Strona Główna
Powiadomienie
Profil
Popularne artykuły
Aktualności
Dodano do zakładek i polubiono
Centrum twórcy
Ustawienia
LIVE
LIVE
Polygon
--
・
657 views
Obserwuj
Zobacz oryginał
„Jak poważne są pesymistyczne dowody dotyczące bezpieczeństwa?” Dowody pesymistyczne:
„Jak poważne są pesymistyczne dowody dotyczące bezpieczeństwa?”
Dowody pesymistyczne:
Zastrzeżenie: Zawiera opinie stron zewnętrznych. To nie jest porada finansowa. Może zawierać treści sponsorowane.
Zobacz Regulamin
0
Zapoznaj się z najnowszymi wiadomościami na temat krypto
⚡️ Weź udział w najnowszych dyskusjach na temat krypto
💬 Współpracuj ze swoimi ulubionymi twórcami
👍 Ciesz się treściami, które Cię interesują
E-mail / Numer telefonu
Zapisz się
Zaloguj się
Odpowiedni twórca
LIVE
Polygon
@0xPolygon
Obserwuj
Odkryj więcej od twórcy
Today, we seek broader community support to call for Matters’ withdrawal of all improperly-filed, generic trademark applications. Aligned with the true Ethereum ethos, Polygon Labs consistently puts out open-source code that benefits everyone. This commitment has positively impacted the entire crypto space. Polygon Plonky2 has been widely adopted, showcasing the immense benefits of our open and collaborative approach to the web3 community. One such beneficiary is Matter Labs, whose core "zk" tech stack leverages Polygon Plonky2. Initially, they utilized this technology developed by Polygon Labs without proper attribution until they were called out. Now, they are taking it a step further. Despite relying on others' zk technology, Matter Labs now seeks to trademark "zk" to potentially restrict its use by others. Should anyone be allowed to monopolize math made publicly available by pioneers like Shafi Goldwasser, Silvio Micali, Charles Rackoff, Eli Ben-Sasson (STARKs), or Daniel Lubarov (Plonky2, a widely adopted zk library in web3)? Absolutely not. They may claim to do this for the benefit of users. But ask yourself: Will users truly benefit if one company monopolizes zk technology? Would zkSync as a network even exist without the zk technology developed by Polygon Labs? No, a trademark on “zk” actually introduces user harm through confusion. When Polygon Labs introduced Polygon zkEVM, we deliberately chose not to trademark it, allowing others to use it freely. As a result, it is now widely adopted, with Immutable zkEVM and Astar zkEVM being just two examples. Openness is fundamental to Ethereum and must be preserved, especially regarding core mathematical principles. For the sake of the entire space, this attack will not be tolerated.
--
yesterday, we introduced the pessimistic proof, the novel ZKP that will ensure safety for chains connected to the AggLayer the pessimistic proof will be generated by @SuccinctLabs' SP1, a general purpose zkVM built with Polygon Plonky3 this means security + low-cost interop 🧵
--
how do you ensure safety among chains connected to the AggLayer? introducing the pessimistic proof, a novel zero-knowledge proof that is flexible enough to support both zk and non-zk chains why pessimistic? because it treats every chain suspiciously 🧵
--
Her: "Noooo babe, I love your portfolio, the big ones scare me." Me:
--
quick rewind: what’s happened to polygon in the last year? flashback to june 2023. a series of community proposals were introduced that reimagined nearly every aspect of polygon. so, what’s actually been accomplished? LOTS. get in, we're going back in time!
--
Najnowsze wiadomości
Econia Labs Co-Founder Discusses Advantages of Building Applications on Aptos
--
BNB Surpasses 600 USDT with a Narrowed 0.69% Increase in 24 Hours
--
Polkadot Unveils Join-Accumulate Machine Upgrade and Launches 10 Million DOT Prize
--
Bitcoin Breaks Through $69,000 Mark, Reports a 2.49% Increase in 24 Hours
--
Ethereum(ETH) Surpasses 3,800 USDT with a Narrowed 1.30% Increase in 24 Hours
--
Zobacz więcej
Mapa strony
Cookie Preferences
Regulamin platformy