A key part of the Luna Classic ($LUNC ) project’s long-term success hinges on the repeg of USTC to $1. But here’s the question: Why isn’t the community focusing more on achieving this goal? When we look at the numbers, USTC’s total supply is much smaller than LUNC’s, so wouldn’t it make more sense for the community to concentrate a portion of its investment and efforts here?

Let’s break it down further. Unlike LUNC, which has an immense supply in circulation and requires massive burns or demand to achieve significant price movements, USTC already has a more manageable supply structure. For example, with a circulating supply of just over 9 billion tokens, pushing USTC closer to $1 would require far less capital than it would to dramatically increase the value of LUNC.

If the community shifts a portion of its resources, investments, and focus toward USTC, we could potentially trigger a strong upward price movement. A successful repeg wouldn’t just improve USTC’s value but could also restore faith in the Luna Classic ecosystem as a whole, creating a ripple effect that benefits LUNC indirectly. After all, the utility and credibility of the entire project are tightly tied to USTC’s stability.

Of course, this approach would require coordinated community efforts, including sustainable burn mechanisms, incentives for holding USTC, and demand-driven use cases to stabilize the price over time. It’s not a small task, but it’s far from impossible with community action and proper strategies.

So, is it time to refocus on USTC? Given the numbers and the potential for quicker success, it’s a question worth serious consideration. The opportunity to build momentum is there—it just needs a collective push.

No question is ever stupid when it challenges us to think deeper and strategize smarter.
#LUNCUSD #Lunc2TheMoonSoon #LUNC✅ #MicroStrategyJoinsNasdaq100 #CryptoUsersHit18M