In the world of cryptocurrencies, market makers play a crucial role in managing tokens and liquidity when they are listed on new exchanges. However, a recent analysis reveals that 78.5% of primary listings are conducted in a way that disrupts fair price discovery, negatively impacting both users and the projects themselves. The study categorized market makers into three types: Parasitic, Transitory, and Symbiotic. It found that 69.9% of primary listings were "Parasitic," leading to inflated prices and market abandonment, while 8.6% were "Transitory," resulting in poorly managed initial supply. Only 21.5% followed a "Symbiotic" approach, which supports fair and healthy price discovery processes. The study calls for better management of primary listings and accountability for market makers.