希曼Heman
币圈10年运营，多家交易所运营总监，操盘过多个项目。
Following
Followers
Liked
Shared
See original
Are you talking about the total amount or the maximum supply? The total amount has already been released and may increase, and it is also possible that the revenue equals or exceeds the issuance amount, in which case buyback and destruction will maintain or reduce the total amount.
$USUAL Can I ask if this total can be increased? Found in the first image community.
See original
How many hundreds of millions of dollars have they bought in government bonds?
$USUAL has already made 20 million in revenue?
See original
In reality, only 10% of people can receive benefits.
Quoted content has been removed
See original
When usd0 has the same market recognition as usdt, it will have an additional platform coin dividend staking demand compared to tether. The larger the market value, the greater the demand for usd0.
$USUAL USD0 as a stablecoin should be for circulation! But so far, the only use of USD0 is for staking!
See original
The official announcement for $USUAL is here, in short: 1. New rewards require a stake of at least 1 month, starting from the 1st of each month; you must complete the staking by the 1st of the next month to receive dividends. 2. There is already a $20 million dividend. 3. New flywheel growth plan. Positive news, take off.
See original
They might just be hedging, on the other side they bought a short
分析师舒琴
--
It's broken, bro, this time he's in trouble.
Previously, a giant whale shorted 20,000 ETH at 3400, and then added to the short position at 3600. The health of the position has dropped sharply from 1.25 to 1.14, and liquidation will occur when it reaches 1.
I calculated that when ETH reaches 4200, the whale's position will be liquidated, and they will be forced to buy back a position of 100 million ETH to cover the short.
Some people ask, is 100 million a lot? Binance's total ETH spot trading volume is currently 600 million, most of which are offset trades, so the actual inflow of funds might just be 50 million, equivalent to an ETF. So, this 100 million liquidation turning into buy orders, is ETH about to take off?
This guy is adding to his short position when the position is at risk, and the liquidation line is precariously close, truly a strong bow at the end.
Now the main players need to step up, directly force him to liquidate, I believe that before it even reaches 4200, the whale will back down, after all, he doesn't want to be liquidated.
I estimate that if ETH rises a bit more, he will have to stop loss and cover the short position, buying back around 24,000 ETH. Now, with this last breath, everyone cannot back down, the whale hunting plan has just begun!
Previously, a giant whale shorted 20,000 ETH at 3400, and then added to the short position at 3600. The health of the position has dropped sharply from 1.25 to 1.14, and liquidation will occur when it reaches 1.
I calculated that when ETH reaches 4200, the whale's position will be liquidated, and they will be forced to buy back a position of 100 million ETH to cover the short.
Some people ask, is 100 million a lot? Binance's total ETH spot trading volume is currently 600 million, most of which are offset trades, so the actual inflow of funds might just be 50 million, equivalent to an ETF. So, this 100 million liquidation turning into buy orders, is ETH about to take off?
This guy is adding to his short position when the position is at risk, and the liquidation line is precariously close, truly a strong bow at the end.
Now the main players need to step up, directly force him to liquidate, I believe that before it even reaches 4200, the whale will back down, after all, he doesn't want to be liquidated.
I estimate that if ETH rises a bit more, he will have to stop loss and cover the short position, buying back around 24,000 ETH. Now, with this last breath, everyone cannot back down, the whale hunting plan has just begun!
See original
Too many people are using AI to rewrite articles.
Binance doesn't protect original posts by authors. Who would dare to work hard for you in the future? Damn, someone in the square stole my post, and I reported it unsuccessfully. They said it's fine and that no violations were found. I'm really fed up with this.
This so-called Goldman guy, I posted something on January 2nd, and he posted it today. Moreover, he didn't even copy everything; he missed some of the images. Can you believe this? And they still say no violations were found. Is there any justice left?
Handsome friends, please help me report this guy. I really can't take it anymore. I thought my post was quite famous and even got recommended, but then I look back and see someone else's name on it.
This so-called Goldman guy, I posted something on January 2nd, and he posted it today. Moreover, he didn't even copy everything; he missed some of the images. Can you believe this? And they still say no violations were found. Is there any justice left?
Handsome friends, please help me report this guy. I really can't take it anymore. I thought my post was quite famous and even got recommended, but then I look back and see someone else's name on it.
See original
Compared to goat, ai16z, and some meme coins, the usual traffic and reputation are definitely not lacking, especially since there is already a TVL of 1.8 billion dollars, and the treasury already has national bonds that can be profitable. The market value is severely underestimated.
$USUAL $ENA $BIO Daily shout, usual strongly recommended, the only potential coin among new currencies. The reasons are as follows:
1. Support from the profit model, usual's profit model is very simple. Unlike bio and pengu, you don’t know if they will be profitable in the future, but usual starts generating profit as soon as it goes live. The greater the demand for usd0, the stronger the profit for usual.
2. Support from scaled demand, usual aims to increase the usage demand for usd0. There are only two ways: one is through marketization, real demand, such as exchanges listing usd0 trading pairs, defi lending, and liquidity provision, etc. The other is that the higher usual's market value, the higher the coin price, and the higher the return rate for staking usd0, which will increase the demand for usd0. Marketization is relatively lengthy, while directly acting as a market maker to boost market value is the fastest. To achieve a scaled brand effect, usual needs to have a market value of at least 5 billion USD, and usd0 must have a circulation of 10 billion USD to transition from the children's table to the adult's table.
3. Demand from the team, many tokens launch with a market value of several billion USD, and the team only needs to sell all their tokens to achieve financial freedom. However, usual launched with a market value of just under 50 million USD, and the team’s tokens are locked for a year. They need to make usual reach the adult's table within a year to sustain operations and realize profits.
4. Demand from market makers and investors, they are backed by BlackRock, Binance, OK, Coinbase, and they will provide full support, offering assistance in both traditional finance and the web3 domain.
1. Support from the profit model, usual's profit model is very simple. Unlike bio and pengu, you don’t know if they will be profitable in the future, but usual starts generating profit as soon as it goes live. The greater the demand for usd0, the stronger the profit for usual.
2. Support from scaled demand, usual aims to increase the usage demand for usd0. There are only two ways: one is through marketization, real demand, such as exchanges listing usd0 trading pairs, defi lending, and liquidity provision, etc. The other is that the higher usual's market value, the higher the coin price, and the higher the return rate for staking usd0, which will increase the demand for usd0. Marketization is relatively lengthy, while directly acting as a market maker to boost market value is the fastest. To achieve a scaled brand effect, usual needs to have a market value of at least 5 billion USD, and usd0 must have a circulation of 10 billion USD to transition from the children's table to the adult's table.
3. Demand from the team, many tokens launch with a market value of several billion USD, and the team only needs to sell all their tokens to achieve financial freedom. However, usual launched with a market value of just under 50 million USD, and the team’s tokens are locked for a year. They need to make usual reach the adult's table within a year to sustain operations and realize profits.
4. Demand from market makers and investors, they are backed by BlackRock, Binance, OK, Coinbase, and they will provide full support, offering assistance in both traditional finance and the web3 domain.
See original
$USUAL $ENA $BIO Daily shout, usual strongly recommended, the only potential coin among new currencies. The reasons are as follows:
1. Support from the profit model, usual's profit model is very simple. Unlike bio and pengu, you don’t know if they will be profitable in the future, but usual starts generating profit as soon as it goes live. The greater the demand for usd0, the stronger the profit for usual.
2. Support from scaled demand, usual aims to increase the usage demand for usd0. There are only two ways: one is through marketization, real demand, such as exchanges listing usd0 trading pairs, defi lending, and liquidity provision, etc. The other is that the higher usual's market value, the higher the coin price, and the higher the return rate for staking usd0, which will increase the demand for usd0. Marketization is relatively lengthy, while directly acting as a market maker to boost market value is the fastest. To achieve a scaled brand effect, usual needs to have a market value of at least 5 billion USD, and usd0 must have a circulation of 10 billion USD to transition from the children's table to the adult's table.
3. Demand from the team, many tokens launch with a market value of several billion USD, and the team only needs to sell all their tokens to achieve financial freedom. However, usual launched with a market value of just under 50 million USD, and the team’s tokens are locked for a year. They need to make usual reach the adult's table within a year to sustain operations and realize profits.
4. Demand from market makers and investors, they are backed by BlackRock, Binance, OK, Coinbase, and they will provide full support, offering assistance in both traditional finance and the web3 domain.
1. Support from the profit model, usual's profit model is very simple. Unlike bio and pengu, you don’t know if they will be profitable in the future, but usual starts generating profit as soon as it goes live. The greater the demand for usd0, the stronger the profit for usual.
2. Support from scaled demand, usual aims to increase the usage demand for usd0. There are only two ways: one is through marketization, real demand, such as exchanges listing usd0 trading pairs, defi lending, and liquidity provision, etc. The other is that the higher usual's market value, the higher the coin price, and the higher the return rate for staking usd0, which will increase the demand for usd0. Marketization is relatively lengthy, while directly acting as a market maker to boost market value is the fastest. To achieve a scaled brand effect, usual needs to have a market value of at least 5 billion USD, and usd0 must have a circulation of 10 billion USD to transition from the children's table to the adult's table.
3. Demand from the team, many tokens launch with a market value of several billion USD, and the team only needs to sell all their tokens to achieve financial freedom. However, usual launched with a market value of just under 50 million USD, and the team’s tokens are locked for a year. They need to make usual reach the adult's table within a year to sustain operations and realize profits.
4. Demand from market makers and investors, they are backed by BlackRock, Binance, OK, Coinbase, and they will provide full support, offering assistance in both traditional finance and the web3 domain.
See original
In other words, usual has dividends, so the actual demand for usd0 will be higher than that for usdt and usdc. With higher demand, there is more principal, more government bonds, and more profits, which leads to a higher market value for usual, thereby driving more demand for usd0.
$USUAL suggests to heavily invest, as the safety margin of the stablecoin is very high, with a TVL of 18B, making it the fifth largest stablecoin TVL globally, and it has already achieved profitability, with a clear business model comparable to USDT and USDC, one with a market cap of 200 billion and the other with a market cap of 45 billion, showing a clear value benchmark. There are several secure and trusted exchanges investing, indicating it will certainly be listed on the USD0 trading pair, and the founding team has a very good reputation.
Currently, the circulating market cap is less than 500 million USD, with a TVL of 18B, making it currently undervalued.
Currently, the circulating market cap is less than 500 million USD, with a TVL of 18B, making it currently undervalued.
See original
$USUAL suggests to heavily invest, as the safety margin of the stablecoin is very high, with a TVL of 18B, making it the fifth largest stablecoin TVL globally, and it has already achieved profitability, with a clear business model comparable to USDT and USDC, one with a market cap of 200 billion and the other with a market cap of 45 billion, showing a clear value benchmark. There are several secure and trusted exchanges investing, indicating it will certainly be listed on the USD0 trading pair, and the founding team has a very good reputation.
Currently, the circulating market cap is less than 500 million USD, with a TVL of 18B, making it currently undervalued.
Currently, the circulating market cap is less than 500 million USD, with a TVL of 18B, making it currently undervalued.
See original
If I go to trade on uni, will the earnings from mining staking also be received? For example, if I staked 20,000 and the earnings in 10 days is 2,000, will there be 22,000 usual when he sells?
How many people have released their pledge without being charged a 10% fee for $USUAL ? It seems that it is still possible to use Uniswap to waive the fee, but I'm not sure if clicking Approve really does not incur this 10% charge?
See original
Ran a little early
Quoted content has been removed
See original
usd0++ direct holding also has returns, putting usd0 directly into crv to form lp also has returns
Does anyone understand the white paper? I want to ask a question, for example, if I stake USDC to purchase USD0, do I only earn returns by holding these USD0? Or do I need to exchange USD0 for USD0++ to earn returns?
See original
The recent decline of $USUAL is mainly due to three reasons:
1. USD0 briefly decoupled; a large trader dumped over ten million USD, causing USD0 to briefly fall to around 0.98, but it quickly recovered, which can be seen as a stress test.
2. Usual withdrawals from staking were originally subject to a 10% fee, but someone formed a LP of usual and usualy on Uniswap, allowing many people to withdraw usual without a fee. This caused many large traders to worry that others would sell off, leading to a rush to withdraw and sell coins.
3. The annualized interest rate has decreased; due to the cost of unstaking, it now takes about ten days to recover this cost, and many people are reluctant to stake.
4. The buying power of spot market hoarders has diminished because staking generates income; many people feel that holding spot assets is not worthwhile. Although the secondary market sees daily trading volumes of over one hundred million USD, it has failed to retain user funds, with quick in-and-out trades.
Future expectations: First, we will look at the profit distribution on the 7th; if it rises above 1.5, confidence will be reestablished, and large traders will again enter the staking market. Additionally, we will observe the upcoming developments in DeFi to see if it can collaborate with major swap and lending markets to enhance the use cases and demand for USD0. When the interest rate drops below 100% in six months, the secondary market may see hoarders entering, as dilution will be reduced.
1. USD0 briefly decoupled; a large trader dumped over ten million USD, causing USD0 to briefly fall to around 0.98, but it quickly recovered, which can be seen as a stress test.
2. Usual withdrawals from staking were originally subject to a 10% fee, but someone formed a LP of usual and usualy on Uniswap, allowing many people to withdraw usual without a fee. This caused many large traders to worry that others would sell off, leading to a rush to withdraw and sell coins.
3. The annualized interest rate has decreased; due to the cost of unstaking, it now takes about ten days to recover this cost, and many people are reluctant to stake.
4. The buying power of spot market hoarders has diminished because staking generates income; many people feel that holding spot assets is not worthwhile. Although the secondary market sees daily trading volumes of over one hundred million USD, it has failed to retain user funds, with quick in-and-out trades.
Future expectations: First, we will look at the profit distribution on the 7th; if it rises above 1.5, confidence will be reestablished, and large traders will again enter the staking market. Additionally, we will observe the upcoming developments in DeFi to see if it can collaborate with major swap and lending markets to enhance the use cases and demand for USD0. When the interest rate drops below 100% in six months, the secondary market may see hoarders entering, as dilution will be reduced.
See original
$USUAL The biggest problem is that the tokens of early investors will be released in one year, and there has been a breach of contract. It was previously said that the tokens would be unlocked in half a year, which led to dissatisfied investors selling the tokens. This is the selling pressure that everyone worries about every month; in addition, 10% of the additional issuance is given to the team, and another part is given to the usd0 pledgers. This means that the longer the pledge is made, the more diluted the stake will be by 10%. Unless the income of the project itself can cover these two parts of the cost, it will lead to a lack of confidence and enter a downward cycle. Originally, if 100% of the additional issuance was given to the pledgers, it would not matter. It's like four people playing mahjong. No matter how much each person's chips increase in proportion, the total amount is still the same. But if you play mahjong in a mahjong hall and charge 10% for each game, the total amount will continue to decrease.
See original
$USUAL The biggest difficulty in defeating Tether lies in user awareness, because for the users of USDT, even if USDT is more centralized and the profits are selfish and not shared with users, it does not affect my use of USDT. I can exchange it for 1 US dollar in equal proportion, and the use of USD0 makes no difference to me. Many users are still willing to use the old brand of USDT. If USDT is not adopted much, it will be difficult to truly subvert Tether.
Therefore, he can only find another way to cooperate with bank settlements, or even cooperate with national level to improve his brand value of security, so that it is possible to be used by more institutions and individuals. The more people use USD0, for example, if the current scale of USDT is 120 billion, then the circulation market value of UAUSL can exceed 100 billion US dollars (now it is about 600 million US dollars in circulation)
The market value may only be within a few billion US dollars, and it cannot reach the scale of more than 100 billion US dollars of Tether.
Therefore, he can only find another way to cooperate with bank settlements, or even cooperate with national level to improve his brand value of security, so that it is possible to be used by more institutions and individuals. The more people use USD0, for example, if the current scale of USDT is 120 billion, then the circulation market value of UAUSL can exceed 100 billion US dollars (now it is about 600 million US dollars in circulation)
The market value may only be within a few billion US dollars, and it cannot reach the scale of more than 100 billion US dollars of Tether.
See original
Web3 has an excess premium for innovators. For example, BTC is not as energy-efficient and efficient as any meme coin, but it is the god of the industry. For example, ETH is not as low in handling fees and efficient as many L2 public chains, but it is the first to innovate, so the premium is several times higher than other public chains. If Usual overturns the stable currency status of USDT, it will be a $100 billion project.
$USUAL The main difference between usd0 and usdt is that the parent company of usdt collects US dollars as reserves to generate usdt for users to use. The parent company uses the interest of US dollar deposits or treasury bonds for its own profits; usd0 uses treasury bonds as collateral. For example, users exchange 10 billion US dollars, and the profit of usdt is kept by themselves. usd0 continues to invest the 11 billion US dollars that arrived in the account after 10 billion US dollars in treasury bonds after one year into buying treasury bonds. All of them are placed in the vault to support the stability of usd0 against 1 US dollar. At the same time, this interest will be used to pay the value of usual, of which 90% belongs to users. The pledge income of usd0 comes from the liquidity of crv, which is the handling fee when users exchange usd0 and usdc, as well as part of the additional issuance income of usual. In essence, usual is a stable currency with collateral rather than an algorithmic stable currency.
See original
$USUAL The main difference between usd0 and usdt is that the parent company of usdt collects US dollars as reserves to generate usdt for users to use. The parent company uses the interest of US dollar deposits or treasury bonds for its own profits; usd0 uses treasury bonds as collateral. For example, users exchange 10 billion US dollars, and the profit of usdt is kept by themselves. usd0 continues to invest the 11 billion US dollars that arrived in the account after 10 billion US dollars in treasury bonds after one year into buying treasury bonds. All of them are placed in the vault to support the stability of usd0 against 1 US dollar. At the same time, this interest will be used to pay the value of usual, of which 90% belongs to users. The pledge income of usd0 comes from the liquidity of crv, which is the handling fee when users exchange usd0 and usdc, as well as part of the additional issuance income of usual. In essence, usual is a stable currency with collateral rather than an algorithmic stable currency.
See original
I like you, a newbie who doesn't know but pretends to know and wants to teach everyone. When you buy 100u of USD0, he doesn't give you 1u of interest out of thin air, but this 100u is a physical collateral with US bonds, and he generates 100u for you. The interest of this 1u comes from the expected return of this bond in the next year, so he first gives you a usual, and then the bond is in the vault. If you don't buy treasury bonds to pledge and there is 1USD0, there is a spread when the price is higher than 1 US dollar, and other people can use the treasury bonds in the vault to generate new USD0 for arbitrage
$USUAL has said it ten times that USUAL is not a spiral upward model and has been criticized by a lot of people. You can be optimistic about this coin and say it has potential, but you cannot analyze objective facts and study theories without pure faith. LUNA is a spiral upward, because the higher the TVL of UST, the more LUNA will be destroyed. The circulation will be directly destroyed to less than 100 million in the end. This coin will increase until 4 billion is released. The higher the USD0, the more USUAL. Do you understand? This coin is used to pay the interest income of USUAL and USD0 pledge. The so-called "you buy stable" by the project party The fixed currency can get a share of the profits, but in fact it is using air coins to pay for the profits, and the real profits have long been taken away by themselves. If you bought 100 USD0, and there should be 1 USD in profit every day, you should be given a real 1 USD or 1 USD0, but not a USUAL worth 1 USD, because the USUAL worth 1 USD is exchanged for 1 USD in the secondary market to find leeks as an ATM to sell, not the project party paying you interest. The project party took away the investment income of more than one billion USD0 for nothing, and they only give you USUAL to come here to dump the market for money. I say all this to say that the cryptocurrency world is a market for speculation. Even BTC has no practical value for now, but it does not hinder the market value of several trillions. This USUAL may have dozens or even hundreds of U in the future. After all, the market is irrational and speculates on emotions and consensus. The more routines there are, the higher the price may be. That's fine, but at least you should not treat this project party as some kind of stablecoin revolutionaries and then play this coin rationally. Don't worship and believe in this all day long. In essence, they are still just a despicable capital circle money maker.