Opinions de Uncle Mose(@unclemose74)

Voir l’original

--

Baissier

$NOT  semble tomber à 0,014 

Avertissement : comprend des opinions de tiers. Il ne s’agit pas d’un conseil financier. Peut inclure du contenu sponsorisé. Consultez les CG.

NOT

0,00785

-4.09%

882

0

Réponses 0

Découvrez les dernières actus sur les cryptos

⚡️ Prenez part aux dernières discussions sur les cryptos

💬 Interagissez avec vos créateur(trice)s préféré(e)s

👍 Profitez du contenu qui vous intéresse

Adresse e-mail/Numéro de téléphone

Créateur pertinent

LIVE

Uncle Mose

@unclemose74

Découvrez-en plus sur le créateur

$TON A message by Durev ❤️ Thanks everyone for your support and love! Last month I got interviewed by police for 4 days after arriving in Paris. I was told I may be personally responsible for other people’s illegal use of Telegram, because the French authorities didn’t receive responses from Telegram. This was surprising for several reasons: 1. Telegram has an official representative in the EU that accepts and replies to EU requests. Its email address has been publicly available for anyone in the EU who googles “Telegram EU address for law enforcement”. 2. The French authorities had numerous ways to reach me to request assistance. As a French citizen, I was a frequent guest at the French consulate in Dubai. A while ago, when asked, I personally helped them establish a hotline with Telegram to deal with the threat of terrorism in France. 3. If a country is unhappy with an internet service, the established practice is to start a legal action against the service itself. Using laws from the pre-smartphone era to charge a CEO with crimes committed by third parties on the platform he manages is a misguided approach. Building technology is hard enough as it is. No innovator will ever build new tools if they know they can be personally held responsible for potential abuse of those tools. Establishing the right balance between privacy and security is not easy. You have to reconcile privacy laws with law enforcement requirements, and local laws with EU laws. You have to take into account technological limitations. As a platform, you want your processes to be consistent globally, while also ensuring they are not abused in countries with weak rule of law. We’ve been committed to engaging with regulators to find the right balance. Yes, we stand by our principles: our experience is shaped by our mission to protect our users in authoritarian regimes. But we’ve always been open to dialogue. Sometimes we can’t agree with a country’s regulator on the right balance between privacy and security. In those cases, we are ready to leave that country.

--

Yes is time to hope in and make profit on $NOT now before is too late

--

$NOT I'm really disappointed in Notcoin this circle I expect more than that shitty performance

--

$NOT volume is too low but the price is ok think

--

$BTC to 64k

--

Dernières actualités

Whale rachète 3689 ETH à Ether.fi

--

La prochaine décision de la Réserve fédérale sur les taux d'intérêt est attendue

--

AXA Investment Managers effectue des transactions en utilisant des CBDC de gros dans le cadre d'un procès de règlement avec la BCE

--

L'ICMA publie un guide de référence sur la dette numérique basé sur la DLT

--

L'EBA analyse les aspects réglementaires des dépôts tokenisés

--

Cookie Preferences

CGU de la plateforme

ba-one-trust-cookie