Yesterday I spent the 1000u I earned on Trump to buy in-game items... To be honest, having blockchain games of this quality is quite reassuring. As long as the economic system doesn't collapse, I can keep playing every season. #Castile @Castileofficial
Yes, if you enter now, it's better to observe a bit more before investing.
Crystal Bazin J8dQ
--
Just entered the dark world, why does this chain game increasingly look like a scam, the trading volume is too low, NFTs can only be traded among players themselves, and the project team does not buy back,
Nos últimos dias, vi muitas análises de jogadores da comunidade sobre jogos baseados em blockchain. Antes de vermos um caso de sucesso, não há evidência empírica sobre como os jogos baseados em blockchain devem ser feitos para encontrar um caminho viável. O que temos até agora são apenas lições aprendidas; aprender com essas lições não significa que seguir um caminho oposto seja o correto.
Além disso, a pergunta é: quem realmente aprendeu a lição? Foi o jogador ou a equipe do projeto? Foram os grandes investidores que foram ensinados ou os pequenos investidores? Dependendo da perspectiva, quem foi ensinado pode variar; às vezes, o que é doce para você pode ser veneno para mim.
A emissão de ativos do jogo na blockchain oferece aos jogadores liberdade de negociação, o que significa que, uma vez que o jogo baseado em blockchain está em operação, não é possível reverter os dados. Portanto, após o lançamento e operação dos jogos baseados em blockchain, se surgirem problemas, não há a oportunidade imediata de seguir um caminho oposto, pois as transações que já ocorreram na blockchain não podem ser revertidas.
Assim, a sobrevivência dos jogos baseados em blockchain é o maior sucesso, e eu concordo com isso; a emissão de tokens também representa uma oportunidade de renascimento, e na próxima temporada ainda haverá histórias a serem contadas.
Genshin Impact é um jogo chinês de estilo anime, com uma estética semelhante a The Legend of Zelda, mas com muitas inovações na jogabilidade. Eu gastei dinheiro em Genshin Impact para obter personagens de cinco estrelas e armas especiais.
brilliantcrypto can now go to the official website to download the game and start playing; the game of Kuei Three Kingdoms War is still in testing, and currently, you can only earn some points by completing tasks in the mini-program activities on Telegram. You can find the link to that Telegram mini-program on the official Twitter.
Cathy姐玩链游
--
O relatório mencionou "Kui Sanguo Zhi Zhan" e "Brilliant Crypto". Joguei o último, mas não joguei bem, vendi a picareta e obtive um pequeno lucro.
Insights do mercado Web3 do Japão: políticas governamentais e tendências de grandes empresas e perspectivas para 2025
In-game currency, if not tge to the chain to issue coins, has no value, but wizzwoods officially announced that they will issue coins in Q1 2025, so we can look forward to it.
Arden Farhart Vn99
--
Sister, is the zoo in the Tabizoo project not a real token? Why has a mining machine appeared again?
Blockchain games have two evaluation systems: whether they are fun + whether they can make money
First of all, I definitely won't play a blockchain game that isn't fun. If the game type isn't my cup of tea, there's no need to force it. For example, I don't love shooting games, I'm not very interested in MOBA games, and I won't touch football or basketball games either. If the game quality is poor, the art is unattractive, the program is unstable, there are too many bugs, and there has been no improvement after several tests, then I should stay away, as this applies to both blockchain and Web2 games.
I consider myself a paying player. If a blockchain game requires a lot of time but has profit, I will hire a professional player; if I have time, I will play myself, and if not, I will leave it to the professional. If I can make money, that's great. The game assets are purchased by me, and the timing for cashing out depends on my judgment.
If a blockchain game doesn't require much time and still has profit, then there's no need to hire a professional; I can just play it myself, like the casual blockchain games on Telegram.
But if a blockchain game isn't profitable, will I still play it? This depends on the design and operation of the blockchain game.
If a blockchain game is fun and of high quality but isn't profitable, is the number of players in the game sufficient to support a community? If only a few people are playing the game, it's likely that most will leave after a few tries. A blockchain game project that doesn't generate profit for a long time cannot sustain itself and can only be transformed into a Web2 game (there are already some cases of blockchain games turning into Web2 games).
If a blockchain game causes players to lose money, will they still play this blockchain game?
This depends on whether the project causes most people to lose money or most people to make money, or whether the big players profit while the small players lose, or vice versa. Whether a player is a big or small player also determines whether he/she will stay and continue playing.
Many large blockchain games now have a seasonal system, and profits and losses are phase-based. Gameplay values can be adjusted, and players and project parties are also in constant negotiation, so the direction of value adjustments may also change.
My own stance is: losing 6000u in a well-made blockchain game is an acceptable amount. After all, one can spend 6000u in Genshin Impact. If I'm happy playing in the game and in the player community, spending money is justified.
So basically, when I play a brand new blockchain game, I start with an initial investment of 500u if I think it looks good, and spending up to 6000u is about right. Depending on whether the project operates very well in the future, I will gradually increase my investment, but I may also reduce my investment (if the game doesn't have a rug pull and I can reduce my investment in time).
YQG
--
The Death of Chain Games Is a False Proposition: Web3 Games Do Not Equal 'Short-term Wealth'
With the success of Seraph's dark TGE and the stark contrast of the rapid decline in the $Seraph coin price, coupled with the continuous decline of various chain game gold-making profits in the market and the depreciation of various assets, market sentiment has dropped to freezing point. Voices like 'chain games are dead', 'the biggest scam', 'ready to change careers', 'not as good as playing with dogs', etc., are endless. However, Cat Brother has a different view and has drawn a clear opposite conclusion: **Now is the best investment opportunity for chain games.**
### **Reflections in a Bear Market: Is Chain Game Really 'Dead'?**
Cat Brother himself has continuously encountered setbacks in this market over the past two years; the chain game projects he invested in either went to zero or incurred losses, which once made him waver and even consider exiting the chain game circle. Recently, I also complained in the community: 'Doing chain games is not as good as trading coins like Tm.'
My <Romance of the Three Kingdoms: The Legend of the Hero> TG pre-event account has been leveled up to the maximum, with only 9 levels in total #魁三国志大战
If you are an old player of blockchain games, I have a KYC player group. You need to send me a screenshot of the blockchain game NFTs you hold for record keeping.
Franklyn Deus obWe
--
Is there a group or something for quick communication?
Tomorrow, the coins pledged on the exchange will be released, and it looks like they will continue to drop. After that, the project team should pump the price.
Still need to observe, currently the zoo coins mined in the game can only be used to draw blind boxes. Drawing 6 types of materials can synthesize the MiniNode miner that mines Tabi, and the miner can only mine Tabi tokens.
阿珂
--
不值钱了?那还玩什么了?公链代币也不说如何映射
Explore as últimas notícias sobre criptomoedas
⚡️ Participe das discussões mais recentes sobre criptomoedas