Binance Square
LIVE
LIVE
Crypto De Nostradame
Haussier
--112.8k views
Bitcoin (BTC) Money Laundering: Woman Sentenced in $6 Billion Fraud Case. *A 42-year-old British-Chinese woman was sentenced to six years and eight months in prison for converting Bitcoin into various assets, including real estate and jewellery. *Jian Wen, who initially faced up to 14 years in prison, was convicted in March on a money laundering-related charge. *During a search of his home in 2018, authorities discovered a safe containing 61,000 #Bitcoins. British-Chinese Woman Convicted of Money Laundering with Bitcoin: In-Depth Examination of the Case British-Chinese Jian Wen, 42, was sentenced to six years and eight months in prison for his involvement in a major Bitcoin money laundering operation. Wen, who initially faced up to 14 years in prison, was found guilty of a money laundering-related charge in March. The case attracted great attention due to the large amount of Bitcoin involved and the complex details of the structuring. In 2018, the Metropolitan Police and a money laundering investigator searched Wen's home. During the search, they found a safe containing 61,000 Bitcoins. This discovery revealed the scale of the operation and the sophisticated methods used to conceal illicit assets. Throughout the trial, Wen maintained that he was unaware of Zhang's massive fraud scheme. He said Zhang told him he was "independently wealthy" and wanted to provide his son with a better future in private school. Wen's defense emphasized Zhang's lack of knowledge about the true nature of his activities and the desire he wanted to provide for his family. The case of Jian Wen and Yadi Zhang reveals the complexity and challenges of combating financial crime in the digital age. With the rise of cryptocurrencies such as Bitcoin, authorities face new challenges in monitoring and prosecuting money laundering activities. Wen's conviction serves as a reminder of the serious consequences of involvement in such schemes, while Zhang's escape highlights ongoing efforts to bring all criminals to justice. $BTC

Bitcoin (BTC) Money Laundering: Woman Sentenced in $6 Billion Fraud Case.

*A 42-year-old British-Chinese woman was sentenced to six years and eight months in prison for converting Bitcoin into various assets, including real estate and jewellery.

*Jian Wen, who initially faced up to 14 years in prison, was convicted in March on a money laundering-related charge.

*During a search of his home in 2018, authorities discovered a safe containing 61,000 #Bitcoins.

British-Chinese Woman Convicted of Money Laundering with Bitcoin: In-Depth Examination of the Case

British-Chinese Jian Wen, 42, was sentenced to six years and eight months in prison for his involvement in a major Bitcoin money laundering operation. Wen, who initially faced up to 14 years in prison, was found guilty of a money laundering-related charge in March. The case attracted great attention due to the large amount of Bitcoin involved and the complex details of the structuring.

In 2018, the Metropolitan Police and a money laundering investigator searched Wen's home. During the search, they found a safe containing 61,000 Bitcoins. This discovery revealed the scale of the operation and the sophisticated methods used to conceal illicit assets.

Throughout the trial, Wen maintained that he was unaware of Zhang's massive fraud scheme. He said Zhang told him he was "independently wealthy" and wanted to provide his son with a better future in private school. Wen's defense emphasized Zhang's lack of knowledge about the true nature of his activities and the desire he wanted to provide for his family.

The case of Jian Wen and Yadi Zhang reveals the complexity and challenges of combating financial crime in the digital age. With the rise of cryptocurrencies such as Bitcoin, authorities face new challenges in monitoring and prosecuting money laundering activities. Wen's conviction serves as a reminder of the serious consequences of involvement in such schemes, while Zhang's escape highlights ongoing efforts to bring all criminals to justice.
$BTC

Avertissement : comprend des opinions de tiers. Il ne s’agit pas d’un conseil financier. Peut inclure du contenu sponsorisé. Consultez les CG.
0
Réponses 24
Découvrez les dernières actus sur les cryptos
⚡️ Prenez part aux dernières discussions sur les cryptos
💬 Interagissez avec vos créateur(trice)s préféré(e)s
👍 Profitez du contenu qui vous intéresse
Adresse e-mail/Numéro de téléphone
Créateur pertinent

Découvrez-en plus sur le créateur

--
Fidelity manager Timmer: Only one thing is needed for Bitcoin to break a new record Fidelity manager Jurrien Timmer, one of the names followed on social media with his market evaluations from time to time, stated that network losses in Bitcoin have slowed down, but the price continues to remain high and said, "This continuous record is being prevented. The network must constantly accelerate in order for new increases to occur." Although it fell after the non-agricultural employment data announced in the USA last week, Bitcoin, which rose after this week's inflation figures and the Fed's decision, could not exceed the 70 thousand dollars level again. While investors questioned whether the upward trend was over, Fidelity manager Jurrien Timmer stated that new peaks could only come with the growth of the Bitcoin network. “The record may come with the thesis of financial dominance” Making some evaluations on his account on X, Fidelity's global macro manager drew attention to the discrepancy between price and adaptation and said: "Network growth in Bitcoin has slowed in recent months. However, we see that the price also increases and remains high. This price-adoption discrepancy may actually be behind Bitcoin's failure to break new records. Bitcoin price is swinging like a pendulum around its growth curve and will continue to swing. Therefore, for records to be achieved, the network needs to start growing again. How will this happen? Perhaps with the arrival of the next phase of the fiscal dominance thesis..." The fiscal dominance thesis mentioned by Timmer is based on the incompatibility of countries' fiscal and monetary policies. While taxation, government expenditures and debt purchases constitute fiscal policies, the central bank's monetary policies can be ineffective from time to time. This situation constitutes the financial dominance thesis. $BTC $ETH $BNB
--
Tesla shareholders took Elon Musk and company management to court Tesla shareholders took Elon Musk and company management to court for allegedly directing resources and talent to external artificial intelligence startup xAI. While this move caused uncertainty in the company's internal structure and position in the market, shareholders resorted to legal action to protect their investments. Tesla shareholders took CEO Elon Musk and company management to court. Allegedly, Musk transferred Tesla's artificial intelligence resources and talented personnel to his own initiative, xAI. This situation is thought to harm Tesla's competitiveness. The case was registered on the day the vote was taken to cancel Musk's large pay package. Shareholders argue that Musk and the board of directors betrayed the interests of Tesla and its shareholders with these actions and demand compensation for their losses. Tesla shareholders have filed a lawsuit in Delaware court against the company's CEO, Elon Musk, and his board of directors. The plaintiffs allege that Musk funneled Tesla's valuable AI resources and talented staff into his own startup, xAI. Shareholders claim that this situation harms Tesla's competitiveness. The case was recorded on the same day a vote was taken to cancel Musk's massive pay package. Allegedly, Musk raised funds for xAI using information about Tesla's artificial intelligence and autonomous driving technologies and transferred important names from the company in the process. In particular, Tesla's computer vision team leader Ethan Knight's transition to xAI in March 2024 is noteworthy. Shareholders also point to a period in which Musk diverted Nvidia GPUs, which were vital for Tesla, to company #xAI and X, and said that these GPUs were not necessary for Tesla. The plaintiffs argue that Musk and the board of directors betrayed the interests of Tesla and its shareholders with these actions and demand compensation for their damages.
--

Dernières actualités

Voir plus
Plan du site
Cookie Preferences
CGU de la plateforme