Pachet roșu, revendicare cadou 1 Superpachet USDT, obțineți-l acum copiați codul și revendicați 👉 https://s.binance.com/5ZyWrZtl 👈 copiați și lipiți-l pe Whatsapp apoi deschideți și revendicați 1usdt 💯🎁🎁🎁 #Write2Earn #redpacketshare
Începeți-vă în această călătorie interesantă pentru a obține recompensa dvs. de 200 USD BNB:
1. 🔍 Urmărește @Convex Finance pentru actualizări și informații exclusive.
2. 💖 Arată puțină dragoste! Like și distribuie cea mai recentă postare de pe acest cont.
3. 🗨️ Confirmă-ți participarea comentând „FAT” mai jos.
Ești gata de fior? Acționează rapid și haideți să vă îndrumăm să vă revendicați 200 USD BNB! Nu ratați această oportunitate incredibilă! 🚀💰 #Write2Earn #BNB #GIVEAWAY_ALERT
😯🔥Tron Founder Justin Sun, Mysterious $500 Million Transfer Moves the Market #JustinSun the founder of Tron, made fun of a significant transfer of $ 500 million in the cryptocurrency market.
This transaction, which originated from Just lend, a platform supported by Sun, led to question marks due to the rapid transition of Sun to Htx, a platform where it has an important consulting position.
Thanks to the Whale Alert data, the big transfer came to light.Sun's participation in JUST LEND, a Tron-based financial platform known for its stUSDT offerings, adds complexity to the results of the transaction. October October also October, an additional USDT of 642.06 million was redirected to justlend from an undisclosed wallet suspected to be linked to Sun, which further increased speculation within the crypto community.
🚨 🚨 🚨 🚨 🚨 🚨 🚨 🚨 🚨 🚨 642.065.880 USDT transferred from unknown wallet (641.943.887 USD) - Whale Alert (@whale_alert) February 18, 2024While the exact motivations behind Justin Sun's $500 million transfer remain unclear, various potential explanations have emerged, igniting further controversy in the crypto world.
Some think that this may be a strategic move to support Sun's proposed platform by injecting liquidity into htx.Others suggest it could be a personal investment that diversifies his assets beyond Tron-related projects.
October October October, in addition, concerns about regulatory scrutiny surrounding Tron and its founder may have been a driving factor that led Sun to move its assets to a different platform WHAT DO THINK .#TRX/USDT #Write2Earn #TRX. #binance
sa🚀📉 Explorați oportunitățile cripto din această săptămână cu cinci monede la prețuri sub 0,01:1 USD.
Shiba Inu (SHIB): - Recunoscut ca o monedă meme proeminentă, Shiba Inu (SHIB) a asistat la o creștere notabilă a valorii. Această creștere poate fi atribuită creșterii activității pe rețeaua sa, Shibarium.
2. 1000SATS (SATS): - În onoarea fondatorului evaziv al Bitcoin, Satoshi Nakamoto, 1000SATS (SATS) este un token digital care utilizează standardul BRC-20. În ciuda unei creșteri recente de 10%, SATS a menținut un interval de preț între 0,0000004665 USD și 0,0000005000 USD înainte de a se confrunta cu o volatilitate crescută a pieței.
3. BitTorrent (BTT): - În ecosistemul BitTorrent-New, BitTorrent (BTT) servește ca criptomonedă nativă, folosită în principal pentru recompensarea contribuabililor. Cu 932 de miliarde de jetoane în circulație, BTT se mândrește cu o valoare de piață de 788 milioane USD, oferind participanților posibilitatea de a achiziționa diverse bunuri și servicii pe platformă.
4. Terra Classic (LUNC): - Revenit în primele 100 de active criptomonede, Terra Classic (LUNC) este setat să ardă 100 de miliarde de monede LUNC, marcând o piatră de hotar semnificativă. Inițiativa condusă de comunitate își propune să îmbunătățească valoarea jetonului și poziția pe piață.
5. eCash (XEC): - Cunoscut anterior ca Bitcoin Cash ABC (BCHA), eCash (XEC) este o versiune rebranded, subliniind rolul său de „criptomonedă destinată utilizării ca monedă electronică”. În special, eCash câștigă popularitate ca metodă de plată pe platforme precum Crypto.com și a format alianțe strategice cu companii blockchain proeminente, cum ar fi Bitcoin.com și Binance Labs. #swap_crypto #Write2Earn #Trending Subiect #BTC #LUNC\USDT
Cum să obțineți USDT gratuit în 2024 🤷♂️🤞Există diverse metode de a achiziționa USDT fără costuri în acest an:⛏️Angajați-vă în Activitatea de Anul Nou 2024 Lite Referral pe Binance și invitați prietenii pe platformă. Deblocați cutii cadou în valoare de până la 500 USDT fiecare și aveți șansa de a câștiga până la 1 BNB sau un voucher simbol pentru o mașină Tesla¹.✔️Participă la programul de rambursare a taxei de tranzacționare pe Binance, completând sarcini precum depunerea, tranzacționarea sau verificarea dvs. identitate. Câștigați 100 USDT în vouchere de reducere a taxelor de tranzacționare².🪆Explorați promoții suplimentare Binance, cum ar fi Bonusul de bun venit Binance Futures 50.000 USDT, Fondul de încercare de economii Binance sau Binance Staking Launchpool⁵.🌱Înregistrați-vă pe Idle-Empire, completați sondaje plătite, vizionați videoclipuri sau îndepliniți ofertele pentru a acumula puncte rapid răscumpărate pentru USDT. Ei vor transfera USDT direct la adresa dvs. preferată de portofel⁶.🎯Creați un cont pe ghidarea cripto, urmați ghidurile și tutorialele lor și câștigați USDT extinzându-vă cunoștințele despre criptomonede și blockchain⁷.🎎Pentru mai multe detalii despre aceste programe, vizitați site-urile lor respective sau aplicații. Dacă aveți întrebări suplimentare, nu ezitați să întrebați. 🫂Rețineți: este nevoie de multă muncă grea pentru a vă oferi cele mai bune articole privind investițiile. Sfaturile dvs. generoase ne-ar împuternici misiunea și ne vor ajuta să lucrăm și mai mult pentru ca dvs. să oferiți cele mai bune sfaturi pentru investiții. #Write2Earn
Analiza prețului BONK: Urmărind media mobilă de 20 de zile Deținătorii mari ai legendarei monede Solana Meme BONK se întreabă acum: „BONK merge la zero?” deoarece prețul monedei a cunoscut din nou o mică scădere într-o distribuție limitată.
Scopul acestui eseu este de a oferi o analiză a mișcărilor actuale ale prețurilor BONK și de a investiga dacă Meme Kombat, o monedă meme mai recentă, reprezintă sau nu o opțiune de investiție mai promițătoare în prezent.
weekendul a adus îmbunătățiri foarte mari pentru ecosistemul BONK, acest token bazat pe Solana depășind SHIB bazat pe ERC-20 în ceea ce privește volumul de tranzacționare pe 24 de ore. Acest lucru a avut loc în ciuda reducerii dramatice a mișcării prețurilor criptomonedei BONK. #bonk #Write2Earn
#Write2Earn is a popular cryptocurrency exchange platform that offers various ways to earn money from crypto assets. Some of the methods are:
Binance Earn: This is a crypto savings platform that allows users to deposit their spot digital assets and earn interest over time. Users can choose from flexible or locked savings products, as well as staking products that reward users for holding certain tokens³.
: This is a trading platform that allows users to trade contracts that track the price movements of crypto assets. Users can leverage their positions and profit #Write2Earn #TrendingTopic #USDTDaily
$CKB așteptați nu cumpăra acum așteptați semnalul că va continua să arunce dumpingul ACUM întrebarea este poate #CKB/USDT să devină una dintre monedele de top? #Write2Earn
🎉🎉🎉💵💵💵💰💰💰Free Free Free🎉🎉🎉🍀Earn 3 USDT Easily on Binance🍀"Welcome to the captivating world of earning crypto on Binance! Picture your 3 USDT gracefully multiplying as you savor your morning brew. With Binance's Simple Earn, it's akin to nurturing crypto seeds and witnessing them flourish into a bouquet of USDT flowers!🕊️📍To embark on this journey, navigate to Binance's platform and venture into the Earn section. There, you'll encounter Simple Earn, your gateway to seamless crypto expansion. Now, it's decision time: do you prefer flexibility or locked-in rewards?📍For those embracing flexibility, Flexible Products are the way to go. Deposit your 3 USDT and revel in a generous 1.2% annualized interest rate. Think of it as your crypto nest egg, steadily growing in the background while remaining readily accessible.📢But if you crave excitement and don't mind a short-term commitment, Locked Products might pique your interest. Place your 3 USDT there for just 7 days, and voilà! Enjoy a tantalizing 5% annualized interest rate. It's akin to a brief crypto escapade where your funds generate returns as you bask in the metaphorical sunlight.📢Whether you lean towards a laid-back approach or seek thrills with a locked-in commitment, Binance's Simple Earn caters to all preferences. Prepare to witness your crypto portfolio flourish, one USDT at a time!🎁#TrendingTopic #Write2Earn #Launchpool #TradeNTell #BTC #Write2Earn
$BTC the rate of $BTC is a hot short reaching a great height at this rate let see from now till 2025, I predict a rate of 10% interest it's just a prediction on my account
have you heard of $BONK an ongoing coin which people said it's a shit coin that only make the people who created it rich and will should not buy it . but as for me I so much believe in BONK bet on it 2025 I also predict bonk rate 0.0002 if you think am wrong let me know #Write2Earn #BONK❓ #BTC🔥🔥
this is what we are talking game changer putting things true to the next level
LIVE
CoinDesk
--
The Biggest Bitcoin ETF Threat No One Is Talking About
As I waited with the rest of the world for the first bitcoin ETF to be approved, one thing has been gnawing at me: With a handful of exceptions including Fidelity and VanEck, nearly every applicant for a spot bitcoin ETF intends to use Coinbase as its custodian.
David Schwed is chief operating officer of Halborn.
As a cybersecurity leader focused on blockchains, this concentration of risk along with the inherently high-risk nature of crypto custodianship and the still-evolving nature of security best practices gives me pause.
It’s not Coinbase itself that worries me here. The firm has never been hit by a known hack, which explains why so many traditional institutions trust its know-how. However, there is no such thing as an unhackable target – anything and anyone can be compromised, given enough time and resources, which is a lesson I've learned over a career at the intersection of cybersecurity and asset management.
What worries me is the extreme asset concentration in a single custodian. And given the cash-like nature of crypto assets, that makes the situation inherently concerning.
See also: Gary Gensler's Bitcoin ETF Clown Show
It may be time to rethink the “qualified custodian” designation, a regulatory sign-off which in its current form doesn’t necessarily ensure risky blockchain-based assets are necessarily (or best) secured. Further, ideally, digital asset custodians should be subject to more oversight by better-trained regulators, under more rigorous state and federal standards, than they are right now.
Most qualified custodians today secure equities, bonds or digitally tracked fiat balances, all of which are fundamentally legal agreements, which can’t simply be “stolen.” But bitcoin [BTC], like cash and gold, is what’s known as a bearer instrument. A successful crypto hack is like a bank robbery in the Wild West, as soon as it’s in the hands of a thief, the money is simply gone.
So for a crypto custodian, one mistake is all it takes for the assets to disappear entirely.
We also know the forces of global crypto-crime are formidable and determined. To pick just one notorious example, North Korea’s Lazarus Group hacking cohort is believed to have stolen $3 billion worth of crypto over the past six years, and it shows no signs of stopping. Inflows to a bitcoin ETF have been projected at somewhere above $6 billion in the first trading week — making these funds a prime target.
If Coinbase winds up with tens of billions in bitcoin sitting in its digital vaults, North Korea can easily organize a $50 million operation to steal those funds, even if it takes multiple years. Threat actors like Russia’s Cozy Bear/APT29 group might also find going after institutional crypto increasingly appealing as those pools get bigger — potentially much, much bigger.
This is the level of threat that major banks prepare for. One widespread model of risk management for financial institutions utilizes three layers of oversight. First, the business management layer designs and implements security practices; second, the risk layer oversees and evaluates those practices; and third, the audit layer makes sure that risk mitigation practices are actually effective.
On top of that, a legacy financial institution will have external auditors and external IT oversight, as well as numerous state and federal regulators looking over their shoulders. Many, many eyes will examine every aspect of risk and security.
But these multiple levels of redundancy and nesting failsafes require one deceptively simple thing: headcount.
During my time as global head of digital assets technology at BNY Mellon, the investment bank had roughly 50,000 employees, of whom around 1,000 – or 2% – were in security roles. Coinbase, even after recent expansion, has fewer than 5,000 employees. BitGo, also a qualified custodian certified by the State of New York and other jurisdictions, has only a few hundred.
This is not to impugn the intentions or skill of any of these organizations or their employees. But real oversight requires redundancy that these new institutions may struggle to provide at a level appropriate for securing tens of billions of dollars in bearer instruments.
See also: Bitcoin ETFs: The Bull Case
Before those numbers get even bigger (and more enticing for the bad guys), it is well past time to refine the cybersecurity standards for qualified custodian designation. Right now, the designation accompanies trust or banking licensing, overseen by state and federal regulators. These are financial regulators largely focused on traditional banking, not cybersecurity experts, and certainly not crypto experts. They understandably focus on balance sheets, legal processes, and other financial operations.
But for crypto custodians, those aren’t the only kinds of oversight that matter, or even necessarily the most important. There are no industry-wide standards for cybersecurity and risk management practices by crypto custodians specifically, meaning that “qualified custodian” status isn’t quite as reassuring as it might sound. That exposes not just investors but an entire nascent sector to opaque risk with potentially dire consequences.
The approval of a cast of bitcoin ETFs is just the latest step in the continued integration of digital assets into the financial system. You don’t have to trust crypto partisans on that prediction – just ask Blackrock, a legacy giant that championed the ETF. As these developments continue, regulators truly interested in investor protection will focus on adapting to this new world: one in which rigorous cybersecurity standards are just as important to financial stability as honest disclosures and financial audits.
this is what we are talking game changer putting things true to the next level
LIVE
CoinDesk
--
The Biggest Bitcoin ETF Threat No One Is Talking About
As I waited with the rest of the world for the first bitcoin ETF to be approved, one thing has been gnawing at me: With a handful of exceptions including Fidelity and VanEck, nearly every applicant for a spot bitcoin ETF intends to use Coinbase as its custodian.
David Schwed is chief operating officer of Halborn.
As a cybersecurity leader focused on blockchains, this concentration of risk along with the inherently high-risk nature of crypto custodianship and the still-evolving nature of security best practices gives me pause.
It’s not Coinbase itself that worries me here. The firm has never been hit by a known hack, which explains why so many traditional institutions trust its know-how. However, there is no such thing as an unhackable target – anything and anyone can be compromised, given enough time and resources, which is a lesson I've learned over a career at the intersection of cybersecurity and asset management.
What worries me is the extreme asset concentration in a single custodian. And given the cash-like nature of crypto assets, that makes the situation inherently concerning.
See also: Gary Gensler's Bitcoin ETF Clown Show
It may be time to rethink the “qualified custodian” designation, a regulatory sign-off which in its current form doesn’t necessarily ensure risky blockchain-based assets are necessarily (or best) secured. Further, ideally, digital asset custodians should be subject to more oversight by better-trained regulators, under more rigorous state and federal standards, than they are right now.
Most qualified custodians today secure equities, bonds or digitally tracked fiat balances, all of which are fundamentally legal agreements, which can’t simply be “stolen.” But bitcoin [BTC], like cash and gold, is what’s known as a bearer instrument. A successful crypto hack is like a bank robbery in the Wild West, as soon as it’s in the hands of a thief, the money is simply gone.
So for a crypto custodian, one mistake is all it takes for the assets to disappear entirely.
We also know the forces of global crypto-crime are formidable and determined. To pick just one notorious example, North Korea’s Lazarus Group hacking cohort is believed to have stolen $3 billion worth of crypto over the past six years, and it shows no signs of stopping. Inflows to a bitcoin ETF have been projected at somewhere above $6 billion in the first trading week — making these funds a prime target.
If Coinbase winds up with tens of billions in bitcoin sitting in its digital vaults, North Korea can easily organize a $50 million operation to steal those funds, even if it takes multiple years. Threat actors like Russia’s Cozy Bear/APT29 group might also find going after institutional crypto increasingly appealing as those pools get bigger — potentially much, much bigger.
This is the level of threat that major banks prepare for. One widespread model of risk management for financial institutions utilizes three layers of oversight. First, the business management layer designs and implements security practices; second, the risk layer oversees and evaluates those practices; and third, the audit layer makes sure that risk mitigation practices are actually effective.
On top of that, a legacy financial institution will have external auditors and external IT oversight, as well as numerous state and federal regulators looking over their shoulders. Many, many eyes will examine every aspect of risk and security.
But these multiple levels of redundancy and nesting failsafes require one deceptively simple thing: headcount.
During my time as global head of digital assets technology at BNY Mellon, the investment bank had roughly 50,000 employees, of whom around 1,000 – or 2% – were in security roles. Coinbase, even after recent expansion, has fewer than 5,000 employees. BitGo, also a qualified custodian certified by the State of New York and other jurisdictions, has only a few hundred.
This is not to impugn the intentions or skill of any of these organizations or their employees. But real oversight requires redundancy that these new institutions may struggle to provide at a level appropriate for securing tens of billions of dollars in bearer instruments.
See also: Bitcoin ETFs: The Bull Case
Before those numbers get even bigger (and more enticing for the bad guys), it is well past time to refine the cybersecurity standards for qualified custodian designation. Right now, the designation accompanies trust or banking licensing, overseen by state and federal regulators. These are financial regulators largely focused on traditional banking, not cybersecurity experts, and certainly not crypto experts. They understandably focus on balance sheets, legal processes, and other financial operations.
But for crypto custodians, those aren’t the only kinds of oversight that matter, or even necessarily the most important. There are no industry-wide standards for cybersecurity and risk management practices by crypto custodians specifically, meaning that “qualified custodian” status isn’t quite as reassuring as it might sound. That exposes not just investors but an entire nascent sector to opaque risk with potentially dire consequences.
The approval of a cast of bitcoin ETFs is just the latest step in the continued integration of digital assets into the financial system. You don’t have to trust crypto partisans on that prediction – just ask Blackrock, a legacy giant that championed the ETF. As these developments continue, regulators truly interested in investor protection will focus on adapting to this new world: one in which rigorous cybersecurity standards are just as important to financial stability as honest disclosures and financial audits.