Now it’s starting to probe downward.
Price is stuck at 1,572, and volume has dropped to only 40% of the average. There’s basically nobody doing anything in the market. MA5 and MA20 are almost stuck together—at 1,577 and 1,579—with resistance overhead and no room below.
RSI is just sitting at 50—neither cold nor hot. But MACD is still in a bearish alignment: DIF -1.06, with no sign of resistance. The Bollinger Band bandwidth is only 2.6%. Price is trading just below the mid-band, a classic weak consolidation pattern.
Key support is at 1,550. It held on two previous tests, but after tonight’s second touch, the probability of a break isn’t small. The resistance zone is around 1,628–1,637, and it’s unlikely to move up much in the short term.
If BTC suddenly turns and dumps lower, ETH will most likely break through 1,550 immediately. The level at 1,550.2 below that likely won’t hold. If BTC stabilizes and doesn’t move, then ETH can only keep grinding lower on reduced volume.
The bearish direction is clearer. If there’s a rebound to around 1,580, I’ll consider taking a small short position—stop-loss placed above 1,595. If it holds, I’ll exit. First target: 1,555. If that breaks, then 1,540. For a long, you’d have to wait for a pullback to 1,550 and only consider it if it holds—but with this low-volume environment tonight, I’m not keen on catching it.
This is just my personal plan—if you lose money, don’t blame me.
This trade is really exhausting. I’m taking a break.
I just finished reading “Poor Charlie’s Almanack” and got stuck on a sentence Munger said.
He said: If all you have is a hammer, everything looks like a nail.
It’s easy to make this mistake in trading. At the beginning, I only focused on the K-line chart, thinking that volume and price were everything. Later I realized that wasn’t enough.
For example, today $BTC 58,745, in the past 24 hours it fell 1.06%, with trading volume of 1.263 billion USDT. If you look at only this one bearish candle, you might think, “It’s breaking down,” or “Time to buy the dip.”
But a single perspective is the most dangerous.
You need to look at emotions—what’s the fear index? How is the capital flowing? Are there any sudden macro-level developments? Are there any anomalies in on-chain data?
Munger calls this a multi-dimensional thinking model. It’s not just economics—you also need to understand psychology, physics, and biology.
Applied to the market, it means don’t use one hammer to hit the whole chart. The K-line is only one mirror.
At this point today, it’s ranging with shrinking volume, and the direction isn’t clear. I’m not analyzing which way it’ll go, but I know this: if you bet using a single perspective, the odds are you’ll be the one who loses money.
The most powerful thing today is $CELO . A single bullish candle sent it up—24-hour trading volume is almost three hundred million USD. In normal times, that kind of volume would just mean “quietly get rich.”
With a $286 million USDT order book, you don’t see a move like this built by retail traders piling in. The RSI is up to 79.8, which means it’s already in the overbought zone—so this push is a bit too fast.
If it can run like this, in plain terms it’s because the MACD is in a bullish alignment, plus a bullish resonance formed after the MA5 and MA20 moving averages cross. The trading volume is more than three times the recent average. A breakout on expanded volume is higher quality than a rise on contracted candles.
At this position tomorrow, the short-term bias is bullish, but it’s only a small breath away from resistance R1 at 0.07. If it can’t break through, only consider taking action once it pulls back to around S1 at 0.06 to confirm support.
My plan is: if it retraces to below 0.062 but above 0.06, I’ll consider a small-lot trial long. Stop loss would be set below 0.059. First look at 0.07—if it breaks, then look at 0.075. This isn’t a callout—if you lose money, don’t come find me.
RSI is overbought and volume is surging to break through—watch out for fake breakouts. Don’t chase the price.
Just flipped through some old trading notes I wrote before. At 2 a.m., I wrote a line— “Always thought I wasn’t smart enough, and that’s why I lost money.” Looking back today, I was wrong.
I was too smart. Always trying to find the optimal solution. Always waiting for that perfect entry. What happened?
Missed it. One miss after another.
Look at <0-9]{11}$SPCXB </0-9]{11} today’s chart. 171.43, up 4.89%, volume 0.85 billion. Back then, I would stare at the K-line to figure out the levels. Now? This volume is the answer.
The market doesn’t reward cleverness. It rewards a clumsy method— In the face of simple facts, shut up and act.
“The first money of ordinary people often comes from admitting that they’re not so smart.” I’ve forgotten who said it. But today I believed it.
Take a quick look when you’re back from lunch—XLM has pulled nearly 8% on this line. All the money is stacked into this thing.
Turnover is 0.76 million, 0.41 billion USDT. This lunch-session has only one real beast.
Why choose it for money? The MACD is arranged in a bullish formation, and MA5 is consistently holding above MA20. The technical setup is clearly a bullish signal.
But the RSI is at 71.8, already overbought. The risk of chasing is right here—short-term profit-taking could dump at any moment.
Key support is at 0.17, resistance at 0.21.
If it pulls back to around 0.19, I’ll consider trying a small long position. I’ll place the stop-loss below 0.168; if it breaks down, I’ll exit. First target is 0.21—once it breaks through, then look to 0.23.
That said, the above is just my personal plan—do what you think best.
The other day, with that huge bullish candle from $SPCXB —I was totally stunned.
It had been consolidating around the 160 area for a full two days, and then suddenly someone started dumping it down. When it surged past 170, the chat went silent for a long time.
Something didn’t feel right. It wasn’t FOMO—it was suppression. The bid looked like someone was systematically collecting shares, and every sell order around the 161 line got eaten up. I remember one of my brothers had a 5,000-dollar short at 161.5, and it was immediately squeezed up to 165 and wiped out. He then cursed for an entire screen.
The mood shifted from panic to doubt, and then to silence. Nobody dared to chase, and nobody dared to slam the sell button. At that spike to 173, the trading volume instantly blew up to 84 million, and the 24h gain was 4.61%. But at the close, it fell back to 170.58.
Anyone who made money was the ones who had been waiting in position early. Anyone who chased in was just a bagholder.
Later I reviewed the chart: this kind of slow pull up followed by a sudden heavy dump is very likely the market maker switching hands. If retail can’t take it, then they push it up slowly on their own. Only once everyone thinks it’s steady do they actually exit—that’s the real exit point.
In the morning I read "The Art of War" and came across this: "First ensure that you cannot be defeated, and then wait for the enemy's moment when they can be defeated." It took me years to digest this. Translated into the crypto world, it means: first make sure you don't die, then wait for others to make mistakes.
Today, the $BTC order book lines up perfectly. At a price of 58,576, it is down 2.11% over the past 24 hours, with trading volume of 1.155 billion. This level is quiet—panic hasn't arrived yet. What Sun Tzu meant by "cannot be defeated" is that you have to stay alive until others start panicking.
It doesn't tell you to rush in now. It's telling you to look at the chart and remember: the market hasn't given the signal yet.
ETH this morning dropped to 1572, tangled with the MA5, consolidating with lower volume—like it’s waiting for the big pie (BTC) to set the pace.
In the past 24 hours, it fell from 1600 to 1550, with 343 million U in turnover; it’s only about 40% of the usual volume. Low volume isn’t a bottom—no one dares to step in.
RSI is 43—weak, but not oversold. The MACD bulls are still there, but the DIF is negative at -4.4, and momentum feels soft. MA5 and MA20 are nearly overlapping at 1572–1576; the Bollinger Band width has narrowed to 4.3%, so it feels squeezed and tense. The direction needs to be chosen, but there’s no power behind it.
Support to watch is 1550.2, with a double-bottom structure. It tested on Thursday night without breaking. If it breaks, look below 1540. Resistance is 1637.58—Bollinger’s upper band is pressing down, and without volume it can’t get through.
In the early session, odds are it’ll keep grinding around 1570, waiting for the big pie to move in the afternoon or evening. There are more bearish clues: low volume + weak RSI + price below the moving averages. If it bounces up to around 1600 and can’t hold, I’ll consider a small-position short; stop-loss set above 1620. Take-profit first at 1550; if it breaks, then look at 1530. If it directly smashes through 1550, don’t catch the falling knife—wait for a volume breakout below 1540 before considering a long. This is my personal plan—if you lose money, don’t come find me.
This market is making me sleepy. I’m taking a break.
Take a quick look before the market opens. BTC is currently stuck at 58,608, down 2.89% over the past 24h, and overall it’s weak. ETH is around 1,568, down 2.77% over the past 24h as well, and it’s weak too.
The BTC range overnight was from 58,201 to 60,277—this level is pretty critical. If the market opens and volume can push and hold above the 60,277 area, short-term sentiment will improve a lot; if instead it gets hammered below 58,201 right at the open, then today is likely to be a choppy consolidation day.
For ETH, we’re more focused on how BTC looks. If BTC doesn’t give direction, it’s hard for ETH to move independently. Trading volume is 353 million USDT—not very active—which suggests everyone is waiting for the opening signal.
I won’t take action immediately at the open. I’ll watch for the first half hour to confirm the direction first. When you open, are you watching BTC first, or altcoins first?
At this hour, ETH is still hard-fighting Bitcoin, with zero independent momentum.
The 1,571 level makes your eyelids twitch as it keeps hovering.
Trading volume has shrunk severely—20-day average volume multiple at 0.0x. Liquidity is as thin as bottled water. Bollinger Band width is only 4.5%. Price is near the upper band but has no strength to break upward.
RSI is 39—weak, but not extremely so. MACD is in a bearish alignment; the DIF sits at -6.2, with no hint of a golden cross.
MA5 is at 1,569, MA20 at 1,582. Price is squeezed between the two moving averages—neither up nor down. This kind of positioning is the most exhausting: longs don’t dare to enter, and shorts don’t dare to chase.
At dawn, support S1 is 1,548, and S2 is 1,550. Below there is no volume. If 1,548 truly gets broken down, 1,530 could be reached directly. Resistance R1 is 1,637, and R2 is 1,628. If price rebounds into this range without volume confirmation, it’s likely a fake breakout.
If Bitcoin suddenly moves in the middle of the night, ETH tends to drop faster than it rises. When Bitcoin dumps 3%, ETH starts at at least -4%. When Bitcoin rallies 3%, ETH managing to keep up with +2% is already pretty good.
Two things to watch when placing orders at dawn: don’t set orders at round-number levels. For levels like 1,550 and 1,600, market makers love to come and eat the liquidity. Place orders just below 1,548 and just above 1,582 for a higher chance of success.
My personal plan: if there’s a pullback to around 1,550, I’ll try a small long position, with a stop-loss placed below 1,538. If 1,548 breaks and rebounds to around 1,560, I’ll look to go short, with the stop-loss above 1,575—first targeting 1,530. The above is just my personal plan, not a call to trade.
This market is really tiring to watch. I’m done for now.
BTC is still hovering around 58,380, and there aren’t many people watching at this hour.
MA5 is pressing at 58,478, and MA20 is at 59,415. The price is like a dead fish lying under the two moving averages.
RSI is down to 20.5—oversold.
But the MACD is still in a bearish lineup, with the DIF negative by nearly 400. The Bollinger Bands have tightened to 4.5%, and trading volume is shrinking. With this kind of volume, even if it rebounds, it can’t rebound up.
S1 is 58,201, today’s low. If it breaks, the next step will be 57,000.
R1 is at 60,780, the dense zone where the main force built short positions. Unless a single big bullish candle prints with 1.5 times the average volume, it won’t go up.
At midnight the liquidity is thin—one spike can cost 300 to 500 points. “Painting the door” (false moves) is also common; there’s no one to take the other side.
If it pulls back to around 58,200, I’ll consider entering a small long position. Put the stop-loss below 57,850; if that breaks, I’ll leave. First watch 58,800—if it passes, then look at 59,400.
But if it directly breaks down through 57,800, and then rebounds to around 58,200, I’ll switch and short instead. Stop-loss above 58,400. Target 57,000.
The above is just my personal plan—decide for yourself.
Don’t chase. Wait for confirmation.
This round looks really exhausting. I’m taking a break.