Binance Square
LIVE
LIVE
Crypto De Nostradame
Haussier
--8.8k views
How did Ripple respond to the SEC's fine request? What was the market reaction? In the legal fight between Ripple and the SEC, the focus has turned to the $ 2 billion fine that the SEC demanded from the Blockchain company. While the SEC demands $876 million in compensation from Ripple, it also demands nearly $200 million in interest. The regulator also said the company must pay an additional $876 million to cover civil penalties. This means that Ripple may end the legal process by paying a penalty of nearly 2 billion dollars. However, it seems that the Blockchain company does not accept the SEC's fine. Not sure how to redeem the code? You can watch the video we show step by step. In its response to the court on April 22, Ripple stated that the case was not caused by careless transactions or did not constitute fraud, and offered to pay a much lower fine. Accordingly, Ripple has a plan to pay a civil penalty of $10 million in its summary response. In his statement, Ripple lawyer Stuart Alderoty interpreted the SEC's request as a step taken to intimidate the crypto industry in the USA. Ripple CEO Brad Garlinghouse made similar statements rejecting the fine, warning that the SEC's actions and policies would have negative effects in the long term. In its summary response, Ripple also claimed that necessary updates had been made, that XRP sales had been brought into compliance in accordance with the court order, and that they were in compliance with regulatory requirements both in the US and internationally. Ripple also stated that they are willing to cooperate within the law in the future. The low probability of a settlement in the litigation process, which is considered the biggest problem for XRP trading, seems to have disappointed the XRP community in general. $BTC $XRP

How did Ripple respond to the SEC's fine request? What was the market reaction?

In the legal fight between Ripple and the SEC, the focus has turned to the $ 2 billion fine that the SEC demanded from the Blockchain company.

While the SEC demands $876 million in compensation from Ripple, it also demands nearly $200 million in interest. The regulator also said the company must pay an additional $876 million to cover civil penalties. This means that Ripple may end the legal process by paying a penalty of nearly 2 billion dollars. However, it seems that the Blockchain company does not accept the SEC's fine.

Not sure how to redeem the code? You can watch the video we show step by step.

In its response to the court on April 22, Ripple stated that the case was not caused by careless transactions or did not constitute fraud, and offered to pay a much lower fine. Accordingly, Ripple has a plan to pay a civil penalty of $10 million in its summary response.

In his statement, Ripple lawyer Stuart Alderoty interpreted the SEC's request as a step taken to intimidate the crypto industry in the USA. Ripple CEO Brad Garlinghouse made similar statements rejecting the fine, warning that the SEC's actions and policies would have negative effects in the long term.

In its summary response, Ripple also claimed that necessary updates had been made, that XRP sales had been brought into compliance in accordance with the court order, and that they were in compliance with regulatory requirements both in the US and internationally. Ripple also stated that they are willing to cooperate within the law in the future.

The low probability of a settlement in the litigation process, which is considered the biggest problem for XRP trading, seems to have disappointed the XRP community in general.
$BTC $XRP

Avertissement : comprend des opinions de tiers. Il ne s’agit pas d’un conseil financier. Peut inclure du contenu sponsorisé. Consultez les CG.
0
Réponses 1
Découvrez les dernières actus sur les cryptos
⚡️ Prenez part aux dernières discussions sur les cryptos
💬 Interagissez avec vos créateur(trice)s préféré(e)s
👍 Profitez du contenu qui vous intéresse
Adresse e-mail/Numéro de téléphone
Créateur pertinent

Découvrez-en plus sur le créateur

--
Vitalik Buterin Explained the Main Reasons for the Defeat of 'Big Blockchains' in the Bitcoin (BTC) Scaling War. Vitalik Buterin, creator of #Ethereum addressed the controversial “Bitcoin block size war” of the late 2010s in a recent blog post. Buterin, who once backed “big bloc” supporters, now concedes that the “small bloc” camp’s approach is more sustainable. This discussion centered on how Bitcoin should be scaled, updated, and managed; Supporters of large blocks were advocating hard-fork updates that would increase transaction capacity. However, Buterin thinks that big block supporters do not have the technical competence to effectively realize their vision and therefore fail to replace #Bitcoin . Buterin noted that the success of small-block promoters is partly due to their technical proficiency and fewer mistakes. He evaluated Jonathan Bier's book "The Blocksize War" from a small block perspective and Roger Ver's book "Hijacking Bitcoin" from a large block perspective. According to Buterin, various Bitcoin implementations proposed by big block supporters were flawed. For example, Bitcoin Classic was not well written and Bitcoin Unlimited was too complicated. Their reputations were also further damaged by the big bloc supporters' alliances with the now discredited Craig Wright. Despite the victory of small-block supporters, Bitcoin still faces ongoing challenges. Bitcoin Core developer Matt Corralo recently expressed concerns about Bitcoin's future as a peer-to-peer currency, noting the lack of effective scaling solutions without intermediaries. This has reignited discussions about soft fork proposals and the ultimate goals for Bitcoin's development. Buterin argues that the solution to these problems is new technology, not compromise. He highlighted technologies such as ZK-SNARKs, which he sees as a promising solution for both privacy and scaling; this technology was absent from historical accounts of the block size war. $ETH
--
Ripple CEO Announces Strategic $25 Million Investment in Crypto-Focused Political Committee. On May 29, Brad Garlinghouse announced in an Garlinghouse noted that the crypto payments company contributed a generous $25 million to FairShake to facilitate the development of the crypto industry and support the “advancement and adoption of crypto and blockchain technologies.” FairShake is a Federal Election Commission-registered committee that empowers blockchain innovators to create their own networks under more transparent and favorable regulatory and legal frameworks. Garlinghouse stated that the continued growth and advancement of the crypto industry in the United States is critical. He emphasized that the country needs to step up to compete with practical and clear regulations that other leading economies and crypto-friendly countries have already developed. Ripple's donation to FairShake came before the US Presidential elections to be held on November 5, 2024. Garlinghouse stated that the company's $25 million contribution sends a message to politicians who do not support the crypto industry and do not create "backward-looking" policies. #Ripple CEO's statement may be referring to the United States Securities and Exchange Commission's (SEC) ongoing enforcement actions against cryptocurrency companies. For years, the US SEC has filed lawsuits and imposed sanctions on many crypto companies; Ripple has been one of the longest targeted in a nearly four-year lawsuit. Additionally, in 2023, Senator Elizabeth Warren launched her re-election campaign, announcing her intention to create an anti-crypto army aimed at undermining the crypto industry. These ongoing efforts to potentially disrupt the crypto industry have increased Ripple's efforts to fully support the industry and led it to fund initiatives to grow the industry. $BTC $XRP
--
Indian Civil Servant's Bitcoin Theft Starts Major Change in Crypto Policing. Chandrahar, a former inspector with the Central Crime Branch (CCB), misused his position to access and transfer Bitcoin from the hacker's digital wallet. This wallet was supposed to be used as secure evidence of an ongoing investigation into illegal activities involving high-profile hacks of exchanges such as Bitfinex and Unocoin orchestrated by Srikrishna Ramesh and his assistant Robin Khandelwal. Although the duo earned approximately $660,000 as a result of their cybercrimes, Chandrahar's actions amounted to serious violations of the legal and ethical conduct expected of law enforcement. The initial disappearance of #BTC led to the creation of a special investigation team (#SIT ) and these abuses were uncovered after inconsistencies in the handling of evidence were noticed. By manipulating access, he forced Khandelwal to transfer the funds and then attempted to erase traces of the incident. His actions not only undermined the integrity of the police force, but also compromised the entire investigation. Chandrahar was arrested after failing to escape after a failed “preventive evacuation” attempt. An officer from the SIT team made the following statements: The charges against him and his accomplices include broad crimes such as breach of trust by a public official and destruction of evidence. This case highlights a significant breach of public trust and highlights the challenges of controlling digital assets within the existing law enforcement framework. This incident comes in the face of India's increasingly strict stance towards cryptocurrencies. Recently, the country implemented “heavy taxation rules” on cryptocurrency transactions and took decisive action against various international cryptocurrency exchanges. $BTC
--
Plan du site
Cookie Preferences
CGU de la plateforme