The more opposing voices, the better!

Originally, I hadn't looked at the comment section for a long time, but I was worried there might be omissions in the commission, so I took a look at the comments on the last two posts. There is one part that I find quite interesting.

In the post I made last week, the volume of opposition was actually not very large. I mentioned that we were moving towards a 4-hour level, and this move would likely end around Monday, most likely near 100,000, before being pushed down. I even included a picture in the post (see image 2).

What I meant to imply is that long positions need to be closed on Monday, and then we should open short positions. If there are short positions, they should be held a bit longer, at least until around the 87,000 level.

Then last night, I wrote an analysis that essentially conveyed the same idea, right? I merely added that it's also possible this central pivot wouldn't move away and would go down directly, but normally it should move up from the central pivot. Short positions are more reasonably set up around 99,500, and in terms of operation, we can split the order to short.

So, my two posts actually convey the same meaning, but last night's post clearly had more opposing voices, while last week's post had noticeably fewer opposing voices, which is quite interesting.