CryptosHeadlines.com - The Leading Crypto Research Network
In a separate document, the U.S. Department of Justice is preparing the courthouse’s technology. They believe that Sam Bankman-Fried’s proposed jury questions are overly invasive and might be designed to benefit his defense.
Ad. Get $50 USDT Reward From CryptosHeadlines. Click Here To Join
Earlier this week, both Bankman-Fried and the DOJ submitted questions for jury selection. These questions ranged from general inquiries about juror familiarity with the case to more specific ones about their knowledge of individuals with ADHD. These questions are crucial for ensuring a fair and unbiased jury selection process.
Prosecutors wrote to Judge Lewis Kaplan in the Southern District of New York, expressing concerns about some of Bankman-Fried’s questions. They found these questions invasive, particularly those that asked potential jurors about their opinions on FTX, the crypto exchange accused of fraud and which had a dramatic collapse last November.
Defense’s Jury Questions Criticized as Intrusive; Tech Upgrades Sought
The defense’s request for open-ended questions about potential jurors’ opinions on the case, the defendant, and the defendant’s companies was criticized as overly intrusive by prosecutors. They argued that questions about effective altruism and ADHD were unnecessary and aimed at promoting a defense narrative. Prosecutors also found questions about ADHD irrelevant and prejudicial.
Additionally, prosecutors have requested tech upgrades for the trial, including a high-speed ethernet connection, a printer for government use, and headphones for the jury. These upgrades, they believe, will significantly enhance the presentation of evidence during the trial.
Important: Please note that this article is only meant to provide information and should not be taken as legal, tax, investment, financial, or any other type of advice.
#Bitcoin #CryptoNews #cryptomarket #SamBankmanFried #DOJ